RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the advent of newer stents, in-stent restenosis has been a persistent and formidable challenge. Trials have demonstrated the superiority of drug-coated balloons (DCB) over plain-old balloon angioplasty (POBA). A recent AGENT IDE trial highlighted the need for a more comprehensive understanding hence we conducted a meta-analysis aimed at elucidating their respective clinical outcomes. METHODS: A literature search was conducted by 2 investigators (SS and MH) using MEDLINE (EMBASE and PubMed) using a systematic search strategy by PRISMA till November 01, 2023. CRAN-R software was used for statistical analysis. The quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (Supplemental Table 5). RESULTS: We included 6 studies with a total of 1171 patients. Our analysis showed decreased odds of multiple outcomes with statistically significant results including TVR (OR 0.33, CI 0.19-0.57), TVF (OR 0.30, CI 0.09-0.99), TLR (OR 0.22, CI 0.10-0.46), restenosis (OR 0.1343, CI 0.06-0.27), and MACE (OR 0.2 CI 0.12-0.37). Although MI and all-cause mortality showed decreased odds with all-cause mortality at 0.8 (95% CI: 0.363-2.09), and MI at 0.6 (95% CI: 0.0349-1.07), the reductions did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our analysis by scrutinizing six RCTs favored DCB over POBA. However, extensive research for deeper understanding cannot be overemphasized.
RESUMEN
The risk of arrhythmia is high in patients with COVID-19. The current literature is limited in understanding the clinical impact of arrhythmias and the extent of healthcare utilization in COVID-19 patients. The Nationwide In-patient Sample Database (NIS) from 2019 to 2020 was queried to identify COVID-19 patients who developed arrhythmias vs those without. Multivariate regression for adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and propensity score matching (PSM) were done to compare outcomes among both cohorts. A total of 1,664,240 patients (weighted) were hospitalized with COVID-19 infection, 380,915 (22.89%) of whom were diagnosed with an arrhythmia. After propensity matching COVID-19 with arrhythmias had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (22.4% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001), acute kidney injury (PSM 39.4% vs 35.7%, P < 0.001), acute heart failure (AHF) (18.2% vs 12.6%, P < 0.001), acute stroke (0.76% vs 0.57%, P < 0.001), cardiogenic shock (1.38% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001), cardiac arrest (5.26% vs 2.3%, P < 0.001) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (12.8% vs 7.8%, P < 0.001), intracerebral hemorrhage (0.63% vs 0.45%, P < 0.001), major bleeding (2.6% vs 1.8%, P < 0.001) and endotracheal intubation (17.04% vs 10.17% < 0.001) compared to arrhythmias without COVID-19. This cohort also had lower odds of receiving interventions such as cardiac pacing (aOR 0.15 95% Cl 0.13-0.189 P < 0.001), cardioversion (aOR 0.43 95% CI 0.40-0.46, P < 0.001), and defibrillator (aOR 0.087 95% Cl 0.061-0.124, P < 0.001) compared to arrhythmia patients without COVID-19. Cardiac arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 resulted in longer length of hospital stay and higher total costs of hospitalizations. Arrhythmias associated with COVID-19 had worse clinical outcomes with an increased rate of in-hospital mortality, longer length of hospital stay, and higher total cost. These patients also had lower odds of receiving interventions during the index hospitalization.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Choque Cardiogénico , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Arritmias Cardíacas/terapia , HospitalizaciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS), also known as stress-induced cardiomyopathy, can be complicated by shock. The outcomes of patients with TTS complicated with cardiogenic shock (CS) versus mixed cardiogenic and septic shock (MS) is not known. METHODS: We queried Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2009-2020 to compare TTS patients with CS and MS using International Classification of Disease, Ninth & Tenth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD- 9 & 10-CM) coding. In-hospital outcomes were compared using one: one propensity score matched (PSM) analysis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 23,126 patients with TTS 17,132 (74%) had CS, and 6,269 (26%) had MS. The mean age was 67 years in CS and 66 years in MS, and majority of patients were female (n = 17,775, 77%). On adjusted multivariate analysis, MS patients had higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.36-1.52), AKI (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.48-1.58), pressor requirement (aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.25-1.50). However, had lower odds of MCS use (aOR 0.44, 95% CI 0.40-0.48) and cardiac arrest (aOR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.90) (p-value <0.0001). Mean LOS and inflation-adjusted hospital charges were higher in MS. CONCLUSION: MS in the setting of TTS have higher rates of in-hospital mortality, AKI, and pressor requirements.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Paro Cardíaco , Choque Séptico , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Choque Cardiogénico , Cardiomiopatía de Takotsubo/complicaciones , Choque Séptico/complicaciones , Mortalidad HospitalariaRESUMEN
Background: Radiation exposure is an occupational hazard for interventional cardiologists and cardiac catheterisation laboratory staff that can manifest with serious long-term health consequences. Personal protective equipment, including lead jackets and glasses, is common, but the use of radiation protective lead caps is inconsistent. Methods: A systematic review qualitative assessment of five observational studies using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines protocol was performed. Results: It was concluded that lead caps significantly reduce radiation exposure to the head, even when a ceiling-mounted lead shield was present. Conclusion: Although newer protective systems are being studied and introduced, tools, such as lead caps, need to be strongly considered and employed in the catheterisation laboratory as mainstay personal protective equipment.
RESUMEN
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) occluder device has been shown to reduce the chance of recurrent stroke. Per guidelines, stroke is higher in females but procedural efficacy and complications based on sex difference is understudied. The nationwide readmission database (NRD) was used to create sex cohorts using ICD-10 Procedural code for elective PFO occluder device placement performed during the years 2016-2019. The 2 groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariate regression models that matched for confounders to report multivariate odds ratio (mOR) for primary and secondary cardiovascular outcomes. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), acute ischemic stroke, postprocedure bleeding, and cardiac tamponade. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA v. 17. A total of 5818 patients who underwent PFO occluder device placement were identified, of which 3144 (54.0%) were females, and 2673 (46.0%) were males. There was no difference in periprocedural in-hospital mortality, new onset acute ischemic stroke, postprocedural bleeding, or cardiac tamponade between both sexes undergoing occluder device placement. AKI incidence was higher in males compared to females after matching for CKD (mORâ¯=â¯0.66; 95% CI [0.48-0.92]; Pâ¯=â¯0.016) this can be procedural or can be secondary to volume status or nephrotoxins. Males also had a higher length of stay (LOS) at their index hospitalization (2 days vs 1 day) which led to slightly higher total hospitalization cost ($26,585 vs $24,265). Our data did not show a statistically significant difference in the readmission LOS trends between the 2 groups at 30, 90, and 180 days. This national retrospective cohort study of PFO occluder outcomes shows similar efficacy and complication rates between sexes, with the exception of AKI incidence which was higher in males. AKI occurrence was high in males that can be limited due to unavailability of data about hydration status and nephrotoxic medications.
Asunto(s)
Taponamiento Cardíaco , Foramen Oval Permeable , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Foramen Oval Permeable/epidemiología , Foramen Oval Permeable/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Taponamiento Cardíaco/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , HospitalesRESUMEN
Cardiovascular (CV) outcomes can be improved with commonality between provider and patient regarding gender and race/ethnicity. Slow growth in CV care provider diversity is an obstacle for women and underrepresented groups. The hope for more equitable outcomes is unlikely to be realized unless trends change in selection of CV fellows and program directors (PDs). We investigate longitudinal trends of gender and racial/ethnic composition of CV FITs. De-identified demographic data were compiled in a descriptive cross-sectional study from AAMC of internal medicine (IM) residents and CV FITs from 2011 through 2021 to evaluate gender and race/ethnicity trends among CV trainees. Trends of CV fellows who later became program directors were analyzed. In the US between 2011 and 2021, 53% of IM residents were male while 40% female (7% unreported). Among CV FITs, 78% were male and 21% female. Races/ethnicities among CV FITs consisted of 36% non-Hispanic white, 28% non-Hispanic Asian, 5% Hispanic, 4%Black, and 25% were classified within other race/ethnicity categories. The proportion who became CV program directors followed similarly: 79% of PDs were male and 21% female. Demographic profiles for CV FITs have not significantly changed over the past decade despite increased diversity among IM residents. Efforts to improve diversity of CV FITs and PDs need to be analyzed. Slow growth of diversity in CV FITs is outpaced by rising patient diversity, leading to disparities in care and poorer CV outcomes for women and underrepresented minorities. Recruiting, training, and retaining diverse CV FITs is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Liderazgo , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Hispánicos o Latinos , Grupos MinoritariosRESUMEN
Background: Patients with a bicuspid aortic valve have increased risk of infective endocarditis, but common organisms are not always the culprit. We describe a case of an otherwise healthy young gentleman with bicuspid aortic valve who experienced Abiotrophia defectiva endocarditis. The aim of this case report is to highlight an uncommon cause of endocarditis associated with significant morbidity and mortality in order to improve the care provided by trainees and clinicians. Case summary: A 37-year-old male presented with a 1-month history of fever, weight loss, myalgia, and night sweats. On transoesophageal echocardiography, he was found to have a bicuspid aortic valve with large vegetation and severe aortic insufficiency. Blood cultures were positive for A. defectiva. The endocarditis was successfully treated with surgical aortic valve replacement and 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy. Discussion: Bicuspid valves are known to have increased susceptibility to endocarditis. The difficulty of isolating A. defectiva typically leads to delayed diagnosis and significant complications. This case is a reminder to have a high degree of suspicion for organisms which are rare and difficult to isolate because prompt recognition and surgical intervention may improve the outcome of care.
RESUMEN
Background. Currently, the literature regarding the management of COVID-19 induced cardiomyopathy with reduced ejection fraction is limited. In this case report, we present the first documented case of COVID-19 induced myocardial stunning leading to severely reduced LV systolic function that was reversed by the administration of corticosteroids and tocilizumab. Case Summary. A 39-year-old female with well controlled systemic hypertension, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and underwent self-isolation for 14 days. Patient presented to our facility a month later with one-week history of progressively worsening generalized body aches, chills, fever, watery diarrhea, nausea with associated mild dry nonproductive cough, shortness of breath and nonspecific chest pain. Initial labs demonstrated that she was COVID-19 positive, elevated troponin (4.295 ng/ml), and elevated BNP (2,291 pg/ml). Her initial Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated an Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 20-25% with apical akinesis. After administration of tocilizumab and corticosteroids, patient demonstrated interval improvement with LVEF improving to 50-55% within days. Her labs confirmed these findings with improved troponin (0.858 ng/ml) and BNP (209 pg/ml). Discussion. This case demonstrates that it can be safe and efficacious to use tocilizumab and corticosteroids in patients with COVID-19 induced cardiomyopathy. These finding suggest that cytokine storm is the predominant mechanism by which COVID-19 induced cardiomyopathy occurs. Additional studies are required to determine the role of corticosteroids and tocilizumab in management of this condition.