Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 16 de 16
Filtrar
1.
J Pharm Pract ; : 8971900231198926, 2023 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37655622

RESUMEN

Background: Career planning is important to student pharmacists and pharmacy schools due to slower job growth for pharmacists over the last decade. Understanding students' career interests can help colleges and schools of pharmacy develop targeted career planning, as well as meaningful curricular and co-curricular activities. Objectives: This study aims to describe the career path interests of two doctor of pharmacy cohorts in each professional year (P1 through P4) during the 2019-2020 and 2020-2021 academic years. Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional survey study conducted at an Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education accredited college of pharmacy in the United States. Students were surveyed regarding their career interests in a mentorship program. Using frequencies and proportions we reported the pattern of students' career interests. Results: The top careers most frequently selected by students in the 2019-2020 cohort as their first choice were hospital (21.4% of P1s, 17.4% of P3s) and community (24.6% of P2s, 24.3% of P4s). Those career paths for the 2020-2021 cohort were hospital (21.4% of P1s), clinical specialty (19.2% of P2s, 21.9% of P4s), and community (22.9% of P3s). In both cohorts and all professional program years, students selected a broad range of first choice career interests and even broader range when indicating top 3 careers of interest. Conclusion: Overall, the most frequently selected career path interests were hospital, community, clinical specialty, and ambulatory care. However, there was broad variability in the career interests, accounting for a third to half of the students with interests different than the majority.

2.
Endocr Pract ; 29(6): 448-455, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898528

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Using supervised machine learning algorithms (SMLAs), we built models to predict the probability of type 1 diabetes mellitus patients on insulin pump therapy for meeting insulin pump self-management behavioral (IPSMB) criteria and achieving good glycemic response within 6 months. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective chart review of 100 adult type 1 diabetes mellitus patients on insulin pump therapy (≥6 months). Three SMLAs were deployed: multivariable logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and K-nearest neighbor (k-NN); validated using repeated three-fold cross-validation. Performance metrics included area under the curve-Receiver of characteristics for discrimination and Brier scores for calibration. RESULTS: Variables predictive of adherence with IPSMB criteria were baseline hemoglobin A1c, continuous glucose monitoring, and sex. The models had comparable discriminatory power (LR = 0.74; RF = 0.74; k-NN = 0.72), with the RF model showing better calibration (Brier = 0.151). Predictors of the good glycemic response included baseline hemoglobin A1c, entering carbohydrates, and following the recommended bolus dose, with models comparable in discriminatory power (LR = 0.81, RF = 0.80, k-NN = 0.78) but the RF model being better calibrated (Brier = 0.099). CONCLUSION: These proof-of-concept analyses demonstrate the feasibility of using SMLAs to develop clinically relevant predictive models of adherence with IPSMB criteria and glycemic control within 6 months. Subject to further study, nonlinear prediction models may perform better.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Insulinas , Adulto , Humanos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada , Estudios Retrospectivos , Control Glucémico , Autocuidado , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Glucemia , Aprendizaje Automático , Aprendizaje Automático Supervisado , Algoritmos , Insulinas/uso terapéutico
3.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 14(8): 982-989, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36055707

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The significance of diabetes self-management and recent advances in diabetes medications call for healthcare professionals' preparedness in educating patients. This study assessed correlations between student pharmacists' confidence and knowledge of diabetes self-management skills. METHODS: An online questionnaire was administered to third-year student pharmacists at one United States college of pharmacy. Students indicated their level of agreement (strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree) with nine confidence items and identified the correct multiple-choice response for nine knowledge items. Correlations between confidence and knowledge scores were assessed using simple linear regression, logistic regression, and Spearman rank (Rho) test. RESULTS: Forty-five students completed the questionnaire. The majority agreed/strongly agreed that they were confident in their knowledge for eight of the nine confidence items. The majority correctly answered six of the nine knowledge items. No associations were identified between confidence and knowledge scores in the linear regression (beta scaled = 0.25) or Spearman's correlation test (r = 0.294). In the logistic regression model, confidence and knowledge scores were associated positively for three domains: glucose meter use (odds ratio [OR] = 4.88), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use (OR = 4.23) and hyperglycemia treatment (OR = 3.33); confidence and knowledge scores were associated negatively with one domain: insulin syringe administration (OR = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no overall association between confidence and knowledge scores in third-year student pharmacists' basic diabetes self-management skills, although there were significant associations with four specific domains. Student pharmacists may require additional training to improve their diabetes self-management skills.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Educación en Farmacia , Automanejo , Estudiantes de Farmacia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Farmacéuticos , Estados Unidos
4.
J Pharm Pract ; 35(4): 617-625, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33736528

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The pharmacy profession has experienced dramatic shifts in scopes of practice, services offered, and employment opportunities over the last couple decades. At the same time, the number of students graduating from pharmacy school each year has steadily increased. The combined effect of these factors is a tightening labor market. Identification of potential knowledge and skill deficits in the applicant pool will create opportunity for pharmacists to tailor their personal development and educators to design content to address contemporary needs. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the current pharmacist pool meets employment needs in Arizona with respect to specific skills and knowledge. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey design, Arizona licensed pharmacists were asked to provide their perspective of the knowledge and skills of candidates for pharmacist positions within 8 skill & knowledge domains. Descriptive statistics were used for respondents' characteristics. A multivariate logistic regression was used for association between respondent characteristics and responses. Free responses were assessed using a qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Among 685 respondents, 88% were employed, 48% had precepting experience, and 44% were involved with hiring. The majority were from chain community pharmacies (33%) and inpatient settings (22%). Management and conflict resolution skills were reported as lacking by 35% and 28% of respondents respectively; 24% reported insufficient compounding knowledge. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest knowledge deficits in management, conflict resolution, and compounding. This information can be used for career planning and for educational program development or curricular enhancements. Similar studies in other regions will provide data on national needs.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Servicios Farmacéuticos , Arizona , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Farmacéuticos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
5.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 47(1): i, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34254331

RESUMEN

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Migraine is a disabling disorder that affects individuals of all ages. To date, there are multiple limitations to using guidelines-recommended treatments and preventive therapies. The goal of this review was to provide a comprehensive clinical review of the safety, efficacy and prescribing information of the emerging calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists. Agents in this new pharmacologic class were approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of acute migraine attack pain and the management of episodic and chronic migraine. METHODS: A total of 12 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials were identified and included in the review utilizing databases such as clinicaltrial.gov, PubMed and EMBASE. The trials collectively evaluated six CGRP antagonists starting from the orally administered CGRPs such as rimegepant and ubrogepant, to the quarterly IV administered CGRP such as eptinezumab, and the monthly/quarterly subcutaneously administered agents such as erenumab, fremanezumab and galcanezumab. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: All agents displayed significant efficacy compared with placebo, measured by reduction in mean monthly migraine days (MMD). In addition, CGRP antagonists displayed a great tolerability profile with few adverse effects. These medications were neither associated with any cardiovascular-related adverse effects, nor do they currently have specific contraindications to pre-existing cardiovascular conditions. This can present a safe alternative to a wide range of patients who cannot be appropriately treated with first-line treatments such as triptans. No treatment-related death was reported in any of the clinical trials outlined and discussed. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists are safe and efficacious medications both in treating acute migraine headache pain and the management of episodic and chronic migraine. Head-to-head comparative studies with current guideline-recommended treatments are needed. However, CGRP antagonists are promising agents that present an alternative solution for patients living with migraine.

6.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(6): 891-900, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34287770

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, an association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid has been detected in pharmacovigilance studies in European and Asian countries; however, no pharmacovigilance data have been published yet in the USA. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between bullous pemphigoid and DPP-4 inhibitors and other oral diabetes mellitus medications in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). METHODS: Case/non-case analyses were performed in the FAERS using data from 2006 to 2020 to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR) signal for bullous pemphigoid for all classes of oral diabetes medications. These analyses were performed under multiple conditions to control for bias: (1) comparison to all other drugs in the FAERS; (2) comparison to other diabetes medications; and (3) comparison to all other diabetes medications where only a single agent was implicated. RESULTS: A statistically significant ROR for bullous pemphigoid was found for DPP-4 inhibitors under all conditions: (1) 109.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 101.61-118.62); (2) 74.46 (95% CI 60.58-91.52); and (3) 35.94 (95% CI 27.91-46.28). A larger signal was seen for non-US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (anagliptin, vildagliptin, teneligliptin) vs FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors (alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin), likely because of an overestimation of the ROR for non-FDA-approved drugs. The largest signal was seen under conditions 1 and 2 with vildagliptin (1) 1022.83 (95% CI 909.45-1150.35) and (2) 158.84 (95% CI 127.01-198.66) followed by anagliptin (1) 628.63 (95% CI 221.36-1785.24) and (2) 60.64 (95% CI 20.98-175.26), alogliptin, teneligliptin, linagliptin, sitagliptin, and saxagliptin. Under condition 3, the largest signal was seen with linagliptin 122.25 (95% CI 93.96-159.07). Both metformin and the sulfonylureas had a significant ROR under condition 2 [3.42 (95% CI 3.01-3.89) and 2.07 (95% CI 1.66-2.57) respectively]; however, this association was not present under condition 3 as only confounded cases occurred, and a large majority of reported cases had concurrent exposure to a DPP-4 inhibitor. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an association between DPP-4 inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid. This association was maintained under controls to limit bias and falsely elevated signal, including controlling for disease state and cases with multiple drug exposures. Non-FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors had a larger ROR compared with FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors, likely owing to fewer reported adverse effects overall for non-FDA-approved drugs in FAERS.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/efectos adversos , Penfigoide Ampolloso/epidemiología , United States Food and Drug Administration/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración Oral , Inhibidores de la Dipeptidil-Peptidasa IV/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Penfigoide Ampolloso/inducido químicamente , Penfigoide Ampolloso/inmunología , Farmacovigilancia , Estados Unidos
8.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(2): e2036725, 2021 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33576817

RESUMEN

Importance: Interprofessional collaborative practice (ICP), the collaboration of health workers from different professional backgrounds with patients, families, caregivers, and communities, is central to optimal primary care. However, limited evidence exists regarding its association with patient outcomes. Objective: To examine the association of ICP with hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) levels among adults receiving primary care. Data Sources: A literature search of English language journals (January 2013-2018; updated through March 2020) was conducted using MEDLINE; Embase; Ovid IPA; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials: Issue 2 of 12, February 2018; NHS Economic Evaluation Database: Issue 2 of 4, April 2015; Clarivate Analytics WOS Science Citation Index Expanded (1990-2018); EBSCOhost CINAHL Plus With Full Text (1937-2018); Elsevier Scopus; FirstSearch OAIster; AHRQ PCMH Citations Collection; ClinicalTrials.gov; and HSRProj. Study Selection: Studies needed to evaluate the association of ICP (≥3 professions) with HbA1c, SBP, or DBP levels in adults with diabetes and/or hypertension receiving primary care. A dual review was performed for screening and selection. Data Extraction and Synthesis: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the PRISMA guideline for data abstractions and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations for bias assessment. Two dual review teams conducted independent data extraction with consensus. Data were pooled using a random-effects model for meta-analyses and forest plots constructed to report standardized mean differences (SMDs). For high heterogeneity (I2), data were stratified by baseline level and by study design. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes included HbA1c, SBP, and DBP levels as determined before data collection. Results: A total of 3543 titles or abstracts were screened; 170 abstracts or full texts were reviewed. Of 50 articles in the systematic review, 39 (15 randomized clinical trials [RCTs], 24 non-RCTs) were included in the meta-analyses of HbA1c (n = 34), SBP (n = 25), and DBP (n = 24). The sample size ranged from 40 to 20 524, and mean age ranged from 51 to 70 years, with 0% to 100% participants being male. Varied ICP features were reported. The SMD varied by baseline HbA1c, although all SMDs significantly favored ICP (HbA1c <8, SMD = -0.13; P < .001; HbA1c ≥8 to < 9, SMD = -0.24; P = .007; and HbA1c ≥9, SMD = -0.60; P < .001). The SMD for SBP and DBP were -0.31 (95% CI, -0.46 to -0.17); P < .001 and -0.28 (95% CI, -0.42 to -0.14); P < .001, respectively, with effect sizes not associated with baseline levels. Overall I2 was greater than 80% for all outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICP was associated with reductions in HbA1c regardless of baseline levels as well as with reduced SBP and DBP. However, the greatest reductions were found with HbA1c levels of 9 or higher. The implementation of ICP in primary care may be associated with improvements in patient outcomes in diabetes and hypertension.


Asunto(s)
Presión Sanguínea , Conducta Cooperativa , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Hipertensión/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus/metabolismo , Educadores en Salud , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Nutricionistas , Manejo de Atención al Paciente , Farmacéuticos , Médicos , Trabajadores Sociales , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33086524

