Impact of specialized training for emergency department nurses screening or undetected HIV infection: the "Urgències VIHgila" project experience. / Impacto de una formación específica y generalizada de los profesionales de enfermería en el despistaje en urgencias de infección oculta por VIH: experiencia del proyecto "Urgències VIHgila".

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of specialized training for nurses on selective screening for undetected HIV infection in the emergency department. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The intervention group was comprised of 6 emergency departments that had been participating in a screening program (the "Urgències VIHgila" project) for at least 3 months. Nurses on all shifts attended training sessions that emphasized understanding the circumstances that should lead to suspicion of unidentified HIV infection and the need to order serology. Two studies were carried out: 1) a quasi-experimental pre-post study to compare the number of orders for HIV serology in each time period and measures of sensitivity, and 2) a case-control study to compare the changes made in the 6 hospitals where specialized training was provided (cases) vs 6 control hospitals in the HIV screening program where no training was given. RESULTS: A total of 280 HIV serologies were ordered for the 81015 patients (0.3%) attended during the period before training; 331 serologies were ordered for the 79620 patients in the period after training (0.4%). The relative increase in serologies was 20.3% (95% CI, 2.9% to 34.5%; P = .022). The relative increase in measures of sensitivity ranged between 19% and 39%, consistent with the main comparison. Serologies in the control group decreased between periods, from 0.9% to 0.8%, indicating a relative decrease of 15.7% (95% CI, -25.1% to -6.2%; P = .001). The absolute number of patients tested in the training group was 0.2% higher in the training hospitals (95% CI, 0.11% to 0.31%; P .001) than in the control hospitals. CONCLUSION: Training nurses to screen for undetected HIV infection in the emergency department increased the number of patients tested, according to the pre-post and case-control comparisons.

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de una formación específica para enfermería en el servicio urgencias (SU) sobre el despistaje selectivo de infección por VIH oculta. METODO: Participaron 6 SU adheridos al programa "Urgències VIHgila" con un mínimo de 3 meses y se realizaron sesiones formativas para los diferentes turnos. Las sesiones enfatizaban en qué circunstancias debía sospecharse infección oculta VIH y la necesidad de solicitar serología. Se realizaron dos estudios: 1) cuasiexperimental pre/post, que comparó la tasa de solicitudes VIH entre ambos periodos, con diversos análisis de sensibilidad; 2) caso-control, que comparó el cambio entre periodos de los 6 SU con formación (caso) con el cambio en otros 6 SU que no tuvieron formación (control). RESULTADOS: Se realizaron serologías de VIH a 280 de los 81.015 pacientes atendidos durante el periodo preintervención (0,3%) y a 331 de los 79.620 del periodo posintervención (0,4%). El incremento relativo fue del 20,3% (IC 95% de +2,9% a +34,5%; p = 0,022). Los análisis de sensibilidad mostraron incrementos relativos congruentes con el análisis principal (entre 19% y 39%). En el grupo control hubo descenso de solicitudes entre periodos, del 0,9% al 0,8% (descenso relativo del 15,7%, IC 95% de ­25,1% a­6,2%; p = 0,001). El grupo caso, en relación con el grupo control, tuvo un incremento absoluto de 0,2% (IC 95% de +0,11 a +0,31%, p 0,001) de pacientes testados. CONCLUSIONES: La formación de enfermería para despistaje de la infección VIH oculta en urgencias incrementa el número de pacientes investigados, tanto comparado con el periodo previo a la formación como comparado con SU sin formación específica para enfermería.

Analysis of the reasons for requesting HIV serology in the emergency department other than those defined in the targeted screening strategy of the "Urgències VIHgila" program and its potential inclusion in a future consensus document.

