Imaging of Sacroiliac Pain: The Current State-of-the-Art.

Pain in the sacroiliac (SI) region is a common clinical manifestation, often caused by diseases involving the SI joints. This is typically due to inflammation or degenerative changes, while infections or cancer are less frequent causes. The SI joint is challenging to image accurately because of its distinct anatomical characteristics. For an accurate diagnosis, conventional radiography often needs to be supplemented with more precise methods such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT). Sacroiliitis, a common presenting feature of axial spondyloarthritis (axial SpA), manifests as bone marrow edema, erosions, sclerosis, and joint space narrowing. Septic sacroiliitis and repetitive stress injuries in sports can also cause changes resembling inflammatory sacroiliitis. Other conditions, such as osteitis condensans ilii (OCI), can mimic the radiologic characteristics of sacroiliitis. Inflammatory lesions are diagnosed by concurrent erosions, hyperostosis, and ankylosis. Ligament ossifications or mechanical stress can also result in arthritic disorders. Determining the exact diagnosis can be aided by the distribution of the lesions. Inflammatory lesions can affect any part of the articulation, including the inferior and posterior portions. Mechanical lesions, such as those seen in OCI, often occur in the anterior middle region of the joint. In cases of idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis, ligament ossification is found at the joint borders. This pictorial essay describes common SI joint problems, illustrated with multimodal imaging data. We, also, discuss strategies for selecting the best imaging modalities, along with imaging pitfalls, key points, and approaches for treating patients with suspected inflammatory back pain.

Delay in fibromyalgia diagnosis and its impact on the severity and outcome: a large cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of the diagnostic delay on fibromyalgia (FM) severity. METHODS: Data were retrospectively extracted from a large database of patients with FM belonging to the Italian Fibromyalgia Registry (IFR) residents on the Marche Region. The diagnosis of FM was formulated according to the 2016 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria. The following information was obtained: time to diagnosis [categorised in early diagnosis (ED) if FM diagnosed within one year, late diagnosis (LD) if FM diagnosed more than 1 year but less than 5 years, and very late diagnosis (VLD) if FM diagnosed over 5 years from symptoms onset], revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FASmod), and Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PDS) [consisting of the sum of Widespread Pain Index (WPI) and Symptom Severity Scale (SSS)]. RESULTS: The study included 616 FM patients (92.2% female), with a mean disease duration of 6.46 (SD 4.14) years and a mean (SD) time to diagnosis of 3.45 (2.39) years. The ED group included 169 patients, the LD 320 patients, and the VLD 127 patients. Comparing the differences among groups, a significant difference in disease severity was observed in all the clinimetric indices in increasing the time to reach the diagnosis (p=0.000001): the median PDS scores were 13.36 (interquartile range [IQR] 7.00-20.00), 16.09 (IQR 9.00-22.00), and 23.00 (IQR 18.25-26.00) for ED, LD, and VLD, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed diagnosis is associated with poorer patient outcomes, including worsening severity.

Trajectory of Change in the Severity of Symptoms in Patients with Fibromyalgia over 24 Months: Exploratory Analyses of a Combination Pharmacological Intervention.

Symptoms of fibromyalgia (FM) fluctuate and vary in severity. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) in FM patients over a 24-month period and to investigate the mediating function of pain catastrophizing subdomains in unfavorable relationships with disease severity levels in patients with FM. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 12 months, and after 24 months, using different patient-reported measures (FIQR, FASmod, PSD, and PCS) to distinguish different levels of FM disease severity. A reduction of 30% or more from baseline was considered clinically important ("markedly improved"). A multivariate analysis was performed to identify the variables predictive of an FIQR reduction. Twenty-two patients (28.6%) were classified as "markedly improved", 16 patients (20.8%) as "slightly/moderately improved", and 39 patients (50.6%) as "not improved." The FIQR, FASmod, and PSD scores were significantly reduced at 24 months. The pain magnification domain score of the PCS was the only variable predictive of worse FIQR scores (Wald coefficient: -2.94; p = 0.047). These results suggest a potential long-term therapeutic role for the PEA + ALC combination, with pain magnification being the primary predictor of poor efficacy.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Based Semi-Quantitative Methods for Rheumatoid Arthritis: From Scoring to Measurement.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that primarily affects the small joints of the hands and feet, characterized by pain, inflammation, and joint damage. In this context, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is useful to identify and monitor joint/tendon inflammation and the evolution of joint damage, playing a key role in treatment response evaluation, in addition to clinical measurements. Various methods to quantify joint inflammation and damage with MRI in RA have been developed, such as RA-MRI Score (RAMRIS), Early RA-MRI Score (ERAMRS), and Simplified RA-MRI Score (SAMIS). RAMRIS, introduced in 2002, offers an objective means to assess inflammation and damage via MRI in RA trials, encompassing findings such as synovitis, bone erosion, and edema/osteitis. Recently, an updated RAMRIS version was developed, which also includes the evaluation of joint space narrowing and tenosynovitis. The RAMRIS-5, which is a condensed RAMSIS version focusing on five hand joints only, has been proven to be a valuable resource for the semi-quantitative evaluation of RA joint damage, both in early and established disease. This narrative literature review will provide an overview of the MRI scoring systems that have been developed for the assessment of joint inflammation and structural damage in RA patients.

Low-Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity, Patient-Reported Measures and Reduced Nailfold Capillary Density Are Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis.

The aim of this paper is to identify factors associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and build an algorithm to better define this association for a personalised application in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 78 SSc patients underwent HRCT to assess ILD. Demographic, clinical and laboratory variables were collected, focusing on those associated either directly or indirectly with lung involvement. The discriminant value of each variable was determined using the operating characteristic curves (ROC) and included in a model to estimate the strength of ILD association in SSc. RESULTS: Thirty-three (42.31%) patients showed ILD on HRCT. DLco, M-Borg, GERD-Q and capillary density were significantly associated with the presence of ILD-SSc. A model including these variables had a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.697. DLco had an AUC of 0.861 (p < 0.001) with a cut-off of ≤72.3% (sensitivity 78.8%, specificity 91.1%, +LR 8.86). The m-Borg Scale showed an AUC of 0.883 (p < 0.001) with a cut-off >2 (sensitivity 84.8%, specificity 82.2%, +LR 4.77), GERD-Q had an AUC of 0.815 (p < 0.001) with a cut-off >7 (sensitivity 72.7%, specificity 86.7%, +LR 5.45). The capillary density showed an AUC of 0.815 (p < 0.001) with a cut-off of ≤4.78 (sensitivity 87.9%, specificity 68.9%, +LR 2.82). Based on the pre-test probability values, these four variables were applied to Fagan's nomogram to calculate the post-test probability of this association. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified four associated clinical factors of ILD in SSc patients. Moreover, their inclusion in an algorithm for the post-test probability, tailored to the specific patients' characteristics, significantly increases the ability to find out the presence of SSc-ILD.

Central Sensitization in Psoriatic Arthritis: Relationship With Composite Measures of Disease Activity, Functional Disability, and Health-Related Quality of Life.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of central sensitization (CS) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and its association with disease activity and patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included adults with PsA without coexisting fibromyalgia (FM). Patients underwent a clinimetric assessment to collect variables regarding disease activity, quality of life (QOL), functional ability, impact of disease, and CS. Spearman ρ was used to examine the relationship between CS Inventory (CSI) scores and other variables. A multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent contribution of each variable to the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-12) score. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven patients were enrolled. Of them, 45.2% scored a CSI ≥ 40, indicating a high probability of CS. Significant correlations were found between CSI and disease activity, as evaluated by Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis score and Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (ρ 0.587 and ρ 0.573, respectively), between CSI and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (ρ 0.607), and between CSI and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey physical component summary and mental component summary scores (ρ -0.405 and ρ -0.483, respectively). In multivariate analysis, CSI score was the principal independent variable (P < 0.001) contributing to PsAID-12 score. CONCLUSION: Patients with PsA with symptoms of CS had higher disease activity, worse functional ability, and worse QOL. The presence of CS is the major contributor in the impact of disease.

Feldenkrais awareness though movement intervention for fibromyalgia syndrome: A proof-of-concept study.

INTRODUCTION: The Feldenkrais Method® is a form of awareness through movement (ATM) aimed at improving spatial and kinesthetic awareness through verbally guided movements, in order to learn more effective actions. METHOD: The present study, a proof-of-concept, observational, non-controlled prospective study, aims at exploring the effectiveness of ATM for fibromyalgia syndrome (FM), measuring the effect by means of multi-dimensional questionnaires, administered at baseline and after 4 months of ATM activity. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight FM patients (mean age 54 years old, 2% males) participated in the study. A statistically significant improvement was found in FM-specific measures (Polysymptomatic Distress Scale, PDS) (p = 0.003) and the Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS) (p = 0.020); coherently, the Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) showed a trend in improvement after the intervention, although this improvement was not statistically significant. The logistic regression analysis found a correlation between PDS, fatigue and anxiety measures; PCS, years from diagnosis and anxiety. CONCLUSION: ATM could improve FM-specific measures and pain-related catastrophizing. Further studies are needed to identify FM subgroups in order to find personalized targets that can be used to guide treatments.

