Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308946, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39137234

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacterial infection is a significant global threat to the healthcare systems. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the leading infectious agent in the healthcare setting is now one of the major threats due to AMR. A comprehensive understanding of the magnitude of AMR, particularly highly public health important pathogens such as P. aeruginosa, is necessary for the management of infections based on local information. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the country-wide AMR of P. aeruginosa. METHODS: Systematic searches were performed to retrieve articles from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect electronic databases, Google Scholar search engine, and repository registrars from 2015 to 31st December 2023. Twenty-three studies that provided important data on AMR in P. aeruginosa were systematically reviewed and analyzed to determine the country-wide magnitude of P. aeruginosa AMR profile from healthcare-associated infections. AMR of P. aeruginosa to 10 different antibiotics were extracted separately into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using STATA 17.0. Cohen's kappa was computed to determine the agreement between reviewers, the Inverse of variance (I2) was used to evaluate heterogeneity across studies, and Egger's test to identify publication bias. A random effect model was used to determine the pooled resistance to each antibiotic. Subgroup analysis was performed by infection type and year of publication. RESULTS: This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of P. aeruginosa in clinical specimens associated with HAI was 4.38%(95%CI: 3.00-5.76). The pooled prevalence of AMR in P. aeruginosa for different antibiotics varies, ranging from 20.9% (95%CI: 6.2-35.8) for amikacin to 98.72% (95%CI: 96.39-101.4) for ceftriaxone. The pooled resistance was higher for ceftriaxone (98.72%), Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (75.41), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (91.2). In contrast relatively lower AMR were observed for amikacin (20.9%) and meropenem (28.64%). The pooled multi-drug resistance (MDR) in P. aeruginosa was 80.5% (95%CI: 66.25-93.84). Upon subgroup analysis by infection types and year of publication, P. aeruginosa isolated from healthcare-associated infections exhibited higher resistance to ceftazidime (94.72%) compared to isolates from mixed types of healthcare-associated infections (70.84%) and surgical site infections (57.84%). Antimicrobial resistance in gentamicin was higher during the periods of 2018-2020 (73.96%), while comparatively lower during 2021-2023 (42.69%) and 2015-2017 (29.82%). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly high AMR and MDR were observed from this systematic review and meta-analysis. AMR obtained from this systematic review and meta-analysis urges the need for improved infection control, antimicrobial stewardship practices, and strengthened surveillance systems to control the spread of AMR and ensure effective treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (Registration ID: CRD42024518145).


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Infección Hospitalaria , Infecciones por Pseudomonas , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Etiopía/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 838, 2024 Aug 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39155370

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The emergence and rapid spread of gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenems among newborns is concerning on a global scale. Nonetheless, the pooled estimate of gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenem that cause neonatal sepsis in developing nations remains unknown. Thus, this study aimed to determine the combined prevalence of gram-negative bacteria resistant to carbapenem in African newborns who were suspected of having sepsis. METHODS: All studies published from January 1, 2010, up to December 30, 2023, from PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus electronic databases, and the Google Scholar search engine were researched. Isolates tested for carbapenem from neonates with sepsis, English language papers conducted in Africa, and cross-sectional and cohort studies papers were included. Using PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed studies that assessed the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. The "Joanna Briggs Institute" was used critically to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The data analysis was carried out using STATA™ version 17. Heterogeneity across the studies was evaluated using Q and I 2 tests. The subgroup analysis was done and, funnel plot and Egger's regression test were used to detect publication bias. A sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: All 36 studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review. The pooled prevalence of carbapenem resistance in Africa was 30.34% (95% CI 22.03-38.64%). The pooled estimate of gram-negative bacteria resistant to imipenem, and meropenem was 35.57% (95% CI 0.67-70.54%) and 34.35% (95% CI 20.04% - 48.67%), respectively. A. baumannii and Pseudomonas spp. had pooled prevalence of 45.9% (95% CI 33.1-58.7%) and 43.0% (95% CI 23.0-62.4%), respectively. Similarly, Pseudomonas spp. and A. baumannii also exhibited strong meropenem resistance, with a pooled prevalence of 29.2% (95% CI 4.8-53.5%) and 36.7% (95% CI 20.1-53.3%), respectively. E. coli and K. pneumoniae were the two most common isolates. CONCLUSION: There should be urgent antimicrobial stewardship practices, strengthened surveillance systems and effective treatment for neonates with sepsis. There was remarkable variation in resistance across the continent.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Carbapenémicos , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Sepsis Neonatal , Humanos , Recién Nacido , África/epidemiología , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Sepsis Neonatal/epidemiología , Sepsis Neonatal/microbiología , Sepsis Neonatal/tratamiento farmacológico , Prevalencia
3.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0309445, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208068

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the decline in tuberculosis (TB) incidence across many regions worldwide, including Ethiopia, the disease remains highly concentrated among vulnerable or socially marginalized populations and in high-risk settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to estimate the pooled prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) among key and vulnerable populations (KVPs) residing in hotspot settings in Ethiopia. METHODS: Potential papers were searched systematically in PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect databases, Google Scholar search engine, and institutional electronic repositories/registrars. A total of 34 potential articles that provide necessary information on the prevalence of PTB were reviewed and data were analyzed to determine the pooled prevalence of PTB among KVPs. The relevant data were recorded and analyzed using STATA 17.0. Cohen's kappa was computed to determine the agreement between reviewers, the Inverse of variance (I2) to evaluate heterogeneity across studies, and Egger's test to identify publication bias. A random effect model was used to determine the pooled prevalence of PTB, subgroup analysis was computed by types of hotspot settings and year of publication. RESULTS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that the pooled prevalence of PTB among populations residing in hotspot settings in Ethiopia was 11.7% (95% confidence interval (95CI): 7.97-15.43) with an I2 of 99.91% and a p< 0.001. Furthermore, the subgroup analysis unveiled the pooled prevalence of PTB among KVPs residing in different hotspot settings as follows: Prison inmates 8.8% (95CI: 5.00-12.55%), University students 23.1% (95CI: 15.81-30.37%), Refugees 28.4% (95CI: -1.27-58.15%), Homeless peoples 5.8% (95CI: -0.67-12.35%), Healthcare settings 11.1% (95CI: 0.58-21.63%), Spiritual holy water sites attendees 12.3% (95CI: -6.26-30.80%), and other high-risk settings 4.3% (95CI: 0.47-8.09%). Besides, the subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled prevalence of PTB post-2015 was 10.79% (95CI: 5.94-15.64%), whereas it stood at 14.04% (95CI: 10.27-17.82%) before 2015. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of PTB among KVPs residing in the hotspot settings in Ethiopia remains significant, with a weighted pooled prevalence of 11.7%. Thus, the national TB control programs should give due attention and appropriate control measures should be instituted that include regular systematic TB screening, compulsory TB testing for presumptive TB cases among KVPs, and tightened infection control at hotspot settings.


Asunto(s)
Tuberculosis Pulmonar , Poblaciones Vulnerables , Etiopía/epidemiología , Humanos , Tuberculosis Pulmonar/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Poblaciones Vulnerables/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA