RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Boltless implantation of stereo-electroencephalography electrode is a useful alternative especially when anchor bolt is not available such as in country with limited resources or is less appropriate such as placement in patients with thin skull or at the occiput area, despite some drawbacks including potential dislodgement. While the accuracy of implantation using anchor bolt is well-studied, data on boltless implantation remain scarce. This study aimed to reveal the accuracy, permissible error for actual placement of electrodes within the grey matter, and delayed electrode dislodgement in boltless implantation. METHODS: A total of 120 electrodes were implanted in 15 patients using a Leksell Stereotactic G Frame with each electrode fixed on the scalp using sutures. Target point error was defined as the Euclidean distance between the planned target and the electrode tip on immediate postimplantation computed tomography. Similarly, delayed dislodgement was defined as the Euclidean distance between the electrode tips on immediate postimplantation computed tomography and delayed MRI. The factors affecting accuracy were evaluated using multiple linear regression. The permissible error was defined as the largest target point error that allows the maximum number of planned gray matter electrode contacts to be actually placed within the gray matter as intended. RESULTS: The median (IQR) target point error was 2.6 (1.7-3.5) mm, and the permissible error was 3.2 mm. The delayed dislodgement, with a median (IQR) of 2.2 (1.4-3.3) mm, was dependent on temporal muscle penetration (P = 5.0 × 10-4), scalp thickness (P < 5.1 × 10-3), and insertion angle (P = 3.4 × 10-3). CONCLUSION: Boltless implantation of stereo-electroencephalography electrode offers an accuracy comparable to those using anchor bolt. During the planning of boltless implantation, target points should be placed within 3.2 mm from the gray-white matter junction and a possible delayed dislodgement of 2.2 mm should be considered.
RESUMEN
Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) therapy effectively treats spasticity caused by brain or spinal cord lesions. However, only a few studies compare the course of treatment for different diseases. We investigated the change in daily dose of baclofen per year and its associated adverse events in patients presenting with the three most common etiologies at our institute: hereditary spastic paraplegia, cerebral palsy, and spinal cord injury. The ITB pumps were implanted from July 2007 to August 2019, with a mean follow-up period of 70 months. In patients with hereditary spastic paraplegia, baclofen dosage was reduced after eight years following ITB introduction, and the treatment was terminated in one patient owing to disease progression. In patients with cerebral palsy, the dosage increased gradually, and became constant in the 11th year. Patients with spinal cord injury gradually increased their baclofen dosage throughout the entire observation period. Severity and adverse event rates were higher in patients with cerebral palsy than in others. The degree and progression of spasticity varied depending on the causative disease. Understanding the characteristics and natural history of each disease is important when continuing ITB treatment.
Asunto(s)
Parálisis Cerebral , Relajantes Musculares Centrales , Paraplejía Espástica Hereditaria , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Baclofeno/efectos adversos , Parálisis Cerebral/complicaciones , Parálisis Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Relajantes Musculares Centrales/efectos adversos , Paraplejía Espástica Hereditaria/complicaciones , Paraplejía Espástica Hereditaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Bombas de Infusión Implantables/efectos adversos , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Espasticidad Muscular/inducido químicamente , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Inyecciones Espinales/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients often experience strong shooting pains after spinal root avulsion. The efficacy of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for this type of pain is inconsistent; however, dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning (DREZ-lesion) has often proven to be an effective treatment modality. The authors report two cases in which DREZ-lesion was performed to treat pain after spinal root avulsion after implantation of SCS, but the operations were challenging due to strong adhesions. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present two cases of patients with pain after spinal root avulsion in whom SCS implantation was only temporarily effective. Patients complained of persistent and paroxysmal shooting pains in the upper extremities. SCS removal and DREZ-lesion were performed, but adhesions in the epidural and subdural space contacting the leads were strong, making it difficult to expose the DREZ. LESSONS: Although adhesions around the spinal cord can be caused by trauma, the authors believe that in these cases, the adhesions could have been caused by the SCS leads. There are few previous reports confirming the efficacy of SCS in treating pain after spinal root avulsion; therefore, caution is required when considering SCS implantation.
RESUMEN
Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is a useful tool for clinically evaluating the localization of interictal spikes. Neurophysiologists visually identify spikes from the MEG waveforms and estimate the equivalent current dipoles (ECD). However, presently, these analyses are manually performed by neurophysiologists and are time-consuming. Another problem is that spike identification from MEG waveforms largely depends on neurophysiologists' skills and experiences. These problems cause poor cost-effectiveness in clinical MEG examination. To overcome these problems, we fully automated spike identification and ECD estimation using a deep learning approach fully automated AI-based MEG interictal epileptiform discharge identification and ECD estimation (FAMED). We applied a semantic segmentation method, which is an image processing technique, to identify the appropriate times between spike onset and peak and to select appropriate sensors for ECD estimation. FAMED was trained and evaluated using clinical MEG data acquired from 375 patients. FAMED training was performed in two stages: in the first stage, a classification network was learned, and in the second stage, a segmentation network that extended the classification network was learned. The classification network had a mean AUC of 0.9868 (10-fold patient-wise cross-validation); the sensitivity and specificity were 0.7952 and 0.9971, respectively. The median distance between the ECDs estimated by the neurophysiologists and those using FAMED was 0.63 cm. Thus, the performance of FAMED is comparable to that of neurophysiologists, and it can contribute to the efficiency and consistency of MEG ECD analysis.
Asunto(s)
Aprendizaje Profundo , Epilepsia , Electroencefalografía , Epilepsia/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Magnetoencefalografía/métodos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: After carotid artery stenting(CAS)in a tortuous artery, the geometrics and elongation of the carotid artery sometimes change. It is not clear whether these changes induce post stent re-stenosis. We report a case of re-stenosis that occurred two years after CAS in a tortuous artery that required carotid endarterectomy with removal of the stent. CASE PRESENTATION: CAS was performed on a 78-year-old male who presented with symptoms of severe stenosis of a tortuous internal carotid artery. Eighteen months after stenting, the echogram revealed moderate stenosis at the distal end of the stent. Six months later, this developed into severe stenosis. Carotid angiography showed that the end of the stent was touching the wall of the internal carotid artery, and blood was passing through the stent wall. A re-CAS was difficult to perform;hence carotid endarterectomy with removal of the stent was performed successfully. He was discharged without any new neurological deficits. CONCLUSION: CAS on a tortuous carotid artery sometimes results in changes to the geometry and elongation of the artery. Potentially, this can lead to changes in the positional relationship between the stent and the artery, alteration of the wall shear stress and re-stenosis. Careful follow-up is needed after CAS on a tortuous artery.