[Scope and limitations of teleconsultation during the covid-19 pandemic: accounts from primary healthcare professionals in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires]. / Alcances y limitaciones de la teleconsulta en pandemia de covid-19: relatos de profesionales de la salud del primer nivel de atención de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.

The aim was to explore the scope and limitations of teleconsultation during the pandemic from the perspective of primary care physicians at the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, a private institution located in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. A qualitative study was conducted with ten individual semi-structured interviews between January and April 2022. The three major emerging topics were the transition to virtuality, accessibility, and the new care model. Obstacles were related to the massive, forced, and unplanned implementation of teleconsultations. The main benefits included providing care during isolation-distancing and addressing epidemiological doubts. Changes were highlighted in care strategies, consultation frameworks, exchange among colleagues, referral criteria, requests for complementary studies, and in the profiles of those seeking consultations. A misuse of the system by individuals and a trivialization of the consultation moment emerged. The rise of communication and information technologies undoubtedly allowed the continuity of healthcare processes, but it does not replace in-person care, and normative guidelines are needed for its continuity.

El objetivo fue explorar alcances y limitaciones de la teleconsulta en pandemia, desde la perspectiva de médicos y médicas del primer nivel de atención del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, una institución privada ubicada en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Se realizó un estudio cualitativo con diez entrevistas semiestructuradas individuales entre enero y abril de 2022. Los tres grandes tópicos emergentes fueron la transición a la virtualidad, la accesibilidad y el nuevo modelo de atención. Los obstáculos se relacionaron con la implementación masiva, forzada y no planificada de las teleconsultas. Los principales beneficios fueron brindar atención durante el aislamiento-distanciamiento y evacuar dudas epidemiológicas. Se destacan cambios en estrategias de atención, encuadre de las consultas, intercambio entre colegas, criterios de derivación y de pedido de estudios complementarios, y en los perfiles de consultantes. Surgió un sobreuso del sistema por parte de las personas, y una banalización del momento de la consulta. El auge de las tecnologías de la comunicación e información indudablemente permitió dar continuidad a los procesos asistenciales en salud, pero no reemplaza la presencialidad y se requieren lineamientos normativos para su continuidad.

Expectativas de inserción laboral en graduados de residencias de Medicina Familiar y General, Buenos Aires / Employment expectations of graduates from family and general medicine residencies, Buenos Aires

La Medicina Familiar y General (MFyG) es una especialidad clave en la estrategia de Atención Primaria de la Salud (APS). Sin embargo, en Latinoamérica se observa una disminución en la cantidad de aspirantes a las residencias de dicha especialidad y con los años abandono de su práctica. Explorar de manera prospectiva las expectativas de inserción laboral de los residentes del último año de MFyG y de los recientemente graduados e identificar el grado de incumbencia en el ámbito de la APS de las primeras experiencias laborales. Se realizó un estudio cualitativo y descriptivo, a través de 20 entrevistas semi-estructuradas y dos grupos focales a médicos de instituciones de gestión privada de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, durante el año 2019. Del análisis del corpus empírico surgieron 4 dimensiones: el perfil del médico de familia/general, la lucha por el reconocimiento de la especialidad, los factores que influyen en las primeras elecciones laborales y las expectativas laborales post residencia. Observamos que los médicos de familia/general se encuentran muy optimistas en la etapa de recién recibidos, con deseos de trabajar en el ámbito de la APS. Sin embargo, se ven obligados a enfrentar un mercado laboral que no aprecia (y hasta no comprende) su preparación. Las expectativas laborales se ven afectadas por una tensión entre ideas profundas sobre "lo correcto" de su trabajo y las oportunidades laborales reales en un sistema de salud que prioriza las especialidades de la fragmentación (AU)

Family and General Medicine is a key specialty in the Primary Health Care (PHC) strategy. However, in Latin America there has been a decrease in the number of physicians who choose and then practice it. To explore the Family and General Medicine residents' expectations on their labor transition after the last training year and identify the degree of concern in the field of PHC of the first work experiences. Qualitative study, through 20 semi-structured interviews and 2 focus groups involving Family and General physicians from privately managed institutions in Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, in 2019. From the analysis of the empirical corpus, four dimensions emerged: the profile of the family physicians, the fight for the recognition of the specialty, the factors that influence their first work experiences and the post-residency careers expectations. The graduates from Family and General Medicine residency programs interviewed have to face a difficult labour market that does not appreciate their training and does not understand what family physicians provide in terms of comprehensive care to patients. Therefore, tension arises between what is right and acceptable in their profession and the real job opportunities offered by the health system that prioritizes fragmented specialties (AU)

Excesivo rastreo de osteoporosis en mujeres menores de 65 años: estudio de corte transversal / Excessive osteoporosis screening in women under 65 years: a cross-sectional study

RESUMEN El rastreo de osteoporosis en mujeres con bajo riesgo de fractura (sobreuso) puede conducir a sobrediagnóstico, tratamiento inapropiado y medicalización. El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar la proporción de mujeres de 45 a 64 años afiliadas a un plan de medicina prepaga de Buenos Aires, Argentina, que realizaron al menos una densitometría ósea de cadera durante 2011 y no cumplían criterios para el rastreo. Se realizó un estudio observacional de corte transversal. Se identificaron 4.310 mujeres de este rango etario que se realizaron una densitometría ósea, entre las que se seleccionó una muestra aleatorizada de 401 mujeres y se obtuvieron datos completos para 178 mujeres. Para determinar si el rastreo era apropiado se utilizaron dos criterios: 1) tener un riesgo de fractura a 10 años mayor que una mujer de 65 años (regla FRAX®); 2) presentar al menos un factor de riesgo de fractura. Un 86,5% de las densitometrías óseas fueron realizadas en mujeres cuyo riesgo estimado por FRAX® no superaba el umbral mínimo recomendado, constatándose osteoporosis en el 5,8% y osteopenia en el 61,0%. En relación con el segundo criterio, el 49,4% no presentaba siquiera un factor de riesgo, documentándose osteoporosis en el 3,4%, y osteopenia en el 62,5%. Los resultados muestran que al menos la mitad de las mujeres no cumplía con los criterios de rastreo.

ABSTRACT Overuse of osteoporosis screening in women at low risk of fracture may lead to overdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment and medicalization. The objective of this work was to estimate the proportion of women aged 45 to 64 enrolled in a private health insurance plan in Buenos Aires undergoing hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 2011 without meeting osteoporosis screening criteria. In this cross-sectional study, 4310 women of this age range that had undergone a hip DXA were identified. A randomly selected sub-group of 401 women was then assessed for the presence of risk factors for osteoporosis and complete data were retrieved for 178 women. Appropriate screening was defined by two criteria: 1) having a 10-year fracture risk higher than that of a 65-year old woman (estimated using the FRAX® tool); 2) having at least one risk factor for fracture. It was found that 86.5% of the women who underwent hip DXA did not exceed the minimum 10-year fracture risk threshold required for screening; 5.8% of them had osteoporosis and 61.0% osteopenia. According to the second criterion, 49.4% had no risk factors, 3.4% of these women had osteoporosis and 62.5% osteopenia. The results show that at least half the women screened did not meet osteoporosis screening criteria.

[Excessive osteoporosis screening in women under 65 years: a cross-sectional study]. / Excesivo rastreo de osteoporosis en mujeres menores de 65 años: estudio de corte transversal.

Overuse of osteoporosis screening in women at low risk of fracture may lead to overdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment and medicalization. The objective of this work was to estimate the proportion of women aged 45 to 64 enrolled in a private health insurance plan in Buenos Aires undergoing hip dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 2011 without meeting osteoporosis screening criteria. In this cross-sectional study, 4310 women of this age range that had undergone a hip DXA were identified. A randomly selected sub-group of 401 women was then assessed for the presence of risk factors for osteoporosis and complete data were retrieved for 178 women. Appropriate screening was defined by two criteria: 1) having a 10-year fracture risk higher than that of a 65-year old woman (estimated using the FRAX® tool); 2) having at least one risk factor for fracture. It was found that 86.5% of the women who underwent hip DXA did not exceed the minimum 10-year fracture risk threshold required for screening; 5.8% of them had osteoporosis and 61.0% osteopenia. According to the second criterion, 49.4% had no risk factors, 3.4% of these women had osteoporosis and 62.5% osteopenia. The results show that at least half the women screened did not meet osteoporosis screening criteria.