Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
2.
J Orthop Res ; 31(2): 295-9, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22991340

RESUMEN

Tenascin-X (TNX) is an extra-cellular matrix glycoprotein associated with collagen fibril deposition. Recent reports have linked truncated TNX mutations (TNXB) to generalized joint hypermobility and most importantly recurrent joint dislocation. In the present study, we investigated whether there is an association between joint dislocation recurrence rate and the frequency of TNXB single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Seventy-eight patients treated for post-traumatic shoulder instability and 82 healthy controls were genotyped for selected TNXB SNP using TaqMan® Genotyping Assays. At a mean follow-up of 24 months recurrence rate and clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Constant and Murley, Rowe, and DASH scores. The association between genotypes and joint dislocation was tested using the dominant, recessive and additive models, and the model-free approach. Genotype distribution of the examined SNPs did not significantly deviate from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) neither in patients nor in the controls. Moreover, there was no significant difference in genotype and allele distribution between patients and controls. Finally, no difference in genotype frequency was detected between patients who experienced a re-dislocation after the initial surgery and patients who did not sustain a re-dislocation. The SNPs investigated in this study have no clinically relevant influence on TNXB gene expression and/or TNX function. Therefore, these SNPs could not be used for predicting individual risk of recurrent shoulder dislocation.


Asunto(s)
Inestabilidad de la Articulación/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Luxación del Hombro/genética , Tenascina/genética , Adulto , Femenino , Frecuencia de los Genes , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Recurrencia , Riesgo , Luxación del Hombro/cirugía , Articulación del Hombro/fisiopatología , Articulación del Hombro/cirugía
3.
Wound Repair Regen ; 17(2): 179-84, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19320885

RESUMEN

Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy is increasingly being used in different areas of medical practice. While demonstrated to be effective in several settings, its mechanism of action is not well understood. In the present study, we determined the effects of HBO on wound epithelialization and neovascularization in an in vivo hairless mouse ear "impaired" wound model. To impair wound healing, macrophages were depleted by pretreatment with iota-carrageenan. Wound epithelialization and neovascularization were measured using intravital microscopy and computerized planimetry. Metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were measured on days 2 and 7 using immunohistochemistry. In nonimpaired healing wounds, the rate of epithelialization and neovascularization was significantly accelerated in the groups treated with HBO. Time to wound closure was significantly delayed in impaired compared with nonimpaired healing wounds and HBO treatment completely reversed this delay. Neither HBO treatment nor macrophage depletion caused significant alterations in MMP-2 expression in wounds. In contrast, TNF-alpha, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 were significantly up-regulated in the impaired healing group receiving HBO treatment. These results show that HBO therapy effectively reversed the negative effect exerted by macrophage reduction on wound epithelialization and neovascularization. This beneficial effect could be due to stimulation of TNF-alpha production and, to a lesser degree due to release of metalloproteinases.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Oído , Oxigenoterapia Hiperbárica/métodos , Neovascularización Fisiológica/fisiología , Cicatrización de Heridas/fisiología , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Análisis de Varianza , Animales , Carragenina/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Oído/irrigación sanguínea , Oído/lesiones , Tejido de Granulación/patología , Inmunohistoquímica , Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Macrófagos/inmunología , Masculino , Metaloproteinasa 2 de la Matriz/análisis , Metaloproteinasa 9 de la Matriz/análisis , Ratones , Ratones Pelados , Microscopía por Video , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Inhibidor Tisular de Metaloproteinasa-1/análisis , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/análisis , Heridas y Lesiones/patología
4.
Transpl Int ; 19(11): 868-80, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17018121

RESUMEN

Each year an estimated 7-million people in the USA need composite tissue reconstruction because of surgical excision of tumors, accidents and congenital malformations. Limb amputees alone comprise over 1.2 million of these. This figure is more than double the number of solid organs needed for transplantation. Composite tissue allotransplantation in the form of hand and facial tissue transplantation are now a clinical reality. The discovery, in the late 1990s, that the same immunotherapy used routinely in kidney transplantation was also effective in preventing skin rejection made this possible. While these new treatments seem like major advancements most of the surgical, immunological and ethical methods used are not new at all and have been around and routinely used in clinical practice for some time. In this review of composite tissue allotransplantation, we: (i) outline the limitations of conventional reconstructive methods for treating severe facial disfigurement, (ii) review the history of composite tissue allotransplantation, (iii) discuss the chronological scientific advances that have made it possible, (iv) focus on the two unique clinical scenarios of hand and face transplantation, and (v) reflect on the critical issues that must be addressed as we move this new frontier toward becoming a treatment in mainstream medicine.


