Protocol for a systematic review of the application of the kidney failure risk equation and Oxford classification in estimating prognosis in IgA nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a common cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Outcomes are highly variable and predicting risk of disease progression at an individual level is challenging. Accurate risk stratification is important to identify individuals most likely to benefit from treatment. The Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) has been extensively validated in CKD populations and predicts the risk of ESRD at 2 and 5 years using non-invasive tests; however, its predictive performance in IgAN is unknown. The Oxford classification (OC) describes pathological features demonstrated on renal biopsy that are associated with adverse clinical outcomes that may also inform prognosis. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the KFRE with the OC in determining prognosis in IgAN. METHODS: A systematic review will be conducted and reported in line with PRISMA guidelines (PRISMA-P checklist attached as Additional file 1). Inclusion criteria will be cohort studies that apply the KFRE or OC to determine the risk of CKD progression or ESRD in individuals with IgAN. Multiple databases will be searched in duplicate to identify relevant studies, which will be screened first by title, then by abstract and then by full-text analysis. Results will be collated for comparison. Risk of bias and confidence assessments will be conducted independently by two reviewers, with a third reviewer available if required. DISCUSSION: Identifying individuals at the highest risk of progression to ESRD is challenging in IgAN, due to the heterogeneity of clinical outcomes. Risk prediction tools have been developed to guide clinicians; however, it is imperative that these aids are accurate and reproducible. The OC is based on observations made by specialist renal pathologists and may be open to observer bias, therefore the utility of prediction models incorporating this classification may be diminished, particularly as in the future novel biomarkers may be incorporated into clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022364569.

Latest advances in frailty in kidney transplantation: A narrative review.

Frailty is a clinical syndrome that is characterised by decline in multiple systems with associated decreased physiological reserve and ability to respond to stressor events. It is associated with greater healthcare burden. It is common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Kidney transplantation is considered the optimal form of renal replacement therapy for suitable patients with ESRD. However, surgery and immunosuppression are physiological stresses that can disproportionately affect frail individuals. Frailty is emerging as a potentially important risk factor in patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation. Most of the published research to date in this area comes from a single transplant centre in the USA. Frailty, as measured using the Physical Frailty Phenotype (FP), is prevalent in waitlisted patients and has been associated with early hospital re-admission, prolonged length of stay, delayed graft function and increased mortality after kidney transplantation. However, although kidney transplantation is a substantial physiological stress to a patient's reserve, by restoring kidney function, kidney transplantation has also been shown to improve a patient's frailty status. The FP is the most studied tool in patients waitlisted for transplantation, but it has not been able to distinguish those whose frailty is improved by kidney transplantation. In summary, there remain significant gaps in knowledge and uncertainties as to how to effectively use existing frailty measures to inform decision-making around kidney transplantation. Further research is needed to address these important gaps in the literature.

The prognostic role of mid-range ejection fraction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of studies investigating the impact of mid-range ejection fraction (mrEF) on clinical outcomes, including ventricular arrhythmias, in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to investigate the prognostic role of mrEF post STEMI and whether recommended medical therapy may modify future risk. METHODS: 533 consecutive patients from a single large-volume centre who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention were included. Reduced EF (<40%), mrEF (40-49%) and preserved EF (≥50%) were defined according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Clinical outcomes were prospectively collected, and the primary endpoint was defined as the composite of death, re-admission with heart failure, sustained ventricular arrhythmia requiring hospitalisation or implantable cardioverter defibrillator over three years follow-up. RESULTS: There was a stepwise increase in the primary endpoint according to EF group (8%, 17%, 30%, P < .001), which was derived from each individual component. Compared to preserved EF, patients with mrEF had significantly higher risk [HR 4.08 (95%CI 2.38 to 6.99), P < .001]. The use of suboptimal medical therapy was associated with increased future risk, particularly in mrEF [HR 2.62, (95%CI 1.18 to 5.83), P = .018]. The proportion of mrEF patients who experience the primary endpoint was significantly different according the status of kidney function and recommended medical therapy (8%, 20%, 33%, 50%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with mrEF following STEMI had increased risk of death, heart failure hospitalisation and ventricular arrhythmias compared to preserved EF. Suboptimal medical therapy in mrEF was associated with increased adverse events, particularly in patients with renal dysfunction.