Osteoarthritis in patients with obesity: The bariatric surgery impacts on its evolution.

Obesity is one of the main modifiable risk factors for osteoarthritis (OA). Moreover, obesity is associated with greater pain intensity and functional limitation, but also with a significantly lower responder rate to intra-articular treatments. Consequently, an arthroplasty is indicated earlier and more frequently in patients with obesity. However, pain and functional symptoms improve slightly less after arthroplasty in patients with obesity, who display higher incidence of early and late complications following prosthetic surgery. Bariatric surgery (BS) has increased worldwide and is efficient to induce major and sustainable weight-loss. Importantly, BS significantly reduces pain and functional limitation in patients with symptomatic knee OA. Biomarkers analysis also revealed a decrease in catabolic factors and an increase in anabolic one after BS suggesting a structural protective effect in knee OA. Nevertheless, the impact of BS prior to arthroplasty remains unclear. BS seems to decrease short- and mid-term complications such as infections or thrombosis. However, BS does not appear to modify long-term complications rate, and may even increase it, especially revisions and infections. Although few studies have compared the symptomatic and functional outcomes of joint replacement with or without BS, these are not significantly improved by prior BS. Despite these heterogeneous results, medico-economic studies found that BS prior to arthroplasty was cost-effective. To conclude, BS could significantly reduce the symptoms of OA and potentially slow its progression, but appears more disappointing in preventing long-term complications of arthroplasties and improving their functional results.

Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections: Recommendations of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR).

Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections are widely performed, although the exact practice varies greatly due to advances in knowledge and techniques. This justifies updating and drawing up good practice recommendations. Using a consensus model formalized by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) and based on a literature review that resulted in a "white book", 13 recommendations were developed by a group of experts. These recommendations were then sent online to 48 specialists for evaluation, 27 of whom were rheumatologists and 15 of whom were general practitioners. These recommendations were also presented at the 34th annual meeting of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) (Paris, December 2021) at a symposium attended by a hundred or so rheumatologists, who voted on these recommendations in person. The results are presented as an overall score out of 10, a median out of 10 and as tertiles. The agreement was excellent for 10 of these 13 recommendations, with mean values of 8.5 to 9.1 out of 10, median values of 9 or 10 out of 10 and agreement of 91.7% to 97.9%, which corresponds to a consensus. The 3 other recommendations were broadly supported but were the subject of more debate. One relates to patient information (mean 7.3/10, median 8/10, upper tertile 72.9%) with discussion about the waiting period. Another related to the summary report (mean 8.4/10, median 9, upper tertile 91.7%) with discussions about its content and the need to specify the lot number of the injected product. The last one related to periprosthetic injections and the need to consult and get approval from a specialist (mean 8.0/10, median 8, upper tertile 83.3%) with mostly the general practitioners having reservations. In all, there is a very strong consensus among the musculoskeletal corticosteroid injection experts and specialists consulted, which justifies them being taken into consideration to improve our daily practice.

Calcific tendinopathy: an unexpected side effect of tyrosine kinase inhibitor?

Musculoskeletal (MSK) pains have been reported during TKI treatment or after its discontinuation in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). We hypothesized that MSK pains originate from calcific tendinopathy according to preliminary clinical observations. We conducted a retrospective study including CML patients divided into three groups: patients with MSK pain during TKI treatment; asymptomatic patients during TKI treatment; patients with MSK pain after TKI discontinuation. Patients with MSK pain were clinically evaluated, and the presence of calcific deposits was assessed in X-rays of both shoulders and pelvis. Forty-five patients were included; 14 described MSK pain during TKI treatment and 12 after TKI discontinuation. A diagnosis of rotator cuff tendinopathy was retained for 57.7% of patients and of gluteus tendinopathy in 19.2%. The prevalence of calcifications in shoulders and/or hips was 64.3% in symptomatic patients receiving TKIs, 63.2% in asymptomatic patients and 75.0% in patients with MSK pain after TKI treatment.

Time to Total Knee Arthroplasty after Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid or Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis.

Intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections are increasingly being prescribed for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). However, failure of the medical treatment may result in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We wondered if IA HA or PRP injections (intervention) may delay the time to TKA (outcome) among KOA patients (population), compared to KOA patients not receiving these injections (comparator). For this systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis, we selected observational studies with at least one group of patients receiving IA HA or PRP and with TKA data available. The main outcome was time from the diagnosis of KOA to TKA. We included 25 articles in the SLR (2,824,401 patients) and four in the meta-analysis. The mean strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) score was 63%. For patients receiving versus not receiving HA injections, the delay between a declared diagnosis of KOA to TKA was increased by 9.8 months (95% CI (8.2-11.4)). As compared with standard of care, the effect size of HA injections for this outcome was 0.57 (95% CI (0.36-0.76)). Only one study described a median time from PRP injections to TKA of 4.1 years (range 0.3-14.7). IA HA injections were associated with increased time to TKA. Causality cannot be concluded because of missing confounder factors as comorbidities. Data were insufficient to conclude any effect of PRP injections on TKA delay.

Do Glucocorticoid Injections Increase the Risk of Knee Osteoarthritis Progression Over 5 Years?

OBJECTIVE: Recent findings have demonstrated that intraarticular (IA) glucocorticoid injections can be deleterious for knees with osteoarthritis (OA). This study was undertaken to assess, in a real-life setting, the risk of knee OA progression in patients who received IA glucocorticoid injections over a 5-year follow-up period. METHODS: We used marginal structural modeling with inverse probability of treatment weighting to determine the causal association between IA glucocorticoid injections and the 5-year risk of disease progression in patients with symptomatic knee OA from the Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis Long-term Assessment cohort. OA progression was defined as an incident total knee replacement (TKR) and/or radiographic worsening (Kellgren/Lawrence [K/L] grade or joint space narrowing [JSN]). We also examined these outcomes in knees that received IA hyaluronan (IAHA) injections. RESULTS: Among the 564 patients with knee OA included in the study sample, 51 (9.0%) and 99 (17.5%) received IA glucocorticoid or IAHA injections, respectively, and 414 (63.1%) did not receive any injection during follow-up. Compared to untreated knees, those treated with IA glucocorticoid injections had a similar risk of incident TKR (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.20, 4.14]; P = 0.91) or K/L grade worsening (HR 1.33 [95% CI 0.64, 2.79]; P = 0.44). IAHA injections had no effect on the risk of TKR (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.14, 4.63]; P = 0.81) or K/L grade worsening (HR 1.36 [95% CI 0.85, 2.17]; P = 0.20). Similar results were obtained for JSN, and when TKR and radiographic outcomes were combined. CONCLUSION: In this study, IA glucocorticoid injections for symptomatic knee OA did not significantly increase the 5-year risk of incident TKR or radiographic worsening. These findings should be interpreted cautiously and replicated in other cohorts.

MRI and ultrasonography for detection of early interphalangeal osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the interest of MRI and ultrasonography (US) in identifying early and advanced interphalangeal (IP) OA. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study including patients with symptomatic hand OA (n=33) and young healthy volunteers (n=26). Proximal and distal IP joints were graded according to Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grades. In OA patients, we separated IP joints into 2 groups: "at risk of OA" joints (potential early pre-radiographic OA joints, KL=0) and OA joints (KL=2-4). All IP joints from healthy participants were KL=0 and were considered strictly normal IP joints. Concurrently, synovitis, effusion, erosions, osteophytes, bone marrow lesions, cysts and cartilage space loss were graded by MRI and/or US. We assessed their prevalence, severity and diagnostic performance in hand OA and then compared normal IP joints from healthy participants and "at risk of OA" IP joints from OA patients as well as "at risk of OA" and OA IP joints from OA patients. RESULTS: The prevalence and grade of most MRI/US-detected lesions were higher in IP joints from OA patients than healthy participants. Except for osteophyte assessment, MRI seemed more sensitive than US. We found more MRI/US-detected lesions in "at risk of OA" IP joints than normal joints but also in OA than "at risk of OA" joints from OA patients. US appeared both sensitive and specific for detecting osteophytes in joints without radiographic abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: MRI and US give good performance for detecting radiographic and pre-radiographic OA lesions and could be interesting tools to identify early hand OA.

Long-Term Results of Anterior-Only Lumbar Interbody Fusions in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a risk factor of lumbar spine surgical failure. The interest of anterior lumbar fusion in this context remains unknown. This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcome of anterior-only fusions between RA patients and non-RA (NRA) patients to treat lumbar spine degenerative disorders. METHODS: NRA and RA groups including anterior-only fusion were compared. Clinical data (Visual Analog Scale score axial back pain scale, the Oswestry Disability Index, and a questionnaire of satisfaction regarding the surgical result); radiologic data (bone fusion, sagittal balance analysis); and adverse events were assessed using repeated measure 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 9.5 years (95% confidence interval [7.1-12.2]) for the RA group (n = 13) and 9.4 years (95% confidence interval [8.7-10.3]) for the NRA group (n = 36). Anterior fusion improved clinical outcome without any effect of RA (Visual Analog Scale score axial back pain scale; P < 0.001/Oswestry Disability Index; P = 0.01). The presence of RA influenced neither the satisfaction as the regards the surgical result nor spine balance nor bone fusion. Context of RA increased the surgical revision rate (10 patients [76.9%] for RA group vs. 3 patients [8.8%] for the NRA group; P = 0.001) because of the occurrence of an adjacent segment disease needing surgical revision (P = 0.028), especially the occurrence of intervertebral frontal dislocation (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: As noticed for posterior-only fusion, the anterior lumbar approach in RA patients does not seem to avoid the occurrence of an adjacent segment disease.

Bone Status According to Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Phenotype: A Descriptive Study of 60 Women in France.

There is an increased risk of osteoporosis and an abnormal bone turn over in neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). Our objective is to evaluate bone status in NF1 and to look for associations with cutaneous phenotype. We conducted a descriptive, monocentric study. We included 60 NF1 women, 18-51 years old, non-menopausal, divided in 2 groups: «at risk phenotype¼ (ARP) composed by 30 patients with at least 2 subcutaneous neurofibromas (SC-NF) and «classical phenotype¼ (CP) composed by 30 patients with none or 1 SC-NF. We evaluated low bone mineral density (BMD) risk factors and measured BMD, calcium and phosphorus homeostasis and bone turnover markers. Before 50 years old, Z-score has to be used to assess BMD. Z-score < - 2 is below expected range and represents 2.5% of the population. There was no difference between the two groups. Overall, Z-scores were low and 5 patients had a Z-score < - 2 (8.3%), which is 3 times general population low BMD frequency. 10 fragility fractures occurred in 8 patients, among which 2 were vertebral fractures. 85% had low calcium intake. 12 patients had hypophosphoremia, 25 elevated PTH. Vitamin D levels were low for 86.4%. 41 patients (69.5%) had at least one abnormal bone turnover markers. Low BMD is 3.3 times more frequent in NF1 than in general population, with high fracture risk, regardless of the skin phenotype, classical or at risk, because of high bone turn over and secondary hyperparathyroidism due to vitamin D deficiency and poor calcium intake.

Influence of inflammatory and non-inflammatory rheumatic disorders on the clinical and biological profile of type-2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To study the profile of type-2 diabetes (T2D) in patients with RA or OA. METHODS: This observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study included, over a 24-month period, consecutive patients with adult-onset diabetes and RA or OA. We collected demographics, disease activity and severity indices, current treatments for RA and diabetes, history and complications of diabetes. A systematic blood test was performed, assessing inflammatory, immunological and metabolic parameters. The homoeostasis model assessment (HOMA)2-S was used to assess insulin resistance. RESULTS: We included 167 patients with T2D, 118 with RA and 49 with OA. RA and OA patients had severe T2D with suboptimal metabolic control and a biological profile of insulin resistance. Insulin resistance was significantly higher in RA than in OA patients after stratification on age, BMI and CS use [HOMA2-S: 63.5 (35.6) vs 98.4 (69.2), P < 0.001]. HOMA2-S was independently associated with DAS28 [odds ratio (OR): 4.46, 95% CI: 1.17, 17.08]. T2D metabolic control was not related to disease activity and functional impairment, but HbA1c levels were independently associated with bone erosions (OR: 4.43, 95% CI: 1.18, 16.61). Treatment with low-dose CSs was not associated with decreased insulin sensitivity or increased HbA1c levels. Treatment with TNF-α inhibitors was associated with increased insulin sensitivity compared with patients not receiving biologics [101.3 (58.71) vs 60.0 (32.5), P = 0.001]. CONCLUSION: RA patients display severe T2D with inflammation-associated insulin resistance. These findings may have therapeutic implications, with the potential targeting of insulin resistance through the treatment of joint and systemic inflammation.

Intraarticular Corticosteroids for Hip Osteoarthritis: A Review.

INTRODUCTION: Hip osteoarthritis is a prevalent condition responsible for important pain and disability. Most available guidelines for nonsurgical management of hip osteoarthritis recommend a combination of nonpharmacological and pharmacological treatment modalities. Intraarticular corticosteroid injections have been used for decades, although evidence is quite scarce, and many controversies remain. METHODS: This article reviews the available literature from Medline and Embase and discusses the evidence for intraarticular corticosteroid injections in hip osteoarthritis, where only 5 randomized controlled trials were found in the literature. These are analyzed in this article, which also aims to explain the main characteristics and features of glucocorticoids, along with their contraindications and potential adverse effects. RESULTS: Available randomized controlled trials show that intraarticular corticosteroid injections provide pain relief and functional improvement in hip osteoarthritis. This efficacy has not been shown with intraarticular hyaluronic acid injections. CONCLUSION: This review shows that intraarticular corticosteroid injections are efficacious in hip osteoarthritis and that this benefit can last up to 12 weeks.

Efficacy of tocilizumab in patients with hand osteoarthritis: double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of tocilizumab, an antibody against IL-6 receptor, in patients with hand osteoarthritis. METHODS: This was a multicentre, 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study from November 2015 to October 2018. Patients with symptomatic hand osteoarthritis (pain ≥40 on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) despite analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; at least three painful joints, Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥2) were randomised to receive two infusions 4 weeks apart (weeks 0 and 4) of tocilizumab (8 mg/kg intravenous) or placebo. The primary endpoint was changed in VAS pain at week 6. Secondary outcomes included the number of painful and swollen joints, duration of morning stiffness, patients' and physicians' global assessment and function scores. RESULTS: Of 104 patients screened, 91 (45 to tocilizumab and 46 to placebo; 82% women; mean age 64.4 (SD 8.7) years) were randomly assigned and 79 completed the 12-week study visit. The mean change between baseline and week 6 on the VAS for pain (primary outcome) was -7.9 (SD 19.4) and -9.9 (SD 20.1) in the tocilizumab and placebo groups (p=0.7). The groups did not differ for any secondary outcomes at weeks 4, 6, 8 or 12. Overall, adverse events were slightly more frequent in the tocilizumab than placebo group. CONCLUSION: Tocilizumab was no more effective than placebo for pain relief in patients with hand osteoarthritis.

Does the Presence of Neuropathic Pain Influence the Response to Hyaluronic Acid in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis?

