Pathophysiology and management of enteric hyperoxaluria.

Enteric hyperoxaluria is a metabolic disorder resulting from conditions associated with fatty acid malabsorption and characterized by an increased urinary output of oxalate. Oxalate is excessively absorbed in the gut and then excreted in urine where it forms calcium oxalate crystals, inducing kidney stones formation and crystalline nephropathies. Enteric hyperoxaluria is probably underdiagnosed and may silently damage kidney function of patients affected by bowel diseases. Moreover, the prevalence of enteric hyperoxaluria has increased because of the development of bariatric surgical procedures. Therapeutic options are based on the treatment of the underlying disease, limitation of oxalate intakes, increase in calcium salts intakes but also increase in urine volume and correction of hypocitraturia. There are few data regarding the natural evolution of kidney stone events and chronic kidney disease in these patients, and there is a need for new treatments limiting kidney injury by calcium oxalate crystallization.

Microbiology and outcomes of polymicrobial peritonitis associated with peritoneal dialysis: a register-based cohort study from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported that polymicrobial peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis (PD) is associated with poor outcomes, but recent data from European cohorts are scarce. METHODS: We included from the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry all patients ≥18 years of age who started PD between January 2014 and November 2020. We compared microbiology and patient characteristics associated with mono- and polymicrobial peritonitis. We assessed patient outcomes after a first polymicrobial peritonitis using survival analysis with competing events. We differentiated microorganisms isolated from dialysis effluent as enteric or non-enteric pathogens. RESULTS: A total of 8848 patients contributed 13 023 patient-years of follow-up and 3348 culture-positive peritonitis episodes, including 251 polymicrobial ones. This corresponded to rates of 0.32 and 0.02 episodes/patient-year, respectively. For most patients (72%) who experienced polymicrobial peritonitis, this was their first peritonitis episode. Enteric pathogens were more frequently isolated in polymicrobial than in monomicrobial peritonitis (57 versus 44%; P < .001). In both cases of peritonitis with and without enteric pathogens, the polymicrobial versus monomicrobial character of the peritonitis was not associated with mortality in patients who did not switch to haemodialysis {adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio [acsHR] 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-5.0], P = .78 and 1.1 [95% CI 0.7-1.8], P = .73, respectively}. However, the risks of death and switch to haemodialysis were higher for monomicrobial peritonitis with enteric pathogens compared with those without [acsHR 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.7), P = .02 and 1.9 (95% CI 1.5-2.4), P < .0001, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Isolation of enteric pathogens, rather than the polymicrobial character of the peritonitis, is associated with poorer outcomes.