CTLA-4 is constitutively expressed on tumor cells and can trigger apoptosis upon ligand interaction.

CTLA-4 (CD152) is a cell surface receptor that behaves as a negative regulator of the proliferation and the effector function of T cells. We have previously shown that CTLA-4 is also expressed on neoplastic lymphoid and myeloid cells, and it can be targeted to induce apoptosis. In our study, we have extended our analysis and have discovered that surface expression of CTLA-4 is detectable by flow cytometry on 30 of 34 (88%) cell lines derived from a variety of human malignant solid tumors including carcinoma, melanoma, neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma and osteosarcoma (but not in primary osteoblast-like cultures). However, by reverse transcriptase-PCR, CTLA-4 expression was detected in all cell lines. We have also found, by immunohistochemistry, cytoplasmic and surface expression of CTLA-4 in the tumor cells of all 6 osteosarcoma specimens examined and in the tumour cells of all 5 cases (but only weakly or no positivity at all in neighbouring nontumor cells) of ductal breast carcinomas. Treatment of cells from CTLA-4-expressing tumor lines with recombinant forms of the CTLA-4-ligands CD80 and CD86 induced apoptosis associated with sequential activation of caspase-8 and caspase-3. The level of apoptosis was reduced by soluble CTLA-4 and by anti-CTLA-4 scFvs antibodies. The novel finding that CTLA-4 molecule is expressed and functional on human tumor cells opens up the possibility of antitumor therapeutic intervention based on targeting this molecule.

HLA-E surface expression is independent of the availability of HLA class I signal sequence-derived peptides in human tumor cell lines.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-E is a nonclassic HLA class I molecule whose expression at the cell surface of tumor cells might allow them to escape T- and natural killer (NK)-cell immune surveillance. In this study, we analyzed HLA-E expression in a panel of human HLA-typed tumor cell lines of different histotypes by flow cytometry with anti-HLA-E monoclonal antibodies and by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Although specific HLA-E transcripts were detected in all cell lines, except in HELA, surface expression was detected at different intensities on seven (23%) of 30 cell lines with higher frequency and intensity among osteosarcoma cell lines. HLA-E-positive tumor cell lines mainly expressed the HLA-A*02 class I allele. Some tumor cell lines demonstrating HLA class I A* or Cw* alleles, which we expected to allow HLA-E surface expression on the basis of reported data on lymphoid cells, instead were HLA-E negative. All tumor cell lines were either tapasin and TAP-1 positive by flow cytometry, except two osteosarcoma cell lines, a finding that suggests an intact assembly machinery for peptide loading. We conclude that the concomitant presence of the appropriate HLA class I alleles with leader sequence-derived peptides and HLA-E heavy chain may not be sufficient to allow HLA-E surface expression in tumor cell lines as opposed to lymphoid cells.