OBJECTIVE: To describe other reasons for requesting HIV serology in emergency departments (ED) other than the 6 defined in the SEMES-GESIDA consensus document (DC-SEMES-GESIDA) and to analyze whether it would be efficient to include any of them in the future. METHODS: Review of all HIV serologies performed during 2 years in 20 Catalan EDs. Serologies requested for reasons not defined by the DC-SEMES-GESIDA were grouped by common conditions, the prevalence (IC95%) of seropositivity for each condition was calculated, and those whose 95% confidence lower limit was >0.1% were considered efficient. Sensitivity analysis considered that serology would have been performed on 20% of cases attended and the remaining 80% would have been seronegative. RESULTS: There were 8044 serologies performed for 248 conditions not recommended by DC-SEMES-GESIDA, in 17 there were seropositive, and in 12 the performance of HIV serology would be efficient. The highest prevalence of detection corresponded to patients from endemic countries (7.41%, 0.91-24.3), lymphopenia (4.76%, 0.12-23.8), plateletopenia (4.37%, 1.20-10.9), adenopathy (3.45%, 0.42-11.9), meningoencephalitis (3.12%, 0.38-10.8) and drug use (2.50%, 0.68-6.28). Sensitivity analysis confirmed efficiency in 6 of them: endemic country origin, plateletopenia, drug abuse, toxic syndrome, behavioral-confusional disorder-agitation and fever of unknown origin. CONCLUSION: The DC-SEMES-GESIDA targeted HIV screening strategy in the ED could efficiently include other circumstances not previously considered; the most cost-effective would be origin from an endemic country, plateletopenia, drug abuse, toxic syndrome, behavioral-confusional-agitation disorder and fever of unknown origin.

Feasibility of a selective targeted strategy of HIV testing in emergency departments: a before-after study.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: The rates of hidden infection and late diagnosis of HIV still remain high in Western countries. Missed diagnostic opportunities represent the key point in changing the course of the epidemic. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and results of implementation of a selective strategy to test for HIV in the emergency department (ED) in patients with six pre-defined medical situations: sexually transmitted infections, herpes zoster, community-acquired pneumonia, mononucleosis syndrome, practice of chemsex (CS) or request of post-exposure prophylaxis. DESIGN: This quasi-experimental longitudinal study evaluated the pre- and post-implementation results of HIV testing in the six aforementioned clinical scenarios. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients attended 34 Spanish EDs. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: The intervention was an intensive educational program and pathways to facilitate and track orders and results were designed. We collected and compared pre- and post-implementation ED census and diagnoses, and HIV tests requested and results. OUTCOME MEASURES AND ANALYSIS: The main outcome was adherence to the recommendations. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the effectiveness of the program by the rate of positive test and the new HIV diagnoses. Differences between first and second periods were assessed. The magnitude of changes (absolute and relative) was expressed with the 95% confidence interval (CI). MAIN RESULTS: HIV tests increasing from 7080 (0.42% of ED visits) to 13 436 (relative increase of 75%, 95% CI from 70 to 80%). The six conditions were diagnosed in 15 879 and 16 618 patients, and HIV testing was ordered in 3393 (21%) and 7002 (42%) patients (increase: 97%; 95% CI: 90-104%). HIV testing significantly increased for all conditions except for CS. The positive HIV test rates increased from 0.92 to 1.67%. Detection of persons with undiagnosed HIV increased from 65 to 224, which implied a 220% (95% CI: 143-322%) increase of HIV diagnosis among all ED comers and a 71% (95% CI: 30-125%) increase of positive HIV tests. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a strategy to test for HIV in selective clinical situations in the ED is feasible and may lead to a substantial increase in HIV testing and diagnoses.

Model to predict risk for hospital admission and indicate the safety of reverse triage in a hospital emergency department: a prospective validation study. / Validación prospectiva de un modelo predictivo de ingreso y orientar la seguridad de la derivación inversa desde el triaje de los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively validate a model to predict hospital admission of patients given a low-priority classification on emergency department triage and to indicate the safety of reverse triage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center observational study of a prospective cohort to validate a risk model incorporating demographic and emergency care process variables as well as vital signs. The cohort included emergency visits from patients over the age of 15 years with priority level classifications of IV and V according to the Andorran-Spanish triage system (Spanish acronym, MAT-SET) between October 2018 and June 2019. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the model was calculated to evaluate discrimination. Based on the model, we identified cut-off points to distinguish patients with low, intermediate, or high risk for hospital admission. RESULTS: A total of 2110 emergencies were included in the validation cohort; 109 patients (5.2%) were hospitalized. The median age was 43.5 years (interquartile range, 31-60.3 years); 55.5% were female. The AUC was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.64-0.75). The model identified 357 patients (16.9%) at low risk of hospitalization and 240 (11.4%) at high risk. A total of 15.8% of the high-risk patients and 2.8% of the low-risk patients were hospitalized. CONCLUSION: The validated model is able to identify risk for hospitalization among patients classified as low priority on triage. Patients identified as having high risk of hospitalization could be offered preferential treatment within the same level of priority at triage, while those at low risk of admission could be referred to a more appropriate care level on reverse triage.

OBJETIVO: Validar prospectivamente un modelo predictivo de ingreso hospitalario para los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) con baja prioridad de visita y determinar la capacidad predictiva del modelo para realizar con seguridad la derivación inversa. METODO: Estudio observacional unicéntrico de una cohorte prospectiva de validación de un modelo predictivo basado en variables demográficas, de proceso y las constantes vitales (modelo 3). Se incluyeron los episodios de pacientes >15 años con prioridades IV y V MAT-SET atendidos entre octubre 2018 y junio 2019. Se evaluó la discriminación mediante el área bajo la curva de la característica operativa del receptor (ABC). Para determinar la capacidad de discriminación se crearon 3 categorías de riesgo: bajo, intermedio y alto. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2.110 episodios, de los cuales 109 (5,2%) ingresaron. La mediana de edad fue de 43,5 años (RIC 31-60,3) con un 55,5% de mujeres. El ABC fue de 0,71 (IC 95%: 0,64-0,75). Según el modelo predictivo, 357 episodios (16,9%) puntuaron de bajo riesgo de ingreso y 240 (11,4%) de alto riesgo. El porcentaje de ingreso observado de los pacientes clasificados de alto riesgo fue de 15,8% mientras que el de los pacientes de bajo riego fue de 2,8%. CONCLUSIONES: El modelo predictivo validado permite estratificar el riesgo de ingreso de los pacientes con baja prioridad de visita. Los pacientes con alto riesgo de ingreso se les podría ofrecer una atención preferente dentro del mismo nivel de prioridad, mientras que los de bajo riesgo podrían ser redirigidos al recurso asistencial más adecuado (derivación inversa).

Improvement of medical students' performance in simulated patient interviews by pre-clinical communication training.

Objectives: To compare the communication skills shown by medical students during simulated patient interviews between those who received training in communication during the preclinical years and those who did not. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the communication skills of several cohorts of fourth-year medical students from Universitat Internacional de Catalunya during simulated patient interviews. Out of a total of 477 students included in the study, 229 (48%) had received training in communication skills through a 60-hour elective course during the preclinical second year, while the remaining 248 (52%) had received none. Communication skills were assessed by an evaluation team using a numerical scale (0 to 10) that included eight categories: "verbal", "non-verbal", "empathy", "concreteness", "warmth", "message content", "assertiveness", and "respect". Scores obtained by trained and non-trained students were compared using the t-test. Results: A trend towards obtaining better results was observed among students who had received communication training (mean score: 6.98/10) versus none (6.83/10, t(1,869)=-1.95, p=0.05). Non-trained male students obtained significantly lower mean scores than non-trained females in the categories of "respect" (7.48/10 vs. 7.83/10, t(968)=-2.89, p<0.01), "verbal communication" (6.87/10 vs. 7.15/10, t(968)=-2.61, p=0.01), "warmth" (6.53/10 vs. 6.95/10, t(968)=-3.40, p<0.01), and "non-verbal communication" (6.49/10 vs. 6.79/10, t(968)=-2.48, p=0.01). Trained female and male students had similar scores. Conclusions: Training in communication skills during the preclinical years may improve fourth-year students' performance in simulated interviews with patients, particularly among males. These results demonstrate the importance of introducing specific training in communication skills early in the undergraduate medical curriculum.

V Spanish Consensus Conference on Helicobacter pylori infection treatment. / V Conferencia Española de Consenso sobre el tratamiento de la infección por Helicobacter pylori.

