RESUMEN
With its significant contribution to cancer mortality globally, advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) requires new treatment strategies. However, despite recent good results for mismatch repair (MMR)-deficient CRC and other malignancies, such as melanoma, the vast majority of MMR-proficient CRCs are resistant to checkpoint inhibitor (CKI) therapy. MMR-proficient CRCs commonly develop from precursor adenomas with enhanced Wnt-signalling due to adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) mutations. In melanomas with enhanced Wnt signalling due to stabilized ß-catenin, immune anergy and resistance to CKI therapy has been observed, which is dependent on micro-environmental myelomonocytic (MM) cell depletion in melanoma models. However, MM populations of colorectal adenomas or CRC have not been studied. To characterize resident intestinal MM cell populations during the early stages of tumorigenesis, the present study utilized the ApcMin/+ mouse as a model of MMR-proficient CRC, using enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expression in the mouse lysozyme (M-lys) lys-EGFP/+ mouse as a pan-myelomonocytic cell marker and a panel of murine macrophage surface markers. Total intestinal lamina propria mononuclear cell (LPMNC) numbers significantly decreased with age (2.32±1.39×107 [n=4] at 33 days of age vs. 1.06±0.24×107 [n=8] at 109 days of age) during intestinal adenoma development in ApcMin/+ mice (P=0.05; unpaired Student's t-test), but not in wild-type littermates (P=0.35). Decreased total LPMNC numbers were associated with atrophy of intestinal lymphoid follicles and the absence of MM/lymphoid cell aggregates in ApcMin/+ mouse intestine, but not spleen, compared with wild-type mice. Furthermore, during the early stage of intestinal adenoma development, there was a two-fold reduction of M-lys expressing cells (P=0.05) and four-fold reduction of ER-HR3 (macrophage sub-set) expressing cells (P=0.05; two tailed Mann-Whitney U test) in mice with reduced total intestinal LPMNCs (n=3). Further studies are necessary to determine the relevance of these findings to immune-surveillance of colorectal adenomas or MMR-proficient CRC CKI therapy resistance.
RESUMEN
Polymorphisms in miRNA and miRNA pathway genes have been previously associated with cancer risk and outcome, but have not been studied in esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. Here, we evaluate candidate miRNA pathway polymorphisms in esophageal adenocarcinoma prognosis and attempt to validate them in an independent cohort of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Among 231 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients of all stages/treatment plans, 38 candidate genetic polymorphisms (17 biogenesis, 9 miRNA targets, 5 pri-miRNA, 7 pre-miRNA) were genotyped and analyzed. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinicopathological covariates helped assess the association of genetic polymorphisms with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Significantly associated polymorphisms were then evaluated in an independent cohort of 137 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Among the 231 discovery cohort patients, 86% were male, median diagnosis age was 64 years, 34% were metastatic at diagnosis, and median OS and PFS were 20 and 12 months, respectively. GEMIN3 rs197412 (aHR = 1.37, 95%CI: [1.04-1.80]; P = 0.02), hsa-mir-124-1 rs531564 (aHR = 0.60, 95% CI: [0.53-0.90]; P = 0.05), and KIAA0423 rs1053667 (aHR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.28-0.96]; P = 0.04) were found associated with OS. Furthermore, GEMIN3 rs197412 (aHR = 1.33, 95% CI: [1.03-1.74]; P = 0.03) and KRT81 rs3660 (aHR = 1.29, 95% CI: [1.01-1.64]; P = 0.04) were found associated with PFS. Although none of these polymorphisms were significant in the second cohort, hsa-mir-124-1 rs531564 and KIAA0423 rs1053667 had trends in the same direction; when both cohorts were combined together, GEMIN3 rs197412, hsa-mir-124-1 rs531564, and KIAA0423 rs1053667 remained significantly associated with OS. We demonstrate the association of multiple miRNA pathway polymorphisms with esophageal adenocarcinoma prognosis in a discovery cohort of patients, which did not validate in a separate cohort but had consistent associations in the pooled cohort. Larger studies are required to confirm/validate the prognostic value of these polymorphisms in esophageal adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , MicroARNs/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous observations suggest suboptimal 'real world' survival outcomes for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We hypothesized that centralisation of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma management would improve chemotherapy treatment and survival from the disease. METHODS: The data was prospectively collected on all cases of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma reviewed through Clatterbridge Cancer Centre according to two groups; 1 October 2009-31st Dec 2010 (devolved care) or 1 January 2013-31 March 2014 (centralised care). Analysis included treatment received, 30-day chemotherapy mortality rate and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: More patients received chemotherapy with central care (67.0% (n=115) vs 43.0% (n=121); P=2.2 × 10-4) with no difference in 30-day mortality (20.8% vs 25%; P=0.573) but reduced time to commencement of chemotherapy (18 vs 28 days, P=1.0 × 10-3). More patients received second-line chemotherapy with central care (23.4% vs 1.9%, P=1.4 × 10-4), while OS was significantly increased with central care (median: Five vs three months, HR 0.785, P=0.045). Exploratory analysis suggested that it was those with a poorer performance status, elderly or with metastatic disease who benefited the most from transition to central care. CONCLUSIONS: A centralised clinic model for advanced pancreatic cancer management resulted in prompt, safe and higher use of chemotherapy compared with devolved care. This was associated with a modest survival benefit. Prospective studies are required to validate the findings reported and the basis for improved survival with centralised care.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Programas Médicos Regionales/organización & administración , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Cuidado de Transición/organización & administración , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Polymorphisms in the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/angiogenesis pathway have been implicated previously in cancer risk, prognosis and response to therapy including in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Prior esophageal adenocarcinoma studies focused on using candidate polymorphisms, limiting the discovery of novel polymorphisms. Here, we applied the tagSNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) approach to identify new VEGF pathway polymorphisms associated with esophageal adenocarcinoma prognosis and validated them in an independent cohort of esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. In 231 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients of all stages/treatment plans, 58 genetic polymorphisms (18 KDR, 7 VEGFA and 33 FLT1) selected through tagging and assessment of predicted function were genotyped. Cox-proportional hazard models adjusted for important socio-demographic and clinico-pathological factors were applied to assess the association of genetic polymorphisms with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Significantly associated polymorphisms were then validated in an independent cohort of 137 esophageal adenocarcinoma patients. Among the 231 discovery cohort patients, 86% were male, median diagnosis age was 64 years, 34% were metastatic at diagnosis and median OS and PFS were 20 and 12 months, respectively. KDR rs17709898 was found significantly associated with PFS (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR = 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.53-0.90; P = 5.9E-3). FLT1 rs3794405 and rs678714 were significantly associated with OS (aHR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.04-1.99; P = 0.03 and aHR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.01-2.24; P = 0.045, respectively). No VEGFA polymorphisms were found significantly associated with either outcome. Upon validation, FLT1 rs3794405 remained strongly associated with OS (aHR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.04-2.44; P = 0.03). FLT1 rs3794405 is significantly associated with OS in esophageal adenocarcinoma, whereby each variant allele confers a 45-60% increased risk of mortality. Validation and evaluation of this association in other cancer sites are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Neovascularización Patológica/genética , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Receptor 1 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Receptor 2 de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular/genética , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
There are very few xenograft models available for the study of esophageal (E) and gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Using a NOD/SCID model, we implanted 90 primary E and GEJ tumors resected from patients and six endoscopic biopsy specimens. Of 69 resected tumors with histologically confirmed viable adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, 22 (32%) was engrafted. One of 11 tumors, considered to have had a complete pathological response to neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation, also engrafted. Of the 23 patients whose tumors were engrafted, 65% were male; 30% were early stage while 70% were late stage; 22% received neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation; 61% were GEJ cancers. Engraftment occurred in 18/54 (33%) adenocarcinomas and 5/16 (31%) squamous cell carcinomas. Small endoscopic biopsy tissue had a 50% (3/6) engraftment rate. Of the factors analyzed, pretreatment with chemo-radiation and well/moderate differentiation showed significantly lower correlation with engraftment (P<0.05). In the subset of patients who did not receive neo-adjuvant chemo-radiation, 18/41 (44%) engrafted compared with those with pretreatment where 5/29 (17%, P=0.02) engrafted. Primary xenograft lines may be continued through 4-12 passages. Xenografts maintained similar histology and morphological characteristics with only minor variations even after multiple passaging in most instances.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Experimentales/patología , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Animales , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones SCID , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The pathogenesis of brain metastasis as a relatively rare complication of epithelial ovarian cancer is poorly understood. Some observations suggest that brain metastases from ovarian cancer are becoming more common and that ovarian cancers, which metastasize to the brain, may have a different biological pattern. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Edinburgh Ovarian Cancer Database on a cohort of patients managed at the Edinburgh Cancer Centre (UK) between 1998 and 2004. The incidence of brain metastases was compared between patients with previous treatment for early breast cancer and patients without previous treatment for early breast cancer. Baseline characteristics, the time to cancer antigen 125 relapse, the time to brain metastasis, and the radiological pattern of relapse were also compared between these patients. RESULTS: We demonstrate a higher incidence of serous histology (P = 0.02) in patients in remission from early breast cancer and that the incidence of brain metastases in this group is 11.6% compared with 1.1% in patients without prior breast cancer (relative risk = 10.5, P < 0.001). Brain metastases were clinically evident after 45.6 months in patients with previous breast cancer compared with 21 months in patients without previous breast cancer (P = 0.008). Among the patients who developed brain metastases, isolated retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence was noticed in patients in remission from early breast cancer but rarely in other patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ovarian cancer patients with a history of early breast cancer have a higher incidence of brain metastases and a different pattern of disease recurrence. We speculate that a higher incidence of breast cancer early onset mutations in patients with previous early breast cancer underlies these observed differences.