Does the presence of preoperative neck pain impact clinical outcomes after posterior decompression in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament?: Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how preoperative neck pain influences clinical outcomes following posterior decompression for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). SETTING: Fourteen medical institutions in Japan. METHODS: We enrolled 90 patients with cervical OPLL who underwent posterior decompression and were followed for a minimum of two years. We collected demographic data, medical history, and imaging findings. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative neck pain presence (Pre-op. neck pain (-) and (+) groups), and their outcomes were compared. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the Pre-op. neck pain (-) and (+) groups. Both groups showed similar distributions of ossification types and K-line positivity. Perioperative complications were comparable between the two groups. Radiographic analysis revealed no significant differences in C2-7 angles or cervical range of motion, pre- and postoperatively. Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in postoperative Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) scores, but there were no significant differences in scores or recovery rates. In the Pre-op. neck pain (-) group, factors associated with appearance of postoperative neck pain included pre- and postoperative lower JOA scores and larger C2-7 angles in neutral and extension positions. CONCLUSIONS: It emerges that lower pre- and postoperative JOA scores or larger C2-7 angles in neutral and extension positions predispose to postoperative neck pain even in those patients without preoperative neck pain. Therefore, this is worth discussing at the time of consenting patients for surgical decompression and fixation.

Therapeutic Intervention for Osteoporosis of Surgical Cases With Non-Vertebral Fractures for Three Years in a Newly Established Rural Hospital in Japan.

Objectives Our hospital was newly opened in the spring of 2020 in a rural area of Japan, with a remarkably developing aging society and population decline. This study aimed to clarify and evaluate the practice of osteoporosis care in our hospital for three years since its establishment. We report a retrospective review of therapeutic interventions for osteoporosis for patients who underwent surgical treatment for non-vertebral fragility fractures in our hospital. Methods We evaluated the practice of osteoporosis intervention in patients who underwent surgery for proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), distal radius fractures (DRFs), or proximal femoral fractures (PFFs) from April 2020 to the end of March 2023. Results There were 115 surgical cases with non-vertebral fractures (10 patients with PHF, 41 patients with DRF, and 64 with PFF). Among the patients who had received osteoporosis treatment at other hospitals before the injury, only 15 (13.0%) patients had been administered therapeutic intervention for osteoporosis by other clinics or hospitals. Also, 82 (71.3%) patients were newly diagnosed with osteoporosis in our hospital after surgery according to the Japanese osteoporosis guideline. New postoperative osteoporosis interventions were administered to 39 (47.0%) patients, of which the rate was higher than the previous reports in Japan. While there was no significant difference between upper limb fracture and PFF in the percentage per young adult mean of spine areal bone marrow density (aBMD), the femoral neck aBMDs in the upper limb fracture group were significantly higher than in the PFF group. The serum total P1NP levels were significantly lower and the 25(OH)D levels were also greater in the upper limb fracture group than in the PFF group, whereas the serum TRACP-5b levels were not significantly different between the two groups. Two (1.7%) patients were affected with secondary fractures during the study period. Conclusions The rates of therapeutic intervention for osteoporosis of patients with non-vertebral fractures, especially in those with upper limb fractures, in our hospital were considered to be greater than those in the previous reports. However, the intervention rate for patients with PFFs was not much, and there was still room for improvement in our hospital concerning osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.

Impact of surgical treatment on patient reported outcome in patients with spinal metastases from prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate postoperative outcomes in patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer, with a focus on patient-oriented assessments. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter registry study involving 35 centers. A total of 413 patients enrolled in the Japanese Association for Spine Surgery and Oncology Multicenter Prospective Study of Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors were evaluated for inclusion. The eligible patients were followed for at least 1 year after surgery. The Frankel Classification, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, visual analog scale for pain, face scale, Barthel Index, vitality index, indications for oral pain medication, and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire were used for evaluating functional status, activities of daily living, and patient motivation. RESULTS: Of the 413 eligible patients, 41 with primary prostate cancer were included in the study. The patient-oriented assessments indicated that the patients experienced postoperative improvements in quality of life and motivation in most items, with the improvements extending for up to 6 months. More than half of the patients with Frankel classifications B or C showed improved neurological function at 1 month after surgery, and most patients presented maintained or improved their classification at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention for spinal metastases of prostate cancer significantly improved neurological function, quality of life, and motivation of the patients. Consequently, our results support the validity of surgical intervention for improving the neurological function and overall well-being of patients with spinal metastases of prostate cancer.

Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained popularity in spinal surgery because of its potential to reduce blood loss. However, concerns regarding its safety and efficacy remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss and its safety profile in spinal surgeries. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating the use of TXA in spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and total estimated blood loss (EBL), and the secondary outcomes included the incidence and types of complications associated with TXA use. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models. Results: Thirteen studies involving 1,213 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The use of TXA was associated with significant reductions in both intraoperative (mean difference: -46.56 mL [-73.85, -19.26], p<0.01]) and total EBL (mean difference: -210.17 mL [-284.93, -135.40], p<0.01) while also decreasing the need for blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.68 [0.51, 0.90], p<0.01). No significant difference was found in the incidence and types of thrombotic complications when TXA was used in spinal surgery. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in instrumentation and fusion surgery and different doses of TXA. Conclusions: TXA is effective in reducing intraoperative and overall blood loss in spinal surgery without increasing the risk of complications. These findings support the use of TXA to improve patient outcomes. However, caution should be exercised because of the heterogeneity among the included studies. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential long-term complications.

Prospective Registration Study for Establishing Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases.

STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective registry study. OBJECTIVE: To clarify minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for surgical interventions for spinal metastases, thereby enhancing patient care by integrating quality of life (QoL) assessments with clinical outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Despite its proven usefulness in degenerative spinal diseases and deformities, the MCID remains unexplored regarding surgery for spinal metastases. METHODS: This study included 171 (out of 413) patients from the multicenter "Prospective Registration Study on Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Tumors" by the Japan Association of Spine Surgeons. These were evaluated preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively using the Face scale, EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L), including the visual analog scale (VAS), and performance status. The MCIDs were calculated using an anchor-based method, classifying participants into the improved, unchanged, and deteriorated groups based on the Face scale scores. Focusing on the improved and unchanged groups, the change in the EQ-5D-5L values from before to after treatment was analyzed, and the cutoff value with the highest sensitivity and specificity was determined as the MCID through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The validity of the MCIDs was evaluated using a distribution-based calculation method for patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: The improved, unchanged, and deteriorated groups comprised 121, 28, and 22 participants, respectively. The anchor-based MCIDs for the EQ-5D-5L index, EQ-VAS, and domains of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression were 0.21, 15.50, 1.50, 0.50, 0.50, 0.50, and 0.50, respectively; the corresponding distribution-based MCIDs were 0.17, 15,99, 0.77, 0.80, 0.78, 0.60, and 0.70, respectively. CONCLUSION: We identified MCIDs for surgical treatment of spinal metastases, providing benchmarks for future clinical research. By retrospectively examining whether the MCIDs are achieved, factors favoring their achievement and risks affecting them can be explored. This could aid in decisions on surgical candidacy and patient counseling.

Satisfaction following correction of spinal deformity: Cultural and regional effects on outcome.

Corrective spine surgery for spinal deformities, such as adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and adult spinal deformity (ASD), aims to enhance the quality of life by addressing physical impairments. However, the extent of patient satisfaction after surgery, which includes pain management, functional recovery, and psychological contentment, exhibits considerable variation across different cultural and geographical landscapes. This review describes the influence of cultural and regional disparities on postoperative satisfaction in AIS and ASD surgery with a particular emphasis on the disparities between the US and Japan. This review underscores the intricate relationship between surgical outcomes and patient-reported satisfaction metrics. The investigation reveals significant contrasts in patient satisfaction and clinical results between these 2 countries, attributed to divergent cultural expectations, lifestyle adaptations, and perceptions of bodily image. These distinctions are crucial for healthcare professionals to recognize, as they necessitate a culturally nuanced approach to patient care. This comparative review not only enhances the understanding of patient experiences across cultures but also provides valuable guidance for physicians in customizing their strategies to align with the varied expectations of their patients, thereby improving postoperative satisfaction and overall quality of life. This review emphasizes the necessity of a tailored and culturally sensitive approach to managing spinal deformities, underscoring the need to factor in cultural and regional elements to enhance patient satisfaction and surgical outcomes.

Impact of malnutrition on mortality and neurological recovery of older patients with spinal cord injury.

This retrospective cohort study established malnutrition's impact on mortality and neurological recovery of older patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). It included patients aged ≥ 65 years with traumatic cervical SCI treated conservatively or surgically. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index was calculated to assess nutritional-related risk. Overall, 789 patients (mean follow-up: 20.1 months) were examined and 47 had major nutritional-related risks on admission. One-year mortality rate, median survival time, neurological recovery, and activities of daily living (ADL) at 1 year post-injury were compared between patients with major nutrition-related risk and matched controls selected using 1:2 propensity score matching to adjust for age, pre-traumatic neurological impairment, and activity. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median survival times were 44.9 and 76.5 months for patients with major nutrition-related risk and matched controls, respectively (p = 0.015). Matched controls had more individuals with a neurological improvement of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale ≥ 1 grade (p = 0.039) and independence in ADL at 1 year post-injury than patients with major nutrition-related risk (p < 0.05). In conclusion, 6% of older patients with cervical SCI had major nutrition-related risks; they showed a significantly higher 1 year mortality rate, shorter survival time, poorer neurological improvement, and lower ADL at 1 year post-injury than matched controls.

Neurological recovery rate and predictive factors of incomplete AIS grade C spinal cord injury in the older aged population.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To define the prognosis and predictive factors for neurological improvement in older patients with incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) of American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade C (AIS-C). SETTINGS: Multi-institutions in Japan. METHODS: We included patients aged ≥65 years with traumatic SCI of AIS-C who were treated conservatively or surgically with >3 follow-up months. To identify factors related to neurological improvement, patients were divided into three groups according to their neurological status at the final follow-up, with univariate among-group comparisons of demographics, radiographic, and therapeutic factors. Significant variables were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 296 older patients with SCI of AIS-C on admission were identified (average age: 75.2 years, average follow-up: 18.7 months). Among them, 190 (64.2%) patients improved to AIS-D and 21 (7.1%) patients improved to AIS-E at final follow-up. There were significant among-group differences in age (p = 0.026), body mass index (p = 0.007), status of pre-traumatic activities of daily living (ADL) (p = 0.037), and serum albumin concentrations (p = 0.011). Logistic regression analysis showed no significant differences in variables in the stratified group of patients who improved to AIS-D. Meanwhile, serum albumin was a significant variable in patients who improved to AIS-E (p = 0.026; OR: 6.20, pre-traumatic ADL was omitted due to data skewness). CONCLUSIONS: Most older patients with incomplete AIS-C SCI demonstrated at least 1 grade of neurological improvement. However, <10% of patients achieved complete recovery. Key predictors of complete recovery were high serum albumin levels on admission and independent pre-traumatic ADL. SPONSORSHIP: No funding was received for this study.

Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Elderly Traumatic Cervical Spinal Injury: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: The effectiveness of early surgery for cervical spinal injury (CSI) has been demonstrated. However, whether early surgery improves outcomes in the elderly remains unclear. This study investigated whether early surgery for CSI in elderly affects complication rates and neurological outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter study included 462 patients. We included patients with traumatic acute cervical spinal cord injury aged ≥65 years who were treated surgically, whereas patients with American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale E, those with unknown operative procedures, and those waiting for surgery for >1 month were excluded. The minimum follow-up period was 6 months. Sixty-five patients (early group, 14.1%) underwent surgical treatment within 24 hours, whereas the remaining 397 patients (85.9%) underwent surgery on a standby basis (delayed group). The propensity score-matched cohorts of 63 cases were compared. RESULTS: Patients in the early group were significantly younger, had significantly more subaxial dislocations (and fractures), tetraplegia, significantly lower ASIA motor scores, and ambulatory abilities 6 months after injury. However, no significant differences in the rate of complications, ambulatory abilities, or ASIA Impairment Scale scores 6 months after injury were observed between the matched cohorts. At 6 months after injury, 61% of the patients in the early group (25% unsupported and 36% supported) and 53% of the patients in the delayed group (34% unsupported and 19% supported) were ambulatory. CONCLUSIONS: Early surgery is possible for CSI in elderly patients as the matched cohort reveals no significant difference in complication rates and neurological or ambulatory recovery between the early and delayed surgery groups.

