Ventricular arrhythmias in athletes: Role of a comprehensive diagnostic workup.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) represent a critical issue with regard to sports eligibility assessment in athletes. The ideal diagnostic evaluation of competitive and leisure-time athletes with complex VAs has not been clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical implications of invasive electrophysiological assessments and endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) among athletes with VAs. METHODS: We evaluated 227 consecutive athletes who presented to our institutions after being disqualified from participating in sports because of VAs. After noninvasive tests, electrophysiological study (EPS), electroanatomic mapping (EAM), and EAM- or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging-guided EMB was performed, following a prespecified protocol. Sports eligibility status was redefined at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: From our sample, 188 athletes (82.8%) underwent EAM and EPS, and 42 (15.2%) underwent EMB. A diagnosis of heart disease could be formulated in 30% of the study population (67/227; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.36) after noninvasive tests; in 37% (83/227; 95% CI 31%-43%) after EPS and EAM; and in 45% (102/227; 95% CI 39%-51%) after EMB. In the subset of athletes undergoing EMB, invasive diagnostic workup allowed diagnostic reclassification of half of the athletes (n = 21 [50%]). Reclassification was particularly common among subjects without definitive findings after noninvasive evaluation (n = 23; 87% reclassified). History of syncope, abnormal echocardiogram, presence of late gadolinium enhancement, and abnormal EAM were linked to sports ineligibility at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive invasive workup provided additional diagnostic elements and could improve the sports eligibility assessment of athletes presenting with VAs. The extensive invasive evaluation presented could be especially helpful when noninvasive tests show unclear findings.

Rationale and design of the EPLURIBUS Study (Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner).

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the standard of reference for myocardial fibrosis detection by late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) is emerging as a promising alternative. The Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner study will assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of a comprehensive functional and anatomical cardiac evaluation with CCT as compared with CMR and invasive coronary angiography as standard of reference. METHODS: Consecutive patients with a newly diagnosed left ventricle (LV) dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and a clinical indication to CMR will be screened. Exclusion criteria will be contraindications to contrast agents and impaired renal function. CCT will be performed per protocol within 10 days from CMR. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled within 24 months. We will evaluate with CCT volume and ejection fraction of the LV and right ventricle, presence, extent and pattern of delayed enhancement and cardiac venous system. Moreover, presence and degree of coronary stenoses will be evaluated among patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography in the 6 months following CCT. RESULTS: The primary study endpoints will be: first, to assess the diagnostic performance of CCT vs. CMR to detect the delayed enhancement in a territory-based and patient-based analysis; second, to assess the agreement between CCT and CMR in the discrimination between ischemic vs. nonischemic delayed enhancement patters in a territory-based analysis; third, to assess the correlation between CCT and CMR for LV and right ventricle end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes and ejection fraction measurements. CONCLUSION: The Evidence for a comPrehensive evaLUation of left ventRicle dysfnctIon By a whole-heart coverage cardiac compUted tomography Scanner study will assess the diagnostic performance of CCT using the latest scanner generation for a comprehensive evaluation of patients with new-onset LV dysfunction.

CMR for Identifying the Substrate of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With Normal Echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) may identify structural heart disease (SHD) in patients with ventricular arrhythmia who had echocardiography ruled out pathological findings. BACKGROUND: Approximately one-half of sudden cardiac deaths are attributable to malignant VA. Echocardiography is commonly used to identify SHD that is the most frequent substrate of VA. METHODS: A single-center prospective study was conducted in consecutive patients with significant VA, categorized as >1,000 but <10,000 ventricular ectopic beats [VEBs]/24 h; ≥10,000 VEBs/24 h; nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or a history of resuscitated cardiac arrest, and no pathological findings at echocardiography, requiring a clinically indicated CMR. Primary endpoint was CMR detection of SHD. Secondary endpoints were a composite of CMR detection of SHD and abnormal findings not specific for a definite SHD diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 946 patients were enrolled (mean 41 ± 16 years of age; 64% men). CMR studies were used to diagnose SHD in 241 patients (25.5%) and abnormal findings not specific for a definite SHD diagnosis in 187 patients (19.7%). Myocarditis (n = 91) was the more frequent disease, followed by arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (n = 55), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 39), ischemic heart disease (n = 22), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 13), congenital cardiac disease (n = 10), left ventricle noncompaction (n = 5), and pericarditis (n = 5). The strongest univariate and multivariate predictors of SHD on CMR images were chest pain (odds ratios [OR]: 2.52 and 2.38, respectively) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (ORs: 2.67 and 2.23, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: SHD was able to be identified on CMR imaging in a sizable number of patients with significant VA and completely normal echocardiography. Chest pain and sustained ventricular tachycardia were the strongest predictors of positive CMR imaging results.

Plaque quantification by coronary computed tomography angiography using intravascular ultrasound as a reference standard: a comparison between standard and last generation computed tomography scanners.

AIMS: The emerging role of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as a non-invasive tool for atherosclerosis evaluation is supported by data reporting a good correlation between CCTA and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for plaque volume quantification. Aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a last generation CT-scanner may improve coronary plaque volume assessment using IVUS as standard-of-reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: From a registry of 1915 consecutive, all-comers, patients who underwent a clinically indicated IVUS evaluation we enrolled 59 patients who underwent CCTA with a 64-slice CT (Group 1) and 59 patients who underwent CCTA with whole-heart coverage CT scanner (Group 2). Patients who underwent CCTA with unfavourable heart rhythm were not excluded from the analysis. Image quality (4-point Likert scale) focused on plaque analysis was evaluated. Plaque volume quantification by CCTA was compared to IVUS. No difference in clinical characteristics was found between Group 1 and Group 2. Plaque volume quantification by CCTA was considered not feasible in 11 plaques of Group 1 and in 4 plaques of Group 2 (P = 0.09). Higher correlation for plaque volume quantification by CCTA vs. IVUS was demonstrated in Group 2 when compared with Group 1 (r = 0.9888 vs. 0.9499; P < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman analysis showed plaque volume overestimation by CCTA of 11.9 mm3 in Group 1 and 4 mm2 in Group 2 (P < 0.001). Effective radiation dose of CCTA was significantly lower in Group 2 vs. Group 1 (2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 8.1 ± 3.6 mSv, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CCTA using a new scanner generation showed to be an accurate non-invasive tool to assess and quantify coronary plaque volume.

CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) alone, adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by computed tomography (CTP) alone, and coronary CTA + CTP by using a 16-cm Z-axis coverage scanner versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the clinical standard. BACKGROUND: Diagnostic performance of coronary CTA for in-stent restenosis detection is still challenging. Recently, CTP showed additional diagnostic power over coronary CTA in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. However, few data are available on CTP performance in patients with previous stent implantation. METHODS: Consecutive stable patients with previous coronary stenting referred for ICA were enrolled. All patients underwent stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP + coronary CTA. Invasive FFR was performed during ICA when clinically indicated. The diagnostic rate and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA, CTP, and coronary CTA + CTP were evaluated in stent-, territory-, and patient-based analyses. RESULTS: In the 150 enrolled patients (132 men; mean age 65.1 ± 9.1 years), the CTP diagnostic rate was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA in all analyses (territory based [96.7% vs. 91.1%; p < 0.0001] and patient based [96% vs. 68%; p < 0.0001]). When ICA was used as gold standard, CTP diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA in all analyses (territory based [92.1% vs. 85.5%, p < 0.03] and patient based [86.7% vs. 76.7%, p < 0.03]). The concordant coronary CTA + CTP assessment exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy values versus ICA (95.8% in the territory-based analysis). The diagnostic accuracy of CTP was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA (75% vs. 30.5%; p < 0.001). The radiation exposure of coronary CTA + CTP was 4.15 ± 1.5 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with coronary stents, CTP significantly improved the diagnostic rate and accuracy of coronary CTA alone compared with both ICA and invasive FFR as gold standard.

Interpretability of coronary CT angiography performed with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in 300 consecutive patients with coronary artery bypass grafts.

AIMS: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an accurate non-invasive tool for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). However, inability to sustain a long breath-hold, high heart rate (HR) and atrial fibrillation may affect image quality. Moreover, radiation exposure is still a matter of some concern. A scanner combining 0.23-mm spatial resolution, new iterative reconstruction and fast gantry rotation time has been recently introduced in the clinical field. The aims of our study were to evaluate interpretability, radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA performed with the latest generation of cardiac-CT scanners compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the assessment of bypass grafts, and non-grafted and post-anastomotic native coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 300 patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA with a 16-cm z-axis coverage, 256-detector rows, and 0.28-sec gantry rotation time scanner. Coronary artery and graft interpretability, image quality and effective dose (ED) were assessed in all patients and diagnostic accuracy was evaluated in a subgroup of 100 patients who underwent ICA. Mean HR during the scan was 69.6 ±â€¯10.8. Sinus rhythm was present in 118 patients with HR < 75 bpm and in 112 patients with HR ≥ 75 bpm, while 70 patients had atrial fibrillation. CABG interpretability was 100%. Compared to ICA, CCTA was able to correctly detecting occlusions or significant stenoses of all CABG segments. Overall interpretability of native coronary segments was 95.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of coronary arteries were 98.3%, 97.4%, 93.1%, 99.3% and 96.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in a patient based analysis was 95.2%. Mean ED was 3.14 ±â€¯1.7 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to evaluating CABG and native coronary arteries with excellent interpretability and low radiation exposure even in the presence of unfavorable heart rhythm.

Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography performed in 100 consecutive patients with coronary stents using a whole-organ high-definition CT scanner.

AIMS: To evaluate image quality, interpretability, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed with a new scanner equipped with 0.23-mm spatial resolution, new generation iterative reconstruction, 0.28-second gantry rotation time and intra-cycle motion-correction algorithm in consecutive patients with coronary stents, including those with high heart rate (HR) and atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 100 consecutive patients (85 males, mean age 65 ±â€¯10 years) with previous coronary stent implantation scheduled for clinically indicated non-emergent invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Image quality, coronary interpretability and diagnostic accuracy vs. ICA were evaluated and the effective dose (ED) was recorded. RESULTS: Mean HR during the scan was 67 ±â€¯13 bpm. Twenty-six patients had >65 bpm HR during scanning and 13 patients had AF. Overall, image quality was high (Likert = 3.2 ±â€¯0.9). Stent interpretability was 95.8% (184/192 stents). Among 192 stented segments, CCTA correctly identified 22 out of 24 with >50% in-stent restenosis (ISR) (sensitivity 92%). In a stent-based analysis, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and diagnostic accuracy for ISR detection were 91%, 99%, 60% and 91%, respectively. In a patient-based analysis, CCTA diagnostic accuracy was 85%. Overall, mean ED of CCTA was 2.4 ±â€¯1.2 mSv. CONCLUSIONS: A whole-organ CT scanner was able to evaluate coronary stents with good diagnostic performance and low radiation exposure, also in presence of unfavorable HR and heart rhythm. TRANSLATIONAL ASPECT: The present study is the first to evaluate the CCTA capability of detecting in-stent restenosis in consecutive patients, including those with high HR and AF, using a recent scanner generation that combines improved spatial and temporal resolution with wide coverage. Using the whole-organ high-definition CT scanner we obtained high quality images of coronary stents with good interpretability and diagnostic accuracy combined with low radiation exposure, even in patients with unfavorable HR or heart rhythm for CCTA evaluation.

Low-Dose Coronary CT Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure with Two Different Approaches.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality, coronary interpretability and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) with the latest scanner generation, comparing two different technical approaches. A new scanner that combines a 0.23 mm spatial resolution, a new generation of iterative reconstruction, fast gantry rotation time and the intracycle motion-correction algorithm to improve the temporal resolution was recently introduced in the clinical field. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 105 consecutive patients with chronic AF who performed CCTA with a whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner (16-cm z-axis coverage with 256 detector rows, 0.28 s gantry rotation time). Five of them were excluded for impaired renal function. Patients were randomized between a double acquisition protocol (50 patients, group 1) or a single acquisition protocol (50 patients, group 2). The image quality, coronary segment interpretability and effective dose (ED) of CCTA were assessed. RESULTS: The mean HR during the scan was 85.6±21 bpm in group 1 vs. 83.7±23 bpm in Group 2, respectively (p < ns). In group 2, overall image quality was high and comparable with that of group 1 (Likert scale =3.2 ± 1.4 vs. 3.3 ± 1.2, p = ns, in group 1 and 2, respectively). Coronary interpretability was high and similar between the two groups (97.5% and 97.1% in group 1 and 2, p = ns, respectively). Mean ED was significantly higher in group 1 than in group 2 (5.3 ± 1.8 mSv vs. 2.7 ± 0.7 mSv, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to perform CCTA with a single-acquisition protocol with high image quality and low radiation exposure in AF patients.

Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated a significant improvement in the diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for the evaluation of in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, coronary stent assessment is still challenging, especially because of beam-hardening artifacts due to metallic stent struts and high atherosclerotic burden of non-stented segments. Adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by CT (CTP) recently demonstrated to be a feasible and accurate tool for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). Yet, scarce data are available on the performance of CTP in patients with previous stent implantation. AIM OF THE STUDY: We aim to assess the diagnostic performance of CCTA alone, CTP alone and CCTA plus CTP performed with a new scanner generation using quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as standard of reference. METHODS: We will enroll 300 consecutive patients with previous stent implantation, referred for non-emergent and clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) due to suspected ISR or progression of CAD in native coronary segments. All patients will be subjected to stress myocardial CTP and a rest CCTA. The first 150 subjects will undergo static CTP scan, while the following 150 patients will undergo dynamic CTP scan. Measurement of invasive FFR will be performed during ICA when clinically indicated. RESULTS: The primary study end points will be: 1) assessment of the diagnostic performance (diagnostic rate, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy) of CCTA, CTP, combined CCTA-CTP and concordant CCTA-CTP vs. ICA as standard of reference in a territory-based and patient-based analysis; 2) assessment of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of CCTA, CTP, combined CCTA-CTP and concordant CCTA-CTP vs. invasive FFR as standard of reference in a territory-based analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The ADVANTAGE study aims to provide an answer to the intriguing question whether the combined anatomical and functional assessment with CCTA plus CTP may have higher diagnostic performance as compared to CCTA alone in identifying stented patients with significant ISR or CAD progression.

Diagnostic performance of coronary CT angiography carried out with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in patients with high heart rate.

BACKGROUND: Aim of the study was to evaluate image quality, radiation exposure and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed with a novel cardiac CT scanner in patients with very high heart rate (HR). METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 202 patients (111 men, mean age 66±8years) with suspected coronary artery disease who underwent CCTA with a whole-organ volumetric CT scanner. The HR during the scan was ≥80bpm in 100 patients (Group 1), while it was ≤65bpm in the remaining 102 patients (Group 2). In all patients, image quality score and coronary interpretability were evaluated and effective dose (ED) was recorded. In 86 of the 202 enrolled patients (40 patients in Group 1, 46 patients in Group 2) who were referred for a clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 6months, diagnostic accuracy of CCTA vs. ICA was evaluated. RESULTS: Mean image quality and coronary interpretability were very high in both Groups (Likert=3.35 vs. 3.39 and 97.3% [1542/1584 segments] and 98% [1569/1600 segments] in Group 1 and Group 2, respectively). Mean ED was lower in Group 2 (1.1±0.5mSv) compared to Group 1 (2.9±1.6mSv). In Group 1, sensitivity and specificity of CCTA for detection of >50% stenosis vs. ICA were 95.2% and 98.9% in a segment-based analysis and 100% and 81.8% in a patient-based analysis, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The whole organ high-definition CT scanner allows evaluating coronary arteries in patients with high HR with excellent image quality, coronary interpretability and low radiation exposure.

Endomyocardial biopsy guided by intracardiac echocardiography as a key step in intracardiac mass diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Based on a plenty of different applications, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is now a well-established technology in complex electrophysiological procedures. Recently, ICE has become the most widely used ultrasound-based imaging tool to guide diagnostic endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). EMB of cardiac mass guided by ICE is an interesting application of ICE. Allowing a correct positioning of the bioptome, ICE reduce the procedure-related risks and the need of a diagnostic open-chest procedure reserving the more invasive approach to selected cases. CASE PRESENTATION: Hereby we report a case series of right ventricular masses in which the EMB was safely and effectively performed under ICE guidance giving essential information for planning the therapeutic strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of both metastatic and primary cardiac tumors relies on the histopathological analyses. The endomyocardial biopsy is a valuable tool for preoperative diagnosis and surgical planning of intracardiac masses suspected for tumors. In our experience, the use of ICE for right ventricle EMB of an intracardiac mass is an attractive modality thanks to the precise localization of the cardiac structures and the ability to guide bioptic withdrawal in the target area.