Helicobacter pylori infection is very common in the Spanish population and represents the main cause of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. The last iteration of Spanish consensus guidelines on H. pylori infection was conducted in 2016. Recent changes in therapeutic schemes along with increasing supporting evidence were key for developing the V Spanish Consensus Conference (May 2021). Fourteen experts performed a systematic review of the scientific evidence and developed a series of recommendations that were subjected to an anonymous Delphi process of iterative voting. Scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation were classified using GRADE guidelines. An eradication therapy, when prescribed empirically, is considered acceptable when it reliably achieves, or preferably surpass, 90% cure rates. Currently, only quadruple therapies (with or without bismuth) and generally lasting 14 days, accomplish this goal in first- and second-line therapies. A non-bismuth quadruple concomitant regimen (proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole) or a quadruple bismuth-based combination (proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole), are recommended as first-line regimens. Rescue therapies after eradication failure and management of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease were also reviewed.

V Spanish Consensus Conference on Helicobacter pylori infection treatment.

Helicobacter pylori infection is very common in the Spanish population and represents the main cause of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, and gastric cancer. The last iteration of Spanish consensus guidelines on H. pylori infection was conducted in 2016. Recent changes in therapeutic schemes along with increasing supporting evidence were key for developing the V Spanish Consensus Conference (May 2021). Fourteen experts performed a systematic review of the scientific evidence and developed a series of recommendations that were subjected to an anonymous Delphi process of iterative voting. Scientific evidence and the strength of the recommendation were classified using GRADE guidelines. An eradication therapy, when prescribed empirically, is considered acceptable when it reliably achieves, or preferably surpass, 90% cure rates. Currently, only quadruple therapies (with or without bismuth) and generally lasting 14 days, accomplish this goal in first- and second-line therapies. A non-bismuth quadruple concomitant regimen (proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, and metronidazole) or a quadruple bismuth-based combination (proton pump inhibitor, bismuth, tetracycline, and metronidazole), are recommended as first-line regimens. Rescue therapies after eradication failure and management of H. pylori infection in peptic ulcer disease were also reviewed.

Predicting hospital admission of patients with emergencies considered low priority according to assigned triage level. / Predicción de ingreso hospitalario en los pacientes con bajo nivel de prioridad de triaje atendidos en un servicio de urgencias.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a model to predict hospital admission of patients in cases assessed as nonurgent or semiurgent on emergency department triage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single-center observational study of a retrospective cohort. We included cases of patients older than 15 years whose emergency was classified as level IV-V according to the Andorran-Spanish triage model (MAT-SET, the Spanish acronym). Fourteen independent variables included demographic and care process items as well as vital signs. The dependent variable was hospital admission. The regression models were based on generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: A total of 53 860 episodes were included; 3430 patients (6.4%) were admitted. The median (interquartile range) age was 44.5 (31.1-63.9) years, and 54.1% were female. Vital signs were recorded in 19.3% of the episodes. The model that best predicted admission included the following variables: age > 84 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.72; 95% CI, 5.26-8.60); male sex (aOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28-1.66); referral from a primary care center (aOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.64-2.29); referral from another acute-care hospital (aOR, 11.22; 95% CI, 4.42-28.51); arrival by ambulance (aOR, 3.72; 95% CI, 3.16-4.40); revisit 72 hours (aOR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.60-2.87); systolic blood pressure $ 150 mmHg (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97); diastolic blood pressure 60 mmHg (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.25-1.98); axillary temperature > 37°C (aOR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.91-2.74); heart rate > 100 beats/min (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.40-1.96); baseline oxygen saturation in arterial blood (SaO2) 93% (aOR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.86-3.81); and SaO2 93%-95% (aOR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.42-2.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model was 0.82 (95% CI; 95% CI, 0.80-0.83). CONCLUSION: The model predicts which patients are more likely to be admitted after their cases were initially considered nonurgent or semi-urgent on triage. Patients found to be at risk can then be given greater attention than others in the same triage level.

OBJETIVO: Desarrollar un modelo predictivo de ingreso hospitalario desde triaje de los pacientes atendidos en el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH) con el nivel poco urgente-no urgente de prioridad de visita. METODO: Estudio observacional de cohortes retrospectivo unicéntrico. Se incluyeron los episodios de pacientes > 15 años con niveles IV-V MAT-SET atendidos en un SUH durante 2015. Se evaluaron 14 variables demográficas, datos de proceso y constantes vitales. La variable dependiente fue el ingreso hospitalario. Se utilizaron modelos de regresión basados en ecuaciones de estimación generalizadas. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 53.860 episodios, 3.430 (6,4%) ingresaron. La mediana de edad fue de 44,5 años (RIC 31,1-63,9), 54,1% mujeres. Un 19,3% de los episodios tenían registrados las constantes vitales (CV). El modelo con mayor capacidad predictiva incluía las siguientes variables: edad $ 85 años (ORa = 6,72; IC 95%: 5,26-8,60), sexo masculino (ORa = 1,46; IC 95% 1,28-1,66), procedencia de atención primaria (ORa = 1,94; IC 95% 1,64-2,29), de otro hospital de agudos (ORa = 11,22; IC 95% 4,42-28,51), llegada en ambulancia (ORa = 3,72; IC 95%:3,16-4,40), consulta previa a urgencias las 72 horas previas (ORa = 2,15; IC 95% 1,60-2,87), presión arterial sistólica $ 150 mmHg (ORa = 0,83; IC 95%:0,71-0,97), presión arterial diastólica 60 mmHg (ORa = 1,57; IC 95% 1,25-1,98), temperatura axilar > 37ºC (ORa = 2,29; IC 95% 1,91-2,74), frecuencia cardiaca > 100 latidos/minuto (ORa 1,65; IC 95% 1,40-1,96) y saturación basal de oxígeno 93% (ORa = 2,66; IC 95% 1,86-3,81) y 93-95% (ORa = 1,70; IC 95% 1,42-2,05). El área bajo la curva COR fue de 0,82 (IC 95% 0,80-0,83). CONCLUSIONES: Este modelo predictivo permitiría identificar desde el triaje a aquellos pacientes que, siendo poco urgentes o no urgentes, tienen mayor probabilidad de ingreso y darles una atención diferencial dentro del mismo nivel de prioridad.

High Effectiveness of a 14-Day Concomitant Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Treatment in Primary Care. An Observational Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The current cure rates with triple therapy combining a proton-pump inhibitor, amoxicillin and clarithromycin are unacceptably low. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of a 14-day concomitant therapy as an empirical first-line treatment for curing Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection in primary care. METHODS: Patients from six primary care centers in Catalonia -Spain- were included consecutively. Hp status pre and post treatment was assessed according to local clinical practice protocol. A 14-day concomitant therapy (amoxicillin 1 g, clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg plus omeprazole 20 mg, all drugs administered twice daily) was prescribed. Adherence to therapy and adverse events were assessed by personal interview. RESULTS: 112 patients were enrolled. Mean age was 46.7 ± 16.1 years. Main indication for treatment was non-investigated dyspepsia (83%). Hp eradication was achieved in 100 of the 112 patients. Eradication rates were 89.3% (95% CI: 81.7-94.1) by intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and 91.7% (95% CI; 84.6-95.9) per protocol (PP). No major side effects were reported; 104 (92.8%) patients complete the treatment. Forty-seven patients (42%) complained of mild side effects (metallic taste, nausea). Low adherence to treatment (p = 0.004) and significant adverse events (p = 0.004) were the variables associated with treatment failure. CONCLUSIONS: In primary care, a 14-day concomitant therapy is highly effective and well tolerated.

Prehospital emergency services in Catalonia: the SEPHCAT analysis. / Estudio SEPHCAT: análisis de los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios en Cataluña.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the main characteristics of all prehospital emergency services (SEPHs, the Catalan acronym) in Catalonia (the SEPHCAT study). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A professional survey researcher interviewed the medical directors of all services in Catalonia, using a questionnaire prepared by the authors. Questions covered aspects related to organization, professional staffing and employment conditions, as well as the staff's training, instructional activity and research. Only closed answers were collected. The survey reflected the situation in 2015. RESULTS: We identified 13 SEPHs (11 in the public health service and 2 private companies). Together they received 2 482 627 calls (16.4% to private services) and attended 943 849 emergencies (11.8% attended by private companies). Three hundred thirty-six basic life support units and 73 advanced life support units were reported. They were mostly considered to be of sufficient size and quality. The SEPHs contracted 1374845 person-hours/y (753995 physician-hours and 620 850 nurse-hours; 23.4% in private companies). These figures correspond to 815 full-time staff positions (447 for physicians and 368 for nurses). The numbers of physicians and nurses working were relatively stable during the morning, afternoon and evening shifts but decreased during the midnight-to-early-morning shift (physicians, by 31%; nurses, by 9%). A majority of the physicians employed were trained in family and community medicine (56.8%), but 21.3% had no specialized training; 6.5% had PhD degrees. SEPH physicians (61.5%) and nurses (46.2%) also taught undergraduate medical students; 46.2% of physicians and 84.6% of nurses taught postgraduate medical courses. Both undergraduate medical and nursing students were received in the same measure for practical training by 15.4% of the SEPHs; 69.2% also offered practical training for physicians at the postgraduate level and 76.9% trained postgraduate nurses. CONCLUSION: SEPHs in Catalonia are very active, and private companies account for nearly 12% of the activity. Together the public and private sectors employ a large number of physicians and nurses. Staff members are involved in training others but are less involved in research.

