[A descriptive study of psychiatric care and pre-sentencing psychiatric reports in a French high-security prison]. / Parcours de soins et expertises psychiatriques pré-sentencielles : une étude descriptive au centre pénitentiaire de Château-Thierry.

CONTEXT: The high prevalence of psychiatric disorders among people in prison is well documented, and several hypotheses have been proposed to explain this overrepresentation. In France, the decrease in the number of people found by the judge to be not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder after a psychiatric expertise could play a crucial role. The Château-Thierry prison is a high-security correctional facility where prisoners whose integration into a "standard" prison is complicated because of behavioural problems, reside. We conducted the first study to describe the judicial and healthcare trajectories of people incarcerated in this facility. METHOD: All the people incarcerated in the Château-Thierry prison between May and September 2019 were included in this cross-sectional study. In addition to sociodemographic characteristics, data on the psychiatric care before and during incarceration as well as information on the judicial and prison history were collected. We also analyzed all the pre-sentencing psychiatric reports in order to collect the degree of discernment determined by the psychiatrist expert for each included individual. RESULTS: Sixty-eight (97%) of the 70 people detained at the Château-Thierry prison during the study period were included and 92 pre-sentencing psychiatric reports were analyzed. The population studied was exclusively male, with an average age of 40 years, low socio-economic status and frequent criminal history (79%). About half of them (46%) had already been hospitalized in a psychiatric community hospital prior to incarceration, and 79% have been hospitalized in a psychiatric facility during their incarceration. Disciplinary sanctions were frequent (72%) as well as convictions for offenses committed while in prison (57%). When at least one pre-sentencing psychiatric report was carried out (29 persons had a single psychiatric forensic evaluation and 27 ones had multiple evaluations), at least one psychiatric expert had concluded to a diminished (but not lack of) criminal responsibility in almost half of the cases (44%). CONCLUSION: This study shows the extent to which people incarcerated in the Château-Thierry prison are affected by psychiatric disorders. It also highlights the difficulties of coping with the prison environment for people suffering from psychiatric disorders. Finally, it raises the question of the lack of diversion programs for the individuals in France with mental health problems whose responsibility has been considered as full or diminished.

[Treatment options for drug-induced sialorrhea: Prescribing guidelines]. / Prise en charge de l'hypersialorrhée iatrogène : revue de la littérature et recommandations pratiques.

OBJECTIVES: Drug-induced hypersalivation is a frequent drug adverse event of psychotropic drugs. This excess salivary pooling in the mouth can cause an impairment of a patient's quality of life leading to low rates of medication adherence. The optimal management of hypersalivation is thus crucial to improve patient care. To date, no recommendations for limiting drug-induced hypersalivation have been published. In this study, we conducted a systematic review to investigate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at reducing drug-induced hypersalivation. METHODS: Treatment of drug-induced sialorrhea based on case reports and clinical studies were sought in May 2021 from PubMed, Google Scholar and Science Direct (keywords : « treatment ¼, « hypersalivation ¼, « induced ¼, « drug ¼, « clozapine ¼). Articles published between 1966 to May 2021 on the treatment of drug-induced hypersalivation were included in this study. RESULTS: Sixty-seven articles were selected in this narrative review. First, patient education associated with non-drug related management are essential to improve the compliance to drugs inducing hypersalivation. The non-drug related management should be initiated with an increase in the frequency of swallowing with chewing gum. In the case of ineffectiveness, the dosage of drug responsive of sialorrhea can be adjusted according to the patient's response and his/her medical history (i.e. reducing the dose or splitting the daily dose). Finally, if the problem persists, a symptomatic treatment can be added according to the type of sialorrhea (diurnal or nocturnal), preferred galenic by patient, tolerance and availability of drugs. Several drugs have been tested to reduce hypersalivation induced by clozapine (61/67), risperidone (3/67), quetiapine (2/67) and aripiprazole (2/67). Among the 63 articles targeting a specific corrective treatment, anticholinergic agents were most described in the literature (41 cases out of 63) with atropine, glycopyrrolate and scopolamine (6/41 each). Other agents were described as clinically effective on hypersalivation: dopamine antagonists (9/63) with amisulpride (5/9), alpha-2-adrenergic agonists (5/63) with clonidine (3/5), botulinic toxin (4/63), and terazosine, moclobemide, bupropion and N-acetylcysteine (for each 1/63). CONCLUSIONS: In the case of drug-induced hypersalivation, after failure of non-drug therapies and dosage optimization of the causative treatment, an anticholinergic drug can be initiated. In case of insufficient response, the different treatments presented can be used depending on the galenic form, tolerance and access to those medications. The assessment of the risk-benefit balance should be systematic. The heterogeneity of the studies, the little knowledge about the pharmacological mechanism of saliva flow modulation and the unavailability of corrective drugs are different factors contributing to the complexity of therapeutic optimization.

