TERT promoter mutations and survival outcomes in adult-type granulosa cell tumors.

OBJECTIVES: T0 evaluate survival outcomes among patients with adult-type granulosa cell tumors who have telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using the MD Anderson Rare Gynecologic Malignancy Registry. Patients with adult granulosa cell tumors who underwent molecular testing for TERT promoter and FOXL2 c.C402G mutations were included. We used descriptive statistics to compare demographic and clinical variables and estimated progression-free and overall survival with Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional hazards regression and log-rank tests were employed for comparisons, with multivariable analyses adjusting for various factors. RESULTS: Among 70 patients, 28 (40%) had TERT+ tumors. The median age at diagnosis was 40 years (range 12-71) for TERT- patients and 46 years (range 25-76) for TERT+ patients. At diagnosis, 22 (63%) of 35 TERT- patients were stage I, 10 (29%) stage II, and 3 (9%) stage III, while in the TERT+ group, 17/23 (74%) were stage I, 3 (13%) stage II, and 3 (13%) stage II. Univariable analysis showed no difference in time from diagnosis to first recurrence (p=0.19) and from first recurrence to second recurrence (p=0.24) based on tumor TERT status. The median time from first to second recurrence in the TERT- group was 27.3 months (95% CI 14.1 to 40.0) and in the TERT+ group was 14.8 months (95% CI 8.1 to 21.0). There was no observed difference in overall survival between the groups (HR=0.53; 95% CI 0.19 to 1.45; p=0.21). Multivariable analysis adjusting for age at diagnosis, TERT promoter mutation status, systemic chemotherapy, and stage demonstrated a significant difference in progression-free survival based on TERT mutation status (HR=2.89; 95% CI 1.32 to 6.36). CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for covariates, patients with adult granulosa cell tumors and TERT+ tumors had shorter progression-free survival after first recurrence. TERT promoter mutations may identify a subset of patients with recurrent adult granulosa cell tumors and less favorable outcomes.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the ovary: a review of 63 cases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms from a curated registry. METHODS: This is a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients in our registry with confirmed ovarian neuroendocrine neoplasms. We excluded patients with small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified, small cell hypercalcemic type, and those with neuroendocrine 'features' or 'differentiation.' Clinicopathological characteristics were described in two separate groups: patients with carcinoid tumors and patients with neuroendocrine carcinomas. Progression-free and overall survival were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator in these two groups, and multivariable analysis was done to identify predictors of survival for neuroendocrine carcinomas only. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients met inclusion criteria, 13 (21%) with carcinoid tumors and 50 (79%) with neuroendocrine carcinomas. In the carcinoid tumor group, one patient (8%) was misdiagnosed. Two patients (15%) had a recurrence and the 5-year overall survival rate was 80% (95% CI 45% to 100%), with a lower bound of the median survival of 4.8 years (95% CI). In the neuroendocrine carcinoma group, 23 patients (46%) were misdiagnosed, 16 of whom (69%) received therapy with the presumption of a non-neuroendocrine carcinoma diagnosis. Thirty patients (60%) had a recurrence, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 24% (10%, 38%), with a median survival of 1.6 years (1.3, 3.3). Patients with carcinomas stage III or IV had an increased risk of progression/recurrence (HR=5.6; 95% CI 1.9 to 17.0) and death (HR=8.1; 95% CI 2.2 to 29.7) compared with those with stage I or II. Pure histology was associated with an increased risk of progression/recurrence (HR=2.3; 95% CI 1.0 to 5.2) compared with admixed histology. CONCLUSION: Most patients had neuroendocrine carcinomas, which were associated with a higher recurrence rate and worse survival than carcinoid tumors. A high proportion of patients in both groups were initially misdiagnosed, and a new association with endometrial hyperplasia was observed. Neuroendocrine admixed histology is associated with a higher risk of progression.