Asunto(s)
Cara/cirugía , Mano/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Trasplante de Tejidos/métodos , Inmunología del Trasplante , Trasplante Homólogo/métodos , Traumatismos Faciales/cirugía , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Masculino
5.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 118(3): 663-70, 2006 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16932174

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The surgical techniques necessary to transplant a human face are well established, and the early success of human hand transplants suggests that the immunological hurdles of transplanting human facial tissues have largely been overcome. Therefore, it is the ethical barriers that pose the greatest challenge to performing facial transplantation. At the center of the ethical debate is the question, "Do the risks posed by the life-long immunosuppression that a recipient would have to take justify the benefits of receiving a face transplant?" In this study, the authors answer this question by assessing the degree of risk individuals would be willing to accept to receive a face transplant. METHODS: To quantitatively assess risks versus benefits in facial transplantation, the authors developed the Louisville Instrument for Transplantation, or LIFT, which contains 237 standardized questions. Respondents in three study populations (healthy individuals, n = 150; organ transplant recipients, n = 42; and individuals with facial disfigurement, n = 34) were questioned about the extent to which they would trade off specific numbers of life-years, or sustain other costs, in exchange for receiving seven different transplant procedures. RESULTS: The authors found that the three populations would accept differing degrees of risk for the seven transplant procedures. Organ transplant recipients were the most risk-tolerant group, while facially disfigured individuals were the least risk tolerant. All groups questioned would accept the highest degree of risk to receive a face transplant compared with the six other procedures. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents an empirical basis for assessing risk versus benefit in facial transplantation. In doing so, it provides a more solid foundation upon which to introduce this exciting new reconstructive modality into the clinical arena.


Asunto(s)
Cara/cirugía , Traumatismos Faciales/cirugía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Trasplante de Tejidos/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Traumatismos Faciales/psicología , Pie/trasplante , Rechazo de Injerto/psicología , Trasplante de Mano , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/psicología , Trasplante de Riñón/psicología , Laringe/trasplante , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trasplante Homólogo/psicología
6.
Transplantation ; 80(4): 487-93, 2005 Aug 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16123723

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus (FK506)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/prednisone combination immunosuppression therapy has been found to effectively prevent composite tissue allograft (CTA) rejection with minimal toxicity in a preclinical porcine model. These findings have been reproduced in 24 human hands transplanted in 18 patients. In CTAs containing bone, adequate bone quality and healing are essential for long-term functional success. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect FK506/MMF/prednisone immunotherapy has on bone quality and healing. METHODS: Forelimb CTA-flaps were transplanted in nine pigs. Recipient animals received FK506/MMF/prednisone therapy for 3 months. Bone quality was studied pre- and posttransplant by measuring acoustic velocity and density and by calculating elastic coefficients. Additional bone quality analyses were performed on unoperated limbs, and in bone grafts from two pigs that had autograft procedures performed. Bone healing was assessed using radiographic analysis. RESULTS: Three animals were lost to immunosuppression-related complications before the endpoint of the study. The bone component of all six CTA-flaps showed normal healing. Although results of the bone density measurements were not significantly different when comparing pre- to posttransplant values, acoustic velocity and elastic coefficient measurements showed a significant decrease posttransplant indicating a decrease in bone quality. CONCLUSIONS: FK506/MMF/prednisone combination therapy prevented rejection, did not adversely affect bone quality, and showed normal bone healing. The transplant procedure itself decreased bone quality more than the immunosuppression regimen did over the observation period in this study. Based on these findings, we conclude to prevent CTA failure it is important to monitor bone quality posttransplant.


Asunto(s)
Miembro Anterior , Glucocorticoides/farmacología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto/efectos de los fármacos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Animales , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Miembro Anterior/citología , Miembro Anterior/metabolismo , Miembro Anterior/trasplante , Rechazo de Injerto/diagnóstico por imagen , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ácido Micofenólico/farmacología , Prednisona/farmacología , Radiografía , Porcinos , Tacrolimus/farmacología , Trasplante Homólogo , Ultrasonografía , Cicatrización de Heridas/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA