Evaluating functional connectivity differences between DBS ON/OFF states in essential tremor.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the ventral intermediate (Vim) nucleus of the thalamus is an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET). We studied 15 â€‹ET patients undergoing DBS to a major input/output tract of the Vim, the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTt), using resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) to evaluate connectivity differences between DBS ON and OFF and elucidate significant regions most influential in impacting tremor control and/or concomitant gait ataxia. Anatomical/functional 1.5T MRIs were acquired and replicated for each DBS state. Tremor severity and gait ataxia severity were scored with DBS ON at optimal stimulation parameters and immediately upon DBS OFF. Whole brain analysis was performed using dual regression analysis followed by randomized permutation testing for multiple correction comparison. Regions of interest (ROI) analysis was also performed. All 15 patients had tremor improvement between DBS ON/OFF (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). Whole brain analysis revealed significant connectivity changes between states in the left pre-central gyrus and left supplemental motor area. Group analysis of ROIs revealed that, with threshold p â€‹< â€‹0.05, in DBS ON vs. OFF both tremor duration and tremor improvement were significantly correlated to changes in connectivity. A sub-group analysis of patients with greater ataxia had significantly decreased functional connectivity between multiple ROIs in the cortex and cerebellum when DBS was ON compared to OFF. Stimulation of the DRTt and concordant improvement of tremor resulted in connectivity changes seen in multiple regions outside the motor network; when combined with both structural and electrophysiologic connectivity, this may help to serve as a biomarker to improve DBS targeting and possibly predict outcome.

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease: A network imaging marker of the treatment response.

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) alleviates motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), thereby improving quality of life. However, quantitative brain markers to evaluate DBS responses and select suitable patients for surgery are lacking. Here, we used metabolic brain imaging to identify a reproducible STN-DBS network for which individual expression levels increased with stimulation in proportion to motor benefit. Of note, measurements of network expression from metabolic and BOLD imaging obtained preoperatively predicted motor outcomes determined after DBS surgery. Based on these findings, we computed network expression in 175 PD patients, with time from diagnosis ranging from 0 to 21 years, and used the resulting data to predict the outcome of a potential STN-DBS procedure. While minimal benefit was predicted for patients with early disease, the proportion of potential responders increased after 4 years. Clinically meaningful improvement with stimulation was predicted in 18.9 - 27.3% of patients depending on disease duration.

Why are clinical trials of deep brain stimulation terminated? An analysis of clinicaltrials.gov.

Background: Although deep brain stimulation (DBS) has established uses for patients with movement disorders and epilepsy, it is under consideration for a wide range of neurologic and neuropsychiatric conditions. Objective: To review successful and unsuccessful DBS clinical trials and identify factors associated with early trial termination. Methods: The ClinicalTrials.gov database was screened for all studies related to DBS. Information regarding condition of interest, study aim, trial design, trial success, and, if applicable, reason for failure was collected. Trials were compared and logistic regression was utilized to identify independent factors associated with trial termination. Results: Of 325 identified trials, 79.7% were successful and 20.3% unsuccessful. Patient recruitment, sponsor decision, and device issues were the most cited reasons for termination. 242 trials (74.5%) were interventional with 78.1% successful. There was a statistically significant difference between successful and unsuccessful trials in number of funding sources (p = 0.0375). NIH funding was associated with successful trials while utilization of other funding sources (academic institutions and community organizations) was associated with unsuccessful trials. 83 trials (25.5%) were observational with 84.0% successful; there were no statistically significant differences between successful and unsuccessful observational trials. Conclusion: One in five clinical trials for DBS were found to be unsuccessful, most commonly due to patient recruitment difficulties. The source of funding was the only factor associated with trial success. As DBS research continues to grow, understanding the current state of clinical trials will help design successful future studies, thereby minimizing futile expenditures of time, cost, and patient engagement.

Opportunities and challenges for the use of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of refractory major depression.

Major Depressive Disorder continues to remain one of the most prevalent psychiatric diseases globally. Despite multiple trials of conventional therapies, a subset of patients fail to have adequate benefit to treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising treatment in this difficult to treat population and has shown strong antidepressant effects across multiple cohorts. Nearly two decades of work have provided insights into the potential for chronic focal stimulation in precise brain targets to modulate pathological brain circuits that are implicated in the pathogenesis of depression. In this paper we review the rationale that prompted the selection of various brain targets for DBS, their subsequent clinical outcomes and common adverse events reported. We additionally discuss some of the pitfalls and challenges that have prevented more widespread adoption of this technology as well as future directions that have shown promise in improving therapeutic efficacy of DBS in the treatment of depression.

Thalamo-cortical evoked potentials during stimulation of the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract demonstrate synaptic filtering.

Essential tremor DBS targeting the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus and its input, the dentato-rubro-thalamic tract (DRTt), has proven to be an effective treatment strategy. We examined thalamo-cortical evoked potentials (TCEPs) and cortical dynamics during stimulation of the DRTt. We recorded TCEPs in primary motor cortex during clinical and supra-clinical stimulation of the DRTt in ten essential tremor patients. Stimulation was varied over pulse amplitude (2-10 â€‹mA) and pulse width (30-250 â€‹µs) to allow for strength-duration testing. Testing at clinical levels (3 â€‹mA, 60 â€‹µs) for stimulation frequencies of 1-160 â€‹Hz was performed and phase amplitude coupling (PAC) of beta phase and gamma power was calculated. Primary motor cortex TCEPs displayed two responses: early and all-or-none (<20 â€‹ms) or delayed and charge-dependent (>50 â€‹ms). Strength-duration curve approximation indicates that the chronaxie of the neural elements related to the TCEPs is <200 â€‹µs. At the range of clinical stimulation (amplitude 2-5 â€‹mA, pulse width 30-60 â€‹µs), TCEPs were not noted over primary motor cortex. Decreased pathophysiological phase-amplitude coupling was seen above 70 â€‹Hz stimulation without changes in power spectra and below the threshold of TCEPs. Our findings demonstrate that DRTt stimulation within normal clinical bounds does not excite fibers directly connected with primary motor cortex but that supra-clinical stimulation can excite a direct axonal tract. Both clinical efficacy and phase-amplitude coupling were frequency-dependent, favoring a synaptic filtering model as a possible mechanism of action.

Virtual transitional pain service delivered via telehealth is effective in preventing new and persistent opioid use amongst post-surgical spine patients.

Opioid dependence is a national crisis, with 30 million patients annually at risk of becoming persistent opioid users after receiving opioids for post-surgical pain management. Translational Pain Services (TPS) demonstrate effectiveness for behavioral health improvements but its effectiveness in preventing persistent opioid use is less established, especially amongst opioid exposed patients. Prohibitive costs and accessibility challenges have hindered TPS program adoption. To address these limitations, we designed and implemented a remote telehealth TPS protocol focusing on preventing continued opioid use while improving behavioral health. Licensed therapists trained in the opioid-tapering CBT protocol delivered sessions reimbursed through standard payer reimbursement. Our prospective study evaluated the protocol's effectiveness on preventing persistent opioid use and behavioral health outcomes amongst both opioid naïve and exposed patients. In an opioid-naive patient cohort (n=67), 100% completely tapered off opioids, while in an opioid-exposed cohort (n =19) 52% completely tapered off opioids, demonstrating promising results. In both cohorts, we observed significant improvements in behavioral health scores, including pain. This opioid-tapering digital TPS is effective, adoptable, and incurs no out-of-pocket cost for healthcare systems. We provide the opioid-tapering CBT protocol in the supplement to facilitate adoption. Trial Registration Impact of Daily, Digital and Behavioral Tele-health Tapering Program for Perioperative Surgical Patients Exposed to Opioids and Benzodiazepines registered at clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04787692. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04787692?term=NCT04787692&draw=2&rank=1.

Brain metabolic changes and clinical response to superolateral medial forebrain bundle deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle is an efficacious therapy for treatment-resistant depression, providing rapid antidepressant effects. In this study, we use 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) to identify brain metabolic changes over 12 months post-DBS implantation in ten of our patients, compared to baseline. The primary outcome measure was a 50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, which was interpreted as a response. Deterministic fiber tracking was used to individually map the target area; probabilistic tractography was used to identify modulated fiber tracts modeled using the cathodal contacts. Eight of the ten patients included in this study were responders. PET imaging revealed significant decreases in bilateral caudate, mediodorsal thalamus, and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex metabolism that was evident at 6 months and continued to 12 months post surgery. At 12 months post-surgery, significant left ventral prefrontal cortical metabolic decreases were also observed. Right caudate metabolic decrease at 12 months was significantly correlated with mean MADRS reduction. Probabilistic tractography modeling revealed that such metabolic changes lay along cortico-limbic nodes structurally connected to the DBS target site. Such observed metabolic changes following DBS correlated with clinical response provide insights into how future studies can elaborate such data to create biomarkers to predict response, the development of which likely will require multimodal imaging analysis.

A narrative review on invasive brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression

While most patients with depression respond to pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, about one-third will present treatment resistance to these interventions. For patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), invasive neurostimulation therapies such as vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and epidural cortical stimulation may be considered. We performed a narrative review of the published literature to identify papers discussing clinical studies with invasive neurostimulation therapies for TRD. After a database search and title and abstract screening, relevant English-language articles were analyzed. Vagus nerve stimulation, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a TRD treatment, may take several months to show therapeutic benefits, and the average response rate varies from 15.2-83%. Deep brain stimulation studies have shown encouraging results, including rapid response rates (> 30%), despite conflicting findings from randomized controlled trials. Several brain regions, such as the subcallosal-cingulate gyrus, nucleus accumbens, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, anterior limb of the internal capsule, medial-forebrain bundle, lateral habenula, inferior-thalamic peduncle, and the bed-nucleus of the stria terminalis have been identified as key targets for TRD management. Epidural cortical stimulation, an invasive intervention with few reported cases, showed positive results (40-60% response), although more extensive trials are needed to confirm its potential in patients with TRD.

Deep brain stimulation of the "medial forebrain bundle": sustained efficacy of antidepressant effect over years.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) to the superolateral branch of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) has emerged as a quite efficacious therapy for treatment resistant depression (TRD), leading to rapid antidepressant effects. In this study, we complete our assessment of our first 10 enrolled patients throughout one year post-implantation, showing sustained antidepressant effect up to 5 years. The primary outcome measure was a 50% reduction in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score, which was interpreted as a response. Deterministic fiber tracking was used to individually map the target area. An insertional effect was seen during the 4-week sham stimulation phase (29% mean MADRS reduction, p = 0.02). However, after 2 weeks of initiating stimulation, five patients met response criteria (47% mean MADRS reduction, p < 0.001). One patient withdrew from study participation at 6 weeks. Twelve weeks after initiating stimulation, six of nine remaining patients had a >50% decrease in MADRS scores relative to baseline (52% mean MADRS reduction, p = 0.001); these same six patients continued to meet response criteria at 52 weeks (63% overall mean MADRS reduction, p < 0.001). Four of five patients who achieved the 5-year time point analysis continued to be responders (81% mean MADRS reduction, p < 0.001). Evaluation of modulated fiber tracts reveals significant common prefrontal/orbitofrontal connectivity to the target region in all responders. Key points learned from this study that we can incorporate in future protocols to better elucidate the effect of this therapy are a longer blinded sham stimulation phase and use of scheduled discontinuation concomitant with functional imaging.

Frameless Robot-Assisted vs Frame-Based Awake Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: An Evaluation of Technique and New Challenges.

BACKGROUND: Methodological approaches to deep brain stimulation (DBS) continue to evolve from awake frame-based to asleep frameless procedures with robotic assistance, primarily directed to optimize operative efficiency, lead accuracy, and patient comfort. Comparison between the 2 is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impacts of methodological differences on operative efficiency and stereotactic accuracy using a frame compared with a frameless robotic platform while maintaining the awake state and use of multiple microelectrode recording (MER) trajectories. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients who underwent bilateral awake frameless robot-assisted DBS were compared with a previous cohort of 30 patients who underwent frame-based surgery. Patient demographics, operative times, and MER data were collected for both cohorts. Two-dimensional radial errors of lead placements were calculated. RESULTS: Preoperative setup, surgical, and total operating room times were all significantly greater for the robot-assisted cohort (P < .001). The need for computed tomography imaging when referencing the robotic fiducials led to increased setup duration because of patient transport, unnecessary for the frame-based cohort. Multiple simultaneous MER trajectories increased surgical time (mean 26 min) for the robot-assisted cohort only. The mean radial errors in the robot-assisted and frame cohorts were 0.98 ± 0.66 and 0.74 ± 0.49 mm (P = .03), respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of a truly frameless robotic platform such as the Mazor Renaissance (Mazor Robotics Ltd) presented challenges when implementing techniques used during awake frame-based surgery. Maintaining good accuracy, intraoperative reference imaging, and limited MER trajectories will help integrate frameless robot assistance into the awake DBS surgical workflow.

Deep brain stimulation of the "medial forebrain bundle": a strategy to modulate the reward system and manage treatment-resistant depression.

The medial forebrain bundle-a white matter pathway projecting from the ventral tegmental area-is a structure that has been under a lot of scrutinies recently due to its implications in the modulation of certain affective disorders such as major depression. In the following, we will discuss major depression in the context of being a disorder dependent on multiple relevant networks, the pathological performance of which is responsible for the manifestation of various symptoms of the disease which extend into emotional, motivational, physiological, and also cognitive domains of daily living. We will focus on the reward system, an evolutionarily conserved pathway whose underperformance leads to anhedonia and lack of motivation, which are key traits in depression. In the field of deep brain stimulation (DBS), different "hypothesis-driven" targets have been chosen as the subject of clinical trials on efficacy in the treatment-resistant depressed patient. The "medial forebrain bundle" is one such target for DBS, and has had remarkably rapid success in alleviating depressive symptoms, improving anhedonia and motivation. We will review what we have learned from pre-clinical animal studies on defining this white matter tract, its connectivity, and the complex molecular (i.e., neurotransmitter) mechanisms by which its modulation exerts its effects. Imaging studies in the form of tractographic depictions have elucidated its presence in the human brain. Such has led to ongoing clinical trials of DBS targeting this pathway to assess efficacy, which is promising yet still lack in sufficient numbers. Ultimately, one must confirm the mechanism of action and validate proof of antidepressant effect in order to have such treatment become mainstream, to promote widespread improvement in the quality of life of suffering patients.

A narrative review on invasive brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

While most patients with depression respond to pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, about one-third will present treatment resistance to these interventions. For patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD), invasive neurostimulation therapies such as vagus nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and epidural cortical stimulation may be considered. We performed a narrative review of the published literature to identify papers discussing clinical studies with invasive neurostimulation therapies for TRD. After a database search and title and abstract screening, relevant English-language articles were analyzed. Vagus nerve stimulation, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a TRD treatment, may take several months to show therapeutic benefits, and the average response rate varies from 15.2-83%. Deep brain stimulation studies have shown encouraging results, including rapid response rates (> 30%), despite conflicting findings from randomized controlled trials. Several brain regions, such as the subcallosal-cingulate gyrus, nucleus accumbens, ventral capsule/ventral striatum, anterior limb of the internal capsule, medial-forebrain bundle, lateral habenula, inferior-thalamic peduncle, and the bed-nucleus of the stria terminalis have been identified as key targets for TRD management. Epidural cortical stimulation, an invasive intervention with few reported cases, showed positive results (40-60% response), although more extensive trials are needed to confirm its potential in patients with TRD.

Surgical Management for Dystonia: Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation in the Long Term.

INTRODUCTION: Dystonia is a movement disorder substantially affecting the quality of life. Botulinum Neurotoxin (BoNT) is used intramuscularly as a treatment for dystonia; however, not all dystonia patients respond to this treatment. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor, but it can help in dystonia as well. OBJECTIVES: We studied a total of 67 dystonia patients who were treated with DBS over a period of 7 years to find out the long-term efficacy of DBS in those patients. First, we calculated patient improvement in post-surgery follow-up programs using the Global Dystonia Severity scale (GDS) and Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scale (BFMDRS). Secondly, we analyzed the scales scores to see if there was any statistical significance. METHODS: In our study we analyzed patients with ages from 38 to 78 years with dystonia who underwent DBS surgery between January 2014 and December 2020 in four different centers (India, Kuwait, Egypt, and Turkey). The motor response to DBS surgery was retrospectively measured for each patient during every follow-up visit using the GDS and the BFMDRS scales. RESULTS: Five to 7 years post-DBS, the mean reduction in the GDS score was 30 ± 1.0 and for the BFMDRS score 26 ± 1.0. The longitudinal change in scores at 12 and 24 months post-op was also significant with mean reductions in GDS and BFMDRS scores of 68 ± 1.0 and 56 ± 1.0, respectively. The p-values were <0.05 for our post-DBS dystonia patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates DBS is an established, effective treatment option for patients with different dystonias, such as generalized, cervical, and various brain pathology-induced dystonias. Although symptoms are not completely eliminated, continuous improvements are noticed throughout the post-stimulation time frame.

Influence of Intraoperative Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation.

BACKGROUND: There is considerable debate regarding the use of intraoperative microelectrode recording (MER) in deep brain stimulation (DBS). OBJECTIVE: To determine if the use of intraoperative MER impacts the final position of the lead implant in DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus (GPi) and to evaluate the incidence of complications. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent STN and GPi DBS with MER, at the University of Texas Health Science Center in Houston from June 1, 2009 to October 1, 2013 to compare initial and final coordinates. Hemorrhagic and infectious complications were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 90 lead implants on 46 patients implanted at the center during this time period were reviewed and included in the study. A statistically significant difference between the initial and final coordinates was observed in the superior-inferior direction with a mean difference of 0.40 mm inferiorly (±0.96 mm, P<0.05) and 0.96 mm inferiorly (±1.32 mm, P<0.05) in the STN and GPi locations, respectively. A nonstatistically significant difference was also observed in the anterior-posterior direction in both locations. There were no intraparenchymal hemorrhages on postoperative computed tomography. Two patients developed postoperative seizures (7.4%). One STN electrode (1.1%) required revision because of a suboptimal response. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative MER in STN and GPi DBS implant does not seem to have a higher rate of surgical complications compared with historical series not using MER and might also be useful in determining the final lead location.

Case report of hyperacute edema and cavitation following deep brain stimulation lead implantation.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative cerebral edema around a deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrode is an uncommonly reported complication of DBS surgery. The etiology of this remains unknown, and the presentation is highly variable; however, the patients generally report a good outcome. CASE DESCRIPTION: Here, we report an unusual presentation of postoperative edema in a 66-year-old female who has bilateral dentatorubrothalamic tract (specifically, the ventral intermediate nucleus) DBS for a mixed type tremor disorder. Initial postoperative computed tomography (CT) was unremarkable and the patient was admitted for observation. She declined later on postoperative day (POD) 1 and became lethargic. Stat head CT scan performed revealed marked left-sided peri-lead edema extending into the centrum semiovale with cystic cavitation, and trace right-sided edema. On POD 2, the patient was alert, but with global aphasia, right-sided neglect, and a plegic right upper extremity. Corticosteroids were started and a complete infectious workup was unremarkable. She was intubated and ultimately required a tracheostomy and percutaneous gastrostomy tube. She returned to the clinic 3 months postoperatively completely recovered and ready for battery implantation. CONCLUSION: While this is an unusual presentation of cerebral edema following DBS placement, ultimately, the outcome was good similar to other reported cases. Supportive care and corticosteroids remain the treatment of choice for this phenomenon.