Management of neurophysiological monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy exposure.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a safe and effective operation in the management of carotid stenosis. Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) changes during carotid clamping has been well studied, but there is scant evidence detailing IONM changes during carotid exposure. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed our experience with IONM changes during CEA exposure to determine whether multimodal IONM changes during exposure predict outcomes and how best to manage this challenging clinical scenario. METHODS: We reviewed all CEAs performed at our medical center between January 2015 and June 2020 and identified patients with multimodal IONM changes during exposure of the carotid artery. Our primary outcomes were perioperative stroke and functional outcomes. Functional outcomes were measured by modified Rankin scale (mRS), with good functional outcome defined at mRS scores 0-3. We also reviewed our intraoperative IONM change management strategies. RESULTS: Five patients (4 males, 1 female) with an average age of 67 ± 12 years had intraoperative IONM changes during carotid exposure. Among these, three patients were discharged with good functional outcome, and four patients had a good functional outcome at last follow-up. Two patients had perioperative stroke, half of which resulted in significant disability. One patient was transferred to the neuroendovascular suite intraoperatively for evaluation for thromboembolism followed by angioplasty and stenting with distal protection. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative IONM changes during carotid exposure predict outcomes in CEA. We propose that transition to the neuroendovascular suite following significant IONM changes during carotid exposure may be a useful strategy for management of this challenging clinical scenario. This approach provides the opportunity to evaluate and treat thromboembolism and still complete carotid revascularization when appropriate. This algorithm may be particularly useful in the era of dual trained vascular neurosurgeons.

Neurophysiological Monitoring During Arteriovenous Malformation Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Neurophysiological monitoring (NPM) is frequently performed during arteriovenous malformation (AVM) embolization. However, the ability of NPM to predict neurological deficits or improve surgical decision making in this setting has not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To review our use of NPM during AVM embolization to better define its utility. METHODS: We retrospectively examined AVM embolization cases from 2004 to 2017. We recorded patient and AVM characteristics as well as outcomes. We then reviewed NPM results from each case, including somatosensory evoked potentials and electroencephalogram. Our primary outcome was postoperative neurological deficit, and secondary outcomes were discharge and 30-d modified Rankin Score (mRS). RESULTS: There were 173 embolizations in 74 patients. Mean patient age was 40 yr. There were 8 (5%) transient and 2 (1.3%) permanent neurological complications. Among those with neurological complications, 3 had NPM changes during the operation (positive predictive value [PPV] = 50%). This improved to 67% for permanent NPM change. Three patients had NPM changes but did not suffer clinical deficits postoperatively (negative predictive value = 90%). The predictive value of the test was improved for discharge but not 30-d mRS, and the test performance improved dramatically with increased pretest probabilities (likelihood ratio [LR](+) = 14.5, LR(-) = 0.715). CONCLUSION: We present a large series of AVM embolization operations performed with NPM. The PPV of NPM changes was moderate but improved dramatically with increased pretest probabilities. The rate of permanent neurological complications was among the lowest reported in the literature, suggesting NPM may lead to improved intraoperative decision making.