Updates in induction immunosuppression regimens for intestinal transplantation.

Intestinal allografts are the most immunologically complex and carry the highest risk of rejection among solid organ transplantation, necessitating complex immunosuppressive management. We evaluated the latest information regarding induction immunosuppression, with an emphasis on established, novel, and emergent therapies. We also reviewed classic and novel induction immunosuppression strategies for highly sensitized recipients. Comparable progress has been made in intestinal transplantation clinical outcomes since the implementation of induction strategies. This review shows a clear diversity of induction protocols can be observed across different centers. The field of intestinal transplantation is still in its early stages, which is further complicated by the limited number of institutions capable of intestinal transplantation and their geographical variation, which further hinders the development of adequately powered studies in comparison to other organs. As the implementation of institution-specific induction protocols becomes more refined and results are disseminated, future research efforts should be directed towards the development of efficacious induction strategies.

Nipple necrosis rate with submuscular versus prepectoral implant-based reconstruction in nipple sparing mastectomy: Does it differ?

BACKGROUND: This study aims to compare the rate of nipple necrosis between the submuscular (SM) versus the prepectoral (PP) implant placement after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: An institutional review board-approved database was reviewed of patients who underwent nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) with IBR at our institution between 2016 and 2019. Patients who had SM versus PP IBR were compared. Incidence of nipple necrosis was evaluated between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 525 NSM with IBR were performed in 320 patients with SM reconstruction in 61% (n â€‹= â€‹322) and PP in 39% (n â€‹= â€‹203) of the mastectomies. Overall, 43 nipples experienced some form of necrosis with 1% of mastectomies experiencing nipple loss. There was no difference between SM group and PP group at the rate of nipple necrosis (9 â€‹% vs 7 %, P â€‹= â€‹0.71). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing NSM with IBR, the rate of nipple necrosis, nipple loss or complications did not differ between groups whether the implant was placed SM or PP, supporting the safety of this newer procedure.

Mastectomy margins for ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS): 18 Years of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: In patients undergoing mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the significance of a positive or close (<2 mm) margin and associated recurrence risk is unclear. The study sought to evaluate risk of recurrence in relation to the mastectomy surgical margin. METHODS: A single institution retrospective review of patients with DCIS who underwent mastectomy between 2000 and 2010 was performed. Patient demographics, tumor biology, margin status and adjuvant therapy were recorded. The incidence of local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients with DCIS were identified. Overall, 12.3% of patients had a pathological positive/close margin (n = 9 tumor on ink and n = 36 <2 mm). Adjuvant radiation was administered to 11 patients with a positive or close margin. At a median follow-up of 12 years, LR was 3.4% (n = 10). None of the patients with LR had a positive or close margin. Additionally, none of the patients who received radiation developed LR. CONCLUSION: Risk of recurrence after mastectomy for DCIS is low and appears to be unrelated to margin status or the use of radiation therapy.

Simultaneous contralateral prophylactic mastectomy compared to unilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer surgical treatment: Are complications higher?

BACKGROUND: This study compared post-operative reconstructive complications and oncologic treatment between patients who underwent unilateral versus bilateral nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM) with implant based reconstruction (IBR). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with unilateral breast cancer who underwent NSM with IBR between 2010 and 2019 were reviewed. Patient demographics, surgical details, adjuvant therapy and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 434 NSM with IBR were performed in 269 patients, 24% unilateral, and 76% bilateral. The bilateral group received a direct implant significantly more frequently and were younger compared to unilateral (p < 0.001). The unilateral group received post-mastectomy radiation therapy at significantly higher rate (p < 0.001) with no difference in receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, 11% of mastectomies developed a 30-day complication requiring reoperation and that extended to 13% at 120 days. There was no difference regarding the incidence of complications requiring reoperation (p = 0.84) or complications type between the two groups (p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: These findings support the oncologic and reconstructive equivalence to support patient choice in CPM.

Inflammatory breast cancer and the importance of skin punch biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The oncologic outcomes of patients diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) based on clinical exam only versus those with dermal lymphatic invasion on skin punch biopsy may be different and are worth further investigation. METHODS: Patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2021 with IBC at our institution were grouped according to clinical diagnosis or skin biopsy performed. Oncologic and survival outcomes among groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 72 IBC patients were identified and grouped into 3 categories based on method of diagnosis: skin biopsy positive (n = 24), skin biopsy negative (n = 10) and no biopsy performed (n = 38). Skin biopsy positive patients had a higher incidence of lymphovascular invasion identified on final pathology and were more likely to experience a chest wall recurrence. At 5.1 yrs of follow-up, 40% of patients experienced recurrence, with 61% overall survival. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis remains diagnostic for IBC, but skin punch biopsy allows for improved oncologic insight.

Primary hyperparathyroidism after radioactive iodine therapy: Is it a distinct clinical entity?

BACKGROUND: Radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment is considered a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). METHOD: A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients with pHPT who underwent parathyroidectomy from 1990 to 2020 was completed to evaluate the prevalence and latency time for development of RAI-associated pHPT and determine clinical differences in pHPT patients with or without prior RAI treatment. RESULTS: 1929 patients with sporadic pHPT underwent parathyroidectomy; 48 (2.5%) had prior RAI treatment and 1881 (97.5%) did not. RAI treatment was for thyrotoxicosis in 43 (90%) patients. Average latency was 24 years (3-59 years) and inversely correlated with age. Patients with prior RAI treatment had lower preoperative calcium and PTH levels (p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in age, symptoms, pathology, ectopic glands and cure rate. CONCLUSION: RAI is a potential causative factor for pHPT, accounting for 2.5% of sporadic pHPT. RAI-associated pHPT may be a less severe form of sporadic pHPT and latency inversely correlates with age.

Management of Mastalgia.

Breast pain is a common symptom in most women during their lifetime, and many times is self-limited. Mastalgia is categorized into 3 main groups: cyclic, noncyclic and extramammary. A good history, examination and targeted imaging can help to delineate the underlying cause of mastalgia and therefore guide treatment options. Diet, medications, stress, hormonal fluctuations, and an ill-fitting bra can be contributing factors for physiologic causes of mastalgia. Breast cancer is rarely a cause but should be excluded. Reassurance, support, dietary changes, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and occasionally hormonal medications are options to help with improving breast pain.

Oncologic safety of axillary lymph node dissection with immediate lymphatic reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) at the time of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can reduce the incidence of lymphedema in patients with breast cancer. The oncologic safety of ILR is unknown and has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if ILR is associated with increased breast cancer recurrence rates. METHODS: Patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND with ILR from September 2016 to December 2020 were identified from a prospective institutional database. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and operative details were recorded. Follow-up included the development of local recurrence as well as distant metastasis. Oncologic outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients underwent ALND with ILR. At cancer presentation, 122 patients (89%) had clinically node positive primary breast cancer, 10 patients (7.3%) had recurrent breast cancer involving the axillary lymph nodes, 3 patients (2.2%) had recurrent breast cancer involving both the breast and axillary nodes, and 2 patients (1.5%) presented with axillary disease/occult breast cancer. For surgical management, 103 patients (75.2%) underwent a mastectomy, 22 patients (16%) underwent lumpectomy and 12 patients (8.8%) had axillary surgery only. The ALND procedure, yielded a median of 15 lymph nodes pathologically identified (range 3-41). At a median follow-up of 32.9 months (range 6-63 months), 17 patients (12.4%) developed a local (n = 1) or distant recurrence (n = 16), however, no axillary recurrences were identified. CONCLUSION: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing ALND is not associated with short term axillary recurrence and appears oncologically safe.

Twenty-two-year evolution of a Medical Breast Service: Filling the important gaps between breast surgery and medical oncology.

BACKGROUND: Historically, surgeons have provided subspecialty breast care. The development of a robust medical breast program in a large academic center staffed by trained primary care providers initially showed a shift in care of benign breast disease away from surgeons. In this review, we aim to revisit the practice after 20 years. Medical patients are defined as patients with symptomatic issues (eg, pain or lump), those at increased risk (due to family history, genetic mutations, or benign atypical lesions), or survivors in need of long-term care. METHODS: Data for this review were collected retrospectively from an internal outpatient appointment dataset. The sample included data for 3 staff breast surgeons (2.6 clinical full-time employees [FTEs]), 3 staff medical breast physicians (2.4 clinical FTEs), and 2 medical breast advanced practice providers (2.0 clinical FTEs). Provider visit types were grouped into 1 of 4 categories (new medical, established medical, new surgical, and established surgical) in order to review the percentages of outpatient visits by provider group. RESULTS: Before the institution of the Medical Breast Service, 75% of breast surgeons' outpatient visits were for either new or established medical issues. Our most recent analyses show that between 2013 and 2017 breast surgeons averaged 19% of surgical outpatient visits for medical issues. Higher surgical outpatient visits have resulted in higher surgical volume, increased surgical productivity and time spent in the operating room, and decreased time to treatment at our institution. Both surgical and medical breast providers can be added and become rapidly productive with focus on their respective areas of expertise. CONCLUSION: The Medical Breast Service has met its expectations in providing access for symptomatic patients, personalized care for those at risk, and attentive care to long-term survivors. The program has allowed for surgeons to focus on surgical outpatient visits, driving surgical volume and productivity, and streamlining care.

Outcomes of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving surgery: Repeat lumpectomy as an alternative to salvage mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: We examined the outcomes of salvage mastectomy and repeat lumpectomy for management of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 113 patients with an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conserving surgery were identified. Patients and tumor characteristics at initial diagnosis and at recurrence were collected. Outcomes evaluated included second recurrence and overall survival. Complications at 30-days and 90-days after surgery for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence were evaluated. RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients underwent salvage mastectomy (n = 84) and 28% underwent repeat lumpectomy (n = 32 overall, n = 13 reirradiation). Salvage mastectomy patients were younger at initial diagnosis (P = .007) with longer time to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence from first diagnosis (P = .03). At 2.5 years median follow-up, the overall incidence of second recurrence was 8% with 5% rate (n = 4) in salvage mastectomy group versus 16% (n = 5) in repeat lumpectomy group; however, among patients undergoing repeat lumpectomy with reirradiation (n = 13), only one patient developed a second recurrence (8%). There was no significant difference in rates of second local recurrence (P = .11), disease free survival (P = .13), or overall survival (P = .95) between repeat lumpectomy with reirradiation and salvage mastectomy. CONCLUSION: At a short-term follow-up, repeat lumpectomy with reirradiation could be considered in a select group of patients presenting with an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence with multidisciplinary input with low rates of postoperative complications and equivalent survival outcomes.

Trends of Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy at the time of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates have substantially increased. The study aimed to examine contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) at the time of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and evaluate factors contributing to CPM decision making process. METHOD: Patients who developed IBTR after BCS from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, genetic testing and reconstruction details were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients had IBTR after BCS and were treated with mastectomy, with 30% electing for a CPM. Patients who underwent CPM were younger, had higher BMI and less comorbidities. A genetic mutation was identified in 19% of patients who underwent testing at the time of IBTR. Tumor characteristics and performing surgeon were not predictors for CPM, however, patients were more likely to undergo CPM if they received reconstruction of the ipsilateral breast with IBTR. CONCLUSION: This study shows that age, BMI, genetic testing and breast reconstruction are factors contributing to CPM decision at the time of IBTR.

Mastectomy options for the treatment of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence after lumpectomy.

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy is the recommended treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who initially received breast conservation surgery (BCS) and radiation. We evaluated the 3 types of mastectomies performed for the surgical treatment of IBTR (nipple sparing (NSM), skin sparing (SSM) and total mastectomy (TM)) to assess surgical complications and local control outcomes among groups. METHODS: Patients who developed IBTR after BCS and received mastectomy from 2011 to 2019 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and treatment were analyzed. The incidence of postoperative complications and second breast cancer recurrence were compared. RESULTS: Mastectomy was performed in 113 patients presenting with isolated IBTR (17 NSM, 48 SSM and 48 TM). There was no difference in post-operative complications between groups. At 3-year follow-up, 5 (4%) patients had a second recurrence. Tumor size at IBTR was the only predictor for second recurrence and not mastectomy type or receipt of reconstruction. CONCLUSION: In patients initially treated with BCS who experienced an IBTR, NSM or SSM mastectomy with immediate reconstruction had low complication rates and no increase in local recurrence compared to the TM group.

Five Hundred Patients With Gut Malrotation: Thirty Years of Experience With the Introduction of a New Surgical Procedure.

OBJECTIVES: Define clinical spectrum and long-term outcomes of gut malrotation. With new insights, an innovative procedure was introduced and predictive models were established. METHODS: Over 30-years, 500 patients were managed at 2 institutions. Of these, 274 (55%) were children at time of diagnosis. At referral, 204 (41%) patients suffered midgut-loss and the remaining 296 (59%) had intact gut with a wide range of digestive symptoms. With midgut-loss, 189 (93%) patients underwent surgery with gut transplantation in 174 (92%) including 16 of 31 (16%) who had autologous gut reconstruction. Ladd's procedure was documented in 192 (38%) patients with recurrent or de novo volvulus in 41 (21%). For 80 patients with disabling gastrointestinal symptoms, gut malrotation correction (GMC) surgery "Kareem's procedure" was offered with completion of the 270° embryonic counterclockwise-rotation, reversal of vascular-inversion, and fixation of mesenteric-attachments. Concomitant colonic dysmotility was observed in 25 (31%) patients. RESULTS: The cumulative risk of midgut-loss increased with volvulus, prematurity, gastroschisis, and intestinal atresia whereas reduced with Ladd's and increasing age. Transplant cumulative survival was 63% at 10-years and 54% at 20-years with best outcome among infants and liver-containing allografts. Autologous gut reconstruction achieved 78% and GMC had 100% 10-year survival. Ladd's was associated with 21% recurrent/de novo volvulus and worsening (P > 0.05) of the preoperative National Institute of Health patient-reported outcomes measurement information system gastrointestinal symptom scales. GMC significantly (P ≤ 0.001) improved all of the symptomatology domains with no technical complications or development of volvulus. GMC improved quality of life with restored nutritional autonomy (P < 0.0001) and daily activities (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Gut malrotation is a clinicopathologic syndrome affecting all ages. The introduced herein definitive correction procedure is safe, effective, and easy to perform. Accordingly, the current standard of care practice should be redefined in this orphan population.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Are We Providing Proper Prophylactic Antibiotic Coverage?

BACKGROUND: Infection after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and implant-based reconstruction (IBR) can be a devastating complication. The retained nipple may act as a portal or nidus for different ductal organisms, and as such, the bacteriology of surgical-site infections (SSIs) in this setting may not be adequately covered by current antibiotic recommendations. This study sought to evaluate SSI and reconstruction outcomes in relation to antibiotic choice and identify the different microbial species implicated. METHODS: A prospective database was reviewed for patients who underwent NSM with IBR from 2010 to 2019. Patient characteristics, operative details, antibiotic regimens, and subsequent treatment details were evaluated. The study analyzed SSI incidence, timing, and type of causative organisms. RESULTS: The study analyzed 571 NSMs with IBR performed for 347 patients (55% with direct implants and 45% with tissue expanders). The preoperative antibiotics consisted of cephalosporin alone for 65% of the patients, a more broad single-antibiotic use for 12% of the patients, and dual-coverage antibiotics for 20% of the patients. During a median follow-up of 1.7 years, SSI developed in 12% of the reconstructions, with 6% requiring prosthesis removal. The most common SSI organism cultured was Staphylococcal species. Neither pre- nor postoperative antibiotic choice was associated with incidence of infection, type of bacteria, or need for prosthetic explanation. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing NSM with IBR, a more aggressive antibiotic choice is not associated with an improved SSI rate. Patient and treatment factors continue to carry the highest risk for SSI.

Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer: Data to Support Surgical Decision Making.

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is thought be a unique entity with higher rates of multifocal/multicentric and bilateral disease. This study aimed to evaluate the true extent of the disease, risk of bilaterality, lymph node involvement, and impact of preoperative imaging to help guide surgical decision making. METHODS: A retrospective analysis identified patients treated for ILC between 2004 and 2017. Clinical staging and pathologic results were compared. Follow-up details including local recurrence, contralateral breast cancer (CBC), and survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The study identified 692 patients with ILC, including 43 patients (6%) with a diagnosis of CBC and 232 patients (33%) with a diagnosis of multifocal/multicentric disease at presentation. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) led to an identification of additional disease in 20% of the patients. Preoperative MRI resulted in a more accurate prediction of tumor size staging but did not improve the discordance between clinical and pathologic nodal staging. Overall, the rate of imaging occult lymph node disease was 24%. At the 6-year follow-up evaluation, a local recurrence had developed in 2.3%, a CBC in 2.3, and a distant metastasis in 9.4% of the patients. The overall survival rate was 96% at 3 years and 91% at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive lobular carcinoma is a distinct subset of cancer that poses a diagnostic staging challenge. The results of this study favor MRI for accurate tumor staging and for improving detection of multicentricity and bilaterality. However, clinicians should be aware of the higher likelihood of occult lymph node involvement with ILC and subsequent early metastasis.

Contralateral breast cancer risk and endocrine therapy use in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with unilateral mastectomy in the modern era.

BACKGROUND: In patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC) and the role of adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) in decreasing CBC risk is not well understood. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients with DCIS who underwent a unilateral mastectomy (UM) from 2000 to 2010. CBC incidence, time to CBC and disease free survival were evaluated for women who took ET versus those who did not. RESULTS: 176 patients underwent a UM for DCIS, 72% were ER positive and 16% of patients took ET. At a median of 12 year follow up, 15 patients experienced CBC. Women over 63 years had highest incidence of CBC. CBC risk was not different between those who took ET versus those who did not. CONCLUSION: The overall incidence of CBC was 9% in our DCIS cohort and was not significantly different among patients who took ET versus those who did not.

Lymphedema Prevention Surgery: Improved Operating Efficiency Over Time.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema prevention surgery (LPS), which identifies, preserves, and restores lymphatic flow via lymphaticovenous bypasses (LVB), has demonstrated potential to decrease lymphedema in breast cancer patients requiring axillary lymph node dissection. Implementing this new operating technique requires additional operating room (OR) time and coordination. This study sought to evaluate the improvement of LPS technique and OR duration over time. METHODS: A prospective database of patients who underwent LPS at our institution from 2016 to 2019 was queried. Type of breast and reconstruction surgery, number of LVB performed, and OR times were collected. LPS details were compared by surgical group and year performed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients underwent LPS, and 88 had complete OR time data available for analysis. Average age was 51 years, body mass index of 28, with an average of 15 lymph nodes removed. Reconstructive treatment groups included prosthetic reconstruction 56% (49), oncoplastic reduction 10% (9), and no reconstruction 34% (30). The number of patients undergoing LPS increased significantly from 2016 to 2019, and average number of LVB per patient doubled. In patients without reconstruction, the average time for LPS improved significantly from 212 to 87 min from 2016 to 2019 (p = 0.015) and similarly in patients undergoing LPS with prosthetic reconstruction from 238 to 160 min (p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: LVB is an emerging surgical lymphedema prevention technique. While requiring additional surgical time, our results show that with refinement of technique, over 4 years, we were able to perform double the number of LVB per patient in half the OR time.