Analysis 2016-2021 of the development of the MAPEX outpatient pharmaceutical care Project by regions in Spain. / Análisis 2016-2021 del desarrollo del proyecto de atención farmacéutica al paciente externo MAPEX por Comunidades Autónomas.

OBJECTIVE: Analyse the evolution of the MAPEX Project (Strategic Map of Pharmaceutical Care for Outpatients) by regions in Spain, through the results of the comparative situation survey between the years 2016 and 2021. METHODS: A committee of national experts belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy prepared the MAPEX Survey on the situation of Outpatient Units, which consisted of 43 specific questions on aspects related to structure, context, integration, processes, results and training, teaching and investigation. It was carried out in two periods, one in 2016 and another in 2021 (with 3 additional questions in 2021, related to the progress of the MAPEX initiative and the priority lines to follow). A comparative analysis of results was carried out at the national level and by regions in Spain. RESULTS: 141 hospitals participated in 2016 and 138 in 2021, with representation from the 17 autonomous communities. The analysis of the results shows significant improvements in all the dimensions of the survey, with variability between the different regions. Among the most important improvements, the development and consolidation of telepharmacy stood out, the greater specialization of pharmacists by areas of knowledge and their integration into multidisciplinary teams. The improvement of the healthcare model was considered the greatest advance at a general level (65%), and remote pharmaceutical care at the hospital level (48.2%). Priority lines of work were considered the expansion and practical application of the pharmaceutical care methodology (66.4%), research (58.4%), and training in all MAPEX initiatives (53.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation and development of the MAPEX initiatives has had a positive impact on the evolution in all healthcare areas of pharmaceutical care for outpatients. The situation survey makes it possible to identify by regions the significant points for improvement, as well as those areas to be developed through strengthening and corrective actions. The expansion of the project in the coming years will mean progress towards excellence in care and in the improvement of health results.

[Translated article] Analysis 2016-2021 of the development of the MAPEX outpatient pharmaceutical care Project by Regions in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the evolution of the MAPEX Project (Strategic Map of Pharmaceutical Care for Outpatients) by regions in Spain, through the results of the comparative situation survey between 2016 and 2021. METHODS: A committee of national experts belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy prepared the MAPEX Survey on the situation of Outpatient Units, which consisted of 43 specific questions on aspects related to structure, context, integration, processes, results and training, teaching, and investigation. It was carried out in 2 periods, one in 2016 and another in 2021 (with 3 additional questions in 2021, related to the progress of the MAPEX initiative and the priority lines to follow). A comparative analysis of results was carried out at the national level and by regions in Spain. RESULTS: 141 hospitals participated in 2016 and 138 in 2021, with representation from the 17 autonomous communities. The analysis of the results shows significant improvements in all the dimensions of the survey, with variability between the different regions. Among the most important improvements, the development and consolidation of telepharmacy stood out, the greater specialisation of pharmacists by areas of knowledge and their integration into multidisciplinary teams. The improvement of the healthcare model was considered the greatest advance at a general level (65%), and remote pharmaceutical care at the hospital level (48.2%). Priority lines of work were considered the expansion and practical application of the pharmaceutical care methodology (66.4%), research (58.4%), and training in all MAPEX initiatives (53.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation and development of the MAPEX initiatives has had a positive impact on the evolution in all healthcare areas of pharmaceutical care for outpatients. The situation survey makes it possible to identify by regions the significant points for improvement, as well as those areas to be developed through strengthening and corrective actions. The expansion of the project in the coming years will mean progress toward excellence in care and in the improvement of health results.

[Translated article] Medication reconciliation in pediatric hemato-oncologic patients: A multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors on admission to hospital in the pediatric onco-hematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these reconciliation errors as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the pediatric onco-hematological population to assess the incidence of reconciliation errors and to describe the characteristics of the patients. RESULTS: Medication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least a medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were related to patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be reconciliation errors. The most frequent type of reconciliation error was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a reconciliation error. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic pediatric patients, such as onco-hematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication reconciliation errors on admission to hospital, and the omission of some medication was the main cause of these errors.

Multicentre study of medication reconciliation in paediatric onco-hematology. / Estudio multicéntrico de conciliación de la medicación en onco-hematología pediátrica.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of reconciliation errors (RE) on admission to hospital in the paediatric onco-haematological population in order to check whether they are similarly susceptible to these RE as adults and to describe the characteristics of the patients who suffer them. METHODS: A 12-month prospective, multicentre study of medication reconciliation on admission in the paediatric onco-haematological population to assess the incidence of RE and describe the characteristics of the patients in whom they occur. RESULTS: Medication reconciliation was performed in 157 patients. At least 1 medication discrepancy was detected in 96 patients. Of the discrepancies detected, 52.1% were justified by the patient's new clinical situation or by the physician, while 48.9% were determined to be RE. The most frequent type of RE was the "omission of a medication", followed by "a different dose, frequency or route of administration". A total of 77 pharmaceutical interventions were carried out, 94.2% of which were accepted. In the group of patients with a number equal to or greater than 4 drugs in home treatment, there was a 2.1-fold increase in the probability of suffering a RE. CONCLUSIONS: In order to avoid or reduce errors in one of the critical safety points such as transitions of care, there are measures such as medication reconciliation. In the case of complex chronic paediatric patients, such as onco-haematological patients, the number of drugs as part of home treatment is the variable that has been associated with the presence of medication RE on admission to hospital, with the omission of some medication being the main cause of these errors.

Development of Antimicrobial Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for the Pediatric Population.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) optimize antimicrobial use, improve patient outcomes, and reduce resistance. To assess the effectiveness of ASPs, it is necessary to have indicators that can be widely used. Defined daily dose (DDD) was designed by WHO for the adult population as a consumption indicator. However, there are no DDDs adapted to the pediatric population. The main objective of this study is to establish the most appropriate DDD values in this population. An observational, retrospective, multicenter study was conducted. Antimicrobial prescriptions were collected from pediatric wards of seven Spanish tertiary hospitals for 2 years. The DDDs obtained from the prescriptions were compared with the theoretical DDDs agreed upon in the first stage. To select the optimal DDD, the following were analyzed: power value, magnitude obtained from the differences in the DDD, statistical significance, and degree of agreement in the stipulated doses. A total of 4788 prescriptions were collected. Pediatric DDD was defined for 30 different antimicrobials. A potency >80% was obtained in 24 antibiotics. 51.2% of the selected DDD correspond to Phase I and 39.5% from Phase II. Pediatric DDD of different antimicrobials was obtained, providing an indicator that can be used globally in different hospitals to analyze the consumption and efficacy of ASPs.

Appropriateness of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy for Cervicitis and Urethritis Prescribed in the Emergency Department.

Objectives: Sexually transmitted infections are a prevalent global health care problem. Treatment guidelines have recently been updated as a result of antimicrobial resistance and public health trends. The aim of the study was to assess the appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy prescribed for cervicitis and urethritis in the emergency department. Methods: We designed a retrospective observational cohort study. We included adult patients with suspected cervicitis or urethritis who attended the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in 2020. We excluded patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease, pregnancy or prostatitis and those requiring admission to hospital. Appropriateness of empirical antibiotic therapy was evaluated taking into account 4 aspects: indication, dosing, duration of therapy, and route of administration. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record, the electronic prescription program, and the discharge summary. Results: The study population comprised 176 patients; mean age was 28.9 years (SD = 7.7), and 90.9% were men. The most prescribed treatment was the combination of ceftriaxone and azithromycin (83.0%). Treatment was inappropriate in 71.6% of patients. A total of 159 drug errors were recorded. The most frequent cause was undertreatment (36.4%) related to underdosing (46.5%), particularly with regard to ceftriaxone. The percentage of errors was 11.9% for indication, 84.9% for dosing, 3.1% for duration, and 0% for route of administration. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients who attended the emergency department for suspected cervicitis or urethritis received an inappropriate empirical antibiotic regimen. The main reason was undertreatment due to underdosing.

Outpatient pharmaceutical care satisfaction survey through Telepharmacy during COVID-19 pandemic in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To present the results of a survey about the Telemedicine outpatients experience and satisfaction of a pharmaceutical care  program through Telepharmacy, carried out from hospital pharmacy  departments in Spain during COVID-19 Pandemic (ENOPEX survey), and  identify differences across regions in Spain. METHOD: An analysis of results of the national survey ENOPEX on outpatient Telepharmacy services during the lockdown due to the COVID­19 pandemic, analyzed by autonomous community in Spain. Data was collected in relation to point of delivery; pharmacotherapeutic follow-up; patient's opinion and satisfaction with Telemedicine; confidentiality; future development of pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy services;  and coordination with the patient care team. Four multilevel regressions were performed to evaluate the differences between Spanish regions on the most relevant variables of the study, using the R version 4.0.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 8,079 interviews were valid, 52.8% of respondents were  female, age was 41-65 years in 54.3% of participants; 42.7% had been  receiving treatment for more than 5 years; 42.8% lived 10-50 km  from the  hospital; the journey to hospital took more than one hour for 60.2% of  participants. Globally, 85.7% received medicines at home. However, medicines  were delivered at a community pharmacy in some communities, such as  Cantabria (95.8%), or at primary care centers as in Castile La Mancha  (16.5%). In total, 96.7% of participants were satisfied or very satisfied with  Telemedicine pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy services, with  differences across communities, with users in Andalusia reporting the highest  satisfaction (OR = 1.58), and users in Castile-León being less satisfied with  Telepharmacy services (OR = 0.66). Users in Catalonia are the ones more  clearly in favor of Telemedicine pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy  services as a complementary service, with an OR = 5.85 with respect to other  users. The Telemedicine most frequently mentioned advantage was that  Telepharmacy services avoided visits, especially in Cantabria (92.5%) and  Extremadura (88.4%). Most patients prefer informed delivery of medicines at  home when they do not have an appointment at the hospital: total of 75.6 %,  from 50.1% of users in Cantabria to 96.3% in Catalonia (p < 0.001). The users  less willing to pay for Telepharmacy services were the ones from Castile- León and Galicia, with users in Catalonia and Navarra showing higher  willingness. CONCLUSIONS: In general terms, patients were satisfied with Telemedicine pharmaceutical care, through Telepharmacy services during the COVID­19 pandemic, being mostly in favor of maintaining these services to avoid travels.

OBJETIVO: Describir los resultados de la encuesta sobre experiencia y  atisfacción de la Telemedicina en pacientes externos relativo a un programa de  atención farmacéutica a través de la Telefarmacia, realizado desde los servicios de farmacia durante la pandemia COVID-19 (encuesta ENOPEX) e identificar  las diferencias entre las comunidades autónomas de España.Método: Se analizaron los resultados de la encuesta nacional ENOPEX sobre  Telefarmacia en pacientes externos durante el confinamiento debido a la  pandemia COVID-19, realizado en las diferentes comunidades autónomas de  España. Se recogieron datos relativos a lugar de entrega, seguimiento farmacoterapéutico, opinión y satisfacción del paciente con la  Telefarmacia, confidencialidad, desarrollo futuro de la atención farmacéutica a  través de los servicios de Telefarmacia, y coordinación con el equipo de atención al paciente. Se realizaron cuatro regresiones multinivel para  evaluar las diferencias entre comunidades autónomas sobre las variables más relevantes del estudio por medio del software R versión 4.0.3. RESULTADOS: Un total de 8.079 entrevistas fueron válidas: el 52,8% eran mujeres, el 54,3% tenía entre 41-65 años, el 42,9% estaban en  tratamiento  prodesde hacía más de 5 años, el 42,8% vivía a 10-50 km del  hospital y el 60,2%  tardaba más de una hora en acudir al hospital.  globalmente, el 85,7% recibieron medicación a domicilio, aunque hubo  comunidades autónomas en las que se optó también por las oficinas de  farmacia, como en Cantabria (95,8%), o los centros de atención primaria,  como en Castilla­La Mancha (16,5%). El 96,7% de los pacientes refirieron estar satisfechos o muy satisfechos con la Telemedicina en la atención farmacéutica  mediante el uso de la Telefarmacia, detectándose variabilidad en cuanto a la  opinión entre comunidades, desde la mejor opinión en Andalucía (odds ratio  =1,58) y la menos favorable en Castilla y León (odds ratio = 0,66). Por su  parte, Cataluña es la comunidad que estaría más claramente a favor de la  Telemedicina en la atención farmacéutica de usar la Telefarmacia como  actividad complementaria, con una odds ratio de 5,85 respecto al resto. Las  ventajas más mencionadas de la Telemedicina fue que los servicios de  Telefarmacia evitaban desplazamientos, especialmente en Cantabria (92,5%) y Extremadura (88,4%). Los pacientes mayoritariamente prefieren el  acercamiento y entrega informada de la medicación a domicilio cuando no  tienen que acudir al hospital, el 75,6% globalmente, desde el 50,1% de  pacientes de Cantabria al 96,3% en Cataluña (p < 0,001). Las comunidades  autónomas menos dispuestas a pagar por el servicio de Telefarmacia fueron  Castilla y León y Galicia, y las que más, Cataluña y Navarra. CONCLUSIONES: En líneas generales, los pacientes están satisfechos con la  Telemedicina aplicada a la atención farmacéutica a través de los servicios de  Telefarmacia durante la pandemia COVID-19, estando mayoritariamente a  favor de mantenerla para evitar desplazamientos.

Standardisation of intravenous infusion therapy for paediatrics: big challenges for the little patients.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide organisations advocate standardising the management of intravenous drugs as an essential strategy to increase safety in paediatric healthcare settings. Intravenous administration is a route associated with some potential complications. Many adverse events are related to the use of intravenous medications, and the great variability in their handling and preparation represents an added risk that jeopardises the safety of children. PURPOSE: To standardise the dilutions of intravenous drugs most commonly administered to Spanish hospitalised paediatric and neonatal patients. METHODS: The process leading to the standardisation of concentrations was undertaken following a two-round modified Delphi procedure. The consensus included the most common drugs administered by continuous or intermittent intravenous infusion to hospitalised and/or critically ill paediatric patients. RESULTS: For paediatric patients, the proposal included a total of 102 drugs (45 continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion), with 192 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 101 drugs (99%), of which 44 were continuous infusion and 59 intermittent infusion; 160 concentrations were standardised (72.7%). For neonates, the initial proposal included 80 drugs (38 continuous infusion and 43 intermittent infusion), with 189 concentrations to be standardised. The final consensus included 80 drugs (100%), of which 38 were continuous infusion and 43 were intermittent infusion; 120 concentrations were standardised (49.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This proposal showed that standardisation is a feasible approach that can be reached by other healthcare institutions. It can be used in other centres and contribute in the future to unifying paediatric clinical practice.

Adecuacy of pediatric antimicrobial prescribing in the Emergency Department at discharge.

INTRODUCTION: In January 2019, the Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. RESULTS: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (κ = 0.308; κ = 0.000; κ = 0.586). CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of the management of infectious processes to the reference Guide in our pediatric ED was high, but it was below 50% when antimicrobial treatment was required. The degree of adequacy to the local protocols of the center was greater than to the regional Guide. This reveals a discrepancy between the 2 documents that should be analyzed and corrected according to the available scientific evidence.

Antimicrobial defined daily dose in neonatal population.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial defined daily dose (DDD), a standardized metric to assess antimicrobial consumption in adult population, has limitations hampering its use in neonatal patients. This study proposes an alternative DDD design applicable for neonates. METHODS: Neonates (<1 month-old) from 6 Spanish hospitals during a 12-months period were included. Weight and weeks gestational age of each neonate were the variables collected. DDD (g) for each antimicrobial was calculated by multiplying the obtained weight times the recommended dose (mg/kg) of the antimicrobial for the most common infectious indication selected by the Delphi method. RESULTS: A total of 4820 neonates were included. Mean age was 36.72 weeks of gestational age and Mean weight was 2.687kg. Standardized DDD (intravenous; oral route) for representative antimicrobials were: Amoxicillin (0.08; 0.08), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (0.27; 0.08), ampicillin (0.27; x), cloxacillin (0.13; 0.13), penicillin G sodium (0.12), cefazolin (0.13), cefuroxime (0.27; x), cefotaxime (0.27), ceftazidime (0.27), ceftriaxone (0.13), cefepime (0.27) piperacillin-tazobactam (0.54), aztreonam (0.24), azithromycin (0.03; 0.03), clindamycin (0.04; 0.04), amikacin (0.04), gentamicin (0.01), metronidazole (0.04; 0.08), ciprofloxacin (0.04; 0.05), levofloxacin (x;x), fluconazole (0.02; 0.02), itraconazole (0.01; 0.01), fosfomycin (0.27). Restricted antimicrobials: meropenem (0.11), teicoplanin (0.02), vancomycin (0.08; 0.11), linezolid (0.08; 0.08), daptomycin (x), amphotericin B liposomal (0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A useful method for antimicrobial DDD measurement in neonatology has been designed to monitor antimicrobial consumption in hospital settings. It should be validated in further studies and thereby included in the design for neonatal antimicrobial stewardship programs in the future.

Antimicrobial defined daily dose in neonatal population.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial defined daily dose (DDD), a standardized metric to assess antimicrobial consumption in adult population, has limitations hampering its use in neonatal patients. This study proposes an alternative DDD design applicable for neonates. METHODS: Neonates (<1 month-old) from 6 Spanish hospitals during a 12-months period were included. Weight and weeks gestational age of each neonate were the variables collected. DDD (g) for each antimicrobial was calculated by multiplying the obtained weight times the recommended dose (mg/kg) of the antimicrobial for the most common infectious indication selected by the Delphi method. RESULTS: A total of 4820 neonates were included. Mean age was 36.72 weeks of gestational age and Mean weight was 2.687kg. Standardized DDD (intravenous; oral route) for representative antimicrobials were: Amoxicillin (0.08; 0.08), amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (0.27; 0.08), ampicillin (0.27; x), cloxacillin (0.13; 0.13), penicillin G sodium (0.12), cefazolin (0.13), cefuroxime (0.27; x), cefotaxime (0.27), ceftazidime (0.27), ceftriaxone (0.13), cefepime (0.27) piperacillin-tazobactam (0.54), aztreonam (0.24), azithromycin (0.03; 0.03), clindamycin (0.04; 0.04), amikacin (0.04), gentamicin (0.01), metronidazole (0.04; 0.08), ciprofloxacin (0.04; 0.05), levofloxacin (x;x), fluconazole (0.02; 0.02), itraconazole (0.01; 0.01), fosfomycin (0.27). Restricted antimicrobials: meropenem (0.11), teicoplanin (0.02), vancomycin (0.08; 0.11), linezolid (0.08; 0.08), daptomycin (x), amphotericin B liposomal (0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A useful method for antimicrobial DDD measurement in neonatology has been designed to monitor antimicrobial consumption in hospital settings. It should be validated in further studies and thereby included in the design for neonatal antimicrobial stewardship programs in the future.

Estudio multicéntrico de la incidencia y evitabilidad de los incidentes por medicamentos en pacientes que acuden a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas.

Objetivo: Determinar la incidencia, gravedad y evitabilidad de los  incidentes por medicamentos detectados en los pacientes que acuden a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas, e identificar los grupos de edad de mayor riesgo y los medicamentos implicados.Método: Estudio multicéntrico observacional prospectivo, realizado entre  marzo y junio de 2017, en pacientes entre 0 y 16 años que acudieron a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas de ocho hospitales públicos españoles. Se recogieron tres tipos de incidentes: eventos adversos por medicamentos, errores de medicación e intoxicaciones accidentales. Los incidentes se caracterizaron atendiendo a su gravedad, evitabilidad, grupos de edad afectados y medicamentos implicados.Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio se registraron 99.797 visitas a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas y se recogieron 334 incidentes por medicamentos en 334 pacientes, de los cuales el 52,4% fueron varones, con una media de edad de 47,1 ± 44,4 meses. La incidencia de pacientes  con incidentes fue del 0,3%. Del total de incidentes, 264 (79%) fueron considerados prevenibles y 158 (47,3%) produjeron daño a los pacientes. Los incidentes detectados fueron 144 (43,1%) eventos adversos por medicamentos, 218 (65,2%) errores de medicación (74 de ellos errores con daño, que se incluyen asimismo como eventos adversos prevenibles) y 46 (13,7%) intoxicaciones accidentales. Los preescolares (edad: 1-5 años) presentaron el 60,8% de los incidentes, siendo también el grupo de edad con un mayor porcentaje de incidentes prevenibles (64%). Un total de 351 medicamentos estuvieron implicados en los incidentes y pertenecieron mayoritariamente a tres grupos terapéuticos: antiinfecciosos de uso sistémico (171; 48,7%), sistema nervioso (66; 18,8%) y sistema respiratorio (41; 11,7%).Conclusiones: La incidencia de incidentes por medicamentos en los pacientes pediátricos que acudieron a servicios de urgencias fue inferior a la referida en pacientes adultos, si bien prácticamente la mitad de los incidentes detectados causaron daños a los pacientes. Los niños preescolares (1-5 años) fueron identificados como el grupo de edad con mayor riesgo. Los incidentes registrados estuvieron causados por un número reducido de medicamentos. Un elevado porcentaje de los incidentes fueron prevenibles, lo que confirma la imperiosa necesidad de implementar medidas de prevención de incidentes en esta población.

Objetivo: Determinar la incidencia, gravedad y evitabilidad de los  incidentes por medicamentos detectados en los pacientes que acuden a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas, e identificar los grupos de edad de mayor riesgo y los medicamentos implicados.Método: Estudio multicéntrico observacional prospectivo, realizado entre  marzo y junio de 2017, en pacientes entre 0 y 16 años que acudieron a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas de ocho hospitales públicos españoles. Se recogieron tres tipos de incidentes: eventos adversos por medicamentos, errores de medicación e intoxicaciones accidentales. Los incidentes se caracterizaron atendiendo a su gravedad, evitabilidad, grupos de edad afectados y medicamentos implicados.Resultados: Durante el periodo de estudio se registraron 99.797 visitas a los servicios de urgencias pediátricas y se recogieron 334 incidentes por medicamentos en 334 pacientes, de los cuales el 52,4% fueron varones, con una media de edad de 47,1 ± 44,4 meses. La incidencia de pacientes  con incidentes fue del 0,3%. Del total de incidentes, 264 (79%) fueron considerados prevenibles y 158 (47,3%) produjeron daño a los pacientes. Los incidentes detectados fueron 144 (43,1%) eventos adversos por medicamentos, 218 (65,2%) errores de medicación (74 de ellos errores con daño, que se incluyen asimismo como eventos adversos prevenibles) y 46 (13,7%) intoxicaciones accidentales. Los preescolares (edad: 1-5 años) presentaron el 60,8% de los incidentes, siendo también el grupo de edad con un mayor porcentaje de incidentes prevenibles (64%). Un total de 351 medicamentos estuvieron implicados en los incidentes y pertenecieron mayoritariamente a tres grupos terapéuticos: antiinfecciosos de uso sistémico (171; 48,7%), sistema nervioso (66; 18,8%) y sistema respiratorio (41; 11,7%).Conclusiones: La incidencia de incidentes por medicamentos en los pacientes pediátricos que acudieron a servicios de urgencias fue inferior a la referida en pacientes adultos, si bien prácticamente la mitad de los incidentes detectados causaron daños a los pacientes. Los niños preescolares (1-5 años) fueron identificados como el grupo de edad con mayor riesgo. Los incidentes registrados estuvieron causados por un número reducido de medicamentos. Un elevado porcentaje de los incidentes fueron prevenibles, lo que confirma la imperiosa necesidad de implementar medidas de prevención de incidentes en esta población.

[Adecuacy of pediatric antimicrobial prescribing in the Emergency Department at discharge]. / Adecuación de la prescripción de antimicrobianos en procesos ambulatorios atendidos en Urgencias.

INTRODUCTION: In January 2019, Community of Madrid's Health Department published a guide about the use of antimicrobials in outpatient children. Taking this regional Guide as reference, this study was aimed at estimating the adequacy of the antimicrobial stewardship at discharge from a pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Secondarily, the differences in adequacy according to the diagnosis and the prescriber were studied, and the agreement between this Guide and the protocols of the ED was assessed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on patients under 16 years old, with a diagnosis included in the regional Guide who were discharged from a pediatric ED between March of 2018 and February of 2019. Prescription was considered adequate when the indication, the antibiotic and the posology (dosage, dosing interval, length of treatment and route of administration) were correct. RESULTS: 165 out of 648 (25,5%) infectious diseases processes analyzed received antimicrobial treatment. In 23 processes treated with antimicrobial, the adequacy could not be evaluated due to the absence of data necessary to assess any aspect of posology. Therapy was considered appropriate in 550/625 processes (88.0%). When antimicrobial treatment was prescribed, 70/142 (49.3%) were appropriate and no statistically significant differences in adequacy were found between prescribers. Posology was the worst handled point of the prescription (26.3%). Tract urinary infection, conjunctivitis and otitis media were the pathologies with the lowest adecuacy (44.4%; 50.0% and 52.2%) and presented the highest discrepancy between the Guide and the center protocols (k=0.308; k=0.000; k=0.586). CONCLUSIONS: The adequacy of the management of infectious processes to the reference Guide in our pediatric ED was high, but it was below 50% when antimicrobial treatment was required. The degree of adequacy to the local protocols of the center was greater than to the regional Guide. This reveals a discrepancy between the 2documents that should be analyzed and corrected according to the available scientific evidence.

Clinical course of severe patients with COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab: report from a cohort study in Spain.

Background: We report the long-term outcomes, changes in laboratory parameters, the incidence of secondary nosocomial infections and treatment cost of a Spanish cohort of patients with severe COVID-19 that received tocilizumab (TCZ).Methods: Retrospective cohort of PCR confirmed adult patients who received TCZ from March 1 to 24, 2020 in a tertiary hospital was analyzed. Patients were followed up until 10 May 2020.Results: We included 162 patients (median age 64 years; 70.4% male). At time of TCZ administration, 48.1% of patients were on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Over a median follow-up of 53 days, 46.9% of patients were discharge in good conditions and 19.8% were still hospitalized. The overall mortality was 33.3%, being higher in patients on IMV than those who did not (46.2% vs 26.7%, P < 0.001). A significant improvement in the lymphocyte count, C-reactive protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and D-dimer was observed. Overall, 43.2% patients presented nosocomial infections, causing death in 8%. Infections were more prevalent in ICU units (63.0% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The total cost of TCZ was €371,784.Conclusions: Among the patients who used TCZ, one third died, regardless the improvement in some inflammatory biomarkers. The incidence of secondary nosocomial infections was high.

Bromocriptine for the treatment of postoperative cerebellar mutism syndrome in pediatric patients: Three case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebellar mutism syndrome (CMS) is a common complication after posterior fossa tumor resection. It is characterized by a significant lack or loss of speech. Its biological origin remains unclear and there are no standardized treatments. However, bromocriptine seems to be a possible treatment for this condition. CASE REPORT: In this paper, we present three cases of pediatric patients (4, 5, and 17-year old) who developed CMS after posterior fossa tumor surgery. They were treated with bromocriptine to improve neurological symptoms.Management and outcome: Bromocriptine was started at a low dose and was progressively increased to reach the minimum effective dose. After four months of treatment, a normal and fluid speech was observed in the three patients. No discontinuation due to adverse events were reported. DISCUSSION: Bromocriptine has shown to be an effective and safe treatment for CMS in pediatric patients after posterior fossa tumor resection.

Outpatients' Opinion And Experience Regarding Telepharmacy During The COVID-19 Pandemic: The Enopex Project.

BACKGROUND: Telepharmacy, as a remote pharmaceutical care procedure, is being used worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the aim of preserving the health of patients and professionals. Its future development should incorporate the assessment of patient perception, but no research study has investigated it. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to poll the opinions and experiences of outpatients with telepharmacy through a purpose-developed questionnaire and to assess it's quality through an internal validity and reliability analysis. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study of adult patients who used telepharmacy services during the COVID-19 lockdown period in Spain. The subjects answered a 24-item questionnaire, after giving their informed consent. Place of delivery, informed pharmacotherapeutic follow-up, opinion about telepharmacy, future development, ethics/satisfaction, and coordination constituted the six questionnaire categories. After assessing the adequate sample size with the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test, the Bartlett sphericity test analyzed the validity of the questionnaire. The intraclass correlation coefficient and Cronbach's α coefficient calculations verified the reliability and internal consistency. RESULTS: A total of 9442 interviews were administered to patients from 81 hospitals, of which 8079 were valid (52.8% female). A 54.1% were aged between 41-65 years; 42.7% had been in treatment for more than 5 years; 42.8% lived between 6-31 miles from the hospital. As many as 96.7% of patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with telepharmacy, 97.5% considering it complementary to their usual follow-up; 55.9% expressed a preference for being followed up face to face when visiting the hospital. 75.6% said they had rather receive their medication at home. The sample size obtained was deemed appropriate [the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test (0.789) and Bartlett's sphericity test (p<0.005)]. The reliability analysis resulted in a Cronbach α = 0.7. CONCLUSION: Patients have shown high satisfaction with telepharmacy and the ENOPEX questionnaire is a tool with sufficient validity and reliability to be used in the evaluation of the care that patients receive through telepharmacy.

Survey on the situation of telepharmacy as applied to the outpatient care in hospital pharmacy departments in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the status of the implementation and development of  telepharmacy as applied to the pharmaceutical care of outpatients treated at  hospital pharmacy services in Spain during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Six weeks after the beginning of the confinement period, an online 10- question survey was sent to all members of the Spanish Society of Hospital  Pharmacists. A single response per hospital was requested. The survey included  questions on the provision of remote pharmaceutical care prior to the onset of  the health crisis, patient selection criteria, procedures for home delivery of  medications and the means used to deliver them, the number of patients who  benefited from telepharmacy, and the number of referrals made. Finally,  respondents were asked whether a teleconsultation was carried out before  sending patients their medication and whether these deliveries were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 39.3% (n = 185) of all the hospitals in the National Health  System (covering all of Spain's autonomous regions) responded to the survey.  Before the beginning of the crisis, 83.2% (n = 154) of hospital pharmacy  services did not carry out remote pharmaceutical care activities that included  telepharmacy with remote delivery of medication. During the study period,  119,972 patients were treated, with 134,142 deliveries of medication being  completed. Most hospitals did not use patient selection criteria. A total of 30.2%  of hospitals selected patients based on their personal circumstances. Home  delivery and informed delivery (87%; 116,129 deliveries) was the option used in most cases. The means used to deliver the medication mainly included the use  of external courier services (47.0%; 87 hospitals) or the hospital's own transport services (38.4%; 71 hospitals). As many as 87.6% of hospitals carried out  teleconsultations prior to sending out medications and 59.6% recorded their  telepharmacy activities in the hospital pharmacy appointments record. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of implementation of telepharmacy in outpatient care in  Spain during the study period in the pandemic was high. This made it possible to guarantee the continuity of care for a large number of patients.

Objetivo: Analizar la situación de la implantación y desarrollo de la telefarmacia aplicada a la atención farmacéutica a pacientes externos de los servicios de  farmacia hospitalaria en España durante la pandemia por la COVID-19.Método: Se envió una encuesta online de 10 preguntas a todos los socios de la  Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria a las seis semanas del inicio del  periodo de confinamiento por la pandemia. Se solicitó una única respuesta por  hospital. Se incluyeron preguntas sobre la realización de atención farmacéutica  no presencial con dispensación a distancia previa al inicio de la crisis sanitaria,  los criterios de selección de pacientes, los procedimientos de envío de  medicación y los medios utilizados, el número de pacientes que se han  beneficiado de la telefarmacia y el número de envíos realizados. Por último, se  identificó la realización o no de teleconsulta previa al envío de medicación y si la  actividad quedó registrada.Resultados: Un 39,3% (n = 185) del total de hospitales públicos del Sistema  Nacional de Salud pertenecientes a todas las comunidades autónomas  respondieron a la encuesta. El 83,2% (n = 154) de los servicios de farmacia  hospitalarios no realizaban actividades de atención farmacéutica no presencial  con telefarmacia que incluyeran envío de medicación antes del inicio de la crisis  sanitaria. En el periodo de estudio se atendieron 119.972 pacientes y se  realizaron 134.142 envíos de medicación. La mayoría de los hospitales no  utilizaron criterios de selección de pacientes. El 30,2% de los centros  seleccionaron en función de las circunstancias personales del paciente. La  dispensación domiciliaria y entrega informada (87%; 116.129 envíos) fue la  opción utilizada de forma mayoritaria para el envío. Los medios para hacer llegar la medicación fueron, principalmente, la mensajería externa (47%; 87 centros) o medios propios del hospital (38,4%; 71 centros). Un 87,6% de los hospitales realizaron teleconsulta previa al envío de medicación y el 59,6% registró la actividad de telefarmacia en la agenda de citación. Conclusiones: La implantación de la telefarmacia aplicada a la atención a  pacientes externos en España durante la pandemia ha sido elevada. Así se ha  podido garantizar la continuidad de los tratamientos de un elevado número de  pacientes.

Hospital pharmacist challenges in evaluation of scientific evidence and its incorporation to pharmacotherapeutic protocols through therapeutic committees in COVID-19 times.

Type 2 coronavirus pandemics that is plaguing almost all the world has caused  qualitative and quantitative strains in health systems that have had to be responded to. The lack of known vaccines and effective treatments has generated the need to  use drugs with very little evidence for their incorporation into pharmacotherapeutic  protocols agreed by the clinical team. The hospital pharmacist, within the  multidisciplinary team, has been responsible for critically evaluating the alternatives and positioning them in these protocols. Finally, some ethical and legal questions  that should be considered in this scenario are analyzed in this article.

La pandemia por coronavirus tipo 2 que está azotando prácticamente todo el mundo ha provocado en los sistemas sanitarios tensiones cualitativas y cuantitativas a las  que ha habido que dar respuesta. La inexistencia de vacunas y de tratamientos  eficaces conocidos ha generado la necesidad de utilizar fármacos con muy escasa  evidencia para su incorporación en protocolos farmacoterapéuticos consensuados  por el equipo clínico. El farmacéutico de hospital, dentro del equipo multidisciplinar,  ha sido en muchas ocasiones el responsable de evaluar críticamente las alternativas para su posicionamiento en estos protocolos. Se analizan en el presente artículo algunas cuestiones éticas y legales que deben ser consideradas en este  escenario.