Image quality and radiation dose of coronary CT angiography performed with whole-heart coverage CT scanner with intra-cycle motion correction algorithm in patients with atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality, coronary evaluability and radiation exposure of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) performed with whole-heart coverage cardiac-CT in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 164 patients with AF who underwent a clinically indicated CCTA with a 16-cm z-axis coverage scanner. In all patients CCTA was performed using prospective ECG-triggering with targeted RR interval. We evaluated image quality, coronary evaluability and effective dose (ED). Patients were divided in two subgroups based on heart rate (HR) during imaging. Group 1: 64 patients with low HR (<75 bpm), group 2: 100 patients with high HR (≥75 bpm). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients and the institutional ethics committee approved the study protocol. RESULTS: In a segment-based analysis, coronary evaluability was 98.4 % (2,577/2,620 segments) in the whole population, without significant differences between groups (1,013/1,024 (98.9 %) and 1,565/1,596 (98.1 %), for groups 1 and 2, respectively, p=0.15). Mean ED was similar in both groups (3.8±1.9 mSv and 3.9±2.1 mSv in groups 1 and 2, respectively, p=0.75) CONCLUSIONS: The whole-heart-coverage scanner could evaluate coronary arteries with high image quality and without increase in radiation exposure in AF patients, even in the high HR group. KEY POINTS: • Last-generation CT scanner improves coronary artery assessment in AF patients. • The new CT scanner enables low radiation exposure in AF patients. • Diagnostic ICA maybe avoided in AF patients with suspected CAD. • Whole-heart coverage CT scanner enables low radiation exposure in AF patients.

Atrial Fibrillation: Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary CT Angiography Performed with a Whole-Heart 230-µm Spatial Resolution CT Scanner.

Purpose To assess image quality, interpretability, diagnostic accuracy, and radiation exposure of a computed tomography (CT) scanner with 16-cm coverage and 230-µm spatial resolution at coronary artery evaluation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) by using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method and to compare the results with those obtained in patients with sinus rhythm (SR). Materials and Methods Written informed consent and institutional ethics committee approval were obtained. Between March 2015 and February 2016, 166 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled (83 with AF, 83 with SR). They underwent ICA and coronary CT angiography performed with a whole-heart CT scanner. Image quality, coronary segment interpretability, effective dose (ED), and diagnostic accuracy were assessed at CT angiography and were compared with those attained with ICA. Diagnostic performance of the groups was compared with the pairwise McNemar test. Results Mean heart rate during scanning was 83 beats per minute ± 21 (standard deviation) in the AF group and 63 beats per minute ± 14 in the SR group (P < .01). Coronary interpretability was 98.5% in the AF group and 98.4% in the SR group (P = .96). In a segment-based analysis, sensitivity and specificity in the detection of coronary stenosis of more than 50% compared with detection of ICA were 96.4% and 98.7%, respectively, in the chronic AF group (P = .98) and 95.6% and 98.1%, respectively, in the SR group (P = .32). In a patient-based analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 95.2% and 97.6%, respectively, in the chronic AF group (P = .95) and 97.8% and 94.7%, respectively, in the SR group (P = .93). Conclusion Whole-heart CT enables evaluation of coronary arteries with high image quality, low radiation exposure, and high diagnostic accuracy in patients with chronic AF, with a diagnostic performance similar to that in patients with SR. © RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Evaluation of coronary plaque characteristics with coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a long-term follow-up study.

AIMS: Recent studies suggested that even non-obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) increases major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) rate. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may detect specific plaque characteristics that may affect prognosis in patients with non-obstructive CAD. METHODS: We enrolled 245 patients who underwent CCTA between April 2004 and April 2007 for suspected CAD and were found to have non-obstructive CAD. Positive remodelling index (PRI), low-attenuation plaque (LAP), plaque burden (PB), spotty calcification (SC), and napkin-ring sign (NRS) have been evaluated for each coronary plaque detected. Acute coronary syndrome, all-cause/cardiac death, and very late elective revascularization (vl-ER) were the endpoints of the study. RESULTS: A total of 28 events were recorded (2 STEMI, 4 NSTEMI, 6 UA, 2 cardiac deaths, 4 non-cardiac death, and 10 vl-ERs) at long-term follow-up (98 ± 20 months). When adjusted for significant clinical variables PRI > 1.4 (HR 3.31 CI 95% 1.11-9.91, P = 0.0392), LAP (HR 8.45 CI 95% 2.22-32.21, P = 0.0019), PB > 0.7 (HR 5.25 CI 95% 1.45-19.03, P = 0.0120), and NRS (HR 12.52 CI 95% 1.51-103.90, P = 0.0198) were still significantly associated with higher rate of hard cardiac events at follow-up. The Kaplan-Meyer curves confirmed lower cumulative hard cardiac events-free survival in patients presenting at least one coronary plaque with two or more high-risk characteristics when compared with patients with no lesion with more than one high-risk plaque characteristics (log-rank P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk plaque characteristics at CCTA (PRI > 1.4, PB > 0.7, LAP, and NRS) seem to be promising for risk stratification of patients with non-obstructive CAD.

Long-Term Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Left Ventricle Noncompaction: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is useful for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). However, there are limited data regarding its prognostic value. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the prognostic relevance of CMR findings in patients with LVNC. METHODS: A total of 113 patients with an echocardiographic diagnosis of LVNC underwent CMR at 5 referral centers. CMR diagnostic criterion of LVNC (noncompacted/compacted ratio >2.3 in end-diastole) was confirmed in all patients. We performed left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular quantitative analysis and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessments and analyzed the following LVNC diagnostic criteria: left ventricular noncompacted myocardial mass (LV-ncMM) >20% and >25%, total LV-ncMM index >15 g/m2, noncompacted/compacted ratio ≥3:1 ≥1 of segments 1 to 3 and 7 to 16 or ≥2:1 in at least 1 of segments 4 to 6 of the American Heart Association model. Outcome was a composite of thromboembolic events, heart failure hospitalizations, ventricular arrhythmias, and cardiac death. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 48 ± 24 months, cardiac events (CEs) occurred in 36 patients (16 heart failure hospitalizations, 10 ventricular arrhythmias, 5 cardiac deaths, and 5 thromboembolic events). LV dilation, impaired LV ejection fraction, and LV-ncMM >20% was significantly more frequent in patients with CEs. LV fibrosis was detected by using LGE in 11 cases. CMR predictors of CEs were LV dilation and LGE. LGE was associated with improved prediction of CEs, compared with clinical data and CMR functional parameters in all 3 models. No CEs occurred in patients without dilated cardiomyopathy and/or LGE. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LVNC evaluated by using CMR, the degree of LV trabeculation seems to have no prognostic impact over and above LV dilation, LV systolic dysfunction, and presence of LGE.

Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight.

BACKGROUND: Coronary CT angiography (CTA) is gaining widespread acceptance for the non-invasive evaluation of coronary arteries. However, radiation exposure and administration of iodinated contrast agents are still reasons of some concern. The 80 kV tube voltage increases the attenuation of iodine, allowing to use lower iodine concentration contrast agents for coronary CTA. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA performed with 64-slice scanner, 80 kV tube voltage, iterative reconstruction algorithm and ultra-low concentration contrast medium to reduce iodine load and radiation dose. METHODS: We enrolled 45 patients with low body weight and indication for elective invasive coronary angiography (ICA). All patients received an 80 ml bolus of Iodixanol-270 at an infusion rate of 5 mL/s and underwent coronary CTA (80 kV and 500-550 mA) with prospective ECG-triggering. Image quality score, type of artifacts, coronary CTA evaluability, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure were assessed. RESULTS: Pre-test probability of CAD was low-to-intermediate (48%). Accordingly, the prevalence of obstructive CAD was 47% (21 out of 45 patients). Most (93%) of the patients were pre-treated with intravenous metoprolol before scanning and achieved a heart rate suitable for prospective ECG-triggering coronary CTA (53 ± 3 bpm). The mean effective dose and iodine load were 1.1 ± 0.4 mSv and 21.6 gI, respectively. We rated 443 out of 720 coronary segments as being of excellent image quality. In a segment-based model, coronary evaluability (number of coronary segments evaluable/total number of coronary segments), was 97% (699/720 segments). In a segment-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for >50% coronary stenosis identification vs. ICA were 89%, 99%, 89%, 99% and 99%, respectively. In a patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 94%, 89%, 83%, 96% and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with low body weight, image quality and diagnostic accuracy of ultra-low radiation dose and low-iodine load coronary CTA are good and similar to values reported in the literature for standard tube voltage and iodine load protocols.

Sex Profile and Risk Assessment With Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure: Propensity Score Matching for Sex Selection Bias.