OBJECTIVES: Up to 50% of patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA) present with neuropathic pain (NP) features. We assessed the impact of NP according to DN4 (Douleurs Neuropathiques 4 questions) score on the response to intra-articular (IA) hyaluronic acid (HA) injections and the effects of HA injections on NP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial comparing the efficacy of 2 HA in symptomatic knee OA at 24 weeks. At baseline, demographic, anthropometric, radiologic data, and symptoms were recorded. The symptomatic effect of HA was assessed by VAS pain, patient global assessment (PGA), WOMAC, DN4, and OMERACT-OARSI response. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were included. NP according to DN4 score was present in 20 patients (10.7%) at baseline. Most common positive DN4 items were tingling (36.9%) and burning (36.4%). NP was associated with WOMAC pain score (P = 0.02). The presence of NP at baseline did not affect the symptomatic improvement after HA injections according to the VAS pain (P = 0.71), PGA (P = 050), WOMAC pain (P = 0.89), WOMAC function (P = 0.52), and rate of OMERACT-OARSI responders (P = 0.21). The prevalence of patients with NP decreased by 50% (n = 10) at 24 weeks after HA injections. Most improved DN4 items were itching (90%), hypoesthesia to pinprick (88%), and burning (50%). CONCLUSION: In our study, NP was associated with pain severity, but did not influence the response to IA HA. On the other hand, HA injections reduced some NP features, especially itching, sting hypoesthesia, and burning.

Intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: a consensus statement from French-speaking experts.

PURPOSE: There has been much debate regarding the use of intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as symptomatic treatment for knee osteoarthritis. The objective of this consensus was to develop guidelines for PRP injections in knee osteoarthritis according to the French National Authority for Health recommendations. METHODS: Fifteen physicians from different French-speaking countries (10 rheumatologists, 4 specialists in rehabilitation and sports medicine and 1 radiologist) were selected for their expertise in the areas of PRP and osteoarthritis. A comprehensive literature review was conducted on Medline including all published therapeutic trials, open studies, meta-analysis and systematic reviews focusing on the effects of PRP in knee OA, as well as fundamental studies concerning the characteristics of the various types of PRP and their mechanisms, indexed before April 2019. Using the method recommended by the French National Authority for Health inspired by the Delphi consensus process, 25 recommendations were finally retained and evaluated. The recommendations were classified as appropriate or not appropriate, with strong or relative agreement, or uncertain if a consensus was not achieved. RESULTS: Among the 25 recommendations selected, the main ones are the following: (1) Intra-articular injections of PRP are an effective symptomatic treatment for early to moderate knee osteoarthritis. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 8; rank = 6-9). Level of evidence 1A. (2) A PRP treatment sequence in knee osteoarthritis may include 1-3 injections. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a strong agreement (Median = 9; rank = 7-9). Level of evidence 1A. (3) Leucocytes-poor PRP should be preferred in knee osteoarthritis. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 8; rank = 5-9). Level of evidence 5. (4) Intra-articular PRP knee injections should be performed under ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance. This recommendation was considered uncertain with no consensus (Median = 8; rank = 3-9). Level of evidence 5. (5) PRP should not be mixed with an anesthetic or intra-articular corticosteroid. This recommendation was considered appropriate with a relative agreement (Median = 9; rank = 6-9). Level of evidence 5 CONCLUSION: Those 25 recommendations should standardize and facilitate the use of IA PRP injections, which are considered by experts as an effective treatment especially in early or moderate knee OA. Although a strong or relative agreement from the experts was obtained for most of the recommendations, many of them had a very low level of evidence (Level 5) and were principally based on the clinical experience of the experts.

Role of adipose tissues in osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epidemiologic studies reveal that the link between obesity and osteoarthritis cannot be uniquely explained by overweight-associated mechanical overload. For this reason, much attention focuses on the endocrine activity of adipose tissues. In addition to the systemic role of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissues, many arguments highlight the involvement of local adipose tissues in osteoarthritis. RECENT FINDINGS: Alteration in MRI signal intensity of the infrapatellar fat pad may predict both accelerated knee osteoarthritis and joint replacement. In this context, recent studies show that mesenchymal stromal cells could play a pivotal role in the pathological remodelling of intra-articular adipose tissues (IAATs) in osteoarthritis. In parallel, recent findings underline bone marrow adipose tissue as a major player in the control of the bone microenvironment, suggesting its possible role in osteoarthritis. SUMMARY: The recent description of adipose tissues of various phenotypes within an osteoarthritic joint allows us to evoke their direct involvement in the initiation and progression of the osteoarthritic process. We can expect in the near future the discovery of novel molecules targeting these tissues.

Heparan sulfate functions are altered in the osteoarthritic cartilage.

BACKGROUND: Heparan sulfate (HS) proteoglycans (PG) may be found at the chondrocyte surface and in the pericellular cartilage matrix, and are involved in cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. An important function of HS chains is to regulate cell fate through specific interactions with heparin-binding proteins (HBP) modulated by their complex sulfation pattern. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a joint disorder characterized by the degradation of articular cartilaginous extracellular matrix. The aim of this study was to investigate HS structure and functions in osteoarthritic cartilages compared to normal cartilages (controls). METHODS: Glycosaminoglycans (GAG) were extracted from human macroscopically normal cartilages (controls, n = 7) and (OA cartilages n = 11). HS were isolated and quantified using the DMMB quantification method. Their structure and functions were then compared using respectively a HPLC analysis and HBP binding tests and their phenotypic effects on murine chondrocytes were studied by RQ-PCR. Statistical analyzes were performed using a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunnett's test or a t test for pairwise comparisons. RESULTS: In OA, HS were characterized by increased sulfation levels compared to controls. Moreover, the capacity of these HS to bind HBP involved in the OA pathophysiological process such as FGF2 and VEGF was reduced. Chondroitin sulfates and keratan sulfates regulated these binding properties. Finally, HS from OA cartilages induced the mRNA levels of catabolic markers such as MMP3, MMP13, and TS4 and inhibited the mRNA levels of anabolic markers such as COL2, ACAN, SOX9, and VEGF in murine articular chondrocytes. CONCLUSION: The sulfation of HS chains was increased in OA cartilages with changes in HBP binding properties and biological effects on chondrocyte phenotypes. Thus, modified HS present in altered cartilages could be a novel therapeutic target in OA.

Recommendations of the French Society of Rheumatology on pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To establish recommendations for pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis specific to France. METHODS: On behalf of the French Society of Rheumatology (SFR), a bibliography group analyzed the literature on the efficacy and safety of each pharmacological treatment for knee osteoarthritis. This group joined a multidisciplinary working group to draw up recommendations. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence level were assigned to each recommendation. A review committee gave its level of agreement. RESULTS: Five general principles were established: 1) need to combine pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, 2) personalization of treatment, 3) symptomatic and/or functional aim of pharmacological treatments, 4) need to regularly re-assess the treatments and 5) discussion about arthroplasty if medical treatment fails. Six recommendations involved oral treatments: 1) paracetamol should not necessarily be prescribed systematically and/or continuously, 2) NSAIDs, possibly as first-line, 3) weak opioids, 4) strong opioids, 5) symptomatic slow-acting drugs of osteoarthritis, and 6) duloxetine (off-label use). Two recommendations involved topical agents (NSAIDs and capsaicin<1%). Three recommendations involved intra-articular treatments: corticosteroid or hyaluronic acid injections that can be proposed to patients. The experts did not draw a conclusion about the benefits of platelet-rich plasma injections. CONCLUSION: These are the first recommendations of the SFR on the pharmacological treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

Acute Symptomatic Calcific Discitis Mimicking a Septic Spondylodiscitis.

Acute symptomatic calcific discitis is a poorly understood condition that has been mostly reported in children. Cases in adults have been scarcely reported and may mimic an infectious process. Imaging, including computed tomography, can show the disc calcification but might fail to show it because its resorption can occur early after the onset of symptoms. We report the case of an adult patient presenting with severe cervical-dorsal junction pain, fever, high C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and imaging findings mimicking an infectious spondylodiscitis, including an erosion of the anterior part of the vertebral endplate. However, the patient improved spontaneously and rapidly, with pain and fever disappearing and C-reactive protein (CRP) returning to normal within a week.