Complete placenta previa and increta after radical trachelectomy: A case report.

Background: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders are increasing in incidence and represent a significant contributor to severe maternal morbidity in the US. Prior uterine surgeries other than cesarean section are important, yet less common, risk factors for PAS. Case: This is a case of a 43-year-old woman with a prior history of cervical cancer necessitating radical trachelectomy. She was subsequently diagnosed with a complete placenta previa with a high degree of suspicion for PAS. Multidisciplinary teams convened to plan for delivery. A cesarean hysterectomy was performed at 32 weeks. Final surgical pathology confirmed the presence of morbidly adherent placenta invading the vaginal cuff. Conclusion: Patients who are diagnosed with early-stage cervical cancers have the option of fertility-preserving surgical management. Serial ultrasound evaluations, specifically looking for PAS, might be warranted in post-trachelectomy pregnancies.

Changes in Rates of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy Among Nulliparous Patients After the ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) Trial.

The ARRIVE (A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management) trial demonstrated lower rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) among low-risk nulliparous patients undergoing labor induction at 39 weeks of gestation. We conducted a population-based cohort study in which we evaluated the association between the routinization of 39-week induction and the rate of HDP by comparing rates before and after the ARRIVE trial publication, using the National Vital Statistics System. Logistic regression models were used to project what the HDP rate would have been based on trends seen pre-ARRIVE. Despite an overall increase in the rate of HDP from pre-ARRIVE to post-ARRIVE (4.9% pre vs 6.3% post, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.26, 95% CI 1.24-1.27), the HDP rate was significantly lower in the post-ARRIVE group among patients undergoing induction at 39 weeks of gestation (14.7% pre vs 14.1% post, aOR 0.91, 95% CI 0.90-0.93), decreasing by 12.0% per year (P<.001). The rate of HDP among all other delivering patients was higher in the post-ARRIVE group (4.1% pre vs 5.5% post, aOR1.32, 95% CI 1.30-1.34). Our findings may suggest that, as the overall HDP rate rises, the relative advantage of 39-week induction will rise similarly.

Changes in use of 17-OHPC after the PROLONG trial: a physician survey.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (17OHPC) or vaginal progesterone use for patients at risk for preterm birth has changed since the publication of the 17-OHPC to Prevent Recurrent Preterm Birth in Singleton Gestations (PROLONG) trial, and to assess which organizations' (Food and Drug Administration's [FDA], American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology's [ACOG] or Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine's [SMFM]) statements most influenced change. METHODS: Through a vignette-based physician survey, we sought to measure (by Likert scale) how counseling tendencies regarding 17OHPC and vaginal progesterone have changed since the PROLONG trial publication. Participants were also asked which organizations' statements most influenced change. RESULTS: With response rate of 97 % (141/145), a pre-to-post PROLONG trial comparison revealed significant changes in counseling for progesterone. Respondents were less likely to recommend 17OHPC (p<0.001) and more likely to recommend vaginal (p<0.001). The FDA statement most influenced the decision not to recommend 17OHPC for the prevention of preterm birth (r=-0.23, p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Providers have made significant changes in their counseling regarding progesterone use for patients at risk for preterm birth after the publication of the PRLONG trial.

Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial.

BACKGROUND: The ARRIVE trial demonstrated the benefit of induction of labor at 39 weeks gestation. Obstetrics departments across the United States faced the challenge of adapting clinical practice in light of these data while managing logistical constraints. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there were changes in obstetrical practices and perinatal outcomes in the United States after the ARRIVE trial publication. STUDY DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study of low-risk, nulliparous women who initiated prenatal care by 12 weeks gestation with singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies delivering at ≥39 weeks. Data were obtained from the US Natality database. The pre-ARRIVE group were women who delivered between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2017. The post-ARRIVE group consisted of women who delivered between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019. Births that occurred in 2018 were excluded. Practice outcomes were rates of induction of labor, timing of delivery, and cesarean delivery rate. Adverse maternal outcomes were blood transfusion and admission to medical intensive care unit. Adverse neonatal outcomes were need for assisted ventilation (immediate and >6 hours), 5-minute APGAR score <3, neonatal intensive care unit admission, seizures, and surfactant use. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Trends were tested across the time period represented by the pre-ARRIVE group using Cochran-Armitage trend test. RESULTS: There were 1,966,870 births in the pre-ARRIVE group and 609,322 in the post-ARRIVE group. The groups differed in age, race, body mass index, marital status, infertility treatment, and smoking history (P<.001). After adjusting for these differences, the post-ARRIVE group was more likely to undergo induction (36.1% vs 30.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [1.36-1.37]) and deliver by 39+6 weeks of pregnancy (42.8% vs 39.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.14 [1.14-1.15]). The post-ARRIVE group had a significantly lower rate of cesarean delivery than the pre-ARRIVE group (27.3 % vs 27.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.94 [0.93-0.94]). Patients in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to receive a blood transfusion (0.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.43 [1.36-1.50]) and be admitted to medical intensive care unit (0.09% vs 0.08%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.20 [1.09-1.33]). Neonates in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to need assisted ventilation at birth (3.5% vs 2.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28 [1.26-1.30]) and >6 hours (0.6% vs 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [1.31-1.41]). The neonates in the post-ARRIVE group were more likely to have low 5-minute APGAR scores (0.4% vs 0.3%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91 [0.86-0.95]). Neonatal intensive care unit admission did not differ between the 2 groups (4.9% vs 4.9%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01 [0.99-1.03]). There were no differences in neonatal seizures (0.04% vs 0.04%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.97 [0.84-1.13]), and surfactant use (0.08% vs 0.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.05 [0.94-1.17]) between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: There were more inductions of labor, more deliveries at 39 weeks' gestation, and fewer cesarean deliveries in the year after the ARRIVE trial publication. The small but statistically significant increase in some adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes should be explored to determine if they are related with concurrent changes in obstetrical practices.

Rising above the mask wars: using nonpharmaceutical interventions to lessen the burden of influenza.

The COVID-19 pandemic imparted important lessons, both through its direct impact on society and through the manner in which society's response influenced the trajectory of other diseases. The decrements in the rates of infection and morbidity from influenza during 2020 were significant, which is particularly important for pregnant women. Despite past attempts by public health authorities to encourage nonpharmaceutical interventions for the prevention of influenza, preventive efforts have focused largely on the use of vaccines. The COVID-19 experience has demonstrated that basic nonpharmaceutical interventions can potentially make a difference in lowering the rates of influenza during future outbreaks. In this article, we discuss the prepandemic role of nonpharmaceutical interventions in disease prevention, the outcomes that were seen in the flu season of 2020, and the role obstetricians should play in using nonpharmaceutical interventions in future influenza disease prevention efforts.

Predictors of readmission for postpartum preeclampsia.

Objective: To develop a predictive model for re-admission for postpartum preeclampsia (PPEC).Methods: A case-control study; cases were patients re-admitted for PPEC; controls were not re-admitted. Mixed linear modelling was used to develop a predictive model on the training set, then validated on the validation set.Results: Two-hundred-sixty-nine patients were readmitted, and matched to 538 controls. A risk calculator was developed and yielded a sensitivity and specificity for readmission of 80.9% and 53.5%, respectively.Conclusion: A predictive model using age, race, discharge blood pressures, and preeclampsia was able to predict re-admission for PPEC with a high level of sensitivity.