Influence of the timing of surgery for cervical spinal cord injury without bone injury in the elderly: A retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Although previous studies have demonstrated the advantages of early surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), the appropriate surgical timing for cervical SCIs (CSCIs) without bone injury remains controversial. Here, we investigated the influence of relatively early surgery within 48 h of injury on the neurological recovery of elderly patients with CSCI and no bone injury. METHODS: In this retrospective multicenter study, we reviewed data from 159 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years with CSCI without bone injury who underwent surgery in participating centers between 2010 and 2020. Patients were followed up for at least 6 months following CSCI. We divided patients into relatively early (≤48 h after CSCI, n = 24) and late surgery (>48 h after CSCI, n = 135) groups, and baseline characteristics and neurological outcomes were compared between them. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with neurological recovery. RESULTS: The relatively early surgery group demonstrated a lower prevalence of cardiac disease, poorer baseline American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade, and lower baseline ASIA motor score (AMS) than those of the late surgery group (P < 0.030, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Although the AMS was lower in the relatively early surgery group at 6 months following injury (P = 0.001), greater improvement in this score from baseline to 6-months post injury was observed (P = 0.010). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that relatively early surgery did not affect postoperative improvement in AMS, rather, lower baseline AMS was associated with better AMS improvement (P < 0.001). Delirium (P = 0.006), pneumonia (P = 0.030), and diabetes mellitus (P = 0.039) negatively influenced postoperative improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Although further validation by future studies is required, relatively early surgery did not show a positive influence on neurological recovery after CSCI without bone injury in the elderly.

Trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force improves dynamic sagittal alignment in postoperative patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

This study aimed to determine whether a trunk orthosis with joints providing resistive force (TORF) modifies sagittal malalignment during level walking in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). Fifteen patients, 6 months after undergoing surgery for LSS, performed level walking at a self-selected speed while wearing a TORF. Dynamic sagittal alignment, including sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, and pelvic tilt, and spatiotemporal data as well as lower limb kinematic and kinetic data were recorded using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and six force plates. Statistical analysis was performed to compare these data with and without the TORF, respectively. Compared to the condition without the TORF, the use of the TORF significantly decreased positive sagittal vertical axis (p < 0.05) and increased the lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt (p < 0.05). Peak hip flexion angle and extension moment during loading response (LR) significantly increased (p < 0.05), and peak hip extension angle and flexion moment during PS statistically decreased (p < 0.05). There was no difference in spatiotemporal data between the two conditions. Our findings suggest that TORF may modify the dynamic sagittal global alignment and lower limb kinematic and kinetics in postoperative LSS patients during level walking.

Proximal Junctional Failure in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: An In-depth Review.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery aims to correct abnormal spinal curvature in adults, leading to improved functionality and reduced pain. However, this surgery is associated with various complications, one of which is proximal junctional failure (PJF). PJF can have a significant impact on a patient's quality of life, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of its causes and the development of effective management strategies. This review aims to provide an in-depth understanding of PJF in ASD surgery. PJF is a complex complication resulting from a multitude of factors including patient characteristics, surgical techniques, and postoperative management. Age, osteoporosis, overcorrection of sagittal alignment, and poor bone quality are identified as significant risk factors. The clinical implications of PJF are substantial, often requiring revision surgery and causing a considerable decrease in patients' quality of life. Prevention strategies include careful preoperative planning, appropriate patient selection, and optimization of surgical techniques. Treatment often necessitates a multifaceted approach, including surgical intervention and the management of underlying risk factors. Predictive modeling is an emerging field that may offer a promising avenue for the risk stratification of patients and individualized preventive strategies. A thorough understanding of PJF's pathogenesis, risk factors, and clinical implications is essential for surgeons involved in ASD surgery. Current preventive measures and treatment strategies aim to mitigate the risk and manage the complications of PJF, but the complication cannot be entirely prevented. Future research should focus on the development of more effective preventive and treatment strategies, and predictive models could be valuable in this pursuit.

Radiographic Outcomes of the Short and Intensive Rehabilitation (SHAiR) Program in Patients with Dropped Head Syndrome.

Background: The radiographic outcomes of nonoperative treatment of dropped head syndrome are still unknown. The purpose of the present study was to assess the change in sagittal spinopelvic radiographic parameters after the short and intensive rehabilitation (SHAiR) program in patients with dropped head syndrome. Methods: This study included 48 consecutive patients with dropped head syndrome who presented with an inability to maintain horizontal gaze and who underwent the SHAiR program during the period of 2018 to 2019. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their ability to maintain horizontal gaze at the time of final follow-up: those who had regained horizontal gaze (the "effective" group) and those who had not regained horizontal gaze (the "noneffective" group). Sagittal radiographic parameters including the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), the C2-7 angle, the C2-7 SVA, T1 slope, thoracic kyphosis of T1-5 and T5-12, lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, pelvic incidence, sacral slope, and curve flexibility, and demographic data and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using an unpaired t test, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Results: Thirty-five patients in the effective group and 13 patients in the noneffective group were analyzed. The rate of response in regaining horizontal gaze with the SHAiR program was 73%. The C2-7 angle, the C2-7 SVA, T1 slope, and thoracic kyphosis (T1-5) demonstrated significant correction in the effective group (p < 0.05). There were no significant changes in other parameters below the mid-thoracic spine-i.e., the thoracolumbar and lumbar spine and pelvis-following the SHAiR program. Scores of the Neck Disability Index and visual analog scale for pain improved significantly in both groups. Conclusions: The SHAiR program improved horizontal gaze among a large percentage of our patients and reduced cervical pain among patients overall. The correction of thoracic kyphosis (T1-5) might be an important treatment target to restore the appropriate T1 tilt in patients with dropped head syndrome. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prognosis of Cervical Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis-Related Spine Injuries in Elderly Patients: Analyses of Both Fracture and Spinal Cord Injury Without Fracture.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the prognosis of elderly patients with injuries related to cervical diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (cDISH) to matched control for each group, with and without fractures. METHODS: The current multicenter study was a retrospective analysis of 140 patients aged 65 years or older with cDISH-related cervical spine injuries; 106 fractures and 34 spinal cord injuries without fracture were identified. Propensity score-matched cohorts from 1363 patients without cDISH were generated and compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk of early mortality for patients with cDISH-related injury. RESULTS: Patients with cDISH-related injuries with fracture did not differ significantly in the incidence of each complication and ambulation or severity of paralysis compared to matched controls. In patients with cDISH-related injury without fracture, those who were nonambulatory at discharge comprised 55% vs 34% of controls, indicating significantly poorer ambulation in those with cDISH-related injuries (P = .023). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications and ambulation or paralysis severity at 6 months as compared with controls. Fourteen patients died within 3 months. Logistic regression analysis identified complete paralysis (odds ratio [OR] 36.99) and age (OR 1.24) as significant risk factors for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The current study showed no significant differences in the incidence of complications, ambulation outcomes between patients with cDISH-related injury with fracture and matched controls, and that the ambulation at discharge for patients with cDISH-related injury without fractures were significantly inferior to those of matched controls.

Navigation-Assisted Micro-Window Excision of Thoracic Ossification of Ligamentum Flavum (Mishima Surgery) in Professional Baseball Pitchers: A Case Report and Technical Note.

Background and Objectives: Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) often causes myelopathy and/or radiculopathy. The disease is frequently observed in East Asian populations. Although thoracic OLF in young athletes who have underwent decompression surgery has been reported, the removal of posterior spinal bony elements and ligamentous complex may often cause postoperative thoracolumbar instability. We established a novel surgical technique that preserves the posterior spinal elements, including the spinous processes, facet joints, and supraspinous and interspinous ligaments for thoracic OLF. This is the first case report to describe a navigation-assisted micro-window excision of thoracic OLF. Case: A 32-year-old male right-handed professional baseball pitcher with significant weakness and numbness in the left leg was referred to our hospital. The patient was diagnosed with thoracic OLF at T10-11 based on radiographic and magnetic resonance images in August 2022. After exposure of the left T10-11 laminae via a small unilateral incision, the location of T10-11 OLF was detected over the lamina by O-arm navigation. Then, the micro-window was made directly above the OLF using a navigated air drill, and the OLF was removed on the ipsilateral side. The contralateral side of OLF was also resected through the same micro-window, achieving complete spinal cord decompression. Results: The next day of the surgery, his leg weakness and numbness were significantly improved. Six weeks after the surgery, he started pitching. Three months after surgery, his symptoms had gone completely, and he pitched from the mound. Approximately 6 months after surgery, he successfully pitched in a professional baseball game. Conclusions: A navigation-assisted micro-window excision of thoracic OLF effectively preserved the spinal posterior bony elements and ligamentous complex. However, long-term clinical outcomes should be evaluated in future studies.

Revolutionizing Spinal Care: Current Applications and Future Directions of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are rapidly becoming integral components of modern healthcare, offering new avenues for diagnosis, treatment, and outcome prediction. This review explores their current applications and potential future in the field of spinal care. From enhancing imaging techniques to predicting patient outcomes, AI and ML are revolutionizing the way we approach spinal diseases. AI and ML have significantly improved spinal imaging by augmenting detection and classification capabilities, thereby boosting diagnostic accuracy. Predictive models have also been developed to guide treatment plans and foresee patient outcomes, driving a shift towards more personalized care. Looking towards the future, we envision AI and ML further ingraining themselves in spinal care with the development of algorithms capable of deciphering complex spinal pathologies to aid decision making. Despite the promise these technologies hold, their integration into clinical practice is not without challenges. Data quality, integration hurdles, data security, and ethical considerations are some of the key areas that need to be addressed for their successful and responsible implementation. In conclusion, AI and ML represent potent tools for transforming spinal care. Thoughtful and balanced integration of these technologies, guided by ethical considerations, can lead to significant advancements, ushering in an era of more personalized, effective, and efficient healthcare.

Worsening ambulation in elderly patients with cervical odontoid fractures: A nationwide multicenter study in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing prevalence of cervical odontoid fractures in older adults, the treatment strategy is controversial. The objectives of the current study are to investigate the prognosis and complications of cervical odontoid fractures in elderly patients and to identify factors associated with worsening of ambulation after 6 months. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective study included 167 patients aged 65 years or older with odontoid fractures. Patient demographic and treatment data were investigated and compared according to the treatment strategy. To determine associations with worsening ambulation after 6 months, we focused on the treatment strategies (nonsurgical treatment [collar immobilization or halo vest], conversion to surgery, or initial surgery) and patients' background. RESULTS: Patients who received nonsurgical treatment were significantly older, and patients who underwent surgery had more Anderson-D'Alonzo type 2 fractures. Of the patients initially treated nonsurgically, 26% later underwent surgery. Numbers of complications, including death, and degrees of ambulation after 6 months did not differ significantly among treatment strategies. Patients who had worsened ambulation after 6 months were significantly more likely to be older than 80 years, to have needed assistance with walking before injury, and to have cerebrovascular disease. Multivariable analysis showed that a score of ≥2 on the 5-item modified frailty index (mFI-5) was significantly associated with worsening ambulation. CONCLUSIONS: Preinjury mFI-5 scores of ≥2 were significantly associated with worsening ambulation 6 months after treatment of cervical odontoid fractures in older adults.

Prognostic impact of respiratory dysfunction in elderly patients with cervical spinal cord injury and/or fractures: a multicenter survey.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of early post-injury respiratory dysfunction for neurological and ambulatory ability recovery in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and/or fractures. METHODS: We included 1,353 elderly patients with SCI and/or fractures from 78 institutions in Japan. Patients who required early tracheostomy and ventilator management and those who developed respiratory complications were included in the respiratory dysfunction group, which was further classified into mild and severe respiratory groups based on respiratory weaning management. Patient characteristics, laboratory data, neurological impairment scale scores, complications at injury, and surgical treatment were evaluated. We performed a propensity score-matched analysis to compare neurological outcomes and mobility between groups. RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients (7.8%) had impaired respiratory function. In propensity score-matched analysis, the respiratory dysfunction group had a lower home discharge and ambulation rates (p = 0.018, p = 0.001, respectively), and higher rate of severe paralysis (p < 0.001) at discharge. At the final follow-up, the respiratory dysfunction group had a lower ambulation rate (p = 0.004) and higher rate of severe paralysis (p < 0.001). Twenty-six patients with severe disability required respiratory management for up to 6 months post-injury and died of respiratory complications. The mild and severe respiratory dysfunction groups had a high percentage of severe paraplegic cases with low ambulatory ability; there was no significant difference between them. The severe respiratory dysfunction group tended to have a poorer prognosis. CONCLUSION: Respiratory dysfunction in elderly patients with SCI and/or cervical fracture in the early post-injury period reflects the severity of the condition and may be a useful prognostic predictor.

Comparative Study of Anticipatory Postural Adjustments between Normal and Cervical Myelopathy Patients.

Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament have been considered to be prone to falls due to lower extremity dysfunction and gait instability. Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) are unconscious muscular activities to counterbalance perturbation. To date, there are no reports on APAs in cervical myelopathy patients, and quantification of postural control remains difficult. Thirty participants were enrolled, of which 15 were cervical myelopathy patients and 15 were normal age- and sex-matched controls. A three-dimensional motion capture system with force plates was used, and the APA phase was defined as the time between start of movement at the center of pressure and heel-off of the step leg. The APA phase (0.47 vs. 0.39 s, p < 0.05) and turning time (2.27 vs. 1.83 s, p < 0.01) were significantly longer, whereas step length tended to be shorter (305.18 vs. 361.04 mm, p = 0.06) in cervical myelopathy patients. There was a significant correlation between Japanese Orthopaedic Association lower extremity motor dysfunction scores and step length (p < 0.01). Cervical myelopathy patients are prone to falls due to longer APA phases with shorter step lengths. Analysis of the APA phase aids the visualization and quantification of postural control during initial gait in cervical myelopathy patients.

Effects of Dementia on Outcomes after Cervical Spine Injuries in Elderly Patients: Evaluation of 1512 Cases in a Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan.

We aimed to retrospectively investigate the demographic characteristics and short-term outcomes of traumatic cervical spine injuries in patients with dementia. We enrolled 1512 patients aged ≥ 65 years with traumatic cervical injuries registered in a multicenter study database. Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence of dementia, and 95 patients (6.3%) had dementia. Univariate analysis revealed that the dementia group comprised patients who were older and predominantly female and had lower body mass index, higher modified 5-item frailty index (mFI-5), lower pre-injury activities of daily living (ADLs), and a larger number of comorbidities than patients without dementia. Furthermore, 61 patient pairs were selected through propensity score matching with adjustments for age, sex, pre-injury ADLs, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale score at the time of injury, and the administration of surgical treatment. In the univariate analysis of the matched groups, patients with dementia had significantly lower ADLs at 6 months and a higher incidence of dysphagia up to 6 months than patients without dementia. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with dementia had a higher mortality than those without dementia until the last follow-up. Dementia was associated with poor ADLs and higher mortality rates after traumatic cervical spine injuries in elderly patients.