OBJETIVO: Describir las principales características de todos los servicios de emergencias prehospitalarios (SEPH) existentes en Cataluña. METODO: Una encuestadora profesional entrevistó a los responsables clínicos de todos los SEPH de Cataluña. La encuesta fue preparada por los autores, y abordaba diversos aspectos organizativos, profesionales, laborales, formativos, docentes y de investigación. Las preguntas contenidas en la encuesta solo permitían respuestas cerradas, y hacían referencia a la situación en 2015. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 13 SEPH (11 públicos, 2 privados), que recibieron 2.482.627 consultas (16,4% a SEPH privados) y realizaron 943.849 atenciones (11,8% por SEPH privados). Había 336 bases de soporte vital básico y 73 de avanzado, con instalaciones mayoritariamente consideradas de tamaño suficiente y calidad buena. Se contrataron 1.374.845 horas anuales (753.995 de médico y 620.850 de enfermero), el 23,4% de ellas por SEPH privados, que globalmente corresponderían a 815 puestos de trabajo a jornada completa (447 de médico, 368 de enfermero). La dotación de médicos/enfermeros era relativamente estable durante el día, pero decaía un 31%/9% de madrugada. La especialidad médica mayoritaria era medicina familiar y comunitaria (56,8%), el 21,3% no tenía formación especializada, y el 6,5% tenía título de doctor. Había médicos/enfermeros profesores universitarios de grado en el 61,5%/46,2% de los SEPH; y de postgrado en el 46,2%/84,6%. Recibían estudiantes de medicina/enfermería en prácticas de grado el 15,4%/15,4% de los SEPH, y de postgrado el 69,2%/76,9%. CONCLUSIONES: La actividad de los SEPH en Cataluña es elevada; un 12% la desarrollan SEPH privados, y globalmente implica a un número alto de médicos y enfermeros, los cuales además desarrollan un rol docente y, en menor medida, investigador.

Spanish primary care survey on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection and dyspepsia: Information, attitudes, and decisions.

INTRODUCTION: Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori are two of the most relevant digestive conditions in primary care. Several consensuses on the subject have been published, but the assimilation/implementation of these guidelines is uncertain. AIMS AND METHODS: To evaluate the attitudes, perceptions, limitations, and adherence to recommendations of Spanish primary care physicians using an open online survey. Responses were anonymously codified. Estimated margin of error was 3.4%. Responses were weighted by province, gender, age, and type of practice. Survey was performed using the AEG-REDCap platform. RESULTS: A total of 1445 responses, received between December 2017 and April 2018, were analyzed. Women represented 54%, and the average age was 48 years; 59% were from urban context, 20% from semi-urban, and 21% from rural; 93% provided public practice. Over 40% had read at least one Maastricht consensus (24% Maastricht V), and 34% had attended a course related to H. pylori. 16% reported no direct access to any validated diagnostic method, only 44% to urea breath test, and 33% did not systematically refer to eradication confirmation test. The first-line treatment of choice was standard triple therapy in 56%, followed by concomitant therapy (28%). Only 20% of physicians had optimal adherence to recommendations. CONCLUSION: Even though some improvements from guidelines have been partially incorporated, the level of penetration of recommendations is still poor and delayed. To provide optimal primary care, the barriers for implementation, access to diagnostic tests and to continuous medical education, should be removed. Rigorous dissemination, implementation, and evaluation programs are desired in future consensuses.

SUHCAT study, part 5: Comparison of staff and chiefs' perceptions of emergency department quality in Catalonia. / Estudio SUHCAT-5: comparación de la percepción de la calidad de los servicios de urgencias de Cataluña entre los profesionales sanitarios y sus responsables.

OBJECTIVES: To study the perceptions of Catalan Society of Emergency Medicine (SoCMUE) members who staff hospital emergency departments regarding measures taken to cope with overcrowding, staff rest areas, and staff size. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional analysis of a survey sent to SoCMUE members. We compared opinions expressed by physicians and nurses in this survey and also compared them to opinions expressed by heads of departments in prior SUHCAT studies. RESULTS: Responses were received from 363 members who worked in hospital departments. More nurses than physicians expressed the opinion that ambulance unloading was habitually blocked (P=.045), patients were being redirected (P<.001), and staffing was inadequate (P=.007). When the results of our SoCMUE survey were compared to those of the earlier SUHCAT surveys of department chiefs, we found that more SoCMUE members believed that measures to cope with overcrowding are frequently applied, quality in rest areas is poorer, and staffing is inadequate. CONCLUSION: Physicians and nurses who are members of SoCMUE and work in hospital emergency departments have different views on measures taken to cope with overcrowding, quality of rest areas, and staff size. In addition, the SoCMUE members' opinions differed from those of respondents in prior SUHCAT studies.

OBJETIVO: Conocer la percepción de los socios de la Societat Catalana de Medicina d'Urgències i Emergències (SoCMUE) con actividad laboral en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) respecto a las medidas frente al colapso, las áreas de descanso y la dimensión de la plantilla, y compararla con la de sus responsables. METODO: Estudio descriptivo transversal mediante encuesta enviada a los socios de SoCMUE. Se compararon las respuestas dadas entre el estamento médico y enfermero, y con los resultados de los estudios SUHCAT 1 y 2. RESULTADOS: Participaron 363 socios. Los enfermeros opinan más frecuentemente que los médicos que es habitual impedir la descarga de ambulancias (p = 0,045), redireccionar pacientes (p < 0,001) y que sus plantillas son insuficientes (p = 0,007). Los socios de SoCMUE perciben mayor frecuencia en la puesta en marcha de todas las medidas para hacer frente al colapso, peor calidad de las áreas de descanso y una plantilla insuficiente en comparación con la opinión de los responsables de los SUH. CONCLUSIONES: Los médicos y enfermeros socios de la SoCMUE que trabajan en los SUH tienen una percepción diferente en aspectos relacionados con las medidas frente al colapso, áreas de descanso y dimensión de la plantilla, que difiere también de la opinión de sus responsables.

Update on the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Position paper from the Catalan Society of Digestology. / Actualización en el manejo de la infección por Helicobacter pylori. Documento de posicionamiento de la Societat Catalana de Digestologia.

More than 30 years after its discovery, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remains the most common cause of gastric and duodenal diseases. H. pylori is the leading cause of chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric MALT lymphoma and gastric adenocarcinoma. Several consensuses have recently been published on the management of H. pylori infection. The general guidelines of the Spanish consensus, the Toronto Consensus and the Maastricht V Consensus of 2016 are similar but concrete recommendations can vary significantly. In addition, the recommendations of some of these consensuses are decidedly complex. This position paper from the Catalan Society of Digestology is an update of evidence-based recommendations on the management and treatment of H. pylori infection. The aim of this document is to review this information in order to make recommendations for routine clinical practice that are simple, specific and easily applied to our setting.

Evaluación de competencias en comunicación clínica en estudiantes de medicina con paciente simulado / Evaluation of clinical communication skills in medical students with simulated patients

Background: Communication skills are not learnt innately. It is therefore necessary to both train and evaluate medical students in this area. Aim: To evaluate communication skills of fourth-year medical students with the use of a simulated patient (SP). Material and Methods: Four clinical scenarios (CS) for clinical interviews with simulated patients were designed: chronic and acute diseases, difficult and functional patients. Each student performed the four CS, and his communication skills were evaluated using our own questionnaire as agreed with the SP. The questionnaire included items on verbal and nonverbal communication, warmth, respect, specificity, assertiveness and empathy (rated from 0 to 10). The response variable was the arithmetic mean of the scores on each item. All students received a detailed evaluation report. Results: Sixty one students (32 men) performing 244 interviews, were evaluated. The overall mean score was 7.87 (4.62 to 9.03). The highest scores were for respect and specificity (7.57 and 7.15 respectively). The lowest were for empathy and nonverbal communication (6.44 and 6.84 respectively). The CS evaluations were 7.87 (chronic disease), 7.02 (difficult patient), 6.46 (acute disease) and 6.14 (functional pathology). Women had higher overall scores compared to men (7.26 and 6.51 respectively; p < 0.01) and a significantly higher score in all communication variables (p < 0.01). Conclusions: The overall assessment in clinical communication with SP is satisfactory although there is room for improvement, especially in empathy and nonverbal communication. Women had significantly higher scores than men.

[Occupational aspects of emergency medicine practice in Catalonia: the OPENCAT opinion survey]. / Opinión de los profesionales acerca de diversos aspectos laborales de los servicios de urgencias y emergencias de Cataluña: Estudio OPENCAT.

OBJECTIVES: To gather information on the contracting and training of members of the Catalan Society of Emergency Medicine (SoCMUE) who work in emergency medicine and services in Catalonia. To survey their opinions on certain aspects of resource availability and working conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study based on a survey sent to SoCMUE members. We studied the opinions of 5 types of respondent: hospital physicians, out-of-hospital physicians, hospital nurses, out-of-hospital nurses, and emergency medical technicians. Responses were grouped to compare the opinions of physicians and nurses and workers in hospital and prehospital settings. RESULTS: We received 616 responses from 1273 members (48.4% response rate). More physicians than nurses come from outside Catalonia and have contracts specifically linked to emergency care; in addition, physicians have done less postgraduate training in emergency medicine. More hospital staff than prehospital staff have permanent contracts linked to the department where they work. More hospital physicians are specialized in internal medicine than in family and community medicine. The opinion that emergency services are inadequately staffed was widespread. Most respondents believed that patient transport is good or adequate. However, respondents working in prehospital services expressed a lower opinion of transport. Great difficulty in combining work with family (life achieving work-life balance) was expressed by 13.5% overall, and more often by hospital staff. Some type of aggression was experienced by 88.2%; 60% reported the event to superiors. Nurses reported aggression more often than physicians. A police report was filed by 10.1%. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine working conditions can be improved in Catalonia according to members of SoCMUE. Relations between groups of professionals are not optimum in some aspects.

OBJETIVO: Investigar las condiciones contractuales y formativas de los socios de la Societat Catalana de Medicina d'Urgències i Emergéncies (SoCMUE) que trabajan en el ámbito de la Medicina de Urgencias y Emergencias (MUE) en Cataluña, y su percepción acerca de algunos recursos disponibles y aspectos de su práctica laboral. METODO: Estudio descriptivo transversal mediante encuesta enviada a los socios de SoCMUE. Se distinguieron médicos hospitalarios y extrahospitalarios, enfermeros hospitalarios y extrahospitalarios, y técnicos en emergencia sanitaria (TES). Se realizaron agrupaciones de médico/enfermero y hospitalario/extrahospitalario. RESULTADOS: Respondieron 616 de 1.273 socios (48,4%). Respecto a los enfermeros, los médicos tienen mayor porcentaje de profesionales no comunitarios, contratos más vinculados a urgencias/emergencias, y han realizado menos formación de postgrado en MUE. Los profesionales hospitalarios, respecto a los extrahospitalarios, tienen mayor proporción de contratos fijos y vinculados al propio servicio, han realizado menos formación de postgrado, y la proporción de especialistas en medicina interna es mayor y en medicina familiar y comunitaria menor. Existe la percepción generalizada de plantillas insuficientes. La transferencia de pacientes es considerada mayoritariamente buena o correcta, pero es peor percibida por extrahospitalaria. El 13,5% refiere una conciliación familiar imposible, más frecuentemente en el ámbito hospitalario. El 88,2% ha sufrido algún tipo de agresión, el 60% lo comunicó a sus superiores (enfermeros más que médicos) y el 10,1% lo denunció judicialmente. CONCLUSIONES: Para los socios de la SoCMUE, en la práctica de la MUE en Cataluña, existen algunas condiciones laborales mejorables y la relación entre colectivos de profesionales es poco óptima en algunos aspectos.