Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta Pharm Sin B ; 14(6): 2475-2504, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828160

RESUMEN

Resistance to cancer immunotherapy is mainly attributed to poor tumor immunogenicity as well as the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) leading to failure of immune response. Numerous therapeutic strategies including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, photodynamic, photothermal, magnetic, chemodynamic, sonodynamic and oncolytic therapy, have been developed to induce immunogenic cell death (ICD) of cancer cells and thereby elicit immunogenicity and boost the antitumor immune response. However, many challenges hamper the clinical application of ICD inducers resulting in modest immunogenic response. Here, we outline the current state of using nanomedicines for boosting ICD of cancer cells. Moreover, synergistic approaches used in combination with ICD inducing nanomedicines for remodeling the TME via targeting immune checkpoints, phagocytosis, macrophage polarization, tumor hypoxia, autophagy and stromal modulation to enhance immunogenicity of dying cancer cells were analyzed. We further highlight the emerging trends of using nanomaterials for triggering amplified ICD-mediated antitumor immune responses. Endoplasmic reticulum localized ICD, focused ultrasound hyperthermia, cell membrane camouflaged nanomedicines, amplified reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, metallo-immunotherapy, ion modulators and engineered bacteria are among the most innovative approaches. Various challenges, merits and demerits of ICD inducer nanomedicines were also discussed with shedding light on the future role of this technology in improving the outcomes of cancer immunotherapy.

2.
Sci Adv ; 10(9): eadk3074, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38416824

RESUMEN

Cancer cells program fibroblasts into cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in a two-step manner. First, cancer cells secrete exosomes to program quiescent fibroblasts into activated CAFs. Second, cancer cells maintain the CAF phenotype via activation of signal transduction pathways. We rationalized that inhibiting this two-step process can normalize CAFs into quiescent fibroblasts and augment the efficacy of immunotherapy. We show that cancer cell-targeted nanoliposomes that inhibit sequential steps of exosome biogenesis and release from lung cancer cells block the differentiation of lung fibroblasts into CAFs. In parallel, we demonstrate that CAF-targeted nanoliposomes that block two distinct nodes in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway can reverse activate CAFs into quiescent fibroblasts. Co-administration of both nanoliposomes significantly improves the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells and enhances the antitumor efficacy of αPD-L1 in immunocompetent lung cancer-bearing mice. Simultaneously blocking the tumoral exosome-mediated activation of fibroblasts and FGFR-Wnt/ß-catenin signaling constitutes a promising approach to augment immunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Exosomas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Animales , Ratones , Exosomas/metabolismo , Proliferación Celular/genética , Fibroblastos/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Fenotipo , Inmunoterapia , Línea Celular Tumoral
3.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 5782, 2023 04 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37031294

RESUMEN

Dual-tail strategy has been successfully utilized in the development of novel carbonic anhydrase IX (CA IX) inhibitors. Herein we adopted this approach in the design and synthesis of a series of novel pyridine sulfonamide-pyrazole hybrid scaffold mimicking dual-tail inhibitors of CA IX. A library of 15 compounds was synthesized and assessed for their potential cytotoxic effects against colorectal cancer cells. Compounds 3, and 11 induced potential cytotoxic effects against the three cancer cell lines (HCT-116, HT-29, and SW-620) with IC50s' of 45.88, 28.27, and 16.57 uM, 25.01, 8.99, and 3.27 µM, respectively. Both compounds induced cellular apoptosis on HCT-116 and SW-620 cells, while compound 3 induced necrosis as well. In addition, both compounds induced cell cycle arrest on G0/G1, and S phases. Also, compound 11 showed potential autophagy induction on both colon cancer cell lines (HCT-116, and HT-29), and a little bit on metastatic type. Both compounds were less cytotoxic than the reference drug on normal epithelial cell. The migration rates of HCT-116 and the metastatic one SW-620 were reduced by both compounds. Finally, molecular docking of compounds 3 and 11 into the active site of CA IX confirmed in vitro inhibitory activity for both compounds.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias del Colon , Humanos , Relación Estructura-Actividad , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Anhidrasa Carbónica IX/metabolismo , Sulfonamidas/farmacología , Sulfonamidas/química , Antineoplásicos/química , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Apoptosis , Pirazoles/farmacología , Pirazoles/química , Estructura Molecular , Proliferación Celular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA