RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Avacopan, an activated complement factor 5 receptor antagonist, has been approved as adjunct therapy for severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). Current evidence supports the management of AAV presenting with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) by administering glucocorticoids combined with either rituximab or cyclophosphamide in addition to supportive care. The role of avacopan in patients with DAH as a primary severe disease manifestation of AAV has not been well established. Furthermore, concerns remain regarding timely access to avacopan, the best glucocorticoid tapering regimen, and long-term efficacy and safety of the drug. We sought to identify clinical features and outcomes of patients presenting with DAH secondary to AAV who received avacopan in addition to glucocorticoids and rituximab or cyclophosphamide. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients presenting with DAH as part of active severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at presentation and follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen patients met inclusion criteria and were observed for a median time of 17 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 6-37 weeks) after initiation of avacopan. Patients were predominantly female and White, had never smoked, and were a median age of 66 years (IQR 52-72 years) at diagnosis. The majority had newly diagnosed severe AAV with renal involvement. Three patients progressed to respiratory failure. The timing of avacopan introduction and patterns of glucocorticoid tapers varied widely in this cohort. Two serious adverse events related to infection were observed, including one opportunistic infection leading to the patient's death, although neither was directly attributed to avacopan administration. CONCLUSION: We describe the clinical course of patients who presented with the severe AAV disease manifestation of DAH and received avacopan as adjunct therapy. Most patients achieved remission during follow-up, and adverse events, including infection, were observed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: ANCA-negative GPA remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Clinical differences between patients with ANCA-negative vs ANCA-positive GPA have not been analyzed in sizable case-control studies, and the effects of ANCA-seroconversion from negative to positive are not well documented. METHODS: A single-center, sex, and age matched case-control study evaluated ANCA-negative vs ANCA-positive GPA from January 1, 1996, to December 31, 2015. Patients who experienced seroconversion were the subject of a case crossover study. Clinical data and outcomes were retrieved from electronic medical records. RESULTS: ANCA-negative GPA was identified in 110 patients; 65% were female; median age was 55 (IQR 39-65) years at time of diagnosis. Disease severity was milder in ANCA-negative GPA (BVAS/WG = 2 vs 6, p< 0.001). Mucous membranous/eye manifestations were more frequent in ANCA-negative GPA. General symptoms, pulmonary, and renal involvement were more frequent in ANCA-positive GPA. Patients with ANCA-positive GPA relapsed more over 60 months (21.8% vs.9.1%, p= 0.009) compared with ANCA-negative GPA and had shorter time to event (p= 0.043). Patients with general manifestations, BMI > 30kg/m2 and necrotizing granulomatous inflammation were more likely to relapse. The 16 patients who seroconverted into ANCA-positive during follow-up had higher mean BVAS/WG at time of diagnosis (p< 0.001) and increased incidence of relapses (p= 0.004) after seroconversion. Necrotizing granulomatous inflammation on biopsy in ANCA-negative GPA patients was identified as a risk factor for subsequent seroconversion to ANCA-positivity. CONCLUSION: Patients with ANCA-negative GPA have milder disease and a lower frequency of relapse than those with ANCA-positive GPA. ANCA appearance portended higher disease severity and an increased frequency of relapses.
RESUMEN
While CT lung cancer screening reduces lung cancer-specific mortality, there are remaining challenges. Radiomic tools promiss to address these challenges, however, they are subject to interobserver variability if semi-automated segmentation techniques are used. Herein we report interobserver variability for two validated radiomic tools, BRODERS (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification) and CANARY (Computer-Aided Nodule Assessment and Risk Yield). We retrospectively analyzed the CT images of 95 malignant lung nodules of the adenocarcinoma spectrum using BRODERS and CANARY. Cases were identified at Mayo Clinic (n = 45) and Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Nashville/Veteran Administration Tennessee Valley Health Care System (n = 50). Three observers with different training levels (medical student, internal medicine resident and thoracic radiology fellow) each performed lung nodule segmentation. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.77, 0.98 and 0.97 for the average nodule volume, BRODERS cancer probability and Score Indicative of Lesion Aggression (SILA) which summarizes the distribution of the CANARY exemplars indicated good to excellent reliability, respectively. The dice similarity coefficient was 0.79 and 0.81 for the data sets from the two institutions. BRODERS and CANARY are robust radiomics tools with excellent interobserver variability. These tools are simple and reliable regardless the observer/operator's level of training.