Nonprescription Treatment Options.

The pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex and multifactorial. However, recent advancements in the genetics and pathophysiology of AD suggest that epidermal barrier dysfunction is paramount in the development and progression of the condition (Boguniewicz M, Leung DYM, Immunol Rev 242(1):233-246, 2011). In addition to standard therapy for AD, there are a plethora of nonprescription treatment modalities which may be employed. Over-the-counter treatments for atopic dermatitis can come in the form of topical corticosteroids, moisturizers/emollients, and oral antihistamines. Though these treatments are beneficial, prescription treatments may be quicker acting and more efficacious in patients with moderate to severe disease or during flares. OTC agents are best used for maintenance between flares and to prevent progression of mild disease. Alternative and complementary treatments lack strong efficacy evidence. However, wet wraps, bleach baths, and other treatments appear to be promising when used in conjunction with conventional treatments. With the financial burden of atopic dermatitis ranging from 364 million to 3.8 billion dollars each year in the United States, we suspect this topic will gain further research attention.

Cutaneous and Noncutaneous Adverse Effects in Patients with Advanced Melanoma Receiving Immunotherapy.

Relationships between cutaneous adverse effects (CAEs) and noncutaneous adverse effects (NCAEs) of melanoma immunotherapy may help identify patterns tied to distinct immunologic pathways. The objective of this study was to determine the associations between CAEs and NCAEs among patients with stages III-IV melanoma receiving immunotherapy and who were enrolled in a prospective cohort. Electronic medical record data were abstracted from the first immunotherapy infusion until 1 year later. CAEs were rash or itch. NCAEs were symptoms and/or laboratory abnormalities documented as immunotherapy related. NCAE onset and time to NCAE were compared between participants with and without CAEs using ORs and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Of 34 participants, 11 (32.4%) developed no adverse effects, 7 (20.1%) developed CAEs only, 3 (8.8%) developed NCAEs only, and 13 (38.2%) developed both CAEs and NCAEs. After adjustment for age, sex, and immunotherapy regimen, CAE was associated with higher odds of NCAE development (OR = 9.72; 95% confidence interval = 1.2-76.8). Median NCAE onset was 63 days in those with CAEs and 168 days in those without CAEs (P = 0.41). Limitations included a small sample size, and larger prospective studies should be performed to confirm findings. CAE was associated with NCAE development. Early identification and treatment of NCAEs may reduce symptom burden and hospitalizations associated with NCAEs.

Tools to study the severity of itch in 8- to 17-year-old children: Validation of TweenItchyQoL and ItchyQuant.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Validated pruritus-specific quality of life and self-reported severity instruments exist primarily for adults. Clinical trials to develop therapeutics for children with chronic pruritus are hampered by the paucity of appropriate outcome measures. To address this gap, we aimed to develop validated instruments to measure itch-specific quality of life and self-reported severity in children. METHODS: We conducted in-depth, open-ended interviews of itchy children and generated concepts to develop TweenItchyQoL. We administered TweenItchyQoL, ItchyQuant, a cartoon-annotated self-reported pruritus severity numeric rating scale (NRS), and a non-cartoon NRS to 175 itchy children aged 8-17 years. We analyzed the data for feasibility, preference, reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: Average completion time was 4.8 minutes for TweenItchyQoL and 33 seconds for ItchyQuant. The majority of patients either preferred ItchyQuant or found no difference between ItchyQuant and the NRS. Cronbach's alpha for TweenItchyQoL total and subscales ranged from 0.84 to 0.95. Test-retest reliability coefficients were ≥0.7 for TweenItchyQoL and 0.4 for ItchyQuant. A 3-dimensional bifactor model was most appropriate (RMSEA = 0.048) on the confirmatory factor analyses. As a function of those reporting worsening, improvement, or no change at their final visit, TweenItchyQoL and ItchyQuant scores in those cohorts changed as expected. CONCLUSIONS: This new set of validated and feasible instruments shows promise to quantify itch severity and QoL impact in older children.

Pruritus assessment tools for 6 to 7-year-old children: KidsItchyQoL and ItchyQuant.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Measures of pruritus severity and quality of life (QoL) are necessary for the development of therapeutics for children with chronic pruritus. In children, questionnaires need to be developed for specific age groups given the differences in cognitive levels. In this study, we aimed to develop tools to assess QoL and pruritus severity in children 6 to 7-years-old with chronic pruritus. METHODS: Based on open interviews with children, we developed a cartoon-annotated QoL instrument, KidsItchyQoL, and validated an existing pruritus severity instrument, ItchyQuant, that measures pruritus impact and severity for the preceding week. Both instruments were administered to 100 children aged 6-7 years with chronic pruritus. The data were analyzed for reliability, reproducibility, construct validity, and responsiveness. RESULTS: We found the 14-item KidsItchyQoL to be reliable (Cronbach's α = 0.846) and reproducible (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.66) as was the ItchyQuant (ICC = 0.47). With respect to construct validity, examination of eigenvalues of the inter-item polychoric correlation matrix suggested three dominant factors. A subsequent confirmatory factor analysis suggested that a 3-dimensional simple structure model with correlated factors provided a reasonable data representation. The responsiveness of KidsItchyQoL and ItchyQuant (P = .005, GLM procedure) were demonstrated with scores changing as expected with the self-reported change of itch severity. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate promise for a new set of reliable research tools to assess QoL and pruritus severity in children 6 to 7 years of age.

Non-Prescription Treatment Options.

The pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex and multifactorial. However, recent advancements in the genetics and pathophysiology of AD suggest that epidermal barrier dysfunction is paramount in the development and progression of the condition (Boguniewicz and Leung, Immunol Rev 242(1):233-246, 2011). In addition to standard therapy for AD, there are a plethora of non-prescription treatment modalities which may be employed. Over-the-counter treatments for atopic dermatitis can come in the form of topical corticosteroids, moisturizers/emollients, and oral anti-histamines. Though these treatments are beneficial, prescription treatments may be quicker acting and more efficacious in patients with moderate to severe disease or during flares. OTC agents are best used for maintenance between flares and to prevent progression of mild disease. Alternative and complementary treatments lack strong efficacy evidence. However, wet wraps, bleach baths, and other treatments appear to be promising when used in conjunction with conventional treatments. With the financial burden of atopic dermatitis ranging from 364 million to 3.8 billion dollars each year in the United States, we suspect this topic will gain further research attention.