Safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens after liver transplantation: longitudinal assessment of renal function in the prospective ANRS CO23 CUPILT study.

BACKGROUND: In liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence, there is concern about renal safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens. Changes in serum creatinine or in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) under treatment are used to look for possible renal toxicity. However, serum creatinine and eGFR are highly variable. AIM: To analyse renal function trajectory with numerous assays of serum creatinine over a long period of time. METHODS: In a multicentre cohort of 139 patients, the eGFR was obtained from serum creatinine using the Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation. Slopes of eGFR were defined as a change in eGFR during a period divided by time. Pre-treatment, on-treatment and post-treatment periods were 9 months, 3-9 months and 4.5 months. Interactions between eGFR slopes and the pre-treatment eGFR, use of ribavirin or mycophenolate mofetil, and stage of fibrosis were addressed. On-treatment eGFR slopes were separated in tertiles. Pre- and post-treatment eGFR slopes were compared globally and according to tertiles. RESULTS: The post-treatment eGFR slope was significantly better than pre-treatment eGFR slope (+0.18 (IQR -0.76 to +1.32) vs -0.11 (IQR -1.01 to +0.73) mL/min/1.73 m2 /month, P = 0.03) independently of the pre-treatment eGFR (P = 0.99), ribavirin administration (P = 0.26), mycophenolate mofetil administration (P = 0.51) and stage of fibrosis (F3 and F4 vs lower stages, P = 0.18; F4 vs lower stages, P = 0.08; F4 Child-Pugh B and C vs lower stages, P = 0.38). Tertiles of on-treatment eGFR slopes were -1.71 (IQR -2.54 to -1.48), -0.78 (IQR -1.03 to -0.36) and +0.75 (IQR +0.28 to +1.47) mL/min/1.73 m2 /month. Pre- and post-treatment eGFR slopes were not significantly different according to tertiles (respectively, P = 0.34, 0.08, 0.73). CONCLUSION: The eGFR varies during treatment and gives a confusing picture of the renal safety of sofosbuvir-based regimens. In contrast, longitudinal assessment of the eGFR shows a rising trajectory over longer time, meaning that these therapies are safe for the kidneys in our cohort of liver transplant recipients.

Difference in antigenic determinant profiles between human and rat myeloperoxidase.

We tested whether rat and human MPO have similar antigenic determinants using 36 human MPO-ANCA positive sera, one mouse anti-rat MPO and four mouse anti-human MPO monoclonal reagents. Purified rat and human MPO were used in ELISA, with or without crossinhibition by preincubation with human MPO or irrelevant antigen in the liquid phase. Only one human MPO ANCA positive serum exhibited significant binding in rat MPO ELISA. This binding was poorly inhibited by preincubation with human MPO in the liquid phase, but was conserved after adsorption of non specific anti-rat activity in a chromatography column. Three mouse anti-human MPO IgG monoclonal antibodies did not recognize rat MPO. Only one mouse anti-human MPO IgA monoclonal antibody bound to rat MPO. This binding was poorly inhibited by preincubation with human MPO (35% at 2 micro g/ml). Conversely, the mouse anti-rat MPO monoclonal did not bind human MPO. We have concluded that: (1) Most human MPO-ANCA recognize antigenic determinants on human MPO which are absent on rat MPO. Therefore, human auto-antibodies bind to epitopes which recently appeared after species evolution; (2) Inversely, the mouse anti-rat MPO monoclonal do not bind human MPO. Therefore, rat MPO epitopes have been altered during species evolution; (3) Mice injected with human MPO preferentially develop antibodies against xeno-epitopes which are not present in rodents. Therefore, human MPO may not be the best antigen to raise ANCA in animal models and (4) A comparison of the amino acid sequences of rat and human MPO may help elucidate the major antigenic epitopes.

Photopheresis affects the course of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in Lewis rat.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The mechanism responsible for the beneficial effects of extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) remains unknown. In the rat model of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE), the transfer of encephalitogenic cells (EAE cells) induces transient passive EAE, followed by resistance to subsequent disease induction through immunization with central nervous system antigens (active EAE). METHODS: We tested whether ECP exerts its therapeutic effect by inducing an immune response targeted on circulating pathogenic T-lymphocytes, which results from their increased immunogenicity. We compared the potential of untreated versus ECP-treated encephalitogenic cells to transfer passive EAE and protect against active induction of the disease. The UVA irradiation conditions were derived from intensive ECP protocols used in human clinical studies. RESULTS: Animals receiving untreated cells showed clinical symptoms following cell transfer but not after subsequent immunisation, whereas those receiving ECP-treated cells remained healthy following cell transfer but experienced clinical symptoms after subsequent immunisation. However, these symptoms were less marked than in control naive rats. CONCLUSION: Under these ECP protocol conditions, ECP-treated cells have no greater active stimulatory potential for the recipient immune system than untreated cells, since they are less effective at triggering the response that causes the resistant state to active EAE. We suggest that intensive ECP protocol may have deleterious effects with a risk of relapses after treatment discontinuation. The search for the irradiation threshold that would inhibit the T-cell pathogenic properties, but retain their ability to educate the immune system, remains a major research challenge.

Extracorporeal photochemotherapy for secondary chronic progressive multiple sclerosis: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Extracorporeal photochemotherapy (ECP) has been proposed for the treatment of various auto- and allo-immune reactions. However, a standard ECP regimen did not significantly alter the course of chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). We tested whether an intensive ECP treatment can affect the course of secondary chronic progressive form of MS. METHODS: Five patients free of immunosuppression were included. Soluble 8-MOP was added ex vivo to a mononuclear cell suspension obtained in a cell separator. This cellular suspension was then irradiated using an UVA irradiator and re-infused into the patient. ECP was performed once a week for 6 weeks and then, depending on clinical evaluation, for a maximum of 6 months, with 2-year follow-up after treatment discontinuation. Scoring was performed with the Kurzke scale and EDSS by a single independent neurologist. RESULTS: One patient was excluded because of recurrent attacks at the very beginning of treatment. Four patients completed the study: one exhibited clinical improvement and three remained stable during the first 6 months of treatment. However, all experienced relapse or worsening of the disease after discontinuation of ECP treatment. CONCLUSION: Our intensive ECP treatment only transiently alters the course of the severe secondary chronic progressive form of MS, with rebound after treatment discontinuation.