Factors affecting the turnaround time for manufacturing, testing, and release of cellular therapy products prepared at multiple sites in support of multicenter cardiovascular regenerative medicine protocols: a Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) study.

BACKGROUND: Cellular therapy studies are often conducted at multiple clinical sites to accrue larger patient numbers. In many cases this necessitates use of localized good manufacturing practices facilities to supply the cells. To assure consistent quality, oversight by a quality assurance group is advisable. In this study we report the findings of such a group established as part of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) studies involving use of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (ABMMCs) to treat myocardial infarction and heart failure. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Factors affecting cell manufacturing time were studied in 269 patients enrolled on three CCTRN protocols using automated cell processing system (Sepax, Biosafe SA)-separated ABMMCs. The cells were prepared at five good manufacturing practices cell processing facilities and delivered to local treatment sites or more distant satellite centers. RESULTS: Although the Sepax procedure takes only 90 minutes, the total time for processing was approximately 7 hours. Contributing to this were incoming testing and device preparation, release testing, patient randomization, and product delivery. The mean out-of-body time (OBT), which was to be less than 12 hours, averaged 9 hours. A detailed analysis of practices at each center revealed a variety of factors that contributed to this OBT. CONCLUSION: We conclude that rapid cell enrichment procedures may give a false impression of the time actually required to prepare a cellular therapy product for release and administration. Institutional procedures also differ and can contribute to delays; however, in aggregate it is possible to achieve an overall manufacturing and testing time that is similar at multiple facilities.

Characteristics of thawed autologous umbilical cord blood.

BACKGROUND: Autologous umbilical cord blood (AutoUCB) has historically been cryopreserved for potential use in hematopoietic transplantation. Increasingly, private AutoUCB banking is performed for therapies unavailable today. A Phase I trial using AutoUCB treatment for early pediatric Type 1 diabetes afforded us an opportunity to analyze characteristics of AutoUCBs. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty AutoUCBs from AABB-accredited private cord blood banks (CBBs) were evaluated for collection, processing, cryopreservation, and thaw characteristics. Using a standardized thaw-wash method, AutoUCBs were assessed for viable total nucleated cells (vTNCs), viable CD34+ (vCD34+), and colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage counts. Postthaw %vTNC recoveries were compared against processing characteristics and analyzed according to processing method, cryopreservation volume, concentration, container, and length of storage. RESULTS: AutoUCB collection volumes (19.9-170 mL), cryopreserved TNC counts (7.6 × 10(7) -3.34 × 10(9)), %TNC processing recoveries (39%-100%), postthaw %vTNC recoveries (58%-100%), and %vCD34+ recoveries (26%-96%) varied widely. Regarding cell dose requirements, only 11% of evaluable AutoUCBs achieved the minimum TNC count of at least 9.0 × 10(8) to meet the National Cord Blood Inventory banking threshold, and only 50% met the minimum of 5.0 × 10(8) TNC count for Food and Drug Administration cord blood licensure eligibility. %vTNC recoveries correlated with %vCD34+ recoveries (R = 0.7; p = 0.03). Length of storage, cryopreservation volume, concentration, and container type did not affect postthaw %vTNC recoveries. CBB processing method, however, was associated with %vTNC postprocessing recoveries, with unmanipulated and plasma-depleted AutoUCBs having the highest postthaw %vTNC recovery, followed by RBC-depleted and density gradient-separated AutoUCBs. CONCLUSION: The high variability and low counts found in AutoUCB banking suggest that further standardization of characterization, collection, and processing procedures is needed.

African American adult apheresis donors respond to granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor with neutrophil and progenitor cell yields comparable to those of Caucasian and Hispanic donors.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) are the most common source of cells used for hematopoietic transplantation. Benign ethnic neutropenia has been found in persons of African descent, affecting circulating white blood cells (WBCs), but not WBC production within marrow. Persons of African descent have reduced neutrophil mobilization after steroid administration, and newborns have fewer nucleated and progenitor cells in their cord blood. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-two African American (AA) and 12 Hispanic PBPC donors were age, sex, and weight matched with 34 Caucasian donors. Groups were compared based on WBC and neutrophil counts after mobilization and numbers of CD34+ cells collected on Day 5 of G-CSF mobilization. RESULTS: AA donors had significantly lower baseline WBC (6.1±1.1 vs. 7.1±1.7, p=0.04) and neutrophil (3.4±1.1 vs. 4.5±1.3, p=0.01) counts compared to matched Caucasian donors. G-CSF-stimulated AAs had a significantly greater increase in WBC and neutrophil counts compared to matched Caucasians (889±293% vs. 665±230% neutrophils, p=0.02). There was no significant difference in product cell counts when comparing total nucleated, CD3+, CD34+, and mononuclear cells or colony-forming units (CFUs) between Caucasians and Hispanics or AAs and trends to greater numbers of neutrophils in products from AA donors. CONCLUSION: When stimulated by G-CSF, AAs are able to increase WBC and neutrophil counts to a higher degree than Caucasians, achieving similar numbers of neutrophil and progenitor cells in apheresis products despite starting from lower baseline blood counts.

Multicenter cell processing for cardiovascular regenerative medicine applications: the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) experience.

Abstract Background aims. Multicenter cellular therapy clinical trials require the establishment and implementation of standardized cell-processing protocols and associated quality control (QC) mechanisms. The aims here were to develop such an infrastructure in support of the Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN) and to report on the results of processing for the first 60 patients. Methods. Standardized cell preparations, consisting of autologous bone marrow (BM) mononuclear cells, prepared using a Sepax device, were manufactured at each of the five processing facilities that supported the clinical treatment centers. Processing staff underwent centralized training that included proficiency evaluation. Quality was subsequently monitored by a central QC program that included product evaluation by the CCTRN biorepositories. Results. Data from the first 60 procedures demonstrated that uniform products, that met all release criteria, could be manufactured at all five sites within 7 h of receipt of BM. Uniformity was facilitated by use of automated systems (the Sepax for processing and the Endosafe device for endotoxin testing), standardized procedures and centralized QC. Conclusions. Complex multicenter cell therapy and regenerative medicine protocols can, where necessary, successfully utilize local processing facilities once an effective infrastructure is in place to provide training and QC.