RESUMEN
BACKGROUND Computer-aided design (CAD) has been used in the Nuss procedure to determine the bar length and shape. Despite computer aid, the shape and design remain quite intuitive. We tested a new algorithm to determine the optimal bar shape. MATERIAL AND METHODS The normal sterno-vertebral distance was defined on computed tomography (CT) scans of patients without pectus excavatum (PEx) at the same level where the deepest depression was found on CT scans of 97 patients with PEx. Four points were marked on the CT scan of 60 patients with PEx at the deepest deformity: P1: edge of the vertebra; P2: edge of the deformity; P3: the expected contact point of the bar and the rib; and P4: the expected end of the bar. The algorithm generated 3 circles upon these points, and the fusion of the arcs drew the line of the ideal bar. Corrected and normal sterno-vertebral distance values were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Ten bars were bent manually guided by a 1: 1 printout of the designed bar and were implanted in 10 adolescents. RESULTS The shortest sterno-vertebral distance was 3 cm below the intermammillary line in PEx patients. The normal mean sterno-vertebral distance at this level was 10.16±1.35 cm in non-PEx patients. The mean virtually corrected sterno-vertebral distance was 10.28±1.27 cm. No significant difference was found (P=0.44). The bars were seamless and were successfully implanted. No bar needed adjustment, the operation time was shorter, and the patient satisfaction score was 9.4/10. CONCLUSIONS With our new algorithm, an optimal Nuss bar can be designed.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Tórax en Embudo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , Tórax en Embudo/cirugía , Tórax en Embudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Niño , Esternón/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Dental caries is one of the most widespread childhood diseases worldwide, although it is largely preventable. In Europe, there is an observable difference between caries prevalence in Eastern and Western European states. This study aimed to gather data on the characteristics of publicly financed dental preventive services for children in European Union (EU) member states. METHODS: Data on important indicators were collected through an online survey. National and international professional bodies specializing in pediatric dentistry and dental services were invited to participate in the study. Descriptive statistics and information gain were applied in the analysis to identify the strongest indicators of the availability and content of childhood caries services. Additionally, the reimbursement characteristics were examined. RESULTS: We received responses from 27 EU member states. The accessibility and assessment of dental preventive services among the member states vary notably. The frequency of screenings and the screened age groups differ by country and free screenings for preschool children are not common. Monitoring systems were present in only 37% of the responding countries, but brief dental interventions are available to promote caries prevention in 25 of the 27 countries. However, these interventions are mainly focused on basic oral health education. Regarding the reimbursement characteristics, we found that the amount of reimbursement is larger for higher-cost treatments targeting already developed caries than for cost-effective preventive treatments, which are less likely publicly financed. CONCLUSIONS: The prevention of dental caries is part of oral health promotion and education efforts in the EU; unlike the treatment of already developed dental caries, the accessibility of clinical prevention services is limited and usually not free for children. Further comprehensive studies are necessary to identify key indicators for international assessment and facilitate the standardization of the screening process, thus promoting the collection of comparable data.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For most rare diseases, which are often significantly under-resourced, sufficient information on funding landscape is missing, which may prevent effective use of research resources and be an obstacle to making effective decisions on research. The objective of this research was to create a database of Rett syndrome research projects carried out in the European Union (EU) and to provide a research landscape analysis. METHOD: Websites of organizations funding research projects were identified and systematically checked. Projects were analysed by date, place, funder types, and research topics. RESULTS: The analysis revealed that the total expenditure on Rett syndrome research was almost 70 million, allocated among 247 projects mostly performed in Italy and the United Kingdom. The main research sponsor was the European Commission. Highlighting research trends and gaps, this work facilitates changes in rare disease research data management. CONCLUSION: This work demonstrates the feasibility of creating an EU-based research database on Rett syndrome projects. It provides a source of information on research development which is useful for individuals, organizations and key players in the private and public sector to make progressive decisions on Rett syndrome research.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/organización & administración , Bases de Datos Factuales , Unión Europea , Síndrome de Rett , Participación de los Interesados , Bases de Datos como Asunto , Humanos , Desarrollo de Programa , Apoyo a la Investigación como Asunto , Síndrome de Rett/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The role of sun exposure in the development of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers is known; however, there are limited data on the contribution of pretransplantation total sun burden (TSB) to the increased skin cancer risk in organ transplant recipients (OTRs). The importance of patient education about sun-safe behaviors is understood, but educations are often unsuccessful in OTRs. METHODS: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was performed with kidney transplant patients at a single academic center to assess the pre- and post-transplant sun exposure, sun protection habits, and skin cancers. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-one patients participated in the study. 13.1% developed at least one skin cancer. High total sun burden before transplantation was reported by 58.4%, and 65.2% reported education about increased skin cancer risk at the time of transplantation. However, that education did not lead to less sun exposure or better sun protection methods after transplantation. Overall, OTR related but not sun protection-guided lifestyle changes affecting OTRs after transplantation led to reduction in sun exposure. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the need for more tailored, population-specific education programmes, even for patients who expect to receive a transplant in the future, and suggest the importance of pretransplantation TSB in determining the post-transplant skin cancer risk.
Asunto(s)
Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Trasplante de Riñón , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Luz Solar/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Quantitative studies have shown the various benefits for having accreditation in hospitals. However, neither of these explored the general conditions before applying for an accreditation. To close this gap, this study aimed to investigate the possible association between joining an accreditation programme with various hospital characteristics. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was implemented using the databases of the 2013 Hungarian hospital survey and of the Hungarian State Treasury. SETTING: Public general hospitals in Hungary. PARTICIPANTS: The analysis involved 44 public general hospitals, 14 of which joined the preparatory project for a newly developed accreditation programme. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes included the percentage of compliance in quality management, patient information and identification, internal professional regulation, safe surgery, pressure sore prevention, infection control, the opinions of the heads of quality management regarding the usefulness of quality management and clinical audits, and finally, the total debt of the hospital per bed and per discharged patient. RESULTS: According to our findings, the general hospitals joining the preparatory project of the accreditation programme performed better in four of the six investigated activities, the head of quality management had a better opinion on the usefulness of quality management, and both the debt per bed number and the debt per discharged patient were lower than those who did not join. However, no statistically significant differences between the two groups were found in any of the examined outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that hospitals applying for an accreditation programme do not differ significantly in characteristics from those which did not apply. This means that if in the future the accredited hospitals become better than other hospitals, then the improvement could be solely contributed to the accreditation.