Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bone Joint J ; 103-B(6): 1160-1167, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058876

RESUMEN

AIMS: Open tibial fractures are limb-threatening injuries. While limb loss is rare in children, deep infection and nonunion rates of up to 15% and 8% are reported, respectively. We manage these injuries in a similar manner to those in adults, with a combined orthoplastic approach, often involving the use of vascularised free flaps. We report the orthopaedic and plastic surgical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients over a five-year period, which includes the largest cohort of free flaps for trauma in children to date. METHODS: Data were extracted from medical records and databases for patients with an open tibial fracture aged < 16 years who presented between 1 May 2014 and 30 April 2019. Patients who were transferred from elsewhere were excluded, yielding 44 open fractures in 43 patients, with a minimum follow-up of one year. Management was reviewed from the time of injury to discharge. Primary outcome measures were the rate of deep infection, time to union, and the Modified Enneking score. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 9.9 years (2.8 to 15.8), and 28 were male (64%). A total of 30 fractures (68%) involved a motor vehicle collision, and 34 (77%) were classified as Gustilo Anderson (GA) grade 3B. There were 17 (50%) GA grade 3B fractures, which were treated with a definitive hexapod fixator, and 33 fractures (75%) were treated with a free flap, of which 30 (91%) were scapular/parascapular or anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps. All fractures united at a median of 12.3 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 9.6 to 18.1), with increasing age being significantly associated with a longer time to union (p = 0.005). There were no deep infections, one superficial wound infection, and the use of 20 fixators (20%) was associated with a pin site infection. The median Enneking score was 90% (IQR 87.5% to 95%). Three patients had a bony complication requiring further surgery. There were no flap failures, and eight patients underwent further plastic surgery. CONCLUSION: The timely and comprehensive orthoplastic care of open tibial fractures in this series of patiemts aged < 16 years resulted in 100% union and 0% deep infection, with excellent patient-reported functional outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1160-1167.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Abiertas/cirugía , Reducción Abierta/métodos , Fracturas de la Tibia/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Colgajos Tisulares Libres/irrigación sanguínea , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Centros Traumatológicos
2.
J Surg Res ; 260: 419-427, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33256986

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory surgery presents unique challenges regarding adequate pain management and education. Studies have documented issues with transfer of information and patient comfort. Our objective was to explore perioperative nurses' perspectives of current practices and challenges with pain management and education. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a qualitative descriptive design and conducted four focus group interviews, with 24 total participants from two perioperative areas of an academic medical center, using a standardized script. Using qualitative analysis software, two investigators reviewed the data and coded major themes and subthemes. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies guidelines were followed for reporting the data. RESULTS: We identified four major themes impacting current perioperative pain management and education practices: communication among the perioperative care team, sources of nurses' frustrations in the perioperative setting, patient expectations for pain, and nurse-driven pain management and education. Nurses highlighted their work became easier with adequate information transfer and trust from physicians. Frustrations stemmed from surgeon, system, and patient factors. Nurses often use their clinical experience and judgment in managing patients throughout the perioperative period. Furthermore, nurses felt patients have limited pain education and stressed education throughout the surgical care pathway could improve overall care. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative pain management, assessment, and education practices are inconsistent, incomplete, and sources of frustrations according to participants. Participant experiences highlight the need for improved and standardized models. Patient pain education should use a multidisciplinary approach, beginning at the point of surgery scheduling and continuing through postoperative follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/enfermería , Dolor Postoperatorio/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/enfermería , Adulto , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Investigación Cualitativa , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA