Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Affect Disord ; 291: 198-208, 2021 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34049189

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While widespread grey matter (GM) changes are seen in bipolar I disorder (BD-I), it is unclear how early in the illness such changes emerge. To date there has been little synthesis of findings regarding longitudinal grey matter changes early in the course of BD-I. We conducted a systematic review to examine the evolution of GM changes in BD-I patients following the first episode of mania (FEM). METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of studies examining longitudinal changes in GM volume (GMV), cortical thickness and/or surface area in BD-I patients following FEM. We qualitatively synthesized results regarding longitudinal GM changes in BD-I patients. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria, all examining GMV changes. Longitudinal ACC volume decrease following FEM was the most replicated finding, but was only reported in 4 out of 7 studies that examined this region as part of a whole brain/region of interest analysis, with 2 of these positive studies using an overlapping patient sample. The impact of episode recurrence, medications, and other clinical factors was inconsistently examined. LIMITATIONS: The literature regarding GM changes early in BD-I is highly inconsistent, likely due to heterogeneity in participant characteristics, imaging methodology/analysis and duration of follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Though there was some suggestion that structural ACC changes may represent a marker for neuroprogression following FEM, results were too inconsistent to draw any conclusions. Larger longitudinal studies examining cortical thickness/surface area, and the influence of relevant clinical factors, are needed to better understand neuroprogression in early BD-I.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Sustancia Gris , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Gris/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Manía , Recurrencia
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 163(1): 49-56, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33113011

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Head and face injuries are the second most frequently reported injuries among bicyclists. Recently, helmet usage has increased, and in some countries, helmet laws have been introduced. However, subsequent changes in the incidence and severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are unknown, and data on neurosurgical interventions are lacking. Therefore, we analyzed a cohort of bicyclists with TBI, in a state with an enforced helmet law, and compared our results with the available literature. METHODS: Patient data of bicycle accidents that occurred between January 2008 and January 2015 were extracted from the state trauma registry, and the corresponding patient files and CT scans were comprehensively reviewed. RESULTS: Of the 1019 patients admitted due to bicycle accidents, 187 patients suffered from TBI. Most cases were mild; however, 72 involved intracranial hemorrhages. Of the TBI patients, 113 were wearing helmets. CT scans were performed on 168 TBI patients, 120 of whom had a Rotterdam CT score of 1, with no difference between helmeted and non-helmeted patients. Open head injury (p < 0.05) and epidural hematomas were significantly less frequent among helmet wearers (p = 0.03). Ten patients required surgery; helmet use and neurosurgical involvement were not significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who wore helmets were significantly less likely to suffer from epidural hematomas and open head injuries. While TBI severity was not significantly different between helmeted and non-helmeted bicyclists, the overall occurrence of TBI and moderate to severe TBI among all admissions was lower than that seen in comparable studies from countries without helmet laws.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito/estadística & datos numéricos , Ciclismo/lesiones , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Dispositivos de Protección de la Cabeza/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Australia Occidental
3.
Can J Psychiatry ; 65(4): 213-227, 2020 04.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31830820

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To review the current evidence for efficacy of cannabidiol in the treatment of mood disorders. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo, Scielo, ClinicalTrials.gov , and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies published up to July 31, 2019. The inclusion criteria were clinical trials, observational studies, or case reports evaluating the effect of pure cannabidiol or cannabidiol mixed with other cannabinoids on mood symptoms related to either mood disorders or other health conditions. The review was reported in accordance with guidelines from Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. RESULTS: Of the 924 records initially yielded by the search, 16 were included in the final sample. Among them, six were clinical studies that used cannabidiol to treat other health conditions but assessed mood symptoms as an additional outcome. Similarly, four tested cannabidiol blended with Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the treatment of general health conditions and assessed affective symptoms as secondary outcomes. Two were case reports testing cannabidiol. Four studies were observational studies that evaluated the cannabidiol use and its clinical correlates. However, there were no clinical trials investigating the efficacy of cannabidiol, specifically in mood disorders or assessing affective symptoms as the primary outcome. Although some articles point in the direction of benefits of cannabidiol to treat depressive symptoms, the methodology varied in several aspects and the level of evidence is not enough to support its indication as a treatment for mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence to recommend cannabidiol as a treatment for mood disorders. However, considering the preclinical and clinical evidence related to other diseases, cannabidiol might have a role as a treatment for mood disorders. Therefore, there is an urgent need for well-designed clinical trials investigating the efficacy of cannabidiol in mood disorders.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Cannabidiol/uso terapéutico , Moduladores de Receptores de Cannabinoides/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Humor/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA