Impact of bariatric surgery on maternal gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in women with obesity: A population-based cohort study from Qatar.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is performed in obese women of reproductive age to help achieve a healthy prepregnancy weight to reduce the complications associated with obesity in pregnancy. However, these procedures can impact maternal nutrition and gestational weight gain (GWG). This study evaluates the maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with prepregnancy bariatric surgery and determines the impact on GWG. METHODS: This study included 24 weeks gestation or more pregnancies, with a maternal BMI at delivery of 30 kg/m2 or more. It was categorized into two groups based on whether they had prepregnancy bariatric surgery (exposed) or not (unexposed). The outcomes included gestational diabetes (GDM), gestational hypertension (GHT), mode of delivery, preterm birth (PTB), GWG, birthweight (BW) and customized BW centiles, low birthweight (LBW), congenital anomalies, and admission to the neonatal intensive unit (NICU). Categorization was also done based on the adequacy of GWG (low, adequate, and excess). RESULTS: A total of 8,323 women were included in the study, 194 of whom had prepregnancy bariatric surgery. After adjusting for confounders, the exposed group had a mean GWG 1.33 kg higher than the unexposed group (95% CI 0.55-2.13, p = 0.001). The exposed group had higher odds of PTB (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.16-2.74, p = 0.008), CD (aOR 6.52, 95% CI 4.28-9.93, p < 0.001), LBW in term babies (aOR 2.60, 95% CI 1.34-5.03, p = 0.005), congenital anomalies (aOR 2.64, 95% CI 1.21-5.77, p = 0.015), low APGAR score (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.12-12.5, p = 0.032) and 80.4g lesser birthweight (95% CI -153.0, -5.8; p = 0.034). More women in the low GWG category had LBW babies (28.6% versus 6.7% in the high GWG group, p = 0.033), lowest mean BW and median BW centiles (2775 grams versus 3289 grams in the high GWG group, p = 0.004 and 57.5% versus 74.5% in the high GWG group, p = 0.040, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study highlight differences in perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, low birth weight, congenital anomalies, cesarean deliveries, and gestational weight gain between post-bariatric women and controls. These insights can help inform the planning and provision of appropriate maternity care to enhance patient safety and outcomes. The results of this study can also guide the counseling of reproductive age-group women who are planning to undergo bariatric surgery.

Once a cesarean, always a cesarean? Obstetricians' approach to counseling for trial of labor after cesarean.

BACKGROUND: Despite no observed increase in obstetrical complication rates, cesarean delivery rates are increasing worldwide. A significant proportion of planned cesarean deliveries are performed for patients with 1 previous cesarean delivery who opt for an elective repeat cesarean delivery rather than a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. The facilitation of informed decision-making by healthcare professionals may influence patient choices and could affect the trial of labor after cesarean delivery uptake rates. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess how obstetricians in the Middle Eastern region approach counseling of patients with a previous cesarean delivery concerning birth choices in the current pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective survey-based study. An online survey of obstetricians in the 2 largest state maternity hospitals in Doha, Qatar, was conducted with participation offered voluntarily. The survey gathered background demographic data and investigated the obstetrician's awareness of factors that could influence the success of the trial of labor after cesarean delivery and the obstetrician's approach to counseling women. The data collected were transferred to SPSS (version 23.0; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) for analysis. Descriptive statistics were performed, and nonparametric analysis of continuous variables and chi-squared analysis of discrete variables were cross-referenced with gender, length of time of specialist qualification, and personal family experience of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Most respondents had training in the Middle East and generally practiced obstetrics in this region, and >80% of the respondents had more than 5 years of experience in the specialty. The obstetrician's gender or length of experience did not significantly influence the attitude to the assessment of risks and benefits. Furthermore, there was little consensus among the group about factors that were the most and the least important for the success of the trial of labor after cesarean delivery. The group emphasized the importance of the patient's wishes in choosing the mode of birth. If a relative contraindication to the trial of labor after cesarean delivery was present, half of the obstetricians would emphasize the various negatives of the approach to the patient during counseling. Most participants favored a dedicated trial of labor after cesarean delivery clinic to reduce cesarean delivery rates. The participants did not feel that supporting the trial of labor after cesarean delivery would be improved with legal department support. CONCLUSION: Obstetricians had different approaches in the counseling for trial of labor after cesarean delivery, and this can influence the patients' acceptance of the trial of labor after cesarean delivery, thereby affecting cesarean delivery rates.

To prescribe or not to prescribe? Perceptions of radiation therapists prescribing medications for common radiation therapy side effects.

BACKGROUND: During radiation therapy treatments patients may require medications to manage radiation toxicities. Since patients are assessed daily by Radiation Therapists (RTs) it would be optimal and timely for patients to receive medication prescriptions for relief of common radiation side effects from the RTs. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the perceptions that RTs and Radiation Oncologists (ROs) have of frontline treatment RTs prescribing medications to patients for treatment-related side effects. METHODS: A qualitative and quantitative survey consisting of twenty-five questions on a five-point Likert scale, one open-ended question, and three demographic questions was designed. While the survey sought to examine the perceptions that RTs and ROs have of RTs prescribing medications, the survey also proposed eight different medications that RTs could potentially prescribe. The medications that were proposed are commonly prescribed to radiation therapy patients and included anti-emetic, topical anti-bacterial, hydrocortisone cream, topical anaesthetic, anti-diarrheal, anti-spasmodic, urinary analgesic and anti-fungal medications. After the survey was approved by the Research Ethics Board, RTs and ROs at a large, academic cancer centre were invited to complete the survey. To analyze the survey results, several statistical tests were performed separately for the RTs' surveys and the ROs' surveys. The chi-squared test was used to determine if the sample RT and RO populations were representative of the actual RT and RO populations (p < 0.05). Additionally, the Sign test for medians was used to analyze statistically the responses to the Likert scale questions (p < 0.05), while the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the responses to the Likert scale questions across the demographic groups identified in the demographic questions (p < 0.05). RESULTS: The response rate was 34% (31/90) for the RT population and 42% (10/24) for the RO population. The statistical analysis of the RT population's surveys showed that the majority of the RTs shared positive perceptions towards having RTs prescribe medications, while some respondents highlighted negative perceptions in the open-ended qualitative question. The majority of the RTs agreed that RTs should prescribe five of the eight proposed medications, excluding anti-spasmodic, urinary analgesic, and anti-fungal medications. In contrast to the RTs, there was no statistically significant consensus from the ROs on RTs prescribing medications. Furthermore, the ROs had varying opinions on RTs prescribing the eight proposed medications. CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size in this study was small, the results from the RT population's surveys supported RTs prescribing medications. The positive results from the RTs and the equivocal response from the ROs suggest that future research should be conducted. Additionally, a future pilot study could be implemented where RTs prescribe one or more of the five medications that were supported to prescribe by the RTs. By having RTs prescribe medications to patients in a pilot study, the effectiveness on patient care could be measured.

Obstetric violence: Comparing medical student perceptions in India and the UK.

OBJECTIVE(S): Obstetric Violence refers to professional deficiencies in maternity care, which can occur in both low and high resource settings. Examples include non-dignified care, lack of respect when giving care, discrimination and abandonment of care. The objective of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes towards obstetric violence in a cohort of medical students in India and the UK. STUDY DESIGN: An online survey was sent to 240 UK and 280 Indian medical students. This incorporated a video showing a dramatized scenario of obstetric violence. The survey assessed participant's demographics and prior knowledge of obstetric violence. Participants scored their perceptions of eight behaviours in the video on visual analogue scales. Participants were asked to reflect on their own practice and score this. Comparisons of survey responses between UK and Indian participants were made using chi squared/Student's t-test. RESULTS: 62 Indian medical students and 58 UK medical students completed the survey. Indian medical students were significantly more likely to be male (p < 0.001). 26 % of UK participants had previously heard the term obstetric violence, compared to 34 % of Indian participants (p = 0.15). Both were able to correctly define obstetric violence at similar rates (32 % versus 34 %). Indian medical students were significantly less critical (p < 0.001) of all eight scored behaviours in the video of obstetric violence compared to their UK counterparts. UK medical students were significantly less likely to agree that the video had changed their perception on how teams should behave and act in this context (p < 0.001). 90 % of UK participants and 38 % of Indian participants had received training in professional behaviours. 14 % of UK participants had seen examples of obstetric violence in clinical practice compared to 49 % of Indian participants. CONCLUSIONS: UK and Indian medical students were able to identify behaviours associated with obstetric violence, although the majority were previously unaware of the term. Indian medical students in this study were less critical of obstetric violence in the video, which may be because of cultural reasons, greater numbers of male students, greater exposure to obstetric violence or less training on professional behaviours. Standardised training to prevent obstetric violence should be part of undergraduate medical training internationally.

Impact of changing gloves during cesarean section on postoperative infective complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The cesarean section rate around the world, currently estimated at 21.1%, continues to increase. Women who undergo a cesarean section sustain a seven- to ten-fold greater risk of infective morbidity compared with those who deliver vaginally. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We aimed to assess the impact of changing gloves intraoperatively on post-cesarean section infective morbidity (PROSPERO CRD42018110529). MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, WHO Global Index Medicus, and Cochrane Central were searched for randomized controlled trials until June 2020. Published randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of glove changing during cesarean section on infective complications were considered eligible for the review. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed the risk of bias, and extracted data about interventions and adverse maternal outcomes. Dichotomous variables were presented and included in the meta-analyses as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach in alignment with the recommendations from the Cochrane Review Group. RESULTS: We identified seven randomized controlled trials reporting data over 1948 women. Changing gloves during a cesarean section was associated with a statistically significantly lower incidence of wound infective complications (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.65, p < 0.0001; GRADE moderate quality evidence). This intervention seemed to be effective only if performed after delivery of the placenta. No significant difference was seen in the incidence of endometritis (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.20, p = 0.74; GRADE moderate quality evidence) and/or febrile morbidity (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.30-1.81, p = 0.50; GRADE moderate quality evidence), regardless of the timing of the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Changing gloves after delivery of the placenta during a cesarean section is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of post-surgical wound complications compared with keeping the same gloves throughout the whole surgery. However, an adequately powered study to assess the limitations and cost-effectiveness of the intervention is needed before this recommendation can be translated into current clinical practice.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the perinatal mental health of women.

Objectives The physical health impact of the coronavirus disease infection (COVID-19) has received attention worldwide; however, data around the psychological impact of the pandemic is still emerging and little has been reported on psychological effects among vulnerable groups. This study was undertaken with the aim of studying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related restrictions on perinatal mental health among women in Qatar. Methods A cross- sectional survey of women accessing maternity services in Qatar was carried out during the months of June and July 2020 at the local peak of the pandemic. Background data including relevant demographic details, pregnancy and mental health history, concerns, as well as helpful stress-reducing factors reported by women was collected. Depression and anxiety symptomatology was studied using the Patient Health Questionnaire Anxiety-Depression Scale (PHQ-ADS). Results The survey results revealed a high prevalence of anxiety and Depressive symptomatology (34.4 and 39.2% respectively), based on PHQ-ADS scoring. These rates appeared much higher than the reported pre-pandemic prevalence and were not affected by occupation, previous mental health problems or pregnancy complications. Women's most commonly reported concerns as well as coping factors are discussed. Conclusions Results indicate a marked increase in anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, among pregnant and puerperal individuals, who constitute a vulnerable group with respect to mental health morbidity. These findings can be used to inform public health interventions, among which, consideration should be given to routine mental health screening of vulnerable groups during major health crises.

Antenatal survey of women's birthing choices in Qatar.

Objectives Attitudes towards labour care and women's choices for their preferred mode of delivery are documented in studies from the around the world, however less is known about women's birth choices in the Middle East. This study was designed with the aim of exploring beliefs and attitudes in this region. Methods Voluntary participation in an ethics-approved survey was offered to pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic at Sidra Medicine from August 2018 to January 2019 with no exclusion criteria. Results Of the 346 respondents, 58.1% were Arabic and the remainder expatriates. This group composition allowed comparison between women native and non-native to the Gulf region. Arabic and non-Arabic women differed significantly in previous birth experiences: the Arabs had had more doctor-led deliveries (45 vs. 34%), epidurals (56.6 vs. 45%) and episiotomies (65.7 vs. 54%). 70.2% of the respondents chose a normal delivery as their preferred birth mode though a smaller majority of the Arabic subgroup did (63.2 %). 60.4% preferred delivery by doctors and longer hospital stays (47.6), more so Arabic participants (64.7 and 68.6 %). Significantly less Arabs, would choose husbands as birth partners (51.2 vs. 86.2%) and more expressed a gender preference for doctors. Other group choices are presented. Conclusions Though women in this region made comparable choices about mode of delivery as their Western counterparts, they demonstrated an expectation of a culturally distinct and more medicalized approach to care in labour. The findings highlight the need for further studies to inform regional obstetric care and health education interventions as well as tailoring maternity care services.

Pre-culture of mesenchymal stem cells within RGD-modified hyaluronic acid hydrogel improves their resilience to ischaemic conditions.

The incorporation of the RGD peptide (arginine-glycine-aspartate) into biomaterials has been proposed to promote cell adhesion to the matrix, which can influence and control cell behaviour and function. While many studies have utilised RGD modified biomaterials for cell delivery, few have examined its effect under the condition of reduced oxygen and nutrients, as found at ischaemic injury sites. Here, we systematically examine the effect of RGD on hMSCs in hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogel under standard and ischaemic culture conditions, to elucidate under what conditions RGD has beneficial effects over unmodified HA and its effectiveness in improving cell viability. Results demonstrate that under standard culture conditions, RGD significantly increased hMSC spreading and the release of vascular endothelial factor-1 (VEGF) and monocyte chemoattractant factor-1 (MCP-1), compared to unmodified HA hydrogel. As adhesion is known to influence cell survival, we hypothesised that cells in RGD hydrogels would exhibit increased cell viability under ischaemic culture conditions. However, results demonstrate that cell viability and protein release was comparable in both RGD modified and unmodified HA hydrogels. Confocal imaging revealed cellular morphology indicative of weak cell adhesion. Subsequent investigations found that RGD was could exert positive effects on encapsulated cells under ischaemic conditions but only if hMSCs were pre-cultured under standard conditions to allow strong adhesion to RGD before exposure. Together, these results provide novel insight into the value of RGD introduction and suggest that the adhesion of hMSCs to RGD prior to delivery could improve survival and function at ischaemic injury sites. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The development of a biomaterial scaffold capable of maintaining cell viability while promoting cell function is a major research goal in the field of cardiac tissue engineering. This study confirms the suitability of a modified HA hydrogel whereby stem cells in the modified hydrogel showed significantly greater cell spreading and protein secretion compared to cells in the unmodified HA hydrogel. A pre-culture period allowing strong adhesion of the cells to the modified hydrogel was shown to improve cell survival under conditions that mimic the myocardium post-MI. This finding may have a significant impact on the use and timelines of modifications to improve stem cell survival in harsh environments like the injured heart.

Stillbirth: Perceptions among hospital staff in the Middle East and the UK.

Objectives Stillbirth is an important and yet relatively unacknowledged public health concern in many parts of the world. Public awareness of stillbirth and its potentially modifiable risk factors is a prerequisite to planning prevention measures. Cultural and regional differences may play an important role in awareness and attitudes to stillbirth prevention. The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the awareness of stillbirth among hospital staff in Qatar and the UK, representing two culturally different regions. Study design An online population survey for anonymous completion was sent to the hospital email accounts of all grades of staff (clinical and non-clinical) at two hospitals in Qatar and one tertiary hospital Trust in the UK. The survey was used to gather information on the participants' demographic background, the experience of stillbirth, knowledge of stillbirth, awareness of information and support sources, as well as attitude towards investigation and litigation. Data were analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics (Chi-Square test and Fisher's exact test). Results 1002 respondents completed the survey, including 349 in the Qatar group and 653 in the UK group. There were significant differences in group demographics in terms of language, religion, gender, nationality and experience of stillbirth. The groups also differed significantly in the knowledge of stillbirth, its incidence and risk factors. The two groups took different views on apportioning blame on healthcare services in cases of stillbirth. The Qatar group showed significantly less awareness of available support organisations and relied significantly more on online sources of information for stillbirths (p < 0.001). Conclusions This comparative study demonstrated significant differences between the two culturally distinct regions in the awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards stillbirths. The complex cultural and other factors that may be contributory should be further studied. The results highlight the need for increasing public awareness around stillbirth as part of effective prevention strategies.

Obstetric violence: Clinical staff perceptions from a video of simulated practice.

OBJECTIVES: Obstetric Violence refers to professional deficiencies in maternity care. Examples include non-dignified care, discrimination and abandonment of care. Obstetric violence has been described in both low and high resource settings. The objective of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes towards obstetric violence in a cohort of multinational obstetric nursing/midwifery staff and obstetricians at a private maternity hospital in Qatar. STUDY DESIGN: An online survey for anonymous completion was sent to the hospital email accounts of obstetric nursing/midwifery staff and obstetricians at Sidra Medicine (n = 640). The survey incorporated a video showing a dramatized scenario of obstetric violence. The survey assessed the participant's demographics and knowledge of the term obstetric violence. The participants scored their perceptions on the behaviors in the video using a visual analogue scale. The participants were then asked to reflect on their own practice. Comparisons of the survey responses were made between both doctors and nursing/midiwfery staff members using student's t-test. RESULTS: 50 obstetricians and 167 obstetric nursing/midwifery staff fully completed the survey. Fifty two percent had previously heard of the term obstetric violence, and 48% could define it correctly. 136 (63%) had witnessed obstetric violence at some point in their career. Significant differences were seen when each professional group was asked to report on the behavior of the opposite professional team as depicted in the video (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001). Doctors completing the survey were also more critical of the doctors-in-training than were the midwifery/nursing staff (p = 0.06). Obstetricians and nursing/midiwfery responders identified patient dignity, privacy and patient-centred care as the leading professional deficiencies seen in the video. Obstetricians were significantly less likely to change their perceptions of how a care team should interact with a patient compared to the obstetric nursing/midwifery group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This questionnaire study demonstrates that the majority of staff in this cohort were aware of obstetric violence and able to identify negative behaviours in the video and then reflect on how this impacts care they provide. Further studies are needed to identify ways in which obstetric violence can be prevented in both low resource and high resource settings.

An analysis of demographic and pregnancy outcome data to explain non-attendance for postpartum glucose testing in women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Why are patients missing follow-up?

OBJECTIVES: To identify significant differences in the demographic and pregnancy factors for women with gestational diabetes mellitus who attended or failed to attend for postpartum glucose testing. STUDY DESIGN: A database of 1052 patients with gestational diabetes mellitus was reviewed. The sample was divided into those who attended for postpartum glucose testing and those who did not. Demographic and obstetric outcomes for the two groups were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-four per cent of patients who did not attend for postpartum glucose testing were in the two most deprived quintiles. Smokers, unemployed, younger women, those of higher parity and those who did not breast feed were less likely to attend. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to attend for postpartum glucose testing is associated with demographic factors reflective of deprivation. The opportunity to afford lifestyle changes and diabetes screening in these groups of women has been missed. Targeted patient education and accessible postpartum testing may improve compliance.

Accuracy of Dose Calculation for Hemibody Treatments at Extended Distance Using a Commercial Treatment Planning System.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of monitor units (MUs) calculation for extended distance hemibody (HB) treatments in Pinnacle, a commercial treatment planning system. The agreement between planning and delivery of low-dose radiation therapy (LD-RT) was assessed with direct comparison to expected doses and tabulated total body irradiation (TBI) calculations. Studies over the past decades indicate that LD-RT has strong potential to be an effective treatment modality for cancer patients with minimal toxicities. This physics-based study aims to provide sufficient conclusions required for prospective clinical studies involving HB irradiation regimes. Specifically, this study may provide reassurance of MU calculation in the Pinnacle system for an upcoming trial regarding nontargeted LD-RT for recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS: Water phantom: A plan was created in Pinnacle to deliver 100 cGy to a water phantom with an ion chamber mount. A percent depth dose was obtained. Electrometer readings were recorded with each irradiation of 400 MUs at varying ion chamber depths at extended distance. A percent depth dose was created from tabulated data. Anthropomorphic phantom: A parallel opposed pair plan was created in Pinnacle to deliver 150 cGy over 10 fractions to the umbilicus of the phantom at 4 m extended source-to-surface distance. The MUs required to deliver 150 cGy, as per Pinnacle were delivered to the phantom using 6 MV photons. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD), used to measure exposure using light-emitting crystals, were placed along six reference locations (lung, mid-T-spine, abdomen, mid-pelvis, thigh, and mid-abdomen) on the phantom. TLD measurements were then compared with the Pinnacle-derived ROI mean doses. For experiment 2, TBI calculation factors were used to determine the required MUs to deliver 150 cGy to the prescription (Rx) point. The calculated MUs were delivered, and TLD readings were recorded to compare the level of agreement of using TBI calculations for HB treatments. RESULTS: Water phantom: Pinnacle did not accurately estimate dmax at extended distance; however, it did accurately estimate the dose past dmax. Anthropomorphic phantom: A 10% variation to expected dose was deemed significant. Both Pinnacle and TBI calculations were accurate methods of planning HB LD-RT treatment, with insignificant difference. Pinnacle's overall average variation across ROIs was borderline significant at 12.1%. CONCLUSION: At extended source-to-surface distance, Pinnacle inaccurately estimated the entrance dose and dmax. Anthropomorphic phantom studies indicated borderline significant variation, as per the implemented 10% limit. TBI calculations presented similar conclusions. For purposes of HB LD-RT, a borderline 10% variation will have insignificant impact to the patient's ability to tolerate treatment. Trial-eligible prostate cancer patients are currently being treated for HB LD-RT at the Juravinski Cancer Centre.

Using videos in a smartphone app logbook to aid obstetricians and gynaecologists with reflection following critical events.

Introduction: Reflection is essential for continuous professional development. Many opportunities to reflect during training in obstetrics and gynaecology are not utilised. A Smartphone App (Healthcare Supervision Logbook), allows doctors training in obstetrics and gynaecology to view videos to aid reflection. The App incorporates a comprehensive logbook of practical skills. A self-facilitated reflective process, prompted by offering the viewing of a video when logging an event such as a shoulder dystocia, has been integrated into the logbook. The objective of this study was to evaluate how this function aids reflection. Methods: Forty doctors training in obstetrics and gynaecology undertook a shoulder dystocia drill as part of a mock examination. After completing the drill, participants scored their performance on a proforma, before watching a video of simulated standard management for shoulder dystocia on a Smartphone. Participants then re-scored themselves before completing a survey. This assessed their agreement with three statements on a five-point Likert scale. Results: 50% of participants marked themselves lower after watching the video. 100% agreed or strongly agreed that watching the video helped them reflect on the shoulder dystocia drill. 80% agreed or strongly agreed that they would feel more prepared to deal with shoulder dystocia as a result of using the video to reflect. 93% agreed or strongly agreed that they would be willing to use a Smartphone App with videos to aid reflection following critical events. Student's t test showed that viewing the standardised video clip on the App resulted in a significant down-marking (P<0.0005). Conclusions: Many emergency scenarios in obstetrics and gynaecology unfold quickly and are rapidly resolved, doctors-in-training need to use opportunities for self-directed reflection. Using the video self-reflection function integrated into Healthcare Supervision Logbook Smartphone App could help to prompt this process, which could be utilised in other specialities and disciplines.

The potential value of surrogate performance markers at caesarean section for the assessment of surgical competence.

OBJECTIVES: We hypothsised that surrogate markers of competence (procedure time and estimated surgical blood loss) could be of value when assessing competence for trainees learning to undertake lower segment caesarean section (LSCS). The study aim was to investigate differences in surrogate markers of surgical competence at LSCS between different training grades of primary surgeon and for different grades of surgical assistant; to assess the potential value of using these surrogate markers in overall assessments of surgical competence. STUDY DESIGN: Operating records for elective LSCS were reviewed from January 2007 to January 2015. Uncomplicated LSCS where a junior trainee (ST2/ST3) or a senior trainee (ST6+) was the primary surgeon were included. Inclusion criteria were LSCS with body mass index less than 35, singleton pregnancy, greater than 34 weeks' gestation, no more than one previous caesarean section and no low-lying placenta. Procedure time, estimated blood loss and the effect of the grade of surgical assistant (consultant or trainee) on these were compared overall for all surgeons at ST2 level, ST3 level and senior level (ST6+) using Student's t test and effect size calculation (Cohen test). RESULTS: During the study period 3099 uncomplicated LSCS were performed by 60 trainees: 1367 by ST2, 1085 by ST3 and 646 by senior trainees (ST6+). Mean procedure times and recorded estimated blood loss decreased significantly for each level of training (p < 0.05). The degree of experience of the surgical assistant was also associated with reduced procedure times and blood loss, this was significant for trainees in ST2 when assisted by a consultant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Training progression is associated with a reduction in procedure time and estimated blood loss, which are both surrogate markers of competence at LSCS. Current objective structured assessments of technical competence for trainees (OSATS) do not take these metrics into account when assessing performance. An enhanced assessment of trainees undertaking LSCS is suggested, reviewing both objective structured assessments of technical performance (OSATS) and surrogate markers of performance recorded in a surgical logbook to provide a more comprehensive assessment of overall competence.

Pain Palliation Using Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Pain is a common symptom for patients with pancreatic cancer and is often treated using palliative radiation therapy. Standard palliative dose regimes typically consist of 2000 cGy to 3000 cGy in 5 to 10 fractions (fx). With the recent advancements in radiation dosimetric planning and delivery, the Juravinski Cancer Centre in Hamilton, Ontario, offers a hypofractionated dose of 2500 cGy in 5 fx for the improvement of pain and tumour control in selected pancreatic cancer patients. This project reviews the safety and efficacy of this prescription. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 24 patients diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer was conducted. Patient data were collected using in-house medical record systems including MOSAIQ, Meditech, and Centricity. Nonparametric data analysis tests were conducted using Minitab17. RESULTS: Nineteen of 24 patients (79%) reported a decrease in pain levels following radiation and 13 of 18 (72%) showed good local control of the tumour on a follow-up CT scan. Around 30% of patients reported nausea and vomiting and fatigue. Only 13% reported diarrhea and 8% reported constipation. Twenty-one percent reported pain flares. All patients were able to finish the entire treatment without pauses or delays. CONCLUSION: A palliative radiotherapy dose regime of 2500 cGy/5 fx demonstrates a potential for the effective control of pain with limited acute toxicities in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. This study aims to indicate the need for further prospective research comparing this regime to other standard treatments in order to determine which is most beneficial for the patient.

Preferences in Learning Styles and Modes of Information Delivery in Patients Receiving First-Day Education for Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to determine levels of patient satisfaction with current first-day teaching practices at a large, academic Canadian Radiation Therapy Department. A secondary objective was to investigate patient preferences in learning styles and modes of information delivery. METHODS: A literature review was conducted on learning styles, modes of information delivery, and patient education in radiation therapy. Based on this review, a quantitative survey was designed to evaluate patient preferences. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were generated to select participants. The study population included 21 patients with prostate cancer and 24 patients with breast cancer. The surveys were distributed for a 2-week period. The Sign Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The results revealed that patients significantly disagreed with the use of group sessions and strongly agreed with sit-down, one-on-one sessions and the use of supporting print material. Patients agreed with the use of a combination of teaching methods. Male participants more frequently strongly agreed with the use of videos to support educational practices. Significant results were found on preference for visual and kinesthetic learning. Overall, participants agreed that teaching sessions reduced anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapists are encouraged to continue with current teaching practices since patients reported high levels of satisfaction. The results of this study indicate that a combination of teaching methods including visual aids and videos for male patients may be of benefit. Therefore, to further strengthen teaching sessions, the use of a multimedia tool can be investigated in the future.

12-hour Shifts for Radiation Therapists.

BACKGROUND: In Canada, Radiation Therapy program hours have ranged between 8 and 10 hours a day. Some centres have an option of a 4-day, 10-hour-day workweek. In 2012, Cancer Care Ontario released their Radiation Treatment Capital Investment Strategy. In this, they mandated that in order to maximize the use of current infrastructure, cancer centres will need to be operational for 12 hours in the future. This strategy was supported by a cost-benefit analysis. OBJECTIVE: Currently, Ontario Radiation Therapy managers are developing a 12-hour staffing model. The objective of this study was to determine radiation therapists' (RTs) perceptions on 12-hour shifts. METHODS: A survey, both quantitative and qualitative, was developed based on a comprehensive review of the current literature. The survey was distributed to 126 RTs at the Juravinski Cancer Centre and the Walker Family Cancer Centre. There were 48 respondents to the survey. Data were analyzed using the Sign Test and Kruskal-Wallis test to determine the difference from the null hypothesis (neutral). RESULTS: The results revealed that RTs have a neutral interest in working 12-hour shifts and that there is a greater number of recognized disadvantages and concerns associated with 12-hour shifts than benefits. Although the extra days off are desired, burnout, scheduling, poor quality of life outside of work, and the challenges with operating such a system with multiple departments seem to have a greater impact on the opinions of RTs. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, further research on staffing models, the incorporation of other departments, and an arrangement of sufficient breaks to prevent fatigue are needed to make 12-hour shifts a more attractive and feasible option to RTs.

The results of a survey highlighting issues with feedback on medical training in the United Kingdom and how a Smartphone App could provide a solution.

BACKGROUND: Feedback drives learning in medical education. Healthcare Supervision Logbook (HSL) is a Smartphone App developed at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals for providing feedback on medical training, from both a trainee's and a supervisor's perspective. In order to establish a mandate for the role of HSL in clinical practice, a large survey was carried out. METHODS: Two surveys (one for doctors undertaking specialty training and a second for consultants supervising their training) were designed. The survey for doctors-in-training was distributed to all specialty trainees in the South and West localities of the Health Education Yorkshire and the Humber UK region. The survey for supervisors was distributed to all consultants involved in educational and clinical supervision of specialty trainees at Sheffield Teaching Hospitals. RESULTS: The results confirm that specialty trainees provide feedback on their training infrequently-66 % do so only annually. 96 % of the specialty trainees owned a Smartphone and 45 % said that they would be willing to use a Smartphone App to provide daily feedback on the clinical and educational supervision they receive. Consultant supervisors do not receive regular feedback on the educational and clinical supervision they provide to trainees-56 % said they never received such feedback and 33 % said it was only on an annual basis. 86 % of consultants surveyed owned a Smartphone and 41 % said they would be willing to use a Smartphone App to provide feedback on the performance of trainees they were supervising. CONCLUSIONS: Feedback on medical training is recorded by specialty trainees infrequently and consultants providing educational and clinical supervision often do not receive any feedback on their performance in this area. HSL is a simple, quick and efficient way to collect and collate feedback on medical training to improve this situation. Good support and education needs to be provided when implementing this new technology.