Cognitive aids used in simulated resuscitation: A systematic review.

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of cognitive aid use during resuscitation with no use of cognitive aids on cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality and performance. Methods: This systematic review followed the PICOST format. All randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating cognitive aid use during (simulated) resuscitation were included in any setting. Unpublished studies were excluded. We did not include studies that reported cognitive aid use during training for resuscitation alone. Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception until July 2019 (updated August 2022, November 2023, and 23 April 2024). We did not search trial registries. Title and abstract screening, full-text screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment (using RoB2 and ROBINS-I), and certainty of evidence (using GRADE) were performed by two researchers. PRISMA reporting standards were followed, and registration (PROSPERO CRD42020159162, version 19 July 2022) was performed. No funding has been obtained. Results: The literature search identified 5029 citations. After removing 512 duplicates, reviewing the titles and abstracts of the remaining articles yielded 103 articles for full-text review. Hand-searching identified 3 more studies for full-text review. Of these, 29 studies were included in the final analysis. No clinical studies involving patients were identified. The review was limited to indirect evidence from simulation studies only. The results are presented in five different populations: healthcare professionals managing simulated resuscitations in neonates, children, adult advanced life support, and other emergencies; as well as lay providers managing resuscitations. Main outcomes were adherence to protocol or process, adherence to protocol or process assessed by performance score, CPR performance and retention, and feasibility of chatbot guidance. The risk of bias assessment ranged from low to high. Studies in neonatal, paediatric and adult life support delivered by healthcare professionals showed benefits of using cognitive aids, however, some studies evaluating resuscitations by lay providers reported undesirable effects. The performance of a meta-analysis was not possible due to significant methodological heterogeneity. The certainty of evidence was rated as moderate to very low due to serious indirectness, (very) serious risk of bias, serious inconsistency and (very) serious imprecision. Conclusion: Because of the very low certainty evidence from simulation studies, we suggest that cognitive aids should be used by healthcare professionals during resuscitation. In contrast, we do not suggest use of cognitive aids for lay providers, based on low certainty evidence.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: an Umbrella review.

We conducted an Umbrella review of eligible studies to evaluate what patient features have been investigated in the multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) population, in order to guide future investigations. We comprehensively searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from December 1, 2019 to the May 6, 2022. The time period was limited to cover the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic period. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42022340228). Eligible studies included (1) a study population of pediatric patients ≤21 years of age diagnosed with MIS-C; (2) an original Systematic review or Mata-analysis; (3) published 2020 afterward; and (4) was published in English. A total of 41 studies met inclusion criteria and underwent qualitative analysis. 28 studies reported outcome data of MIS-C. 22 studies selected clinical features of MIS-C, and 6 studies chose demographic data as a main topic. The mortality rate for children with MIS-C was 1.9% (interquartile range (IQR) 0.48), the ICU admission rate was 72.6% (IQR 8.3), and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation rate was 4.7% (IQR 2.0). A meta-analysis of eligible studies found that cerebral natriuretic peptide in children with MIS-C was higher than that in children with COVID-19, and that the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in combination with glucocorticoids to treat MIS-C compared to IVIG alone was associated with lower treatment failure. In the future, for patients with MIS-C, studies focused on safety of surgery requiring general anesthesia, risk factors, treatment, and long-term outcomes are warranted.

A mixed-methods needs assessment for an antimicrobial stewardship curriculum in pediatrics.

Objective: Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) education initiatives for multidisciplinary teams are most successful when addressing psychosocial factors driving antimicrobial prescribing (AP) and when they address the needs of the team to allow for a tailored approach to their education. Design: We conducted a mixed-methods embedded study as a needs assessment, involving quantitative analysis of AS concerns observed by pharmacists through an audit while attending clinical team rounds, as well as qualitative semi-structured interviews based on the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) to identify psychosocial barriers and facilitators for antimicrobial prescribing for an inpatient general pediatric service. We analyzed the data using deductive and inductive methods by mapping the TDF to a model for social determinants of antimicrobial prescribing (SDAP) in pediatric inpatient health care teams. Setting: The Clinical Teaching Unit (CTU) and Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU), at a tertiary care pediatric hospital in Canada. Participants: Interviews (n = 23) with staff and resident physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists. Results: Psychosocial facilitators and barriers for AS practice in the PICU and CTU which were identified included: collaboration, shared decision-making, locally accessible guidelines, and an overarching goal of doing right by the patient and feeling empowered as a prescriber. Some of the barriers identified included the norm of noninterference, professional comparisons, limited resources, feeling inadequately trained in AS, emotional prescribing, and a pejorative monitoring system. Conclusions: Our findings identified barriers and facilitators to AS decisions on pediatric inpatient teams as well as actionable needs in psychosocial-based AS education.