[Involuntary psychiatric care for incarcerated people: a descriptive study of 73 consecutive judge-ordered discharges from psychiatric hospitalisation in France]. / Soins psychiatriques sans consentement pour les personnes détenues : une étude descriptive de 73 mainlevées consécutives en unité hospitalière spécialement aménagée.

INTRODUCTION: The procedure of involuntary psychiatric hospitalization has been recently modified in France. Indeed, since 2011, a liberty and custody judge is appointed for each measure, to guarantee the rights of psychiatric inpatients and to prevent abusive hospitalizations. As a result, if procedural errors are noted, the liberty and custody judge may order the immediate ending of the psychiatric hospitalization. To date, only two studies described the reasons for judiciary discharge from involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations, but no study has been conducted in forensic psychiatric units for incarcerated people. The objective of the current study was to describe the main reasons judges use to decide on the irregularity of the hospitalization (against the opinion of psychiatrists) for detained patients, and to compare these reasons with those for patients in the community psychiatric unit. METHODS: We included all the discharges ordered between 2011 and 2018 in two units of the same hospital: a forensic psychiatric unit for incarcerated people and a community involuntary psychiatric unit. We extracted sociodemographic characteristics and judiciary information such as date of discharge, resason fordischarge, presence of the patient at the hearing. We analyzed the judge-ordered discharge rate (corresponding to the number of discharges divided by the number of involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations) for each year. Then, we examined the reason of discharge for each measure. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven discharges were analyzed: 73 in the psychiatric forensic unit and 73 in the community psychiatric unit. Rates of discharges were 6.7% and 8.8% for the forensic unit and the general psychiatric unit, respectively. Several reasons for the discharges were common for the two units (failure to inform the patient, lack of physical examination), but others were specific to the forensic unit, such as the impossibility for the patients to communicate with their lawyer, or the lack of immediate dangerousness for the person or for the others. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the specific aspects of involuntary psychiatric hospitalizations for people in prison in France. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of these judge-ordered discharge on patient's mental health, particularly for incarcerated patients.

[Impact of an educational video on the representations of electroconvulsive therapy among psychiatrists in Hauts-de-France and Occitanie]. / Impact d'une vidéo pédagogique sur les croyances et représentations relatives à l'électro-convulsivothérapie chez les psychiatres des Hauts-de-France et d'Occitanie.

INTRODUCTION: Despite its effectiveness and good tolerance, electro-convulsive therapy (ECT) is under-used in current clinical practice probably because of stigma and the negative image of this treatment. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of an educational video on the representations of ECT among psychiatrists and psychiatric residents in the North and in Occitanie districts of France. METHOD: We evaluated the representations of ECT through the Questionnaire on Attitudes and Knowledge of ECT (QuAKE) before (T0) and after (T1) viewing a short educational video. Scores at T0 and T1 were compared with a paired t-test. Factors associated with the improvement of the representations were investigated using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: In all, 195 responses were obtained. The QuAKE score at T1 was significantly better than at T0 (29.4 at T1 vs. 31.5 at T0, P<0.001). The more negative the representations were at T0, the higher the probability of a decrease in the score at T1 (OR=1.07 [1.02-1.13], P=0.003). DISCUSSION: Our study showed a beneficial effect of a short educational video on psychiatrists' representations of ECT. The wide use of this type of media, allowing information and destigmatization, could considerably optimize access to ECT for patients.

[Risk of incarceration of persons undergoing psychiatric care. A retrospective longitudinal study on the French department of Oise using information from a psychiatric hospital discharge database]. / Le risque d'incarcération des personnes suivies en psychiatrie. Une étude longitudinale rétrospective dans le département français de l'Oise à partir du Recueil d'informations médicalisé en psychiatrie.

INTRODUCTION: Compared to the general population, persons with mental disorders are overrepresented in prison. In a study carried out in Picardy (northern France) in 2017, a quarter of those entering prison had had contact with a psychiatric service prior to their incarceration. Since to our knowledge no work on this subject has been published in France, we conducted a retrospective study, the main objective of which was to propose an estimate measure of incarceration likelihood in people with mental disorders. METHODS: Using data from a psychiatric hospital discharge database (Recueil d'informations médicalisé en psychiatrie, RimP), we searched for patients aged 18 and older who had received psychiatric care (except for those who were incarcerated at baseline) at the Oise psychiatric hospital in 2015-2016 and identified those who had also been registered by the psychiatric care tool (DSP) in liaison with the same hospital. As a marker of incarceration, registration was the event to be investigated. Survival analyses (Kaplan-Meier), first simple and then stratified by age, gender, past history, main diagnosis and intensity of care outside of prison were carried out to calculate likelihood of incarceration. A multivariate Cox model was used in order to identify the factors associated with incarceration. RESULTS: Among the 25,029 patients monitored in the Oise psychiatric hospital in 2015-2016, 126 had experienced incarceration during the 12 months following their inclusion in the study, i.e. an incarceration probability of 0.45% (95 % confidence interval: 0.37-0.55%). The incarcerated patients were younger (36.6 years in average versus 44.7-Pt-test<0.0001), more often male (96.8% versus 43.7% - P<0.0001), and had a more frequent history of detention (11.1% versus 0.6% - P <0.0001) and psychiatric care (20.6% versus 10.1% - P<0.0001) than the general population. The probability of incarceration at 12 months for the population followed in the psychiatry unit was 3.2 times higher than the detention rate of the general population in Oise over the same period. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the pronouncedly high incarceration rate of people with mental disorders. Scheduled to begin in 2020, coding in the RimP of a single nationwide patient identifier for all the procedures and stays described will allow the generalized measurement by means of the proposed indicator throughout France.

[Health care delivery and psychiatric hospitalizations in the prisons of the North of France: An observational study]. / Offre de soins et recours aux hospitalisations psychiatriques en milieu pénitentiaire : une étude observationnelle dans le Nord de la France.

BACKGROUND: In French prisons, psychiatric care for inmates is organized into three levels: ambulatory care within each jail in "unités sanitaires en milieu pénitentiaire" (USMP: sanitary units in correctional settings), day hospitalizations in the 28  services médico-psychologiques régionaux (SMPR, "regional medical-psychological services") and full-time hospitalizations in one of the nine "unités d'hospitalisation spécialement aménagées" (UHSA: specially equipped hospital units). Despite high prevalence of mental disorders among French prisoners, the efficiency of these specialized psychiatric care units has been insufficiently studied. The main goal of this study is to describe full-time psychiatric hospitalizations for inmates in the twenty prisons located in the North of France. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive study based on medical and administrative data and survey results. The following data were collected for each prison regarding 2016: 1) number and occupancy rates for mental health professionals and 2) psychiatric hospitalization rates (in the UHSA of Lille-Seclin and the general psychiatric hospitals). RESULTS: Provision of care is incomplete: the vacancy rate in the health units studied reaches 40 %. Moreover, access to UHSA is unequal: it varies pronouncedly according to the location of the prison; only inmates in prisons close to the UHSA benefit from satisfactory access. CONCLUSION: Access to psychiatric care for inmates remains problematic in France, particularly due to a lack of mental health professionals in USMPs, the overload of patients in UHSAs and the distance of theses facilities from certain prisons and jails.

[Post-traumatic stress disorder in prison]. / Trouble de stress post-traumatique en milieu pénitentiaire.

PTSD is frequent in prison, with a lifetime prevalence of 17.8% among male inmates, and of 40.1% among female inmates. Despite those high rates, only a limited number of studies have been published about this disorder in the prison population, and PTSD is still widely underdiagnosed in jail. We conducted a review of the literature to identify the PTSD sociodemographic characteristics and specificities among incarcerated populations. Some epidemiological characteristics of PTSD are identical in both the general and the prison populations, with a higher prevalence among women than men, high rates of comorbidity with depression and anxiety disorders, and high suicide rates. PTSD after committing a violent crime seems to be common but is greatly underdiagnosed, mostly because of a lack of knowledge about this entity. The occurrence is especially high when the offender suffers from a severe mental illness at the time of the offence. Homicidal crimes are the most at risk to lead to PTSD. Every inmate should be screened for this diagnosis by psychiatrists practicing in prisons. Inmates are exposed to many traumatic events during their time in detention. Yet, little is known about the mental health consequences of imprisonment. PTSD after exposure to a traumatic event while in detention should be systematically explored, and future studies need to consider this matter. The high levels of PTSD among imprisoned people could be explained by the exposition of prisoners to repetitive traumatic events, especially during childhood, and by the multiple risk factors for PTSD found in this population. In France, screening for and treatment of PTSD in prison are insufficient. Strategies must be elaborated by the institutions created in 2019 (Centre National de Ressource et de Résilience et Centre Régionaux de Psychotraumatismes) to improve the health of inmates suffering from PTSD. Complex PTSD should also be studied in the prison population.

[Mental health care in French correctional facilities during the Covid-19 pandemic]. / Prisons confinées : quelles conséquences pour les soins psychiatriques et la santé mentale des personnes détenues en France ?

OBJECTIVE: The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the 11 million people currently incarcerated worldwide is the subject of many concerns. Prisons and jails are filled with people suffering from many preexisting medical conditions increasing the risk of complications. Detainees' access to medical services is already limited and overcrowding poses a threat of massive contagion. Beyond the health impact of the crisis, the tightening of prison conditions worries. On March 16, 2020, in France, the lockdown measures have been accompanied by specific provisions for prisons: all facilities have suspended visitations, group activities and external interventions. Over 10,000 prisoners have been released to reduce the prison population and the risk of virus propagation. These adjustments had major consequences on the healthcare system in French prisons. The objectives of this article are to describe the reorganization of the three levels of psychiatric care for inmates in France in the context of Covid-19 pandemic and to have a look at the impact of lockdown measures and early releases on mental health of prisoners. METHODS: This work is based on a survey conducted in April 2020 in France among psychiatric healthcare providers working in 42 ambulatory units for inmates and in the 9 full-time inpatient psychiatric wards exclusively for inmates called "UHSAs" (which stands for "unités hospitalières spécialement aménagées", and can be translated as "specially equipped hospital units"). A review of the international literature on mental healthcare system for inmates during the Covid-19 epidemic has also been performed. RESULTS: The Covid-19 epidemic has been rather contained during the period of confinement in French prisons but the impact of confinement measures on the prison population is significant. The three levels of psychiatric care for inmates have implemented specific measures to ensure continuity of care, to support detainees during Coronavirus lockdown and to prevent an infection's spread. Among the most important are: limitation of medical consultations to serious and urgent cases, creation of "Covid units", cancellation of voluntary psychiatric hospitalizations, reinforcement of preventive hygiene measures and reshuffling of medical staff. Prolonged confinement has consequences on mental health of detainees. Currently, mental health workers are facing multiple clinical situations such as forced drug and substance withdrawal (linked to difficulties in supplying psychoactive substances), symptoms of anxiety (due to concerns for their own and their relatives' well-being) and decompensation among patients with severe psychiatric conditions. Early releases from prison may also raise some issues. People recently released from prison are identified as at high risk of death by suicide and drug overdose. The lack of time to provide the necessary link between health services within prisons and health structures outside could have serious consequences, emphasizing the well-known "revolving prison doors" effect. DISCUSSION: The current lockdown measures applied in French jails and prisons point out the disparities between psychiatric care for inmates and psychiatric care for general population. Giving the high vulnerability of prison population, public health authorities should pay more attention to health care in prisons.

[Catatonia education in France: A cross-sectional study]. / L'enseignement du syndrome catatonique en France : enquête nationale et état des lieux.

OBJECTIVES: Catatonia is a transnosographic syndrome described by K. Kahlbaum in 1874. Catatonia can be life-threatening due to its complications and in case of malignant catatonia. Safe and effective treatments have been identified (benzodiazepines and electro-convulsive-therapy). The prevalence of this syndrome is important and represents about 10% of inpatients in an acute psychiatric ward. However, this syndrome appears to remain under-diagnosed and poorly known. We were, therefore, interested in the current knowledge of French psychiatry residents and young psychiatrists as well as the education they had received about catatonia. METHODS: A questionnaire was submitted to French psychiatry residents and young psychiatrists with fewer than 5 years of experience. It included questions about knowledge of the symptoms, complications, causes and treatments of catatonia. Participants were also asked about their confidence in the management of a patient with catatonia and about the number of catatonic patients they had already met. The type of lecture and teaching about catatonia was also assessed. RESULTS: Among the 376 psychiatrists that completed the questionnaire, 37.5% never had received any specific teaching about catatonia. Concerning the 62.5% who benefited from a specific lecture, this was mainly delivered as part of psychiatry DES. Heterogeneity in the education delivery on the French territory had been highlighted. In addition, participants' knowledge of catatonic syndrome seems incomplete. However, knowledge of catatonic symptoms and first intention treatments was significantly better among respondents who were part of the "with education" group. The confidence in catatonia recognition and management, as well as the number of catatonic patients they met, are also significantly higher in the group "with education". CONCLUSION: Specific education seems to improve the knowledge of young doctors and their ability to diagnose and treat catatonic patients. This education remains poorly provided and heterogeneous on the French territory. Catatonia deserves a place in the teaching program of the psychiatry DES, thus to become systematic.