Multimodal ultrasound muscle assessment in patients with rheumatic diseases: a patient-based reliability study.

Objectives: The aim was to explore the inter-reliability of a newly developed US scanning protocol (multimodal US) for the assessment of different aspects of sarcopenia-related muscle involvement, including muscle mass, muscle quality and muscle stiffness [using point shear-wave elastography (SWE)], in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Methods: Quadriceps muscle mass (i.e. muscle thickness), muscle quality (i.e. muscle echogenicity evaluated with both a visual semi-quantitative scale and a dedicated software package for image analysis, ImageJ) and point SWE measurements were obtained by two rheumatologists (blinded to each other's evaluation) in consecutive RMD patients without previous/current myositis or neuromuscular disorders.Inter-reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Cohen's kappa (κ) for categorical variables. Results: A total of 45 RMD patients were enrolled [mean age 54.5 (16.0) years, male-to-female ratio 1:1.5, mean BMI 24.6 (4.6) kg/m2], 10 with PsA, 7 RA, 5 AS, 5 PMR, 4 SLE, 4 gout, 4 OA, 3 FM and 3 SSc. The grade of inter-rater reliability was excellent for muscle mass [ICC = 0.969 (0.953 < ICC < 0.979)]. Regarding muscle echogenicity, the agreement was substantial/almost perfect using the visual semi-quantitative scale (weighted linear = 0.793, weighted squared = 0.878) and excellent using ImageJ analysis [ICC = 0.916 (0.876 < ICC < 0.944)]. Finally, a good agreement was obtained for point SWE measurements [ICC = 0.76 (0.712 < ICC < 0.8)]. Conclusion: Multimodal US is a novel and reliable tool for the evaluation of different aspects of muscle involvement (muscle mass, muscle quality and muscle stiffness) in RMD patients.

Films for Wound Healing Fabricated Using a Solvent Casting Technique.

Wound healing is a complex process that involves restoring the structure of damaged tissues through four phases: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. Wound dressings are the most common treatment used to cover wounds, reduce infection risk and the loss of physiological fluids, and enhance wound healing. Despite there being several types of wound dressings based on different materials and fabricated through various techniques, polymeric films have been widely employed due to their biocompatibility and low immunogenicity. Furthermore, they are non-invasive, easy to apply, allow gas exchange, and can be transparent. Among different methods for designing polymeric films, solvent casting represents a reliable, preferable, and highly used technique due to its easygoing and relatively low-cost procedure compared to sophisticated methods such as spin coating, microfluidic spinning, or 3D printing. Therefore, this review focuses on the polymeric dressings obtained using this technique, emphasizing the critical manufacturing factors related to pharmaceuticals, specifically discussing the formulation variables necessary to create wound dressings that demonstrate effective performance.

The Psoriatic Arthritis 5-Thermometer Scales (PsA-5Ts): Measurement Properties of a New Multidimensional Composite Tool for the Quick Assessment of the Overall Health Status in Psoriatic Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous condition that is difficult to assess. The goal of this research was to evaluate the clinimetric properties of the Psoriatic Arthritis 5-Thermometer Scales (PsA-5Ts), a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) to measure the overall health status in PsA patients. METHODS: The PsA-5Ts were compared to composite measures of disease activity (DAPSA, PASDAS, CPDAI) and PROs (PsAID-12 and SF-36). The convergent validity was assessed through the Spearman's correlation coefficient and the discriminant validity through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, applying the Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) as an external criterion. RESULTS: The cross-sectional assessment included 155 patients. Significant high correlations were observed when comparing PsA-5Ts to composite indices of disease activity and PROs (all at significance levels of p < 0.0001). The PsA-5Ts subscales were highly significantly different in terms of MDA status (all at p < 0.0001). The PsA-5Ts had good discriminant validity like that of the DAPSA, CPDAI, PASDAS, and PsAID-12, and better than that of the SF-36, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.944 (65% CI 0.895-0.974). CONCLUSIONS: The PsA-5Ts are an easy-to-use PRO that can be integrated with disease activity indices in the assessment of PsA in daily clinical practice.

Palmitoylethanolamide and acetyl-L-carnitine act synergistically with duloxetine and pregabalin in fibromyalgia: results of a randomised controlled study.

OBJECTIVES: Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterised by a form of debilitating pain that is unresponsive to standard analgesics. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of supplementing ongoing pregabalin (PGB) and duloxetine (DLX) treatment with palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) and acetyl-L-carnitine (ALC) for 24 weeks in FM patients. METHODS: After undergoing three months of stable treatment with DLX+PGB, FM patients were randomised to continue the same treatment (Group 1) or to add PEA 600 mg b.i.d + ALC 500 mg b.i.d. (Group 2) for a further 12 weeks. Every two weeks throughout the study, cumulative disease severity was estimated using the Widespread Pain Index (WPI) as the primary outcome measure; the secondary outcomes were the fortnightly scores of the patient-completed revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) and the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status (FASmod) questionnaire. All three measures were expressed as time-integrated area under the curve (AUC) values. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty (91.5%) of the initial 142 FM patients completed the study: 68 patients in Group 1 and 62 in Group 2. Twenty-four weeks after randomisation, the Group 2 patients showed additional significant improvements in all three outcome measures. Although there was some fluctuation in both groups during the study period, the AUC values of the WPI scores steadily decreased in Group 2 (p=0.048), which also showed better outcomes in terms of the AUC values of the FIQR (p=0.033) and FASmod scores (p=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first randomised controlled study demonstrating the effectiveness of the adding on therapy of PEA+ALC to DLX+PGB in FM patients.

Determining the PASS cut-off points for the FIQR, FASmod and PSD in patients with fibromyalgia: a registry-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the cut-off values of Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) for the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR), the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Scale (FASmod), and the Polysymptomatic Distress scale (PSD) and to determine the predictors of PASS in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: FM patients belonging to the Italian Fibromyalgia Registry (IFR) completed the FIQR, the FASmod and the PSD. The PASS was assessed using a dichotomous answer. The cut-off values were obtained through the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of achieving the PASS. RESULTS: 5545 women (93.7%) and 369 males (6.3%) were included in the study. The 27.8% of patients reported an acceptable symptom state. Patients in PASS differed in all patient-reported outcome measures (p <0.001). The FIQR PASS threshold was ≤58 (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.819). The FASmod PASS threshold was ≤23 (AUC = 0.805) and the PSD PASS threshold was ≤16 (AUC = 0.773). In the pairwise AUC comparison, the discriminatory power of the FIQR PASS outperforms both FASmod PASS (p = 0.0124) and PSD PASS (p <0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that FIQR items related to memory and pain were the only predictors of PASS. CONCLUSIONS: The FIQR, FASmod, and PSD PASS cut-off points for FM patients have never been determined before. This study provides additional information to facilitate interpretation of the severity assessment scales in daily practice and clinical research related to FM patients.

Kihon Checklist validation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Italian translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and evaluation of the validity in comparison to two frailty screening tools based on the Fried phenotype and deficit accumulation model.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic test accuracy in terms of discriminant validity of the Kihon Checklist (KCL), Italian version, with respect to the Comprehensive Rheumatologic Assessment of Frailty (CRAF), and the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe Frailty Instrument (SHARE-FI) in identifying the presence of frailty in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: An Italian version of the KCL was obtained by a consensus of experts. Then, adult RA patients underwent a cross-sectional evaluation inclusive of KCL, CRAF, and SHARE-FI. The performance of the tools was determined in terms of differences in areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC-ROCs) considering the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) criteria has external gold standard. For KCL, the optimal cut-point was determined at the Youden index. RESULTS: The study included 219 RA patients. The three tools provided varying frailty prevalence percentages, from 16.0% (SHARE-FI) to 35.6% (CRAF). No scale performed better than others, according to AUC-ROCs comparisons, and when compared to the CHS criteria, all scales have an accuracy rate >80%. A KCL cut-off point of 7 resulted the optimum trade-off for sensitivity (93.3%), specificity (90.8%), with a positive likelihood ratio of 10.15. CONCLUSIONS: All the tools examined were useful and reflected the definition of frailty, however, the KCL was the most suitable since it is self-administered and might enable interventions in RA patients.

Quantification of sarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by measuring the cross-sectional area of the thigh muscles with magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: To determine the utility of cross-sectional area (CSA) measurements on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at the level of the thigh muscles, to estimate muscle mass in discriminating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with sarcopenia from those without. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive female RA patients were enrolled for this cross-sectional study. Patients were assessed for disease activity, radiological damage, handgrip strength, physical performance and for the presence of sarcopenia, identified in accordance with the EWGSOP2 criteria. A 1.5 T MRI machine was used to scan the thigh muscles. A dimensional region growth algorithm (Horos™) was used to segment the muscles CSAs (in cm2) on MR images located 25 cm above the knee joint (MRI-CSA-25). The MRI-CSA-25 was obtained by summing the CSAs of the individual muscles. MRI-CSA-25 was correlated (Pearson's r) with the other variables, and its optimal cut-off point (Youden index) for sarcopenia diagnosis was identified in relation to the EWGSOP2 criteria. RESULTS: 32 RA female patients were studied, 34.4% diagnosed as sarcopenic. The mean MRI-CSA-25 was 151.00 cm2 for patient with sarcopenia, 275.57 cm2 for patient without sarcopenia (p < 0.001). MRI-CSA-25 correlated significantly with measures of physical performance, and disease activity, but not with radiological damage or age. The MRI-CSA-25 optimal cut-off point in discriminating sarcopenic patients was identified at 182.00 cm2 (AUC-ROC = 0.894). CONCLUSION: MRI-CSA-25 can differentiate sarcopenic versus non-sarcopenic RA patients, representing an imaging biomarker of this condition.

Imaging of the peripheral nervous system in nociplastic pain: An ultrasound study in patients with fibromyalgia.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although fibromyalgia (FM) is considered a central sensitization syndrome, studies investigating peripheral nerves in this condition are not available. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the sonographic changes (ie, increased cross-sectional area [CSA]), of peripheral nerves in patients with FM compared to healthy controls. The secondary objective is to identify potential clinical correlations associated with increased CSA in patients with FM. METHODS: In this cross-sectional observational study, consecutive female patients with FM underwent sonographic assessment using a standardized scanning protocol. The CSA of seven nerves was measured bilaterally at 11 anatomic sites by an experienced sonographer. Differences in CSA of nerves were compared with those of healthy subjects by one-way analysis of variance. Patients underwent clinimetric evaluation aimed at investigating disease severity, neuropathic pain features, depression, anxiety, fatigue, and autonomic symptoms to explore the possible correlation between CSA and clinical features. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled. Differences in terms of increased CSA between patients and healthy controls were identified at multiple levels, mainly at the level of the sural nerve, vagus nerve, and sixth cervical nerve root (for all, p < .001). Sonographic findings, however, did not correlate with the clinical features explored. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with FM show higher CSA of nerves than healthy subjects. The increased CSA is most evident at the sural nerve, vagus nerve, and sixth cervical nerve root. Ultrasound, a relatively easy-to-use technique, could identify morphological changes, in peripheral nervous structures in patients with FM.

The measurement of fibromyalgia severity: converting scores between the FIQR, the PSD and the FASmod.

OBJECTIVES: The revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR) is a widely used fibromyalgia severity assessment tool that was introduced in 2009 prior to the publication of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) preliminary fibromyalgia criteria in 2010 and its revision in 2016. In 2020, the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Scale (FASmod) was published. The Polysymptomatic Distress scale (PSD) of the fibromyalgia criteria and FASmod include assessments of pain location severity and can be used for diagnosis as well as in non-fibromyalgia patients. The aim of this study is to provide equations for the conversion of the FIQR scores to PSD and FASmod as an aid to understanding and sharing fibromyalgia severity information. METHODS: 3089 patients with fibromyalgia, diagnosed according to the ACR 2010/2011 criteria and belonging to the Italian Fibromyalgia Registry completed FIQR, FASmod and PSD questionnaires. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to test the correlations between indices. The least square regression approach was used to produce predictive equations for each scale based on the remaining scales. RESULTS: FIQR was correlated with PSD (r=0.714) and FASmod (r=0.801); PSD and FASmod showed the highest correlation (r=0.897), expected since they assess the same constructs. Predictive equations showing a linear model were effective in producing mean cohort values, but individual predictions deviated substantially, precluding prediction in the individual patient. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion equations that allow for interconversion of multiple scales fibromyalgia severity assessment scales are produced. These can be useful in obtaining mean values for cohorts but are not accurate enough for use in individual patients.

Inflammaging and Frailty in Immune-Mediated Rheumatic Diseases: How to Address and Score the Issue.

Frailty is a new concept in rheumatology that can help identify people more likely to have less favorable outcomes. Sarcopenia and inflammaging can be regarded as the biological foundations of physical frailty. Frailty is becoming more widely accepted as an indicator of ageing and is linked to an increased risk of negative outcomes such as falls, injuries, and mortality. Frailty identifies a group of older adults that seem poorer and more fragile than their age-matched counterparts, despite sharing similar comorbidities, demography, sex, and age. Several studies suggest that inflammation affects immune-mediated pathways, multimorbidity, and frailty by inhibiting growth factors, increasing catabolism, and by disrupting homeostatic signaling. Frailty is more common in the community-dwelling population as people get older, ranging from 7 to 10% in those over 65 years up to 40% in those who are octogenarians. Different parameters have been validated to identify frailty. These primarily relate to two conceptual models: Fried's physical frailty phenotype and Rockwood's cumulative deficit method. Immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, and vasculitis, are leading causes of frailty in developing countries. The aim of this review was to quantitatively synthesize published literature on the prevalence of frailty in IMRDs and to summarize current evidence on the relevance and applicability of the most widely used frailty screening tools.

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of disease severity in fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore additional evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) in a large sample of subjects with fibromyalgia (FM). METHODS: Patients were consecutively enrolled for a cross-sectional assessment comprehensive of three FM-specific measures (the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [FIQR], the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status [modFAS], and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale [PDS]) and of CSI. To test the convergent validity, the Spearman's rho was used to measure the degree of correlation between the variables CSI and the FM-specific measures. To assess discriminant validity, CSI scores were grouped according to FIQR disease severity states, and differences between these groups studied with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Interpretative cutoffs were established with the interquartile reconciliation approach. RESULTS: The study included 562 FM patients, 199 (35.4%) were classified as having central sensitization syndrome (CSI ≥40). CSI was largely correlated with modFAS (ρ = 0.580; p < 0.0001), FIQR (ρ = 0.542; p < 0.0001), and PDS (ρ = 0.518; p < 0.0001). The differences between the CSI scores in accordance with the FIQR were significant (p < 0.000001). CSI cutoffs proposed for FM: 21 between remission and mild severity, 30 between mild and moderate severity, 37 between moderate and severe disease, and 51 between severe and very severe disease. CONCLUSION: The current study successfully showed additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the CSI in FM patients.

Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic tools for sarcopenia in immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs).

Sarcopenia is characterized by loss of muscle mass, altered muscle composition, fat and fibrous tissue infiltration, and abnormal innervation, especially in older individuals with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRDs). Several techniques for measuring muscle mass, strength, and performance have emerged in recent decades. The portable dynamometer and gait speed represent the most frequently used tools for the evaluation of muscle strength and physical efficiency, respectively. Aside from dual-energy, X-ray, absorptiometry, and bioelectrical impedance analysis, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques appear to have a potential role in evaluating muscle mass and composition. US and MRI have been shown to accurately identify sarcopenic biomarkers such as inflammation (edema), fatty infiltration (myosteatosis), alterations in muscle fibers, and muscular atrophy in patients with IMRDs. US is a low-cost, easy-to-use, and safe imaging method for assessing muscle mass, quality, architecture, and biomechanical function. This review summarizes the evidence for using US and MRI to assess sarcopenia.

A cross-sectional research on female workers examining the loss of productivity caused by mild, moderate and severe fibromyalgia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess (a) the impacts of fibromyalgia (FM) symptoms on patients' ability to work and (b) the relationship between FM severity states and lost productivity from the perspective of patients. METHODS: FM female patients were retrospectively evaluated for this cross-sectional study. FM severity was determined using the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQR). Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Fibromyalgia (WPAI-FM) was used to evaluate patients' employment status. Differences across FM severity states were evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square or Fisher's exact test. The Pearson's r test was performed for the correlation analysis. RESULTS: The study included 209 subjects, 64 (30.6%) had mild, 64 (30.6%) had moderate, and 81 (38.8%) had severe FM; 57.9% were working full-time, and 42.1% were working part-time. According to WPAI-FM the work productivity and activity impairment resulted: absenteeism 7.03%; presenteeism 44.35%; activity impairment 47.24%; overall work productivity loss 58.23%. Disease severity was associated with decreased work productivity. Presenteeism, overall work productivity loss, and activity impairment demonstrated significant correlations with FIQR and PainDETECT Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: FM severity is associated to a reduced job productivity. Early identification and treatment of FM may provide a window of opportunity for job preservation.