Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urol J ; 20(5): 350-354, 2023 Oct 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37089059

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of reducing post-operative oral corticosteroid regimen on associated postoperative surgical complication rate, patient and graft survival in kidney transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled patients who received a kidney transplant during two periods of distinct corticosteroid protocols. 592 patients in group 1 received prednisone 2 mg/kg (maximum dose 120 mg) on post-operative days (POD) 1, 2 and 3, 1mg/kg for a week, and tapered it to 10 mg by 3 months post-transplant and sustained the daily 10mg from 3 months post-transplant as maintenance therapy. 639 patients in group 2 received prednisone 50 mg on POD 1, 40mg on POD 2, 30mg on POD 3, 20mg on POD 4, 15mg on POD 5 and continued with 10mg daily from POD 6, as maintenance therapy. The two groups were similar in terms of other immunosuppression drug regimens. RESULTS: 75 (12.7%) patients in group 1 and 24 (3.4%) patients in group 2 developed corticosteroid-related postoperative surgical complications (P < .001). Wound infection (P = .035), incisional hernia (P = .003), infectious collection (P = .004), post-op hemorrhage (P = .005) and ureteral fistula (P = .076) occurred with lower frequency in group 2. Patient survival (1-year: 97.3% vs 97.1%, respectively; P = .85, 5-year: 89.9% vs 94.9%, respectively; P = .06) and graft survival (1-year: 94.6% vs 93.3%, respectively; P = .29, 5-year: 81.2% vs 85.1%, respectively; P = .39) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Post-operative corticosteroid dosage decrement through our protocol would lessen the serious associated postoperative surgical complications, without negative impacts on overall patient and graft survival.

2.
Urol J ; 19(2): 126-130, 2022 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35568974

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To present the early to midterm experience of two referral kidney transplantation centers with living and deceased kidney transplantations that were performed within the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All cases performed in two referral centers in Iran within the COVID-19 pandemic were investigated. Transplantations were performed from May 2020 to February 2021. The protocol for screening included nasopharyngeal RT-PCR with chest CT scan for living and deceased transplantations in center A and RTPCR for living transplantations and chest CT scan for deceased transplantations in center B. Patients were followed for 14-26 months after transplantation regarding COVID-19 infection and its outcomes in case of infection. RESULTS: 103 kidney transplantations were performed during the study period including 54 (52.4%) living and 49 (47.6%) deceased kidney transplantations. Twenty-four recipients (23.3%) and a living donor (1%) were infected with COVID-19. The severity of COVID-19 infection was mild, moderate, severe, and critical in 16 (66.6%), 4 (16.6%), 2 (8.4%), and 2 patients (8.4%), respectively. Two mortalities were observed within transplantation recipients with COVID-19 infection (1.9%). 87.5% (7/8) COVID-19 infections in center B were observed in recipients of deceased transplantations who were screened only by chest CT scan. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate a low frequency of COVID-19 mortality (1.9% for the whole cohort and 8.3% within COVID-19 infected patients) for recipients of living and deceased kidney transplantation that were performed within the COVID-19 pandemic. The above findings highlight for the first time in a large study the probability of living kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic in case strict screening of donors and recipients and close supervision of operating rooms and wards are implemented. We further hypothesize the inadequacy of chest CT scan for screening of COVID-19 in kidney transplantation surgery candidates.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Pandemias , Receptores de Trasplantes
3.
J Stem Cells Regen Med ; 18(2): 43-51, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36713798

RESUMEN

Objective: In this study, we analyzed the therapeutic effect of periurethral injection of autologous muscle-derived stem cell versus mid-urethral sling surgery at a 1-year follow-up. Method: This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 30 women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) who had not responded to conservative treatments, after registering the participants and obtaining informed consent. Patients were divided into two groups of 15 each treated with periurethral injection of muscle-derived stem cells (MDSCs) and mid-urethral sling surgery, respectively. Follow-ups were done at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the treatment using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UISF) and Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) questionnaires, clinical examination, cough test, and 1-hour pad test. The results were analyzed within the groups and then compared between the two groups. Moreover, both groups were compared in terms of postoperative complications. Results: At the 1-year follow-up, in the stem cell group, 10 patients (66.6%) experienced improvements after the periurethral injection of stem cells; half of these patients (33.3%) reported a full recovery. In the mid-urethral sling group, 13 patients (93.3%) experienced improvement, and 12 patients (80%) reported a full recovery. The analysis of ICIQ-UISF and I-QOL questionnaires indicated that the responses in both groups were significant, but the response in the stem cell group was significantly lower compared with the standard surgery group. No considerable complications were observed in the two groups. Conclusion: Although the periurethral injection of MDSCs considerably improves the symptoms with minimum complications in women with SUI, its therapeutic response is significantly lower compared with mid-urethral sling surgery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA