Lipid emulsion therapy during management of the critically-ill poisoned patient: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Despite conflicting data, intravenous lipid emulsion has emerged as a potential antidote. The "lipid sink" theory suggests that following intravenous administration of lipid, lipophilic drugs are sequestered in the vascular compartment, thereby reducing their tissue concentrations. This study sought to determine if survival is associated with the intoxicant's degree of lipophilicity. METHODS: We reviewed all cases in the Toxicology Investigators Consortium's lipid sub-registry between May 2012 through December 2018. Information collected included demographics, exposure circumstances, clinical course, management, disposition, and outcome. The primary outcome was survival after lipid emulsion therapy. Survival was stratified by the log of the intoxicant's octanol-water partition coefficient. We also assessed the association between intoxicant lipophilicity and an increase in systolic blood pressure after lipid emulsion administration. RESULTS: We identified 134 patients, including 81 (60.4%) females. The median age was 40 years (interquartile range 21-75). One hundred and eight (80.6%) patients survived, including 45 (33.6%) with cardiac arrest during their intoxication. Eighty-two (61.2%) were hypotensive, and 98 (73.1%) received mechanical ventilation. There was no relationship between survival and the log of the partition coefficient of the intoxicant on linear analysis (P = 0.89) or polynomial model (P = 0.10). Systolic blood pressure increased in both groups. The median (interquartile range) systolic blood pressure before lipid administration was 68 (60-78) mmHg for those intoxicants with a log partition coefficient < 3.6 compared with 89 (76-104) mmHg after lipid administration. Among those drugs with a log partition coefficient > 3.6, the median (interquartile range) was 69 (60-84) mmHg before lipid and 89 (80-96) mmHg after lipid administration. CONCLUSION: Most patients in this cohort survived. Lipophilicity was not correlated with survival or the observed changes in blood pressure. The study did not address the efficacy of lipid emulsion.

Impact of a Mandatory Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Check on Emergency Department Opioid Prescribing Rates.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) exist in 49 states to guide opioid prescribing. In 40 states, clinicians must check the PDMP prior to prescribing an opioid. Data on mandated PDMP checks show mixed results on opioid prescribing. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine the impact of the Massachusetts mandatory PDMP check on opioid prescribing for discharges from an urban tertiary emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of discharges from one ED from 7/1/2010-10/15/2018. The primary outcome was the monthly percentage of patients discharged from the ED with an opioid prescription. The intervention was Massachusetts mandating a PDMP check for all opioid prescriptions. Prescribing was compared pre- and post-mandate. Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis accounted for known declining trends in opioid prescribing. RESULTS: Of 273,512 ED discharges, 35,050 (12.8%) received opioid prescriptions. Mean monthly opioid prescribing decreased post-intervention from 15.1% (SD ± 3.5%) to 5.1% (SD ± 0.9%; p < 0.001). ITS showed equal pre and post-intervention slopes (-0.002, p = 0.819). A small immediate decrease occurred in prescribing around the mandated check: a 3-month level effect decrease of 0.018 (p = 0.039), 6-month level effect 0.019 (p = 0.023), and a 12-month level effect of 0.020 (p = 0.019). The 24-month level effect was not decreased. CONCLUSION: Prior to the mandated PDMP check, ED opioid prescribing was declining. The mandate did not change the rate of decline but was associated with a non-sustained drop in opioid prescribing immediately following enactment.

A Geographically Distinct Case of Fatal Methanol Toxicity from Ingestion of a Contaminated Hand Sanitizer Product During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered outbreaks of unanticipated toxicities, including methanol toxicity. Multiple methanol outbreaks have been described, including contaminated hand sanitizer in the southwest USA. In this case, we describe a fatal case of methanol toxicity from hand sanitizer ingestion, geographically separated from the outbreak in the southwest USA and prior to the announcement of nationwide warnings by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The product was identified as one later recalled by the FDA for methanol contamination. Additionally, the consumption in this case was related to a desire to conceal alcohol consumption from family members. This case of methanol toxicity should increase awareness of the ease of which contaminated products can be widely distributed and of the use of alternative ethanol-containing products to obscure relapse in alcohol use disorder.

Opioid-associated amnestic syndrome: Description of the syndrome and validation of a proposed definition.

OBJECTIVE: An opioid-associated amnestic syndrome (OAS) characterized by acute onset memory loss and bilateral hippocampal signal abnormalities on brain imaging in the setting of a history of opioid use, most notably fentanyl, has been reported. To date, however, there is no case definition to assist neurologists and other clinicians in identifying this syndrome. A multi-disciplinary collaboration of physicians, including neurologists, propose diagnostic criteria for OAS using cases that have been published in the medical literature or presented at conferences. METHODS: Cases were classified as confirmed, probable, or possible based on brain imaging findings and history or analytical testing supporting opioid use. Published articles and presentations were identified by discussion with public health authorities and a systematic search of PubMed. Included were articles, abstracts or posters through November 2019 that presented case reports or case series of a new-onset amnestic syndrome associated with bilateral hippocampal injury on imaging and/or prior opioid or other substance use. The percentages of cases that would meet confirmed, probable, or possible criteria were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-three publications from all sources met criteria for inclusion, accounting for 40 unique cases. Based on the case definition of OAS, 50% (20/40) were confirmed, 25% (10/40) were probable and 25% (10/40) were possible. CONCLUSION: The development of a validated, formal case definition for OAS can assist neurologists and other clinicians in evaluating patients with amnesia and a history of opioid use.

Metabolomic analysis of acetaminophen induced subclinical liver injury.

Introduction: This study examines the metabolomic profile in humans following acetaminophen (APAP) induced subclinical hepatoxicity in the presence and absence of propylene glycol (PG), a cytochrome P450 2E1 inhibitor.Methods: Plasma samples were collected during a previously performed randomized, cross-over trial where 21 subjects received APAP, four grams daily for two weeks in one arm and APAP, four grams daily with 20 mL PG in a second arm. Plasma collected at baseline and at day nine of each arm(time of peak elevation of liver function tests) underwent metabolomic analysis.Results: There were reduced phase two metabolites in subjects who displayed liver injury. There was also decreased sulfonation capacity in all subjects as well as in subjects displaying liver injury relative to subjects not displaying liver injury as evidenced by decreased sulfonation of hepatically derived steroids. There were decreased levels of acylcarnitines in subjects who displayed liver injury relative to subjects not displaying liver injury, indicating inhibition of mitochondrial fatty acid ß-oxidation.Conclusions: Daily APAP dosing led to saturation of metabolic pathways and inhibition of mitochondrial function in subjects displaying subclinical liver injury.

Difficult Intraoperative Heparinization Following Andexanet Alfa Administration.

Direct oral anticoagulants are now commonplace, and reversal agents are recently becoming available. Andexanet alfa (AnXa), approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2018, is a novel decoy molecule that reverses factor Xa inhibitors in patients with major hemorrhage. We present a case of a 70-year-old man taking rivaroxaban with hemodynamic instability from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. He received AnXa prior to endovascular surgery, and intraoperatively he could not be heparinized for graft placement. Consideration should be given to the risks and benefits of AnXa administration in patients who require anticoagulation after hemorrhage has been controlled.

Inhibition of CYP2E1 With Propylene Glycol Does Not Protect Against Hepatocellular Injury in Human Acetaminophen Daily-Dosing Model.

Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced liver injury is initiated by metabolism of APAP by the cytochrome P-450 (CYP) system, primarily CYP2E1. We previously demonstrated CYP inhibition following administration of a liquid APAP formulation containing propylene glycol, a CYP2E1 inhibitor, and other excipients. This study was undertaken to determine if propylene glycol specifically inhibits production of CYP-derived metabolites and if propylene glycol reduces the rise in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) seen following prolonged APAP dosing. Human subjects were randomized to receive 4 g of APAP daily in one arm of the study or 4 g of APAP with 5 mL of 99% propylene glycol in the other arm, both for 14 days. After a washout period of at least 14 days, subjects were crossed over between arms. Outcomes were rise of ALT greater than 2 times baseline (responders) and proportion of randomly sampled CYP-derived metabolites relative to total metabolites produced. There was no difference in percentage of responders between treatment groups: 6 of 21 in the APAP group (29%) compared with 8 of 20 in the APAP + propylene glycol group (40%); chi-square, P = .59. For all subjects, the mean percentage of CYP-derived metabolites produced was 5.8% (APAP) versus 4.3% (APAP + propylene glycol); P = .018. This effect was solely attributable to the responders: the mean percentage of CYP metabolites of responders was 7.7% (APAP) versus 4.6% (APAP + propylene glycol), P = .050, whereas there was no difference for the nonresponders. Five subjects were responders in both arms (2% probability of random occurrence). Our data indicates that propylene glycol inhibits CYP2E1 metabolism of APAP in some subjects but does not effect hepatocellular indury at the dose given.

Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Ground-level Fall With Antiplatelet or Anticoagulant Agents.

OBJECTIVES: Anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications are known to increase the risk and severity of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (tICH), even with minor head trauma. Most studies on bleeding propensity with head trauma are retrospective, are based on trauma registries, or include heterogeneous mechanisms of injury. The goal of this study was to determine the rate of tICH from only a common low-acuity mechanism of injury, that of a ground-level fall, in patients taking one or more of the following antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications: aspirin, warfarin, prasugrel, ticagrelor, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or enoxaparin. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at a Level I tertiary care trauma center of consecutive patients meeting the inclusion criteria of a ground-level fall with head trauma as affirmed by the treating clinician, a computed tomography (CT) head obtained, and taking and one of the above antiplatelet or anticoagulants. Patients were identified prospectively through electronic screening with confirmatory chart review. Emergency department charts were abstracted without subsequent knowledge of the hospital course. Patients transferred with a known abnormal CT head were excluded. Primary outcome was rate of tICH on initial CT head. Rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were compared. RESULTS: Over 30 months, we enrolled 939 subjects. The mean ± SD age was 78.3 ± 11.9 years and 44.6% were male. There were a total of 33 patients with tICH (3.5%, 95% CI = 2.5%-4.9%). Antiplatelets had a rate of tICH of 4.3% (95% CI = 3.0%-6.2%) compared to anticoagulants with a rate of 1.7% (95% CI = 0.4%-4.5%). Aspirin without other agents had an tICH rate of 4.6% (95% CI = 3.2%-6.6%); of these, 81.5% were taking low-dose 81 mg aspirin. Two patients received a craniotomy (one taking aspirin, one taking warfarin). There were four deaths (three taking aspirin, one taking warfarin). Most (72.7%) subjects with tICH were discharged home or to a rehabilitation facility. There were no tICH in 31 subjects taking a direct oral anticoagulant. CIs were overlapping for the groups. CONCLUSION: There is a low incidence of clinically significant tICH with a ground-level fall in head trauma in patients taking an anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication. There was no statistical difference in rate of tICH between antiplatelet and anticoagulants, which is unanticipated and counterintuitive as most literature and teaching suggests a higher rate with anticoagulants. A larger data set is needed to determine if small differences between the groups exist.

Management of Major Bleeding Events in Patients Treated With Dabigatran for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective, Multicenter Review.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: There are limited data on the clinical presentations and management of dabigatran-associated major bleeding outside the clinical trial setting. The aim of this study is to describe clinical characteristics, interventions, and outcomes in patients with dabigatran-associated major bleeding who present to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational chart review study of dabigatran-treated patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who presented with acute major bleeding to the ED. We searched electronic medical record databases cross-referencing medication lists and hemorrhage International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and ICD-10 codes. We studied the resulting charts to yield confirmed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in patients with an index event of major bleeding and at least 1 dose of dabigatran in the 5 preceding days. RESULTS: The electronic search yielded 284 cases, and we assessed 93 as ineligible, leaving 191 in the final cohort. Of these, 118 patients (62%) had gastrointestinal hemorrhage; 36 (19%) had intracranial hemorrhage, 8 (4%) of which were nontraumatic cases and 28 (15%) traumatic. Thirty-six (19%) of the index events were in "other" locations and 1 (0.5%) "unknown." There were 12 deaths (6%): 8 from patients presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding events, 2 from intracranial hemorrhage (both nontraumatic), and 2 from other. Although RBC and plasma transfusions were common, only 11 patients (6%) received purified coagulation factors. CONCLUSION: Despite rare use of reversal strategies, mortality was low and outcomes were favorable, similar to reported outcomes from clinical trials, in this sample of patients with major bleeding while receiving dabigatran.

Predicting morphine related side effects in the ED: An international cohort study.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Morphine is the reference treatment for severe acute pain in an emergency department. The purpose of this study was to describe and analyse opioid-related ADRs (adverse drug reactions) in a large cohort of emergency department patients, and to identify predictive factors for those ADRs. METHODS: In this prospective, observational, pharmaco-epidemiological international cohort study, all patients aged 18years or older who were treated with morphine were enrolled. The study was done in 23 emergency departments in the US and France. Baseline numerical rating scale score and initial and total doses of morphine titration were recorded. Logistic regression analysis was used to study the effects of demographic, clinical and medical history covariates on the occurrence of opioid-induced ADRs within 6h after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1128 patients were included over 10months. Median baseline initial pain scores were 8/10 (7-10) versus 3/10 (1-4) after morphine administration. Median titration duration was 10min (IQR, 1-30). The occurrence of opioid-induced ADRs was 25% and 2% were serious. Patients experienced mainly nausea and drowsiness. Medical history of travel sickness (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-2.86) and history of nausea or vomiting post morphine (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 2.29-6.51) were independent predictors of morphine related ADRs. CONCLUSION: Serious morphine related ADRs are rare and unpredictable. Prophylactic antiemetic therapy could be proposed to patients with history of travel sickness and history of nausea or vomiting in a postoperative setting or after morphine administration.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Receiving Prothrombin Complex Concentrate for Warfarin-associated Intracranial Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Prothrombin complex concentrates (PCCs) are commonly used to rapidly reverse warfarin-associated coagulopathy; however, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an established adverse event. OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for VTE AFTER administration of a three-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (3F-PCC) for warfarin-associated intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients with a warfarin-associated ICH who received a 3F-PCC at a single tertiary care hospital between 2008 and 2013. Outcomes were VTE events (defined as deep vein thrombosis [DVT], pulmonary embolism [PE], limb ischemia, transient ischemic attack, cerebrovascular accident, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, and unexplained sudden death) occurring within 30 days of 3F-PCC administration. Risk factors in subjects with and without VTE complications were compared via Fisher's exact test, Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and univariate logistic regression as appropriate. RESULTS: Two hundred nine subjects received 3F-PCC for warfarin-associated ICH. There were 22 VTE events in 19 subjects (9.1%). Baseline characteristics of subjects with and without VTE were similar. There was a significant increase in VTE events in 29 subjects who were taking warfarin for a previous PE or DVT (36.8% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.007; logistic regression odds ratio 4.455, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a prior history of PE or DVT who were given 3F-PCC for warfarin-associated ICH were 4.5 times more likely to sustain a VTE within 30 days. A careful analysis of risks and benefits of rapidly reversing anticoagulation must be made prior to the administration of 3F-PCC in this patient population.

Trends and Characteristics of Emergency Department Patients Prescribed Novel Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Since 2010, several novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the use in the prevention of cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to describe the trends and characteristics of NOAC-related emergency department (ED) visits. METHODS: Retrospective review of data from an ED tracking system of all visits that had a medication reconciliation with an NOAC or warfarin to a tertiary care ED between October 2010 and August 2014. Basic demographics, admission rate, admission diagnoses, and trends were analyzed. RESULTS: The rate of warfarin visits was stable at 50-60 patients per month (PPM) per 1000 ED visits, however, the rate of dabigatran visits rose to 3-5 PPM/1000 until 2012 and has stayed stable, while rivaroxaban and apixaban have been gradually increasing to 2-4 and 1-2 PPM/1000, respectively. The admission rate for warfarin was 63.7% and for NOACs was 58.1%, compared to baseline admission rate of 35.5%. The hemorrhagic diagnosis rate was similar for warfarin and the NOACs (8.8% and 8.0%, respectively). There were three significantly different admission diagnoses: there were more admission for atrial fibrillation (5.4% vs. 1.9%) and CVA/transient ischemic attack (5.3% vs. 3.0%) in the NOAC group, while there were more admissions for intracranial hemorrhage (2.7% vs. 0.8%) in the warfarin group. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a steady increase of ED patients who are taking an NOAC. There is a nearly double admission rate for an anticoagulated patient regardless of reason for ED visit. There appears to be no difference between rates of bleeding between warfarin and NOACs, although patients taking NOACs are admitted less often for intracranial hemorrhage.

Hemorrhagic complications in emergency department patients who are receiving dabigatran compared with warfarin.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Dabigatran is a reversible direct thrombin inhibitor recently approved for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. An increasing number of patients receiving dabigatran present to the emergency department (ED) with bleeding complications. Unlike vitamin K antagonists, there are no accepted reversal agents for dabigatran and the data on course and management of bleeding complications are limited. The study objective is to describe the course of bleeding complications in patients admitted through the ED who are prescribed dabigatran in comparison with warfarin therapy. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of ED patients under treatment with dabigatran or warfarin who were admitted with bleeding complications during a 6-month period. Patient demographics, laboratory results, bleeding site, interventions, and outcomes are reported. RESULTS: There were 15 and 123 patients admitted with dabigatran and warfarin-induced bleeding complications, respectively. Of the warfarin patients, 25 charts were randomly chosen for extraction. Patients with dabigatran-induced bleeding had a shorter length of stay (3.5 versus 6.0 days) and were older (77 versus 70 years). Patients receiving dabigatran were more likely to have gastrointestinal bleeding (80% versus 48%) and less likely to have intracranial bleeding (0% versus 32%) than those receiving warfarin. Of patients with dabigatran-induced bleeding, 53% presented with an acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: Our patients with dabigatran-induced bleeding had a more benign clinical course with a shorter length of stay compared with patients with warfarin-induced bleeding. As was the case in previous published reports, there were fewer intracranial hemorrhages in patients receiving dabigatran than warfarin. Sustaining an acute kidney injury potentially predisposes patients to bleeding while receiving dabigatran.

Effect of excipients on acetaminophen metabolism and its implications for prevention of liver injury.

Acetaminophen poisoning is the most frequent cause of acute hepatic failure in the US. Toxicity requires reductive metabolism of acetaminophen, primarily via CYP2E1. Liquid acetaminophen preparations contain propylene glycol, a common excipient that has been shown to reduce hepatocellular injury in vitro and in rodents. Children are less susceptible to acetaminophen toxicity for unclear reasons. We conducted a pharmacokinetic single-blinded crossover study of 15 healthy adult volunteers comparing the CYP2E1 and conjugative metabolism of a 15 mg/kg dose of liquid versus solid preparations of acetaminophen. Measured AUC's for the CYP2E1 metabolites were 16-17% lower and extrapolated AUC's were 25-28% lower in the liquid formulation arm while there was no difference in conjugative metabolite production. The formation rate constants for reductive metabolites were equivalent between solid and liquid formulations indicating that enzyme inhibition was competitive. Propylene glycol, an established CYP2E1 competitive antagonist, was detected in the liquid formulation but not solid formulation arm. Since children tend to ingest liquid preparations, the protective effect of this excipient could explain their decreased susceptibility to acetaminophen toxicity. A less hepatotoxic formulation of acetaminophen could potentially be developed if co-formulated with a CYP2E1 inhibitor.