Perioperative clinical practice recommendations for pediatric tonsillectomy: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in children. Since most clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) are designed to support surgical decisions, none are specifically designed for the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy. We aimed to identify and analyze the existing CPGs with recommendations for the perioperative management of children undergoing tonsillectomy by conducting a systematic review. SOURCE: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePub Ahead of Print, and CINAHL for relevant articles published from inception to 3 August 2022. The inclusion criteria were: 1) CPG of perioperative recommendations for tonsillectomy under general anesthesia in children, 2) CPG that include at least one evidence-based recommendation, 3) peer-reviewed CPG published in English after 2000. We extracted data on baseline characteristics of each CPG and general recommendations for perioperative interventions or complications. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Out of five eligible CPGs, AGREE II and REX confirmed that two CPGs were high quality while only one of the two was recommended for implementation without modifications. Most of the recommendations were for pain management. Acetaminophen was the only medication recommended in all five CPG. Except for the oldest CPG, the CPG all supported of the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids as a pain adjunct. CONCLUSIONS: Acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and steroids are recommended in the perioperative management of pediatric tonsillectomy. Future CPG should further clarify the safe use of opioids based on severity of obstructive sleep apnea and in the context of opioid-sparing techniques, such as dexmedetomidine, high-dose dexamethasone, and gabapentinoids. STUDY REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42021253374); first submitted 18 June 2021.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'amygdalectomie est l'une des interventions chirurgicales les plus courantes pratiquées chez les enfants. Étant donné que la plupart des lignes directrices de pratique clinique sont conçues pour soutenir les décisions chirurgicales, aucune n'est spécifiquement conçue pour la prise en charge périopératoire des enfants bénéficiant d'une amygdalectomie. Notre objectif était d'identifier et d'analyser les lignes directrices de pratique clinique existantes comportant des recommandations pour la prise en charge périopératoire des enfants bénéficiant d'une amygdalectomie en réalisant une revue systématique. SOURCES: Nous avons recherché des articles pertinents dans Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE ePub Ahead of Print et CINAHL, publiés depuis la création de ces bases de données jusqu'au 3 août 2022. Les critères d'inclusion étaient les suivants : 1) lignes directrices de pratique clinique comportant des recommandations périopératoires pour l'amygdalectomie sous anesthésie générale chez les enfants, 2) lignes directrices de pratique clinique incluant au moins une recommandation fondée sur des données probantes, et 3) lignes directrices de pratique clinique évaluées par des pairs et publiées en anglais après 2000. Nous avons extrait des données sur les caractéristiques de base de chacune des lignes directrices de pratique clinique et des recommandations générales pour les interventions périopératoires ou les complications. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Sur les cinq lignes directrices de pratique clinique admissibles, AGREE II et REX ont confirmé que deux lignes directrices de pratique clinique étaient de haute qualité, tandis qu'une seule des deux a été recommandée pour une mise en œuvre sans modifications. La plupart des recommandations portaient sur la prise en charge de la douleur. L'acétaminophène était le seul médicament recommandé dans les cinq lignes directrices de pratique clinique. À l'exception des lignes directrices de pratique clinique les plus anciennes, les autres ont toutes soutenu l'utilisation d'agents anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens et de stéroïdes comme adjuvants pour la douleur. CONCLUSION: L'acétaminophène, les agents anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens et les stéroïdes sont recommandés pour la prise en charge périopératoire de l'amygdalectomie pédiatrique. À l'avenir, les lignes directrices de pratique clinique devraient clarifier davantage l'utilisation sécuritaire des opioïdes en fonction de la gravité de l'apnée obstructive du sommeil et dans le contexte des techniques d'épargne des opioïdes, telles que la dexmédétomidine, la dexaméthasone à forte dose et les gabapentinoïdes. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: PROSPERO (CRD42021253374); soumise pour la première fois le 18 juin 2021.

Association of delayed adequate antimicrobial treatment and organ dysfunction in pediatric bloodstream infections.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are associated with significant mortality and morbidity, including multiple organ dysfunction. We explored if delayed adequate antimicrobial treatment for children with BSIs is associated with change in organ dysfunction as measured by PELOD-2 scores. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of critically ill children <18 years old with BSIs. The primary outcome was change in PELOD-2 score between days 1 (index blood culture) and 5. The exposure variable was delayed administration of adequate antimicrobial therapy by ≥3 h from blood culture collection. We compared PELOD-2 score changes between those who received early and delayed treatment. RESULTS: Among 202 children, the median (interquartile range) time to adequate antimicrobial therapy was 7 (0.8-20.1) hours; 124 (61%) received delayed antimicrobial therapy. Patients who received early and delayed treatment had similar baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in PELOD-2 score changes from days 1 and 5 between groups (PELOD-2 score difference -0.07, 95% CI -0.92 to 0.79, p = 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find an association between delayed adequate antimicrobial therapy and PELOD-2 score changes between days 1 and 5 from detection of BSI. PELOD-2 score was not sensitive for clinical effects of delayed antimicrobial treatment. IMPACT: In critically ill children with bloodstream infections, there was no significant change in organ dysfunction as measured by PELOD-2 scores between patients who received adequate antimicrobial therapy within 3 h of their initial positive blood culture and those who started after 3 h. Higher PELOD-2 scores on day 1 were associated with larger differences in PELOD-2 scores between days 1 and 5 from index positive blood cultures. Further study is required to determine if PELOD-2 or alternative measures of organ dysfunction could be used as primary outcome measures in trials of antimicrobial interventions in pediatric critical care research.

The care of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in Ontario pediatric intensive care units.

PURPOSE: To describe and review the experience of two pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in Ontario, Canada, adapting and providing care to critically ill adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. CLINICAL FEATURES: At a time of extreme pressure to adult intensive care unit (ICU) capacity, two PICUs provided care to critically ill adults with COVID-19 pneumonia. Substantial yet rapid planning was required to facilitate safe delivery of critical care to adult patients while maintaining PICU services, including thoughtful development of care pathways and patient selection. To prepare clinical staff, several communication strategies, knowledge translation, skill consolidation, and system-adaptation mechanisms were developed. There was iterative adaptation of operational processes, including staffing models, specialist consultation, and the pharmacy. Care provided by the interprofessional teams was reoriented as appropriate to the needs of critically ill adults in close collaboration with adult ICU teams. Forty-one adults were admitted to the two PICUs over a 12-week period. In total, 36 patients (88%) received invasive ventilation, eight patients (20%) were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and six patients (15%) received continuous renal replacement therapy. Four died in the PICU during this period. Feedback from staff included anxiety around reorienting practice to the care of critically ill adults, physical exhaustion, and psychological distress. Importantly, staff also reported a renewed sense of purpose with participation in the program. CONCLUSION: Though challenging, the experience has provided opportunity to enhance collaboration with partner institutions and improve the care of older children and adolescents in the PICU.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Nous avions pour objectif de décrire et examiner l'expérience de deux unités de soins intensifs pédiatriques (USIP) en Ontario, au Canada, qui se sont adaptées et ont fourni des soins aux adultes gravement malades pendant la pandémie de COVID-19. CARACTéRISTIQUES CLINIQUES: À l'époque où la capacité des unités de soins intensifs (USI) pour adultes était extrêmement sollicitée, deux USIP ont prodigué des soins à des adultes gravement malades souffrant de pneumonie liée à la COVID-19. Une planification substantielle mais rapide a été nécessaire pour faciliter la prestation sécuritaire de soins intensifs à une patientèle adulte tout en maintenant les services de l'USIP, y compris l'élaboration réfléchie des trajectoires de soins et la sélection de la patientèle. Pour préparer le personnel clinique, plusieurs stratégies de communication, d'application des connaissances, de consolidation des compétences et de mécanismes d'adaptation du système ont été élaborées. Il y a eu une adaptation progressive des processus opérationnels, y compris des modèles de dotation, des consultations de spécialistes et de la pharmacie. Les soins fournis par les équipes interprofessionnelles ont été réorientés en fonction des besoins des adultes gravement malades en étroite collaboration avec les équipes adultes de soins intensifs. Quarante et une personnes adultes ont été admises dans les deux unités de soins intensifs pédiatriques sur une période de 12 semaines. Au total, 36 adultes (88 %) ont bénéficié d'une ventilation invasive, huit personnes (20 %) ont reçu une oxygénation par membrane extracorporelle veino-veineuse, et six (15 %) ont reçu un traitement substitutif de l'insuffisance rénale en continu. Quatre personnes sont décédées à l'USIP au cours de cette période. Les commentaires du personnel comprenaient de l'anxiété liée à la réorientation de leur pratique vers des soins à des adultes gravement malades, l'épuisement physique et la détresse psychologique. Fait important, le personnel a également signalé un regain de motivation lié à la participation de leur USIP à ce programme. CONCLUSION: Bien que difficile, l'expérience a permis d'améliorer la collaboration avec les établissements partenaires et d'améliorer les soins aux enfants plus âgé·es et aux adolescent·es de l'USIP.

Case report: Foreign body aspiration requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Introduction: Foreign body aspiration is a common cause of respiratory distress in pediatrics, but the diagnosis can be challenging given aspirated objects are mostly radiolucent on chest radiographs and there is often no witnessed choking event. We present a case of a patient who was initially managed as severe status asthmaticus, requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for refractory hypercarbia and hypoxemia, but was later found to have bilateral bronchial foreign body aspiration. This case is unique in its severity of illness, diagnostic dilemma with findings suggesting a more common diagnosis of asthma, and use of ECMO as a bridge to diagnosis and recovery. Patient case: A previously healthy 2-year-old boy presented during peak viral season with a 3-day history of fever, cough, coryza, and increased work of breathing over the prior 24 h. There was no reported history of choking or aspiration. He was diagnosed with asthma and treated with bronchodilator therapy. Physical examination revealed pulsus paradoxus, severe work of breathing with bilateral wheeze, and at times a silent chest. Chest radiographs showed bilateral lung hyperinflation. Following a brief period of stability on maximum bronchodilator therapies and bilevel positive pressure support, the patient had a rapid deterioration requiring endotracheal intubation, with subsequent cannulation to VA-ECMO. A diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy was performed and demonstrated bilateral foreign bodies, peanuts, in the right bronchus intermedius and the left mainstem bronchus. Removal of the foreign bodies was done by rigid bronchoscopy facilitating rapid wean from VA-ECMO and decannulation within 24 h of foreign body removal. Conclusion: Foreign body aspiration should be suspected in all patients presenting with atypical history and physical examination findings, or in patients with suspected common diagnoses who do not progress as expected or deteriorate after a period of stability. Extracorporeal life support can be used as a bridge to diagnosis and recovery in patients with hemodynamic or respiratory instability.

Video Review of Simulated Pediatric Cardiac Arrest to Identify Errors/Latent Safety Threats: A Mixed Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes from pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest depend on the treatment provided as well as resuscitation team performance. Our study aimed to identify errors occurring in this clinical context and develop an analytical framework to classify them. This analytical framework provided a better understanding of team performance, leading to improved patient outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed 25 video recordings of pediatric cardiac arrest simulations from the pediatric intensive care unit at the Alberta Children's Hospital. We conducted a qualitative-dominant crossover mixed method analysis to produce a broad understanding of the etiology of errors. Using qualitative framework analysis, we identified and qualitatively described errors and transformed the data coded into quantitative data to determine the frequency of errors. RESULTS: We identified 546 errors/error-related actions and behaviors and 25 near misses. The errors were coded into 21 codes that were organized into 5 main themes. Clinical task-related errors accounted for most errors (41.9%), followed by planning, and executing task-related errors (22.3%), distraction-related errors (18.7%), communication-related errors (10.1%), and knowledge/training-related errors (7%). CONCLUSIONS: This novel analytical framework can robustly identify, classify, and describe the root causes of errors within this complex clinical context. Future validation of this classification of errors and error-related actions and behaviors on larger samples of resuscitations from various contexts will allow for a better understanding of how errors can be mitigated to improve patient outcomes.

Hyperchloremia and association with acute kidney injury in critically ill children.

BACKGROUND: Hyperchloremia has been associated with acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill adult patients. Data is limited in pediatric patients. Our study sought to determine if an association exists between hyperchloremia and AKI in pediatric patients admitted to the intensive care unit (PICU). METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients admitted to the PICU for greater than 24 h and who received intravenous fluids. Patients were excluded if they had a diagnosis of kidney disease or required kidney replacement therapy (KRT) within 6 h of admission. Exposures were hyperchloremia (serum chloride ≥ 110 mmol/L) within the first 7 days of PICU admission. The primary outcome was the development of AKI using the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Secondary outcomes included time on mechanical ventilation, new KRT, PICU length of stay, and mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 407 patients included in the study, 209 in the hyperchloremic group and 198 in the non-hyperchloremic group. Univariate analysis demonstrated 108 (51.7%) patients in the hyperchloremic group vs. 54 (27.3%) in the non-hyperchloremic group (p = < .001) with AKI. On multivariate analysis, the odds ratio of AKI with hyperchloremia was 2.24 (95% CI 1.39-3.61) (p = .001). Hyperchloremia was not associated with increased odds of mortality, need for KRT, time on mechanical ventilation, or length of stay. CONCLUSION: Hyperchloremia was associated with AKI in critically ill pediatric patients. Further pediatric clinical trials are needed to determine the benefit of a chloride restrictive vs. liberal fluid strategy. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Up to the Challenge: Adapting Pediatric Intensive Care During a Global Pandemic.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained health systems world wide. In our region, surging numbers of critically ill adult patients demanded urgent system-wide responses. During the peak of the pandemic, our Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) team redesigned the existing educational resources and processes of care to ensure for adult patients for the first time in the hospital's history. Aim: Describe the experiences and impacts of the rapidly initiated Adult COVID-19 Program on health care providers (HCP) and family members. Havelock's Theory of Change framed the examination of Adult COVID-19 Program participant experiences and surfaced lessons learned. Materials and Methods: A quality improvement review was employed to collect feedback about the program experience from the health care team and patient's family members. HCP completed a questionnaire 10 months following the implementation of the program and feedback from family members was provided during the program was obtained. Havelock's Theory of Change was used to explore trends and frame participants' experiences. Results: Pediatric Intensive Care Unit bedside team members and clinical leaders (n = 17), adult hospital partners (n = 3), and family members (n = 8) participated. HCP describe; motivation and readiness; concern for personal safety and uncertainty experienced in the early program phases; the importance of supports and resources; use of relationships and collaboration to facilitate change; the emotional impacts of this unique experience; and opportunities for individual and team growth. An overarching theme of 'doing our part to help' emerged. Family members described the positive impacts of family-centered interventions offered, individualized care, and shock at their family member's illness. Conclusion: The PICU team rapidly adapted to provide care for adults at the peak of the pandemic. Family members expressed feeling grateful for the care their loved ones received in the pediatric setting. The experience of caring for adult patients with COVID-19 was a source of tension, personal growth, and meaning for the pediatric intensive care team.

Antibiotic treatment duration for bloodstream infections in critically ill children-A survey of pediatric infectious diseases and critical care clinicians for clinical equipoise.

OBJECTIVE: To describe antibiotic treatment durations that pediatric infectious diseases (ID) and critical care clinicians usually recommend for bloodstream infections in critically ill children. DESIGN: Anonymous, online practice survey using five common pediatric-based case scenarios of bloodstream infections. SETTING: Pediatric intensive care units in Canada, Australia and New Zealand. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatric intensivists, nurse practitioners, ID physicians and pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended treatment durations for common infectious syndromes associated with bloodstream infections and willingness to enrol patients into a trial to study treatment duration. RESULTS: Among 136 survey respondents, most recommended at least 10 days antibiotics for bloodstream infections associated with: pneumonia (65%), skin/soft tissue (74%), urinary tract (64%) and intra-abdominal infections (drained: 90%; undrained: 99%). For central vascular catheter-associated infections without catheter removal, over 90% clinicians recommended at least 10 days antibiotics, except for infections caused by coagulase negative staphylococci (79%). Recommendations for at least 10 days antibiotics were less common with catheter removal. In multivariable linear regression analyses, lack of source control was significantly associated with longer treatment durations (+5.2 days [95% CI: 4.4-6.1 days] for intra-abdominal infections and +4.1 days [95% CI: 3.8-4.4 days] for central vascular catheter-associated infections). Most clinicians (73-95%, depending on the source of bloodstream infection) would be willing to enrol patients into a trial of shorter versus longer antibiotic treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of clinicians currently recommend at least 10 days of antibiotics for most scenarios of bloodstream infections in critically ill children. There is practice heterogeneity in self-reported treatment duration recommendations among clinicians. Treatment durations were similar across different infectious syndromes. Under appropriate clinical conditions, most clinicians would be willing to enrol patients into a trial of shorter versus longer treatment for common syndromes associated with bloodstream infections.

Noninferiority Margin Size and Acceptance of Trial Results: Contingent Valuation Survey of Clinician Preferences for Noninferior Mortality.

OBJECTIVES: We used modified contingent valuation methodology to determine how noninferiority margin sizes influence clinicians' willingness to accept clinical trial results that compare mortality in critically ill children. METHODS: We surveyed pediatric infectious diseases and critical care clinicians in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand and randomized respondents to review 1 of 9 mock abstracts describing a noninferiority trial of bacteremic critically ill children assigned to 7 or 14 d of antibiotics. Each scenario showed higher mortality in the 7-d group but met noninferiority criterion. We explored how noninferiority margins and baseline mortality rates influenced respondent acceptance of results. RESULTS: There were 106 survey respondents: 65 (61%) critical care clinicians, 28 (26%) infectious diseases physicians, and 13 (12%) pharmacists. When noninferiority margins were 5% and 10%, 73% (24/33) and 79% (27/33) respondents would accept shorter treatment, compared with 44% (17/39) when the margin was 20% (P = 0.003). Logistic regression adjusted for baseline mortality showed 5% and 10% noninferiority margins were more likely to be associated with acceptance of shorter treatment compared with 20% margins (odds ratio [OR] 3.5, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-9.6, P = 0.013; OR 5.1, 95% CI: 1.8-14.6, P = 0.002). Baseline mortality was not a significant predictor of acceptance of shorter treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are more likely to accept shorter treatment when noninferiority margins are ≤10%. However, nearly half of respondents who reviewed abstracts with 20% margins were still willing to accept shorter treatment. This is a novel application of contingent valuation methodology to elicit acceptance of research results among end users of the medical literature. HIGHLIGHTS: Clinicians are more likely to accept shorter treatment durations based on noninferior mortality results when the noninferiority margin is 5% or 10% than if the margin is 20%.However, nearly half of clinicians would still accept shorter-duration treatment as noninferior with margins of 20%.Baseline mortality does not independently predict acceptance of shorter-duration treatment.Contingent valuation is a novel approach to elicit the acceptance of research design parameters from the perspective of endusers of the medical literature.

The impact of clinical result acquisition and interpretation on task performance during a simulated pediatric cardiac arrest: a multicentre observational study.

PURPOSE: The acquisition and interpretation of clinical results during resuscitations is common; however, this can delay critical clinical tasks, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. This study aims to determine the impact of clinical result acquisition and interpretation by the team leader on critical task completion during simulated pediatric cardiac arrest before and after team training. METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of video-recorded simulated resuscitation scenarios conducted during Teams4Kids (T4K) study (June 2011-January 2015); scenarios included cardiac arrest before and after team training. The scenario included either a scripted paper or a phone call delivery of results concurrently with a clinical transition to pulseless ventricular tachycardia. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to compare team performance before and after training. RESULTS: Performance from 40 teams was analyzed. Although the time taken to initiate CPR and defibrillation varied depending on the type of interruption and whether the scenario was before or after team training, these findings were not significantly associated with the leader's behaviour [Kruskal-Wallis test (p > 0.05)]. An exact McNemar's test determined no statistically significant difference in the proportion of leaders involved or not in interpreting results between and after the training (exact p value = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: Team training was successful in reducing time to perform key clinical tasks. Although team training modified the way leaders behaved toward the results, this behaviour change did not impact the time taken to start CPR or defibrillate. Further understanding the elements that influence time to critical clinical tasks provides guidance in designing future simulated educational activities, subsequently improving clinical team performance and patient outcomes.

RéSUMé: BUT: L'acquisition et l'interprétation des résultats cliniques pendant les réanimations sont courantes; toutefois, cela peut retarder les tâches cliniques critiques, ce qui entraîne une augmentation de la morbidité et de la mortalité. Cette étude vise à déterminer l'impact de l'acquisition et de l'interprétation des résultats cliniques par le chef d'équipe sur la réalisation des tâches critiques lors d'un arrêt cardiaque pédiatrique simulé, avant et après la formation de l'équipe. MéTHODES: Il s'agit d'une analyse de données secondaires de scénarios de réanimation simulés enregistrés sur vidéo, réalisés au cours de l'étude Teams4Kids (T4K) (juin 2011-janvier 2015); les scénarios comprenaient un arrêt cardiaque avant et après la formation de l'équipe. Le scénario comprenait un document écrit ou un appel téléphonique donnant les résultats en même temps qu'une transition clinique vers la tachycardie ventriculaire sans pouls. Des statistiques descriptives et des tests non paramétriques ont été utilisés pour comparer le rendement de l'équipe avant et après la formation. RéSULTATS: Les performances de 40 équipes ont été analysées. Bien que le temps nécessaire au déclenchement de la RCP et de la défibrillation ait varié selon le type d'interruption et selon que le scénario se déroulait avant ou après la formation de l'équipe, ces résultats n'étaient pas significativement associés au comportement du leader [test de Kruskal-Wallis (p > 0,05)]. Un test exact de McNemar n'a déterminé aucune différence statistiquement significative dans la proportion de dirigeants impliqués ou non dans l'interprétation des résultats entre et après la formation (valeur p exacte = 0,096). CONCLUSIONS: La formation en équipe a permis de réduire le temps nécessaire pour effectuer les tâches cliniques clés. Bien que la formation de l'équipe ait modifié le comportement des dirigeants vis-à-vis des résultats, ce changement de comportement n'a pas eu d'incidence sur le temps nécessaire pour commencer la RCP ou la défibrillation. Une meilleure compréhension des éléments qui influencent le temps consacré aux tâches cliniques critiques fournit une orientation pour la conception des futures activités éducatives simulées, améliorant par la suite le rendement des équipes cliniques et les résultats pour les patients.

Antimicrobial treatment duration for uncomplicated bloodstream infections in critically ill children: a multicentre observational study.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) cause significant morbidity and mortality in critically ill children but treatment duration is understudied. We describe the durations of antimicrobial treatment that critically ill children receive and explore factors associated with treatment duration. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study in six pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) across Canada. Associations between treatment duration and patient-, infection- and pathogen-related characteristics were explored using multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 187 critically ill children with BSIs, the median duration of antimicrobial treatment was 15 (IQR 11-25) days. Median treatment durations were longer than two weeks for all subjects with known sources of infection: catheter-related 16 (IQR 11-24), respiratory 15 (IQR 11-26), intra-abdominal 20 (IQR 14-26), skin/soft tissue 17 (IQR 15-33), urinary 17 (IQR 15-35), central nervous system 33 (IQR 15-46) and other sources 29.5 (IQR 15-55) days. When sources of infection were unclear, the median duration was 13 (IQR 10-16) days. Treatment durations varied widely within and across PICUs. In multivariable linear regression, longer treatment durations were associated with severity of illness (+ 0.4 days longer [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1 to 0.7, p = 0.007] per unit increase in PRISM-IV) and central nervous system infection (+ 17 days [95% CI, 6.7 to 27.4], p = 0.001). Age and pathogen type were not associated with treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Most critically ill children with BSIs received at least two weeks of antimicrobial treatment. Further study is needed to determine whether shorter duration therapy would be effective for selected critically ill children.

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

2021 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; First Aid Task Forces; and the COVID-19 Working Group.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation initiated a continuous review of new, peer-reviewed published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science. This is the fifth annual summary of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations; a more comprehensive review was done in 2020. This latest summary addresses the most recently published resuscitation evidence reviewed by International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task force science experts. Topics covered by systematic reviews in this summary include resuscitation topics of video-based dispatch systems; head-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation; early coronary angiography after return of spontaneous circulation; cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone patient; cord management at birth for preterm and term infants; devices for administering positive-pressure ventilation at birth; family presence during neonatal resuscitation; self-directed, digitally based basic life support education and training in adults and children; coronavirus disease 2019 infection risk to rescuers from patients in cardiac arrest; and first aid topics, including cooling with water for thermal burns, oral rehydration for exertional dehydration, pediatric tourniquet use, and methods of tick removal. Members from 6 International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation task forces have assessed, discussed, and debated the quality of the evidence, according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria, and their statements include consensus treatment recommendations or good practice statements. Insights into the deliberations of the task forces are provided in Justification and Evidence-to-Decision Framework Highlights sections. In addition, the task forces listed priority knowledge gaps for further research.

Evaluation of antibiotic treatment decisions in pediatric intensive care units in Saudi Arabia: A national survey.

OBJECTIVE: To describe variables used by Saudi pediatric intensivists to make antibiotic-related decisions for children with suspected severe bacterial infections. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey, which was developed using a multi-step methodological approach. The survey included 4 clinical scenarios of the most relevant bacterial infections in pediatric critical care (pneumonia, sepsis, meningitis and intra-abdominal infection). The potential determinants of antibiotic treatment duration addressed in all scenarios included clinical variables (patient characteristics, disease severity), laboratory infection markers, radiologic findings, and pathogens. RESULTS: The response rate was 65% (55/85). Eight variables (immunodeficiency, 3 months of age, 2 or more organ dysfunctions, Pediatric Risk of Mortality III score >10, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein [CRP], elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and elevated procalcitonin [PCT]) were associated with prolonging antibiotic treatment duration for all 4 clinical scenarios, with a median increase ranging from 3.0 days (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5, 3.5, leukocytosis) to 8.8 days (95% CI 5.5, 10.5, immunodeficiency). There were no variables that were consistently associated with shortening antibiotic duration across all scenarios. Lastly, the proportion of physicians who would continue antibiotics for ≥5 days despite a positive viral polymerase chain reaction test result was 67% for pneumonia, 85% for sepsis, 63% for meningitis, and 95% for intra-abdominal infections. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic-related decisions for critically ill patients are complex and depend on several factors. Saudi pediatric intensivists will use prolonged courses of antibiotics for younger patients, patients with severe clinical picture, and patients with persistently elevated laboratory markers and hospital acquired infections, even when current literature and guidelines do not suggest such practices. Antimicrobial stewardship programs should include interventions to address these misconceptions to ensure the rational use of antibiotics in pediatric intensive care units.

Comfort-holding in critically ill children: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: To understand and summarize the breadth of knowledge on comfort-holding in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs). SOURCES: This scoping review was conducted using PRISMA methodology. A literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials. Search strategies were developed with a medical librarian and revised through a peer review of electronic search strategies. All databases were searched from inception to 14 April 2020. Only full-text articles available in English were included. All identified articles were reviewed independently and in duplicate using predetermined criteria. All study designs were eligible if they reported on comfort-holding in a PICU. Data were extracted independently and in duplicate. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Of 13,326 studies identified, 13 were included. Comfort-holding was studied in the context of end-of-life care, developmental care, mobilization, and as a unique intervention. Comfort-holding is common during end-of-life care with 77.8% of children held, but rare during acute management (51% of children < three years, < 5% of children ≥ three years). Commonly reported outcomes included child outcomes (e.g., physiologic measurements), safety outcomes (e.g., accidental line removal), parent outcomes (e.g., psychological symptoms), and frequency of holding. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of literature on comfort-holding in PICUs. This scoping review identifies significant gaps in the literature, including assessment of child-based outcomes of comfort-holding or safety assessment of comfort-holding, and highlights core outcomes to consider in future evaluations of this intervention including child-based outcomes, parent-based outcomes, and safety of the intervention.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Comprendre et résumer l'étendue des connaissances sur la pratique des étreintes de réconfort dans les unités de soins intensifs pédiatriques (USIP). SOURCES: Cette étude de portée a été réalisée en utilisant la méthodologie PRISMA. Une recherche de la littérature a été menée dans les bases de données MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL et dans le registre Cochrane CENTRAL d'études contrôlées. Les stratégies de recherche ont été élaborées avec un bibliothécaire médical et révisées au moyen d'un examen par les pairs des stratégies de recherche électronique. Toutes les bases de données ont été passées en revue de leur création au 14 avril 2020. Seuls les articles en texte intégral disponibles en anglais ont été inclus. Tous les articles identifiés ont été révisés indépendamment et en double à l'aide de critères prédéterminés. Tous les types de plans d'étude étaient admissibles s'ils abordaient le thème des étreintes de réconfort dans une USIP. Les données ont été extraites indépendamment et en double. CONSTATATIONS PRINCIPALES: Sur les 13 326 études identifiées, 13 ont été incluses. Les étreintes de réconfort ont été étudiées dans le contexte des soins de fin de vie, des soins développementaux, de la mobilisation et en tant qu'intervention unique. Les étreintes de réconfort sont une approche courante dans le cadre de soins de fin de vie, durant lesquels 77,8 % des enfants sont étreints, mais plus rares pendant la prise en charge aiguë (51 % des enfants < trois ans, < 5 % des enfants ≥ trois ans). Les résultats couramment rapportés comprenaient les issues pour les enfants (p. ex. mesures physiologiques), les issues en matière de sécurité (p. ex. retrait accidentel d'une ligne), les issues pour les parents (p. ex. symptômes psychologiques) et la fréquence des étreintes. CONCLUSION: Il n'existe que très peu de littérature s'intéressant aux étreintes de réconfort dans les USIP. Cette étude de portée identifie d'importantes lacunes dans la littérature, notamment l'évaluation des issues pour l'enfant suite à une étreinte de réconfort ou l'évaluation de la sécurité de telles étreintes, et met en évidence les issues principales dont il faudra tenir compte dans les évaluations futures de cette intervention, y compris les issues axées sur l'enfant, les issues basées sur les parents et la sécurité de l'intervention.

Family presence during resuscitation: a needs assessment of education, policy, and opinion in Canada.

PURPOSE: Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been widely endorsed. Nevertheless, there is limited information available on current education and training used to support FPDR implementation, including that of relevant policy. Understanding the current state of FPDR educational opportunities, policies, and practices across Canadian hospitals is crucial to advancing and standardizing these within our medical community. Our objective was to identify the current and desired state of education and policy on FPDR, as well as current practices and opinions of Canadian healthcare professionals. METHODS: We selected questionnaire topics and employed a modified Delphi consensus technique using a group of subject matter experts in resuscitation. We contacted a stratified sample of Canadian healthcare professionals via select listservs and surveyed the cohort using RedCAP™. We used descriptive statistics and conducted quantitative analyses to describe and test for significant differences among groups. RESULTS: In total, 635 surveys were completed. Only 46.3% of participants reported ever attending an educational opportunity involving learning how to manage FPDR; however, 92% wanted training. Only 11% knew if they had an official FPDR policy in their current hospital but 62.9% indicated they wanted one. In support of FPDR, 88% agreed that family members should be allowed to be present during a resuscitation. CONCLUSION: While opinions are mostly positive towards FPDR, there exists a gap between the current and desired state of education and policy supporting it within Canada.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: La présence de la famille pendant la réanimation est largement appuyée. Néanmoins, il existe peu d'informations disponibles sur l'éducation et la formation actuelles utilisées pour soutenir la mise en œuvre de la présence de la famille pendant la réanimation, y compris l'information touchant les politiques pertinentes. Il est essentiel de comprendre l'état actuel des opportunités de formation, des politiques et des pratiques en matière de présence familiale pendant la réanimation dans l'ensemble des hôpitaux canadiens afin de les faire progresser et de les standardiser au sein de la communauté médicale. Notre objectif était de déterminer l'état actuel et souhaité de la formation et des politiques en matière de présence familiale pendant la réanimation, ainsi que les pratiques et les opinions actuelles des professionnels de la santé canadiens. MéTHODE: Nous avons sélectionné un questionnaire et utilisé une technique de consensus Delphi modifiée afin d'obtenir les réponses d'un groupe d'experts en matière de réanimation. Nous avons communiqué avec un échantillon stratifié de professionnels de la santé canadiens par l'entremise de gestionnaires de liste sélectionnés et avons sondé notre cohorte à l'aide de l'application RedCAP™. Nous avons utilisé des statistiques descriptives et effectué des analyses quantitatives pour décrire et tester les différences significatives entre les groupes. RéSULTATS: Au total, 635 sondages ont été complétés. Seuls 46,3 % des participants ont déclaré avoir déjà assisté à une opportunité de formation portant sur l'apprentissage de la gestion de la présence familiale pendant la réanimation; toutefois, 92 % des répondants ont déclaré désirer une formation. Seulement 11 % des répondants savaient s'il existait une politique officielle de présence de la famille pendant la réanimation dans leur hôpital, mais 62,9 % ont indiqué qu'ils souhaitaient en avoir une. En faveur de la présence familiale, 88 % étaient d'avis que les membres de la famille devraient être autorisés à être présents lors d'une réanimation. CONCLUSION: Bien que les opinions soient pour la plupart positives à l'égard de la présence familiale pendant la réanimation, il existe un écart entre l'état actuel et souhaité de la formation et des politiques qui l'appuient au Canada.

Code Team Structure and Training in the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality International Collaborative.

OBJECTIVES: Code team structure and training for pediatric in-hospital cardiac arrest are variable. There are no data on the optimal structure of a resuscitation team. The objective of this study is to characterize the structure and training of pediatric code teams in sites participating in the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative. METHODS: From May to July 2017, an anonymous voluntary survey was distributed to 18 sites in the international Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative. The survey content was developed by the study investigators and iteratively adapted by consensus. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: All sites have a designated code team and hospital-wide code team activation system. Code team composition varies greatly across sites, with teams consisting of 3 to 17 members. Preassigned roles for code team members before the event occur at 78% of sites. A step stool and backboard are used during resuscitations in 89% of surveyed sites. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback is used by 72% of the sites. Of those sites that use CPR feedback, all use an audiovisual feedback device incorporated into the defibrillator and 54% use a CPR coach. Multidisciplinary and simulation-based code team training is conducted by 67% of institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Code team structure, equipment, and training vary widely in a survey of international children's hospitals. The variations in team composition, role assignments, equipment, and training described in this article will be used to facilitate future studies regarding the impact of structure and training of code teams on team performance and patient outcomes.