BACKGROUND: In heart failure (HF), women show better survival despite a comparatively low peak oxygen consumption (V˙o2): this raises doubt about the accuracy of risk assessment by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in women. Accordingly, we aimed to check (1) whether the predictive role of well-known CPET risk indexes, ie, peak V˙o2 and ventilatory response (V˙e/V˙co2 slope), is sex independent and (2) if sex-related characteristics that impact outcome in HF should be considered as associations that may confound the effect of sex on survival. METHODS: The study population consisted of 2985 patients with HF, 498 (17%) of whom were women, from the multicentre Metabolic Exercise Test Data Combined with Cardiac and Kidney Indexes (MECKI): the end point was cardiovascular death within a 3-year period. RESULTS: During the follow-up, 305 (12%) men and 39 (8%) women (P = 0.005) died, and female sex was linked to better survival on univariate analysis (P = 0.008) and independent of peak V˙o2 and V˙e/V˙co2 slope on multivariate analysis. According to propensity score matching for female sex to exclude a sex selection bias and sample discrepancy, 498 men were selected: the standardized percentage bias ranged from 20.8 (P < 0.0001) to 3.3 (P = 0.667). After clinical profile harmonizing, female sex was predictive of HF at univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The low peak V˙o2 and female association with better outcome in HF might be counterfeit: the female prognostic advantage is lost when sex-specific differences are correctly taken into account with propensity score matching, suggesting that for an effective and efficient HF model, adjustment must be made for sex-related characteristics.

ACE-Inhibition Benefit on Lung Function in Heart Failure is Modulated by ACE Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism.

PURPOSE: The benefit of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition in chronic heart failure (HF) is partially due to its effects on pulmonary function and particularly on lung diffusion, the latter being counteracted by acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Tissue ACE activity is largely determined by an insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism resulting in three possible genotypes (DD, ID and II). It is not clear if ACE inhibitor therapy could exert different effects in these genotypes. The aim of the study was to understand whether I/D polymorphism interferes with ACE inhibitor's protection of the lungs in HF during acute fluid overload. METHODS: 100 HF patients (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40 %) in stable clinical conditions, treated with enalapril but without ASA performed pulmonary function tests including lung diffusion (DLco) and its subcomponents, membrane diffusion (Dm) and capillary volume (Vcap), and a cardiopulmonary exercise test before and immediately after rapid infusion of 500 cc saline. RESULTS: ACE I/D genotype prevalence was: DD = 28, ID =55 and II = 17 cases. No significant differences in major pulmonary function and exercise parameters were observed before saline infusion among ACE genotypes. After fluid challenge, DD patients presented a higher DLco and Dm reduction than ID and II (DLco -2.3 ± 1.3 vs. -0.8 ± 1.9 and -0.6 ± 1 mL/mmHg/min, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01; Dm -7 ± 5 vs. -3.2 ± 7.4 and -1.3 ± 5 mL/mmHg/min, p < 0.05, respectively) and a higher increase in VE/VCO2 slope than II (1.8 ± 1.9 vs. -0.8 ± 2.3, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ACE DD genotype is associated with higher vulnerability of the alveolar-capillary membrane to acute fluid overload in HF patients treated with ACE inhibitors.

Right heart chamber geometry and tricuspid annulus morphology in patients undergoing mitral valve repair with and without tricuspid valve annuloplasty.

According to current recommendations, patients could benefit from tricuspid valve (TV) annuloplasty at the time mitral valve (MV) surgery if tricuspid regurgitation is severe or if tricuspid annulus (TA) dilatation is present. Therefore, an accurate pre-operative echocardiographic study is mandatory for left but also for right cardiac structures. Aims of this study are to assess right atrial (RA), right ventricular (RV) and TA geometry and function in patients undergoing MV repair without or with TV annuloplasty. We studied 103 patients undergoing MV surgery without (G1: 54 cases) or with (G2: 49 cases) concomitant TV annuloplasty and 40 healthy subjects (NL) as controls. RA, RV and TA were evaluated by three-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography. Comparing the pathological to the NL group, TA parameters and 3D right chamber volumes were significantly larger. RA and RV ejection fraction and TA% reduction were lower in pathological versus NL, and in G2 versus G1. In pathological patients, TA area positively correlated to systolic pulmonary pressure and negatively with RV and RA ejection fraction. Patients undergoing MV surgery and TV annuloplasty had an increased TA dimensions and a more advanced remodeling of right heart chambers probably reflecting an advanced stage of the disease.