Kidney transplant in pediatric gut transplant recipients - Technical challenges and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is limited data in the literature about pediatric kidney transplant (KT) following gut transplant (GT). The purpose of this study is to highlight the technical challenges and outcomes of KT in pediatric gut recipients who developed kidney failure (KF). METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of pediatric GT recipients from January 2000 to December 2019 was performed. In total, 14 (7%) out of 206 pediatric GT recipients developed KF and were listed for KT. Ten patients underwent kidney after gut transplant (KAGT), three patients underwent simultaneous kidney and re-do gut transplant (SKAGT), and one patient died on the KT waitlist. RESULTS: 1-, 5-, and 10-year kidney graft survival was 100%, 91%, and 78%, respectively. 1-, 5-, and 10-year GT graft survival was 100%, 77%, and 77%, respectively. 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival was 100%, 91%, and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the technical complexity, KAGT and SKAGT for pediatric GT recipients that develop KF can be performed with favorable outcomes.

Disparities in Liver Transplantation for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Women.

BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the fastest-growing indication for liver transplantation (LT). Sex disparities among patients with cirrhosis on the LT waitlist are well known. We wanted to understand these disparities further in women with end-stage liver disease patients listed for NASH cirrhosis in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to assess sex racial, and ethnic differences in NASH patients listed for LT. Adults transplanted from August 1997 to June 2021 were included. Inferential statistics were used to evaluate differences with univariate and multivariate comparisons, including competitive risk analysis. RESULTS: During the study time period, we evaluated 12 844 LT for NASH cirrhosis. Women were transplanted at a lower rate (46.5% versus 53.5%; P  < 0.001) and higher model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) (23.8 versus 22.6; P < 0.001) than men. Non-White women were transplanted at a higher MELD (26.1 versus 23.1; P  < 0.001) than White women and non-White male patients (26.1 versus 24.8; P  < 0.001). Graft and patient survivals were significantly different ( P  < 0.001) between non-White women and White women and men (White and non-White). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluation of LT candidates in the United States demonstrates women with NASH cirrhosis have a higher MELD than men at LT. Additional disparities exist among non-White women with NASH as they have higher MELD and creatinine at LT compared with White women. After LT, non-White women have worse graft and patient survival compared with men or White women. These data indicate that non-White women with NASH are the most vulnerable on the LT waitlist.

Non-Lung Solid Organ Transplantation From SARS-CoV-2-Positive Donors to Uninfected Recipients.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of evidence on the risk of donor-recipient transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 in solid organ transplant recipients. Initial impressions suggest non-lung solid organs may be safely transplanted from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors without risk of viral transmission. METHODS: We reviewed clinical results of transplants in which SARS-CoV-2-negative recipients received non-lung solid organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors at a single transplant center. No prisoners were used in this study, and participants were neither coerced nor paid. The manuscript was created in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS: Between June 2021 and January 2023, we transplanted 26 solid organs, including 13 kidneys, 8 livers, 3 hearts, and 1 simultaneous heart and kidney, from 23 SARS-CoV-2-positive donors into 25 SARS-CoV-2 negative recipients. Two of the recipients had a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction after transplantation, but otherwise, patients had no SARS-CoV-2-related complications, and all patients to date are alive with excellent allograft function. CONCLUSION: Transplantation of non-lung solid organs from SARS-CoV-2-positive donors into uninfected recipients can be safely performed without adverse effects from SARS-CoV-2.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes for Ethnic Minorities in the United States After Liver Transplantation: Parsing the Hispanic Paradox.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionally affected by end-stage liver disease. Unfortunately, disparities in referrals to liver transplantation (LT), organ allocation, and posttransplant outcomes exist in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients over the age of 18 years undergoing LT in the United States using the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 2002 to 2016. We evaluated factors associated with patient and graft outcomes and explored the effect of race and ethnicity along with social variables. RESULTS: During the study time period, 78,999 patients received LT. Of these, 60,102 were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 7988 were African American (AA), and 10,909 were Hispanic. AA had significantly lower patient survival, graft survival, and death-censored graft survival at both 1 and 5 years when compared to NHW. Conversely, at 1 and 5 years, patient survival and graft survival were significantly higher for Hispanics compared to NWH. In addition, AA had significantly lower survival outcomes compared to Hispanics. On multivariate analysis after controlling for race/ethnicity, age, AA race, diagnosis, and deceased donor were independent risk factors for patient death and graft failure. CONCLUSIONS: Despite socioeconomic disadvantages seen among Hispanics, this population appears to have improved short- and long-term survival after LT compared to NHW and AA.

Sequential liver and kidney living donors: Making the ultimate gift twice.

There are nearly 150 living donors in the United States who donated more than one solid organ. Using our divisional database, we found 20 individuals who donated a liver and a kidney at different times. We performed a retrospective chart review of these donors, studying their motivating factors, complications and outcomes. The donors included 11 (55%) males and nine females. Thirteen (65%) donated the kidney before the liver. Fourteen (70%) were nondirected donors at the first donation, and four of the six directed donors in the first donation became nondirected in the second donation. Seventeen (85%) were nondirected at the second donation. Common reasons for donating the second time were a good experience with the first donation and knowing that one can donate again. Outcomes and the incidence of early complications were not significantly different after the 2nd versus the 1st donation. All donors recovered and currently are doing well. Our results show a significant number of dual organ donors are nondirected and motivated by their strong desire to help. A positive experience with the 1st donation often was the driving factor for the 2nd. A history of previous organ donation did not negatively impact the 2nd donation.

Portal vein thrombosis and renal dysfunction: a national comparative study of liver transplant recipients for NAFLD versus alcoholic cirrhosis.

The prevalence of portal vein thrombosis (PVT), renal dysfunction (RD), and simultaneous PVT/RD in liver transplantation (LT) is poorly understood. We analyzed the prevalence of PVT, RD, simultaneous PVT/RD, and the outcomes of adult recipients of LT for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) between 2006 and 2016 in the United States. We found that the prevalence of PVT (7.2% â†’ 11.3%), RD (33.8% â†’ 39.2%), and simultaneous PVT/RD (2.4% â†’ 4.5%) has increased significantly over the study period (all P-values <0.05). NAFLD patients had a higher proportion of PVT (14.8% vs. 9.2%), RD (45.0% vs. 42.1%), and simultaneous PVT/RD (6.5% vs. 3.9%; all P-values <0.05). 90-day mortality was 3.8%, 6.3%, 6.8%, and 9.8% for PVT(-)/RD(-), PVT(-)/RD(+), PVT(+)/RD(-), and PVT(+)/RD(+) recipients, respectively (P < 0.01). 5-year survival was 82.1%, 75.5%, 74.8%, and 71.1% for PVT(-)/RD(-), PVT(-)/RD(+), PVT(+)/RD(-), and PVT(+)/RD(+) recipients, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the prevalence of PVT, RD, and simultaneous PVT/RD has increased among LT recipients, especially for those with NAFLD. The short- and long-term outcomes of recipients with PVT, RD, and simultaneous PVT/RD were inferior to patients without those risk factors irrespective of their indication for LT. No differences in patient outcomes were found between ALD and NAFLD recipients after stratification by risk factors.

Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 7226 Patients.

Objective: To systematically review and compare the overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival after hepatic resections for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) versus other risk factors. Background: Different clinical and tumor characteristics are associated with HCC in the setting of NAFLD in comparison to other risk factors. It is still unclear whether these differences impact patient survival after radical hepatectomies. Methods: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies published in the English literature between July 1980 and June 2020 were searched using multiple databases. Patients' baseline characteristics and the hazard ratios (HRs) of the OS and DFS were extracted and meta-analyses were performed. Results: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies with a total of 7226 patients were included. Among them, 1412 patients (19.5%) had NAFLD and 5814 (80.4%) had other risk factors (eg, viral hepatitis B or C, alcoholic cirrhosis, or cryptogenic cirrhosis). Summary statistics showed that patients with NAFLD had better DFS (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94; P = 0.006) and OS (HR = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.90; P = 0.001) than the control group. Subgroups analyses also indicated that the OS favored NAFLD patients versus patients with viral hepatitis B or C (HR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.67-0.96; P = 0.017) or alcoholic and cryptogenic cirrhosis (HR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.47-1.0; P = 0.05). Conclusion: After hepatic resections for HCC, NAFLD patients have better DFS and OS than patients with other risk factors. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression suggested that the survival advantage of NAFLD patients was more pronounced in studies published after 2015 and from Asian centers.