Anaesthetic management of people with multiple sclerosis.

There is a lack of published guidelines on the management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing procedures that require anaesthesia and respective advice is largely based on retrospective studies or case reports. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for anaesthetists and neurologists for the management of patients with MS requiring anaesthesia. This review covers issues related to the anaesthetic management of patients with MS, with a focus on preoperative assessment, choice of anaesthetic techniques and agents, side-effects of drugs used during anaesthesia and their potential impact on the disease evolution, drug interactions that may occur, and the need to use monitoring devices. A systematic PubMed research was performed to retrieve relevant articles.

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for immune-mediated neurological diseases: what, how, who and why?

In carefully selected patients, autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a safe, highly effective and cost-saving treatment modality for treatment-resistant, and potentially treatment-naïve, immune-mediated neurological disorders. Although the evidence base has been growing in the last decade, limited understanding has led to confusion, mistrust and increasing use of health tourism. In this article, we discuss what autologous HSCT is, which immune-mediated conditions can be treated with it, how to select patients, what are the expected outcomes and potential adverse effects, and how cost-effective this treatment is.

EBV persistence in gastric cancer cases conventionally classified as EBER-ISH negative.

BACKGROUND: The Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes various B-cell lymphomas and epithelial malignancies, including gastric cancer (GC) at frequencies ranging from 5 to 10% in adenocarcinomas (ADK) to 80% in GC with lymphoid stroma (GCLS). Using high-sensitivity methods, we recently detected EBV traces in a large cohort of EBV-negative B-cell lymphomas, suggesting a hit-and-run mechanism. METHODS: Here, we used routine and higher-sensitivity methods [droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for EBV segments on microdissected tumour cells and RNAscope for EBNA1 mRNA] to assess EBV infection in a cohort of 40 GCs (28 ADK and 12 GCLS). RESULTS: ddPCR documented the presence of EBV nucleic acids in rare tumour cells of several cases conventionally classified as EBV-negative (ADK, 8/26; GCLS, 6/7). Similarly, RNAscope confirmed EBNA1 expression in rare tumour cells (ADK, 4/26; GCLS, 3/7). Finally, since EBV induces epigenetic changes that are heritable and retained after complete loss of the virus from the host cell, we studied the methylation pattern of EBV-specifically methylated genes (Timp2, Eya1) as a mark of previous EBV infection. Cases with EBV traces showed a considerable level of methylation in Timp2 and Eya1 genes that was similar to that observed in EBER-ISH positive cases and greater than cases not featuring any EBV traces. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that: (a) EBV may contribute to gastric pathogenesis more widely than currently acknowledged and (b) indicate the methylation changes as a mechanistic framework for how EBV can act in a hit-and-run manner. Finally, we found that the viral state was of prognostic significance in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Did it hurt? COVID-19 vaccination experience in people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend vaccination against SARS-CoV2 for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). The long-term review of the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in pwMS is limited. METHODS: Service re-evaluation. PwMS using the MS service at Barts Health National Health Service Trust were sent questionnaires via email to report symptoms following first and second COVID-19 vaccinations (n = 570). A retrospective review of electronic health records was conducted for clinical and safety data post-vaccination(s); cut-off was end of September 2021. Separate logistic regressions were carried out for symptoms experienced at each vaccination. Two sets of regressions were fitted with covariates: (i) Disease-modifying therapy type and (ii) patient characteristics for symptoms experienced. RESULTS: 193/570 pwMS responded. 184 pwMS had both vaccinations. 144 received the AZD1222 and 49 the BNT162b2 vaccine. 87% and 75% of pwMS experienced any symptoms at first and second vaccinations, respectively. The majority of symptoms resolved within a short timeframe. No severe adverse effects were reported. Two pwMS subsequently died; one due to COVID-19 and one due to aspiration pneumonia. Males were at a reduced risk of reporting symptoms at first vaccination. There was evidence that pwMS in certain treatment groups were at reduced risk of reporting symptoms at second vaccination only. CONCLUSIONS: Findings are consistent with our preliminary data. Symptoms post-vaccination were similar to the non-MS population and were mostly temporary. It is important to inform the MS community of vaccine safety data.

The Sylvia Lawry Centre for Multiple Sclerosis Research (SLCMSR)--Critical review facing the 20 anniversary.

The SLCMSR was formed as an international Multiple Sclerosis Trials, Research and Resource Center to identify clinical MRI and other predictors of the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) based on a large database of natural history and clinical trial data. Using an elaborate validation concept several key findings were published, challenging established outcome parameters and their assessment in MS such as disability ratings with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), relapses and MRI endpoints. Sustained increase of EDSS appeared to be an invalid outcome for 2-3 year clinical trials at least in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. The number of gadolinium-enhancing lesions and T2-lesion load on MRI were shown not to have a meaningful additional predictive value for the disease course. These issues risen some 15 years ago had triggered controversial discussions which have also been noticed by regulatory authorities and they all have not been resolved. In addition the SLCMSR contributed to the development of new outcomes such as real-world walking speed as an attractive, ecologically valid tool based on a wearable device. A so-called evidence-based-decision-support tool was constructed to provide individual prognostic estimates based on a matching algorithm to a given database. This paper condensates the findings of 20 years of critical MS research.

Experience with the COVID-19 AstraZeneca vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Some people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) are at increased risk of severe Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and should be rapidly vaccinated. However, vaccine supplies are limited, and there are concerns about side-effects, particularly with the ChAdOx1nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) vaccine. OBJECTIVES: To report our first experience of pwMS receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine. METHODS: Service evaluation. pwMS using the MS service at Barts Health NHS Trust were sent questionnaires to report symptoms following vaccination. RESULTS: Thirty-three responses were returned, 29/33 pwMS received a first dose of AstraZeneca vaccine, the remaining four received a first dose of BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine. All but two patients (94%) reported any symptoms including a sore arm (70%), flu-like symptoms (64%), fever (21%), fatigue (27%), and headache (21%). In more than 2/3 patients, symptoms lasted up to 48 hours, and with the exception of two pwMS reporting symptom duration of 10 and 12 days, respectively, symptoms in the remainder resolved within seven days. No severe adverse effects occurred. CONCLUSIONS: pwMS report transient symptoms following AstraZeneca vaccination, characteristics of which were similar to those reported in the non-MS population. Symptoms may be more pronounced in pwMS due to the temperature-dependent delay in impulse propagation (Uhthoff's phenomenon) due to demyelination.

Neurofilament results for the phase II neuroprotection study of phenytoin in optic neuritis.

BACKGROUND: A randomized trial of phenytoin in acute optic neuritis (ON) demonstrated a 30% reduction in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) loss with phenytoin versus placebo. Here we present the corresponding serum neurofilament analyses. METHODS: Eighty-six acute ON cases were randomized to receive phenytoin (4-6 mg/kg/day) or placebo for 3 months, and followed up for 6 months. Serum was collected at baseline, 3 and 6 months for analysis of neurofilament heavy chain (NfH) and neurofilament light chain (NfL). RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had blood sampling. Of these, 58 and 56 were available at 3 months, and 55 and 54 were available at 6 months for NfH and NfL, respectively. There was no significant correlation between serum NfH and NfL at the time points tested. For NfH, the difference in mean placebo - phenytoin was -44 pg/ml at 3 months (P = 0.019) and -27 pg/ml at 6 months (P = 0.234). For NfL, the difference was 1.4 pg/ml at 3 months (P = 0.726) and -1.6 pg/ml at 6 months (P = 0.766). CONCLUSIONS: At 3 months, there was a reduction in NfH, but not NFL, in the phenytoin versus placebo group, while differences at 6 months were not statistically significant. This suggests a potential neuroprotective role for phenytoin in acute ON, with the lower NfH at 3 months, when levels secondary to degeneration of the anterior visual pathway are still elevated, but not at 6 months, when levels have normalized.

Long-term safety data from the cladribine tablets clinical development program in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Long-term safety data are of particular interest for any newly approved treatment in multiple sclerosis such as cladribine tablets 10 mg (MAVENCLAD®; 3.5 mg/kg cumulative dose over 2 years, referred to as cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg), which is approved in Europe and the USA. Here we provide the final report on the integrated analysis of the safety profile of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg from the clinical development program, including final data from the PREMIERE registry. METHODS: Safety data for cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg from three previously reported Phase III studies (CLARITY, CLARITY Extension and ORACLE-MS), as well as the prospective, observational PREMIERE registry (which ran from November 2009 to October 2018; consisting of patients who had participated in at least one of the Phase III trials) were combined to provide the Monotherapy Oral cohort. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and predefined SAEs of special interest were recorded. Observation-adjusted incidence rates per 100 patient-years (Adj-AE per 100 PY) were used to assess adverse events (AEs). Standardized incidence ratios for malignancies were calculated in relation to a matched GLOBOCAN reference population, and risk differences (cladribine tablets versus placebo) were estimated. RESULTS: The Monotherapy Oral cohort comprised 923 patients who received cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and 641 patients who received placebo. Overall, the reported number of SAEs was higher in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group (133/923 [14.4%] patients with at least 1 SAE), versus the placebo group (68/641 [10.6%] patients with at least 1 SAE). Four patients in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group had lymphopenia classified as a serious event (resulting in an Adj-AE of 0.10 per 100 PY) and 2 patients had serious herpes zoster (resulting in an Adj-AE of 0.05 per 100 PY). There were no cases in the corresponding placebo groups. There was no difference between the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group and placebo in the overall incidence of infections. However herpetic infection AEs occurred more frequently in the cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg group (driven primarily by herpes zoster, followed by oral herpes and herpes simplex). Overall, there was a numerical imbalance in malignancy incidence between cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg and placebo, with an Adj-AE of 0.26 and 0.12 per 100 PY, respectively; however the difference was not statistically significant. The rate of malignancies observed with cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg in the final integrated safety analysis was not different from the expected rate in the matched GLOBOCAN reference population (standardized incidence ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.69). CONCLUSION: Additional patient-years of observation do not significantly alter the conclusions of earlier interim analyses, and no new major safety findings were identified in this consolidated analysis of safety data of cladribine tablets 3.5 mg/kg monotherapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Severe lymphopenia after subcutaneous cladribine in a patient with multiple sclerosis: To vaccinate or not?

OBJECTIVE: To describe a fatal case of influenza A pneumonia in a patient with severe lymphopenia after receiving subcutaneous cladribine to treat her multiple sclerosis (MS). METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: A 53-year-old woman developed fatal influenza pneumonia associated with grade 4 lymphopenia two months after receiving a total dose of 60mg subcutaneous cladribine. Despite treatment with oseltamivir, her condition deteriorated and the patient passed away after developing respiratory failure. CONCLUSION: Cladribine-related lymphopenia is usually mild to moderate, however severe lymphopenia may occur. People with MS, especially those who are immunosuppressed, should be offered the inactivated influenza vaccine annually.

COVID-19 vaccine-readiness for anti-CD20-depleting therapy in autoimmune diseases.

Although most autoimmune diseases are considered to be CD4 T cell- or antibody-mediated, many respond to CD20-depleting antibodies that have limited influence on CD4 and plasma cells. This includes rituximab, oblinutuzumab and ofatumumab that are used in cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and off-label in a large number of other autoimmunities and ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis. Recently, the COVID-19 pandemic created concerns about immunosuppression in autoimmunity, leading to cessation or a delay in immunotherapy treatments. However, based on the known and emerging biology of autoimmunity and COVID-19, it was hypothesised that while B cell depletion should not necessarily expose people to severe SARS-CoV-2-related issues, it may inhibit protective immunity following infection and vaccination. As such, drug-induced B cell subset inhibition, that controls at least some autoimmunities, would not influence innate and CD8 T cell responses, which are central to SARS-CoV-2 elimination, nor the hypercoagulation and innate inflammation causing severe morbidity. This is supported clinically, as the majority of SARS-CoV-2-infected, CD20-depleted people with autoimmunity have recovered. However, protective neutralizing antibody and vaccination responses are predicted to be blunted until naive B cells repopulate, based on B cell repopulation kinetics and vaccination responses, from published rituximab and unpublished ocrelizumab (NCT00676715, NCT02545868) trial data, shown here. This suggests that it may be possible to undertake dose interruption to maintain inflammatory disease control, while allowing effective vaccination against SARS-CoV-29, if and when an effective vaccine is available.