Expiratory flow limitation development index (ELDI): a novel method of assessing respiratory mechanics in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) can be detected using oscillometric reactance and is associated with a worse clinical presentation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Reactance can show negative swings upon exhalation, which may develop at different rates between patients. We propose a new method to quantify the rate of EFL development; the EFL Development Index (ELDI). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of data from 124 COPD patients was performed. Data included lung function tests, Impulse Oscillometry (IOS), St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score. Fifty four patients had repeat data after 6 months. Twenty two patients had data recorded after 5 days of treatment with long acting bronchodilator therapy. EDLI was calculated as the mean expiratory reactance divided by the minimum expiratory reactance. RESULTS: The mean ELDI was used to categorise patients with rapid onset of EFL (> 0.63; n = 29) or gradual onset (≤ 0.63; n = 34). Those with rapid development had worse airflow obstruction, lower quality of life scores, and greater resting hyperinflation, compared to those with gradual development. In patients with EFL, ELDI correlated with symptoms scores, airflow obstruction, lung volumes and gas diffusion. Both EFL and ELDI were stable over 6 months. EFL and EDLI improved with bronchodilator treatment. CONCLUSIONS: COPD patients with rapid EFL development (determined by ELDI) had worse clinical characteristics than those with gradual EFL development. The rate of EFL development appears to be associated with clinical and physiological characteristics.

Asthma diagnosis: a comparison of established diagnostic guidelines in adults with respiratory symptoms.

Background: Considerable variability exists between asthma diagnostic guidelines. We tested the performance characteristics of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults. Methods: In this prospective observational study (ISRCTN-11676160, May 2019-June 2022), participants referred from primary care with clinician-suspected asthma underwent comprehensive investigation including: spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, peak expiratory flow variability, bronchial challenge testing with methacholine and mannitol, and responsiveness to inhaled corticosteroid therapy. Results were reviewed by a panel of asthma specialists to determine asthma diagnosis (reference standard) and compared to each diagnostic test and the ERS, NICE and GINA diagnostic algorithms (index tests). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values were calculated. Findings: One hundred and forty adults were enrolled and 118 given a definitive diagnostic outcome [75 female; mean (SD) age 36 (12) years; 70 (59%) with asthma] and included in the analysis. Sensitivity of individual tests was poor (15-62%), but they provided good specificity at the most stringent thresholds (range: 88-100%). The sensitivity/specificity of ERS, NICE and GINA was 81/85%, 41/100% and 47/100%, respectively. Concordance between guidelines was only moderate (Cohen's Kappa 0.45-0.51). Interpretation: Current guidelines for the diagnosis of asthma in adults provide either excellent specificity but low sensitivity (GINA and NICE) or only reasonable sensitivity and specificity (ERS). All guidelines therefore have limitations with regards to their clinical application; new guidelines are needed but should be tested prospectively before roll out. Funding: This work was supported by the Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (grant no. BRC-1215-20007, and NIHR203308), Asthma UK/Innovate (grant no. AUK-PG-2018-406), GSK ID 212474 and North West Lung Centre Charity.

Asthma innovations from the second International Collaborative Asthma Network (ICAN) forum.

Asthma continues to cause morbidity and mortality despite advances in treatment that include biologics targeting Type 2 inflammation. The International Collaborative Asthma Network (ICAN) forum was developed with the primary goal of promoting innovative, collaborative research that focuses on mechanisms and treatment for asthma that does not respond or that responds poorly to currently available treatments. The mission of ICAN is innovation, collaboration, translation, and increasing high quality research. At the second ICAN meeting, presenters covered a broad scope and depth of asthma-related topics in the categories of complex data, novel therapeutics and diagnostics, breath analysis and microbiome, disease mechanisms, systemic effects, and circadian rhythm. Key actionable needs and research topics were identified during the group discussions. The presentations and discussions that occurred at the second ICAN had an immediate impact on asthma research in the form of new collaborations and implementation of new research ideas and techniques. The forum also served to connect early-stage investigators with investigators who are well established, thereby fostering innovation, translation, and collaboration well into the future. A third ICAN meeting is planned for 2025 to further the innovations and collaborations that will translate into novel therapies and diagnostics to improve the lives of patients with asthma.

Generating pooled quality control samples of volatile organic compounds.

Untargeted analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from exhaled breath and culture headspace are influenced by several confounding factors not represented in reference standards. In this study, we propose a method of generating pooled quality control (QC) samples for untargeted VOC studies using a split-recollection workflow with thermal desorption tubes. Sample tubes were desorbed and split from each sample and recollected onto a single tube, generating a pooled QC sample. This QC sample was then repeatedly desorbed and recollected with a sequentially lower split ratio allowing injection of multiple QC samples. We found pooled QC samples to be representative of complex mixtures using principal component analysis and may be useful in future longitudinal, multi-centre, and validation studies to assess data quality and adjust for batch effects.

The impact of time of day on the diagnostic performance of tests for asthma.

Performing fractional exhaled nitric oxide and bronchodilator reversibility tests in the morning is more likely to lead to a positive test result than when performed in the afternoon. Therefore, time of day should be considered during test interpretation. https://bit.ly/4b79e5J.

Fulfilling the Promise of Breathomics: Considerations for the Discovery and Validation of Exhaled Volatile Biomarkers.

The exhaled breath represents an ideal matrix for non-invasive biomarker discovery, and exhaled metabolomics have the potential to be clinically useful in the era of precision medicine. In this concise translational review we will specifically address volatile organic compounds in the breath, with a view towards fulfilling the promise of these as actionable biomarkers, in particular for lung diseases. We review the literature paying attention to seminal work linked to key milestones in breath research; discuss potential applications for breath biomarkers across disease areas and healthcare systems, including the perspectives of industry; and outline critical aspects of study design that will need to be considered for any pivotal research going forward, if breath analysis is to provide robust validated biomarkers that meet the requirements for future clinical implementation.

Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds for Asthma Control Classification in Children with Moderate to Severe Asthma: Results from the SysPharmPediA Study.

RATIONALE: Early identification of children with poorly controlled asthma is imperative for optimizing treatment strategies. The analysis of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is an emerging approach to identify prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers in pediatric asthma. OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry based exhaled metabolite analysis to differentiate between controlled and uncontrolled pediatric asthma. METHODS: This study encompassed a discovery (SysPharmPediA) and validation phase (U-BIOPRED, PANDA). Firstly, exhaled VOCs that discriminated asthma control levels were identified. Subsequently, outcomes were validated in two independent cohorts. Patients were classified as controlled or uncontrolled, based on asthma control test scores and number of severe attacks in the past year. Additionally, potential of VOCs in predicting two or more future severe asthma attacks in SysPharmPediA was evaluated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Complete data were available for 196 children (SysPharmPediA=100, U-BIOPRED=49, PANDA=47). In SysPharmPediA, after randomly splitting the population into training (n=51) and test sets (n=49), three compounds (acetophenone, ethylbenzene, and styrene) distinguished between uncontrolled and controlled asthmatics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) for training and test sets were respectively: 0.83 (95% CI: 0.65-1.00) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.58-0.96). Combinations of these VOCs resulted in AUROCCs of 0.74 ±0.06 (UBIOPRED) and 0.68 ±0.05 (PANDA). Attacks prediction tests, resulted in AUROCCs of 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.91) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.52-0.90) for training and test sets. CONCLUSIONS: Exhaled metabolites analysis might enable asthma control classification in children. This should stimulate further development of exhaled metabolites-based point-of-care tests in asthma.

Protocol for a scoping review to map health outcomes in individuals with inducible laryngeal obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Inducible laryngeal obstruction causes narrowing of the laryngeal aperture in response to external triggers. Outcomes are measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction to monitor changes in health status over time. METHODS: This study is a scoping review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. The review will be guided by the following research question: 'What health outcomes are measured in studies including people with inducible laryngeal obstruction?' The research question was validated using the Population-Concept-Context framework according to the methodology for Joanna Briggs Institution Scoping Reviews. Relevant peer-reviewed studies and grey literature conducted over the last 40 years will be identified from electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, Embase, EMCARE, MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed and PsycINFO. The search strings 'inducible laryngeal obstruction', 'ILO', 'vocal cord dysfunction', 'VCD', 'paradoxical vocal fold motion', 'PVFM', 'outcome', 'measure', 'measurement instrument', 'assessment', 'scale', 'questionnaire' will be combined using Boolean logic. An independent reviewer will conduct title screening; two independent reviewers will conduct abstract and full article screening, followed by data extraction by two reviewers. Analyses will be conducted appropriate to the findings. DISCUSSION: The review will document evidence of health outcomes measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction, identifying measurement characteristics and potential utility. Collating studies may identify gaps in coverage, the need for novel tools, and for standardisation for clinical and research purposes. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: What is already known on the subject Inducible laryngeal obstruction causes narrowing of the laryngeal aperture in response to external triggers. Outcomes are measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction to monitor changes in health status over time. Currently, there are no standardised outcome measures for measuring the effects of interventions in inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO). What this paper adds to existing knowledge Assessment of health can be measured in a variety of ways. Physiological, radiological and biochemical measurements of impairment are more common historically but there are a lot of outcomes of other factors now including subjective measures of functional status and health-related quality of life, with data collected directly from patients. This study will allow us to scope the literature to see the health outcomes being measured in ILO to attempt to standardise and develop future health outcomes. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The review will document evidence of health outcomes measured in inducible laryngeal obstruction, identifying measurement characteristics and potential utility. Collating studies may identify gaps in coverage, the need for novel tools and for standardisation for clinical and research purposes.

Clinical Characteristics and Impact of Inducible Laryngeal Obstruction in the UK National Registry.

BACKGROUND: Inducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO) describes inappropriate laryngeal closure during respiration, with airflow obstruction occurring at the glottic and/or supraglottic level, leading to breathlessness. OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of data describing the demographics and impact of ILO. We aimed to report the clinical and demographic features of ILO in individuals entered prospectively in the UK national ILO registry. METHODS: Data were entered into a Web-based registry from participants with endoscopically confirmed ILO who were attending four established UK-wide specialist ILO centers between March 2017 and November 2019. All patients provided written informed consent. RESULTS: Data from 137 individuals were included. Most (87%) had inspiratory ILO and required provocation during endoscopy to induce symptoms. There was a female predominance (80%), mean age 47 years (SD, 15 years). The most common comorbidities included asthma (68%) and reflux (57%). Health care use was high: 88% had attended emergency health care with symptoms at least once in the previous 12 months and nearly half had been admitted to the hospital. A fifth had required admission to critical care owing to ILO symptoms. Patient morbidity was substantial; 64% reported impaired functional capacity (≥3 on the Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale) and a third stated that symptoms affected working capability. CONCLUSION: We describe the first multicenter prospective characterization of individuals with endoscopically diagnosed ILO. Analysis of our multicenter data set identified ILO as associated with a high burden of morbidity and health care use, comparable to severe asthma. These data will support the development of health care resources in the future and guide research priorities.

Volatilomes of human infection.

The human volatilome comprises a vast mixture of volatile emissions produced by the human body and its microbiomes. Following infection, the human volatilome undergoes significant shifts, and presents a unique medium for non-invasive biomarker discovery. In this review, we examine how the onset of infection impacts the production of volatile metabolites that reflects dysbiosis by pathogenic microbes. We describe key analytical workflows applied across both microbial and clinical volatilomics and emphasize the value in linking microbial studies to clinical investigations to robustly elucidate the metabolic species and pathways leading to the observed volatile signatures. We review the current state of the art across microbial and clinical volatilomics, outlining common objectives and successes of microbial-clinical volatilomic workflows. Finally, we propose key challenges, as well as our perspectives on emerging opportunities for developing clinically useful and targeted workflows that could significantly enhance and expedite current practices in infection diagnosis and monitoring.