Survey on the usage of therapeutic erythrocytapheresis in transfusion services in Italy for the treatment of polycythemia vera, secondary erythrocytosis and hemochromatosis.

INTRODUCTION: Erythrocytapheresis, an apheresis treatment which selectively removes red blood cells, is an alternative to therapeutic phlebotomy, over which it has several advantages. Actually there is a high degree of variability in the use of this treatment. This prompted SIdEM (Italian Society of Hemapheresis and Cell Manipulation) to conduct a survey on the use of erythrocytapheresis in the Italian Transfusion Services. The purpose is to monitor this activity in the treatment of Polycythemia Vera (pv), secondary erythrocytosis and hemochromatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A data collection file was sent to the SIdEM regional delegates who, in turn, involved the Transfusion Centers in the areas they cover. The data collected were processed on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. RESULTS: 75 centers from 14 Italian regions responded to the Survey: 36 centers (48 %) use erythrocytapheresis (35 centers perform therapeutic apheresis and 1 center only donor apheresis), 39 centers (52 %) do not (15 centers perform therapeutic apheresis, 18 centers only donor apheresis and 6 centers do not perform either therapeutic apheresis or donor apheresis). Although most centers have a substantially uniform attitude concerning the indications for which erythrocytapheresis is used, the survey shows that there are still differences more evident in the treatment of secondary erythrocytosis than in the treatment of pv or hemochromatosis. CONCLUSIONS: This survey has been useful to document the current Italian reality and to raise awareness about the need for improvement in optimizing and standardizing the use of a therapy with a great potential to exploit properly.

Safety of hematopoietic stem cell donation in glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase-deficient donors.

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency is the most common RBC enzymatic disorder in humans capable of producing hemolytic events. Recently, concern has been raised about using G6PD-deficienct subjects as hemopoietic stem cell (HSC) donors. In a 10-year period, 101 consecutive HSC donors were submitted to donation procedures for transplantation inside their families in our Center. All donors were tested for G6PD and 19 (19%) turned out to be G6PD-deficient. The donors' safety and the effectiveness of these transplant outcomes were compared with those of the remaining 82 donors. No difference could be observed in any safety parameter between the two groups. No difference was recorded in donors' complications rates, in HSC production, in quantity of growth factor required, in Hb early drop or in Hb recovery. No difference was found in transplant outcome. From this retrospective analysis, we conclude that a G6PD-deficient but otherwise healthy volunteer can be selected as a HSC donor.