Impact of pelvic radiation therapy in patients with early neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma and no residual disease in the radical hysterectomy specimen: a NeCTuR study.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of adjuvant pelvic radiation therapy on the rate and location of recurrences was evaluated in patients with early-stage (IA1-IB2) neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma who underwent prior conization or polypectomy with no residual disease and negative nodes in the subsequent upfront radical hysterectomy specimen. As a secondary objective, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed. METHODS: We searched the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) to identify patients with clinical early-stage neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma with no residual disease in the specimen from upfront radical surgery and negative nodes. Patients who received pelvic radiation therapy were compared with those who did not, regardless of whether they received adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, representing 17% of all patients with clinical early-stage disease who underwent upfront radical hysterectomy included in the NeCTuR registry. The median age was 36.0 years (range 26.0-51.0). Six (22%) patients had stage IA, 20 (74%) had stage IB1, and one (4%) had stage IB2 disease. Seven (26%) patients received adjuvant radiation therapy and 20 (74%) did not. All seven patients in the radiation group and 14 (70%) in the no-radiation group received adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.16). Fifteen percent (4/27) of patients had a recurrence, 14% (1/7) in the radiation group and 15% (3/20) in the no-radiation group (p=0.99). In the radiation group the recurrence was outside the pelvis, and in the no-radiation group, 67% (2/3) recurred outside the pelvis and 33% (1/3) recurred both inside and outside the pelvis (p=0.99). In the radiation group the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 100% while, in the no-radiation group, the 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 81% (95% CI 61% to 100%) (p=0.99) and 80% (95% CI 58% to 100%) (p=0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with no residual disease and negative nodes in the upfront radical hysterectomy specimen, our study did not find that pelvic radiation therapy improves survival.

Clinicopathologic characteristics, oncologic outcomes, and prognostic factors in neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes of patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma in an institutional neuroendocrine cervical tumor registry. METHODS: Retrospective study including patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas diagnosed between 1986 and 2022. Patients were categorized into International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 stage groups: early-stage (IA1-IB2, IIA1); locally advanced (IB3, IIA2-IVA); and advanced (IVB). Clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes were evaluated by stage. Survival was compared between patients diagnosed in 1986-2003 and those diagnosed in 2004-2016. Progression-free and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimator. RESULTS: A total of 453 patients was included, 133 (29%) with early-stage, 226 (50%) with locally advanced, and 94 (21%) with advanced disease. Median age was 38 years (range 21-93). Sixty-nine percent (306/453) had pure and 32% (146/453) had mixed histology. The node positivity rate (surgical or radiological detection) was 19% (21/108) for tumors ≤2 cm, 37% (39/105) for tumors >2 to ≤4 cm, and 61% (138/226) for tumors >4 cm (p<0.0001). After primary treatment, rates of complete response were 86% (115/133) for early-stage, 65% (147/226) for locally advanced, and 19% (18/94) for advanced disease (p<0.0001). The recurrence/progression rate was 43% for early-stage, 69% for locally advanced, and 80% for advanced disease (p<0.0001). Five-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 59% (95% CI 50% to 68%) and 71% (95% CI 62% to 80%), respectively, for early-stage, 28% (95% CI 22% to 35%) and 36% (95% CI 29% to 43%), respectively, for locally advanced, and 6% (95% CI 0% to 11%) and 12% (95% CI 5% to 19%), respectively, for advanced disease. For early-stage disease, the 5-year progression-free survival rate was 68% for tumors ≤2 cm and 43% for tumors >2 to ≤4 cm (p=0.0013). Receiving cisplatin/carboplatin plus etoposide (HR=0.33, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.63, p=0.0008) and receiving curative radiotherapy (HR=0.32, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.6, p=0.0004) were positive predictors of survival for patients with advanced disease. CONCLUSION: Among patients with neuroendocrine cervical carcinomas, overall survival is favorable for patients with early-stage disease. However, most patients present with locally advanced disease, and overall survival remains poor in this subgroup. For patients with advanced disease, receiving cisplatin/carboplatin plus etoposide and curative radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival.

Clinical outcomes of leuprolide acetate in the treatment of recurrent ovarian granulosa cell tumors.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of recurrent ovarian granulosa cell tumors is not known. Preclinical studies and small case series have suggested direct antitumor activity of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in the treatment of this disease, but little is known about the efficacy and safety of this approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe patterns of use and clinical outcomes of leuprolide acetate in a cohort of patients with recurrent granulosa cell tumors. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the Rare Gynecologic Malignancy Registry at a large cancer referral center and affiliated county hospital. Patients meeting inclusion criteria had a diagnosis of recurrent granulosa cell tumor and received either leuprolide acetate or traditional chemotherapy as cancer treatment. Outcomes were separately examined for leuprolide acetate used as adjuvant treatment, maintenance therapy, and the treatment of gross disease. Demographic and clinical data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Progression-free survival was calculated from the initiation of treatment to the date of disease progression or death, and compared between groups with the log-rank test. The 6-month clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of patients without disease progression 6 months after starting therapy. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients received a total of 78 leuprolide acetate-containing therapy courses, owing to 16 instances of retreatment. Of these 78 courses, 57 (73%) were for treatment of gross disease, 10 (13%) were adjuvant to tumor reductive surgery, and 11 (14%) were for maintenance therapy. Patients had received a median of 2 (interquartile range, 1-3) systemic therapy regimens before their first leuprolide acetate treatment. Tumor reductive surgery (100% [62/62]) and platinum-based chemotherapy (81% [50/62]) were common before first leuprolide acetate exposure. The median duration of leuprolide acetate therapy was 9.6 months (interquartile range, 4.8-16.5). Nearly half of the therapy courses were single-agent leuprolide acetate (49% [38/78]). Combination regimens most often included an aromatase inhibitor (23% [18/78]). Disease progression was the most common cause of discontinuation (77% [60/78]); only 1 patient (1%) discontinued leuprolide acetate because of adverse events. In the treatment of gross disease, the 6-month clinical benefit rate for first use of leuprolide acetate was 66% (95% confidence interval, 54-82). Median progression-free survival was not statistically different compared with that which followed chemotherapy (10.3 months [95% confidence interval, 8.0-16.0] vs 8.0 months [95% confidence interval, 5.0-15.3]; P=.3). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients with recurrent granulosa cell tumors, the 6-month clinical benefit rate of first-time leuprolide acetate treatment of gross disease was 66% and progression-free survival was comparable to patients treated with chemotherapy. Leuprolide acetate regimens were heterogeneous, but significant toxicity was rare. These results support leuprolide acetate as safe and effective for the treatment of relapsed adult granulosa cell tumors in the second line and beyond.

RB1 alteration and poor prognosis in women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a NeCTuR study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the gene alteration status in high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) specimens and to explore the potential association of unique gene alterations with survival. METHODS: Results from tumor-based molecular testing on specimens from women with high-grade NECC in the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry were reviewed and analyzed. Tumor specimens could be from primary or metastatic sites and obtained at initial diagnosis, during treatment, or at recurrence. RESULTS: Molecular testing results were available for 109 women with high-grade NECC. The genes most frequently mutated were PIK3CA (mutated in 18.5% of patients), TP53 (17.4%), and MYC (14.5%). Other targetable alterations identified were alterations in KIT (7.3%), KRAS (7.3%), and PTEN (7.3%). Women with tumors having an RB1 alteration (6.4%) had a median overall survival (OS) of 13 months, compared to 26 months for women with tumors that did not have an RB1 alteration (p=0.003). None of the other genes evaluated were shown to be associated with OS. CONCLUSION: Although no individual alteration was found in a majority of tumor specimens from patients with high-grade NECC, a large proportion of women with this disease will have at least one targetable alteration. Treatments based on these gene alterations may offer additional targeted therapies for women with recurrent disease, who currently have very limited therapeutic options. Patients with tumors that harbor RB1 alterations have decreased OS.

Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab improves progression-free survival in patients with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer: a Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer has a very poor prognosis and limited active treatment options. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the 3-drug regimen of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR), which include data abstracted directly from medical records of women diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix from English- and Spanish-speaking countries. The study compared women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen. Patients continued chemotherapy until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxic effects. Progression-free survival from the start of therapy for recurrence to the next recurrence or death, overall survival from the first recurrence, and response rates were evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 62 patients who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and 56 patients who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen for recurrence. The median progression-free survival rates were 8.7 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 3.7 months in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for disease progression of 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.48; P<.0001). In the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, 15% of patients had stable disease, 39% of patients had a partial response, and 18% of patients had a complete response. Compared with patients in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, significantly more patients in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group remained on treatment at 6 months (31% vs 67%, respectively; P=.0004) and 1 year (9% vs 24%, respectively; P=.02). The median overall survival rates were 16.8 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 14.0 months in the non-topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.37). CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab was an active regimen in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer and improved progression-free survival while decreasing the hazard ratio for disease progression.

Role of radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a NeCTuR study.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with early-stage, high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma typically undergo radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. To explore the role of radical surgery in patients with this disease, who have a high likelihood of undergoing postoperative adjuvant therapy, we aimed to determine the rate of parametrial involvement and the rate of parametrial involvement without other indications for adjuvant treatment in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients in the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) at our institution to identify those with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IA1-IB2, high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma who underwent up-front radical surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. RESULTS: One hundred patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 35 years (range 22-65), and 51% (51/100) had pure high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. No patient had a tumor >4 cm or suspected parametrial or nodal disease before surgery. Ten patients (10%) had microscopic parametrial compromise in the final surgical specimens. Ninety-four (94%) patients underwent nodal assessment, and 19 (19%) had positive nodes. Ten patients underwent both sentinel lymph node biopsy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, and none had false-negative findings. Patients with parametrial compromise were more likely to have positive pelvic nodes (80% vs 12%, p<0.0001), and a positive vaginal margin (20% vs 1%, p=0.03). All patients with parametrial compromise had lymphovascular space invasion (100% vs 73%, p=0.10). Of the 100 patients, 95 (95%) were recommended adjuvant therapy and 89 (89%) were known to have received it. Adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy reduced the likelihood of local recurrence by 62%. CONCLUSIONS: In carefully selected patients with high-grade neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma, the rate of microscopic parametrial involvement is 10%. As most patients receive adjuvant treatment, we hypothesize that simple hysterectomy may be adequate when followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and etoposide followed by additional chemotherapy.

Anti TNF-α therapy in patients with relapsed and refractory Langerhans cell histiocytosis: a phase II study.

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is produced in Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) lesions and is elevated in plasma of patients with active LCH. It has been postulated that TNF-α may play a role in the pathophysiology of LCH. Etanercept, an anti-TNF-α antibody, has been used in TNF-modulated diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We conducted a phase II study to determine the efficacy of etanercept for patients with refractory or relapsed LCH. Five LCH patients who had failed at least 2 prior treatments (range 2-9) received etanercept at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg twice weekly for up to a total of 24 doses. Disease response was assessed at 4 and 8 weeks. None of the five patients had improvement in their disease with etanercept treatment. Three progressed at week 4 and 1 progressed at week 8. One subject died after 3 weeks of treatment from disease progression. During the study, only one drug-related toxicity was noted which spontaneously resolved. The study was concluded early due to lack of response to etanercept and insufficient accrual rate. This data suggests that etanercept as given in this study may not be effective for relapsed or refractory LCH. However, the number of patients treated was not adequate enough to power this study and it is possible that a different dose and regimen of etanercept may be required to successfully treat this disease.