RESUMEN

Short message service (SMS) is easily accessible and potentially an ideal platform for delivering patient-targeted messages. However, an effective SMS dosing strategy is not well established. Our purpose was to evaluate the impact of diabetes self-care promoting messages via non-tailored one-way automated SMS (OASMS) on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). The change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was compared between patients who received the service and those who did not. This retrospective quasi-experimental pre-post feasibility study was conducted at an academic medical center endocrinology clinic. English-speaking adults (≥18 years) with uncontrolled T2DM (HbA1c ≥ 8%) were included. A total of 69 patients (intervention n = 34; control n = 35) met the inclusion criteria. The mean (±SD) baseline HbA1c values were 10.2% (±1.9%) and 9.9% (±1.7%) in the intervention and control arms, respectively. Median follow-up was 3.3 months (IQR = 3-4.2). An ANCOVA model adjusted for baseline HbA1c and age showed an estimated HbA1c reduction difference of -0.97% (95% CI, -1.73 to -0.20%, p = 0.014), favoring the intervention arm. Inverse propensity score weighting confirmed the ANCOVA results. Our study suggests that adding diabetes self-care promoting messages via non-tailored OASMS to usual care improves glycemic control in poorly controlled T2DM. Larger and longer studies are needed to evaluate different features of the non-tailored OASMS strategy.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Control Glucémico , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Adulto , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
10.
Endocr Pract ; 25(11): 1151-1157, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31414904

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the 30-day re-admission predictive performance of the HOSPITAL score and Diabetes Early Re-admission Risk Indicator (DERRI™) in hospitalized diabetes patients. Methods: This was a case-control study in an academic, tertiary center in the United States. Adult hospitalized diabetes patients were randomly identified between January 1, 2014, and September 30, 2017. Patients were categorized into two groups: (1) re-admitted within 30 days, and (2) not re-admitted within 30 days. Predictive performance of the HOSPITAL and DERRI™ scores was evaluated by calculating receiver operating characteristics curves (c-statistic), Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit tests, and Brier scores. Results: A total of 200 patients were included (100 re-admitted, 100 non-re-admitted). The HOSPITAL score had a c-statistic of 0.731 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.661 to 0.800), Hosmer-Lemeshow test P = .211, and Brier score 0.212. The DERRI™ score had a c-statistic of 0.796 (95% CI, 0.734 to 0.857), Hosmer-Lemeshow test P = .114, and Brier score 0.212. The difference in receiver operating characteristic curves was not statistically significant between the two scores but showed a higher c-statistic with the DERRI™ score (P = .055). Conclusion: Both HOSPITAL and DERRI™ scores showed good predictive performance in 30-day re-admission of adult hospitalized diabetes patients. There was no significant difference in discrimination and calibration between the scores. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DERRI™ = Diabetes Early Re-admission Risk Indicator; IQR = interquartile range.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Curva ROC
11.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 20(1): 97-114, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30361953

RESUMEN

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases in the USA. If uncontrolled, diabetes can lead to devastating complications. Diabetes medications and medical devices largely contribute to the significant financial expense that the disease inflicts on affected individuals and society. Alongside significant economic burden, there are numerous cutaneous adverse effects associated with diabetes medications and medical devices. Despite the large and increasing number of individuals living with diabetes and the wide use of the related medications and medical devices, there is limited literature that comprehensively documents their cutaneous adverse effects. These cutaneous adverse effects are significant as they can worsen glycemic control, increase disease distress, and may increase risk of associated complications. Thus, it is important that providers can recognize these cutaneous adverse effects, identify the culprit agents, and can properly manage them. In this article, we provide a critical review of the cutaneous adverse effects of medications and devices used in the management of diabetes and provide insight into risk factors and prevention and an overview of therapeutic management. An emphasis is placed on clinical recognition and treatment for use of the medical providers who, regardless of practice setting, will treat patients with diabetes.


Asunto(s)
Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Infusión de Insulina/efectos adversos , Glucemia/análisis , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea/instrumentación , Diabetes Mellitus/sangre , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Factores de Riesgo
12.
Saudi Pharm J ; 25(7): 1019-1021, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158710

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist providing direct patient care as a member of interprofessional team on diabetes management. This study is a retrospective chart review of diabetes patients seen by a pharmacist in an endocrinology clinic affiliated with an academic medical center. The following patient outcomes were recorded pre and post the pharmacist intervention: glycemic control as measured by change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), change in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), statin use, and use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). 144 charts were reviewed, 28 of which were included in the study. A statistically significant improvement in HbA1c was observed in patients following the pharmacist intervention. The mean pre-intervention HbA1c was 8.77% (±SD 2.48) while the post-intervention HbA1c was 7.59% (±SD 1.18), with a p-value of 0.040. A decrease in blood pressure was also observed; however, this decrease was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in use of ACEI/ARB and statins pre- and post-intervention. The results suggest that involvement of pharmacists in direct patient care as members of interprofessional team in our specialty ambulatory care clinic is associated with a positive impact on the glycemic control in patients with diabetes.

13.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 8: 675-680, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29033623

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of supplemental diabetes-related training modalities and volunteer activities in increasing first-year medical students' knowledge/comfort in providing diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) to patients. METHODS: A group of medical students developed supplemental diabetes-related training/volunteer programs. The training modalities included an optional 7-session interprofessionally taught Diabetes Enrichment Elective and a 3-hour endocrinologist-led training session intended to prepare students for involvement in an inpatient DSMES volunteer program. The volunteer program provided the students with the opportunity to provide DSMES to patients with diabetes admitted to an academic medical center. Those participating in any of the stated programs were compared to those with no such training regarding confidence in providing DSMES using an optional online survey. The results were analyzed by using Mann-Whitney U test and descriptive analyses. RESULTS: A total of 18 first-year medical students responded to the optional survey with a response rate of ~30% (10 of 33) among participants in any training/volunteer program. First-year medical students who attended any of the offered optional programs had statistically significant higher comfort level in 4 of the 6 areas assessed regarding providing DSMES compared with those with no such training (p<0.05), with medium to large effect size (r=0.48-0.59). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the supplemental preclerkship diabetes-specific training modalities/volunteer programs can provide benefit in providing medical students with practical knowledge while improving their confidence in providing DSMES to patients with diabetes.

14.
Pharmacotherapy ; 37(12): 1600-1616, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29023930

RESUMEN

Among various forms of hearing loss, there are acute (within 72 hrs) or subacute (weeks to months) presentations that may be reversible with early pharmacological intervention. The workup of a patient presenting with hypoacusia includes the usual history and physical examination in conjunction with an audiometric assessment in order to categorize the hearing loss as conductive, sensorineural, or mixed. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss and autoimmune inner ear disease are acute and subacute forms of sensorineural hypoacusia most likely to be reversed with prompt pharmacological intervention. Systemic or local corticosteroid therapy has the most evidence of benefit in patients with sudden sensorineural hypoacusia and is the best available first line therapy noted in clinical practice guidelines. Alternative immunosuppressant therapies have not been well studied, and many have serious toxicities that further complicate the benefit-risk assessment. There are no randomized comparisons of corticosteroid dosing regimens that evaluated clinically important outcomes, so expert opinion must serve as the basis for dosing recommendations. Clinicians need to involve patients with hypoacusia in the shared decision-making process, since partial or complete reversal of hearing loss can have substantial quality-of-life implications for affected patients.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Toma de Decisiones , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Participación del Paciente
15.
Ann Pharmacother ; 51(10): 890-907, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28573873

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses examining the impact of pharmacist interventions as part of health care teams on diabetes therapeutic outcomes in ambulatory care settings. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus, WHO's Global Health Library, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Google Scholar were searched (1995 to February 2017). Search terms included pharmacist, team, and diabetes. STUDY SELECTION: Full-text articles published in English with comparative designs, including randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized controlled trials, and pretest-posttest studies evaluating hemoglobin A1C (A1C), were assessed. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened for study inclusion and extracted data. Quality of the studies was assessed using tools developed based on the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration's recommendations. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 1908 studies were identified from the literature and reference searches; 42 studies were included in the systematic review (n = 10 860) and 35 in the meta-analyses (n = 7417). Mean age ranged from 42 to 73 years, and 8% to 100% were male. The overall standardized mean difference (SMD) for A1C for pharmacist care versus comparison was 0.57 ( P < 0.01), a moderate effect representing a mean difference of 1.1% (95% CI = 0.88-1.27). The effects for systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were between small and moderate (SMD = 0.31 and 0.32; P < 0.01). The heterogeneity was high for all outcomes (>83%), indicating functional differences among the studies. No publication bias was detected. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists' interventions as part of the patient's health care team improved diabetes therapeutic outcomes, substantiating the important role of pharmacists in team-based diabetes management.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacéuticos/normas , Rol Profesional , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Adv Med Educ Pract ; 7: 567-570, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27785118

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to develop a preclerkship elective and assess its effectiveness in supplementing medical students' education. METHODS: A group of medical students under the guidance of two faculty advisors developed an elective consisting of six sessions covering a variety of practical aspects of diabetes care/education taught by an interprofessional team. Following the course completion, a survey was emailed to the enrollees who attended at least one session. The results were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and descriptive analyses. RESULTS: A total of 14 medical students were enrolled (nine first year and five second year). An average of 4.4 sessions/student was attended. Thirteen students attended at least one session and were surveyed. The survey response rate was ~62% (8/13). All eight students indicated that the course was valuable and would recommend it to their colleagues. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed a statistically significant increase in students' confidence in all five areas assessed following participation in the course, P<0.05 with a large effect (r>0.5). CONCLUSION: This study suggests the feasibility of developing disease state-specific preclerkship elective courses and that such courses can be beneficial in supplementing medical student education with practical knowledge.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA