RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Given the substantial lack of knowledge, we aimed to assess clinical/dosimetry predictors of late hematological toxicity on patients undergoing pelvic-nodes irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer (PCa) within a prospective multi-institute study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical/dosimetry/blood test data were prospectively collected including lymphocytes count (ALC) at baseline, mid/end-PNI, 3/6 months and every 6 months up to 5-year after PNI. DVHs of the Body, ileum (BMILEUM), lumbosacral spine (BMLS), lower pelvis (BMPELVIS), and whole pelvis (BMTOT) were extracted. Current analysis focused on 2-year CTCAEv4.03 Grade ≥ 2 (G2+) lymphopenia (ALC < 800/µL). DVH parameters that better discriminate patients with/without toxicity were first identified. After data pre-processing to limit overfitting, a multi-variable logistic regression model combining DVH and clinical information was identified and internally validated by bootstrap. RESULTS: Complete data of 499 patients were available: 46 patients (9.2 %) experienced late G2+ lymphopenia. DVH parameters of BMLS/BMPELVIS/BMTOT and Body were associated to increased G2+ lymphopenia. The variables retained in the resulting model were ALC at baseline [HR = 0.997, 95 %CI 0.996-0.998, p < 0.0001], smoke (yes/no) [HR = 2.9, 95 %CI 1.25-6.76, p = 0.013] and BMLS-V ≥ 24 Gy (cc) [HR = 1.006, 95 %CI 1.002-1.011, p = 0.003]. When acute G3+ lymphopenia (yes/no) was considered, it was retained in the model [HR = 4.517, 95 %CI 1.954-10.441, p = 0.0004]. Performances of the models were relatively high (AUC = 0.87/0.88) and confirmed by validation. CONCLUSIONS: Two-year lymphopenia after PNI for PCa is largely modulated by baseline ALC, with an independent role of acute G3+ lymphopenia. BMLS-V24 was the best dosimetry predictor: constraints for BMTOT (V10Gy < 1520 cc, V20Gy < 1250 cc, V30Gy < 850 cc), and BMLS (V24y < 307 cc) were suggested to potentially reduce the risk.
Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea , Linfopenia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Linfopenia/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Médula Ósea/efectos de la radiación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pelvis/efectos de la radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Irradiación Linfática/efectos adversos , Irradiación Linfática/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to study the evolution of quality of life (QoL) in the first 5 years following Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) and to determine possible associations with clinical/treatment data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled in a prospective multicentre observational trial in 2010-2014 and treated with conventional (74-80 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fr) or moderately hypofractionated IMRT (65-75.2 Gy, 2.2-2.7 Gy/fr). QoL was evaluated by means of EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, at radiation therapy (RT) end, and every 6 months up to 5 years after IMRT end. Fourteen QoL dimensions were investigated separately. The longitudinal evaluation of QoL was analysed by means of Analysis of variances (ANOVA) for multiple measures. RESULTS: A total of 391 patients with complete sets of questionnaires across 5 years were available. The longitudinal analysis showed a trend toward the significant worsening of QoL at RT end for global health, physical and role functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhoea, and pain. QoL worsening was recovered within 6 months from RT end, with the only exception being physical functioning. Based on ANOVA, the most impaired time point was RT end. QoL dimension analysis at this time indicated that acute Grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity significantly impacted global health, physical and role functioning, fatigue, appetite loss, diarrhoea, and pain. Acute Grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity resulted in lower role functioning and higher pain. Prophylactic lymph-nodal irradiation (WPRT) resulted in significantly lower QoL for global health, fatigue, appetite loss, and diarrhoea; lower pain with the use of neoadjuvant/concomitant hormonal therapy; and lower fatigue with the use of an anti-androgen. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective, longitudinal, observational study, high radiation IMRT doses delivered for PCa led to a temporary worsening of QoL, which tended to be completely resolved at six months. Such transient worsening was mostly associated with acute GI/GU toxicity, WPRT, and higher prescription doses.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Masculino , Humanos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Diarrea , Fatiga/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To quantify patient-reported 2-year intestinal toxicity (IT) from pelvic nodal irradiation (PNI) for prostate cancer. The association between baseline/acute symptoms and 2-year worsening was investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient-reported IT was prospectively assessed through the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ), filled in at baseline, radiotherapy mid-point and end, at 3 and 6 months and every 6 months until 5 years. Two-year deterioration of IBDQ scores relative to the Bowel Domain was investigated for 400 patients with no severe baseline symptoms and with questionnaires available at baseline, 2 years, RT mid-point and/or end and at least three follow-ups between 3 and 18 months. The significance of the 2-year differences from baseline was tested. The association between baseline values and ΔAcute (the worst decline between baseline and RT mid-point/end) was investigated. RESULTS: In the IBDQ lower scores indicate worse symptoms. A significant (p < 0.0001) 2-year mean worsening, mostly in the range of -0.2/-0.4 points on a 1-7 scale, emerged excepting one question (IBDQ29, "nausea/feeling sick"). This decline was independent of treatment intent while baseline values were associated with 2-year absolute scores. The ΔAcute largely modulated 2-year worsening: patients with ΔAcute greater than the first quartile (Q1) and ΔAcute less or equal than Q1 showed no/minimal and highly significant (p < 0.0001) deterioration, respectively. Rectal incontinence, urgency, frequency and abdominal pain showed the largest mean changes (-0.5/-1): risk of severe worsening (deemed to be of clinical significance if ≤ 2) was 3-5 fold higher in the ΔAcute ≤ Q1 vs ΔAcute > Q1 group (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A modest but significant deterioration of two-year patient-reported intestinal symptoms from PNI compared to baseline was found. Patients experiencing more severe acute symptoms are at higher risk of symptom persistence at 2 years, with a much larger prevalence of clinically significant symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Oncología por Radiación , Masculino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Pelvis/efectos de la radiación , Recto/efectos de la radiación , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the persistence of symptoms after radiotherapy (RT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa) and the association with quality of life (QOL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective patient-reported outcome (PRO) from a multi-institutional study on PCa treated with radical RT (2010-2014) was analysed. Data was collected at baseline (BL) and follow-ups (FUPs) up to 5 years. Patients with BL and ≥3 late FUPs (≥6 months) were analysed. PRO was scored by means of the IPSS and ICIQ-SF (urinary), LENT-SOMA (gastrointestinal [GI]), and EORTC-C30 (pain, insomnia, fatigue, and QOL) questionnaires. Symptoms were defined 'persistent' if the median score over FUPs was ≥3 (urinary) or ≥2 (GI, pain, insomnia, and fatigue), and worse than BL. Different thresholds were chosen to have enough events for each symptom. QOL was linearly transformed on a continuous scale (0-100). Linear-mixed models were used to identify significant differences between groups with and without persistent symptoms including age, smoking status, previous abdominal surgery, and diabetes as confounders. Mean QOL differences between groups were evaluated longitudinally over FUPs. RESULTS: The analysis included 293 patients. Persistent urinary symptoms ranged from 2% (straining) to 12% (weak stream, and nocturia). Gastrointestinal symptoms ranged from 7% (rectal pain, and incontinence) to 30% (urgency). Proportions of pain, insomnia, and fatigue were 6, 13, and 18%. Significant QOL differences of small-to-medium clinical relevance were found for urinary incontinence, frequency, urgency, and nocturia. Among GI symptoms, rectal pain and incontinence showed small-to-medium differences. Fatigue was associated with the largest differences. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis showed that symptoms after RT for PCa occur with different persistence and their association with QOL varies in magnitude. A number of persistent urinary and GI symptoms showed differences in a comparable range. Urinary incontinence and frequency, rectal pain, and faecal incontinence more often had significant associations. Fatigue was also prevalent and associated with largely deteriorated QOL.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales , Nocturia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Enfermedades del Recto , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Incontinencia Urinaria , Masculino , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Próstata , Estudios Prospectivos , Nocturia/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Incontinencia Urinaria/complicaciones , Dolor , Fatiga , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Importance: Although active surveillance for patients with low-risk prostate cancer (LRPC) has been recommended for years, its adoption at the population level is often limited. Objective: To make active surveillance available for patients with LRPC using a research framework and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes between those who receive active surveillance vs radical treatments at diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, prospective cohort study was designed by a large multidisciplinary group of specialists and patients' representatives. The study was conducted within all 18 urology centers and 7 radiation oncology centers in the Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta Regional Oncology Network in Northwest Italy (approximate population, 4.5 million). Participants included patients with a new diagnosis of LRPC from June 2015 to December 2021. Data were analyzed from January to May 2023. Exposure: At diagnosis, all patients were informed of the available treatment options by the urologist and received an information leaflet describing the benefits and risks of active surveillance compared with active treatments, either radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiation treatment (RT). Patients choosing active surveillance were actively monitored with regular prostate-specific antigen testing, clinical examinations, and a rebiopsy at 12 months. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes of interest were proportion of patients choosing active surveillance or radical treatments, overall survival, and, for patients in active surveillance, treatment-free survival. Comparisons were analyzed with multivariable logistic or Cox models, considering centers as clusters. Results: A total of 852 male patients (median [IQR] age, 70 [64-74] years) were included, and 706 patients (82.9%) chose active surveillance, with an increasing trend over time; 109 patients (12.8%) chose RP, and 37 patients (4.3%) chose RT. Median (IQR) follow-up was 57 (41-76) months. Worse prostate cancer prognostic factors were negatively associated with choosing active surveillance (eg, stage T2a vs T1c: odds ratio [OR], 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.93), while patients who were older (eg, age ≥75 vs <65 years: OR, 4.27; 95% CI, 1.98-9.22), had higher comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 vs 0: OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.02-3.85), underwent an independent revision of the first prostate biopsy (OR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.26-4.38) or underwent a multidisciplinary assessment (OR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.38-5.11) were more likely to choose active surveillance vs active treatment. After adjustment, center at which a patient was treated continued to be an important factor in the choice of treatment (intraclass correlation coefficient, 18.6%). No differences were detected in overall survival between active treatment and active surveillance. Treatment-free survival in the active surveillance cohort was 59.0% (95% CI, 54.8%-62.9%) at 24 months, 54.5% (95% CI, 50.2%-58.6%) at 36 months, and 47.0% (95% CI, 42.2%-51.7%) at 48 months. Conclusions and Relevance: In this population-based cohort study of patients with LRPC, a research framework at system level as well as favorable prognostic factors, a multidisciplinary approach, and an independent review of the first prostate biopsy at patient-level were positively associated with high uptake of active surveillance, a practice largely underused before this study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Espera Vigilante , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Antígeno Prostático EspecíficoRESUMEN
Introduction: We hypothesized that increasing the pelvic integral dose (ID) and a higher dose per fraction correlate with worsening fatigue and functional outcomes in localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Methods: The study design was a retrospective analysis of two prospective observational cohorts, REQUITE (development, n=543) and DUE-01 (validation, n=228). Data were available for comorbidities, medication, androgen deprivation therapy, previous surgeries, smoking, age, and body mass index. The ID was calculated as the product of the mean body dose and body volume. The weekly ID accounted for differences in fractionation. The worsening (end of radiotherapy versus baseline) of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 scores in physical/role/social functioning and fatigue symptom scales were evaluated, and two outcome measures were defined as worsening in ≥2 (WS2) or ≥3 (WS3) scales, respectively. The weekly ID and clinical risk factors were tested in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results: In REQUITE, WS2 was seen in 28% and WS3 in 16% of patients. The median weekly ID was 13.1 L·Gy/week [interquartile (IQ) range 10.2-19.3]. The weekly ID, diabetes, the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and the dose per fraction were significantly associated with WS2 [AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) =0.59; 95% CI 0.55-0.63] and WS3 (AUC=0.60; 95% CI 0.55-0.64). The prevalence of WS2 (15.3%) and WS3 (6.1%) was lower in DUE-01, but the median weekly ID was higher (15.8 L·Gy/week; IQ range 13.2-19.3). The model for WS2 was validated with reduced discrimination (AUC=0.52 95% CI 0.47-0.61), The AUC for WS3 was 0.58. Conclusion: Increasing the weekly ID and the dose per fraction lead to the worsening of fatigue and functional outcomes in patients with localized PCa treated with EBRT.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Baseline urinary incontinence (UI) strongly modulates UI recovery after adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy (ART/SRT), inducing clinicians to postpone it "as much as possible", maximizing UI recovery but possibly reducing efficacy. This series aims to analyze the trend of UI recovery and its predictors at radiotherapy start. METHODS: A population of 408 patients treated with ART/SRT enrolled in a cohort study (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02803086) aimed at developing predictive models of radiation-induced toxicities. Self-reported UI and personality traits, evaluated by means of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-SF) and Eysenck Personality Questionnaire - Revised (EPQ-R) questionnaires, were assessed at ART/SRT start. Several endpoints based on baseline ICIQ-SF were investigated: frequency and amount of urine loss (ICIQ3 and ICIQ4, respectively), "objective" UI (ICIQ3 + 4), "subjective" UI (ICIQ5), and "TOTAL" UI (ICIQ3 +4 + 5). The relationship between each endpoint and time from prostatectomy to radiotherapy (TTRT) was investigated. The association between clinical and personality variables and each endpoint was tested by uni- and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: TTRT was the strongest predictor for all endpoints (p-values ≤ 0.001); all scores improved between 4 and 8 months after prostatectomy, without any additional long-term recovery. Neuroticism independently predicted subjective UI, TOTAL UI, and daily frequency. CONCLUSIONS: Early UI recovery mostly depends on TTRT with no further improvement after 8 months from prostatectomy. Higher levels of neuroticism may overestimate UI.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To assess bowel dose-volume relationships for acute patient-reported intestinal symptoms of patients treated with whole-pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy (WPRT) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complete data of 415 patients enrolled in a multi institute, prospective trial (#NCT02803086) treated with radical (31%), adjuvant (33%) and salvage (36%) intent at a median dose to pelvic nodes/lymph-nodal area of 53 Gy were available. The most severe changes between baseline and radiotherapy mid-point/end toxicity assessed by Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (only Bowel Domain) were considered (ΔIBDQ). The 25th percentile values of these score variations were set as endpoints. DVHs of bowel loops for patients with/without toxicity were compared for each endpoint, having excluded patients with baseline scores <5 (rate ranging between 2% and 7% according to the endpoint): the resulting best dosimetric predictors were combined with selected clinical parameters through multivariate logistic regression (MVA) to derive predictive models. RESULTS: ΔIBDQ ranged between 0.2-1.5 points considering separately each IBDQ symptom. Only four symptoms (IBDQ1 = frequency, IBDQ5 = diarrhea, IBDQ17 = gas passage, IBDQ24 = urgency) showed a median worsening ≥ 1; DVH predicted the risk of worse symptoms for IBDQ5, IBDQ24 and overall Bowel Domain. At multivariable analysis DVHs (best cut-off: V46Gy ≥80 cc) and baseline scores (Odd-Ratio:0.35-0.65) were independently associated to the three end-points. The resulting models were reliable (H&L test: 0.453-0.956), well calibrated (calibration plot: slope = 0.922-1.069, R2 = 0.725-0.875) and moderately discriminative (Area Under the Curve:0.628-0.669). A bootstrap-based validation confirmed their robustness. CONCLUSION: Constraining the bowel loops (V46 < 80 cc) may reduce the risk of several moderate intestinal symptoms, with a much greater impact for patients with lower IBDQ baseline scores.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Pelvis , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Objective: To investigate predictors of patient-reported urinary incontinence (PRUI) in the first 2 years after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy (PORT) with particular emphasis on possible dose-effect relationships. Patients and Methods: Two-hundred-thirteen patients, whose clinical and dosimetric data were prospectively collected within a registered multi-institutional cohort study, underwent PORT with adjuvant (n = 106) or salvage (n = 107) intent with conventional (n = 123, prescribed dose to the prostatic bed: 66.6-79.8Gy in 1.8-2.0Gy/fr) or moderately hypo- (n = 90, 65.8-76.8Gy in 2.1-2.7Gy/fr) fractionation during the period 2011-2017. PRUI was evaluated through the ICIQ-SF questionnaire filled in at baseline and every 6 months thereafter. The analysis focused on three ICIQ-based clinically relevant endpoints: (a) very frequent leakage (FREQUENCY, ICIQ3 score >3), (b) moderate to severe amount of urine loss (AMOUNT, ICIQ4>2) (c) objective severe symptoms (OBJECTIVE, ICIQ3+4>5). Predictors of the incidence within 2 years for the three endpoints were investigated focusing only on patients without endpoint symptoms at baseline. A uni-variable logistic regression analysis was performed in order to determine the best dose metrics describing PRUI risk in terms of 2-Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) calculated with different α/ß values reported in the literature (0.8, 3, 5Gy), and to identify the most significant clinical variables. Variables showing p < 0.20 at uni-variable analysis were entered into a backward stepwise multi-variable logistic regression analysis. Lastly, the goodness of fit and model calibration were evaluated and internally validated. Results: Patients without symptoms at baseline experienced (a), (b), and/or (c) within 2 years in 41/130 (32%), 40/192 (21%), and 41/129 (32%) of the cases, respectively. EQD2 for α/ß = 0.8Gy was the best dose metric associated with PRUI. Multi-variable analysis identified baseline incontinence levels as the strongest predictor for all endpoints (p < 0.006). Both FREQUENCY and OBJECTIVE were significantly influenced also by EQD2(α/ß = 0.8Gy). The goodness of fit was excellent, as was the calibration; internal calibration confirmed apparent performance. Conclusion: Baseline mild urinary incontinence symptoms strongly modulate the 2-year risk of PRUI. In addition, FREQUENCY is characterized by a marked dose-effect relationship also influencing the trend of OBJECTIVE, with results more reliable than AMOUNT as an objective index. A strong impact of fractionation on severe PRUI after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy also emerged.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Urinary incontinence following radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa) has a relevant impact on patient's quality of life. The aim of the study was to assess the unknown dose-effect relationship for late patient-reported urinary incontinence (LPRUI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were enrolled within the multi-centric study DUE01. Clinical and dosimetry data including the prescribed 2Gy equivalent dose (EQD2) were prospectively collected. LPRUI was evaluated through the ICIQ-SF questionnaire filled in by the patients at RT start/end and therefore every 6months. Patients were treated with conventional (74-80Gy, 1.8-2Gy/fr) or moderately hypo-fractionated RT (65-75.2Gy, 2.2-2.7Gy/fr) in 5 fractions/week with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Six different end-points of 3-year LPRUI, including or not patient's perception (respectively, subjective and objective end-points), were considered. Multivariable logistic models were developed for each end-point. RESULTS: Data of 298 patients were analyzed. The incidence of the most severe end-point (ICIQ-SF>12) was 5.1%. EQD2 calculated with alpha-beta=0.8Gy showed the best performance in fitting data: the risk of LPRUI markedly increased for EQD2>80Gy. Previous abdominal/pelvic surgery and previous TURP were the clinical factors more significantly predictive of LPRUI. Models showed excellent performances in terms of goodness-of-fit and calibration, confirmed by bootstrap-based internal validation. When included in the analyses, baseline symptoms were a major predictor for 5 out of six end-points. CONCLUSIONS: LPRUI after RT for PCa dramatically depends on EQD2 and few clinical factors. Results are consistent with a larger than expected impact of moderate hypo-fractionation on the risk of LPRUI. As expected, baseline symptoms, as captured by ICIQ-SF, are associated to an increased risk of LPRUI.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Anciano , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/efectos adversos , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
AIM: To assess the predictors of the onset of impotence 1 year after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a multi-centric prospective study, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire-based potency of 91 hormone-naïve and potent patients (IIEF1-5 > 11 before radiotherapy) was assessed. At the time of this analysis, information on potency 1 year after treatment was available for 62 of 91 patients (42 treated with hypofractionation: 2.35-2.65 Gy/fr, 70-74.2 Gy; 20 with conventional fractionation: 74-78 Gy). Prospectively collected individual information and Dmax/Dmean to the penile bulb were available; the corresponding 2 Gy-equivalent values (EQD2_max/EQD2_mean) were also considered. Predictors of 1year impotency were assessed through uni- and multi-variable backward logistic regression: The best cut-off values discriminating between potent and impotent patients were assessed by ROC analyses. The discriminative power of the models and goodness-of-fit were measured by AUC analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H&L) test. RESULTS: At 1year follow-up, 26 of 62 patients (42 %) became impotent. The only predictive variables were baseline IIEF1-5 values (best cut-off baseline IIEF1-5 ≥ 19), Dmax ≥ 68.5 Gy and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy. The risk of 1year impotence may be predicted by a two-variable model including baseline IIEF1-5 (OR: 0.80, p = 0.003) and EQD2_max ≥ 74.2 Gy (OR: 4.1, p = 0.022). The AUC of the model was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87, p = 0.0007, H&L: p = 0.62). The 1year risk of impotency after high-dose radiotherapy in potent men depends on the EQD2_max to the penile bulb and on baseline IIEF1-5 values. CONCLUSION: A significant reduction in the risk may be expected mainly when sparing the bulb in patients with no/mild baseline impotency (IIEF1-5 > 17).
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pene/efectos de la radiación , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Análisis de Regresión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this work is to develop an algorithm to predict recurrence in prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy, getting up to a prognostic power higher than traditional D'Amico risk classification. METHODS: Two thousand four hundred ninety-three men belonging to the EUREKA-2 retrospective multi-centric database on prostate cancer and treated with external-beam radiotherapy as primary treatment comprised the study population. A Cox regression time to PSA failure analysis was performed in univariate and multivariate settings, evaluating the predictive ability of age, pre-treatment PSA, clinical-radiological staging, Gleason score and percentage of positive cores at biopsy (%PC). The accuracy of this model was checked with bootstrapping statistics. Subgroups for all the variables' combinations were combined to classify patients into five different "Candiolo" risk-classes for biochemical Progression Free Survival (bPFS); thereafter, they were also applied to clinical PFS (cPFS), systemic PFS (sPFS) and Prostate Cancer Specific Survival (PCSS), and compared to D'Amico risk grouping performances. RESULTS: The Candiolo classifier splits patients in 5 risk-groups with the following 10-years bPFS, cPFS, sPFS and PCSS: for very-low-risk 90 %, 94 %, 100 % and 100 %; for low-risk 74 %, 88 %, 94 % and 98 %; for intermediate-risk 60 %, 82 %, 91 % and 92 %; for high-risk 43 %, 55 %, 80 % and 89 % and for very-high-risk 14 %, 38 %, 56 % and 70 %. Our classifier outperforms D'Amico risk classes for all the end-points evaluated, with concordance indexes of 71.5 %, 75.5 %, 80 % and 80.5 % versus 63 %, 65.5 %, 69.5 % and 69 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our classification tool, combining five clinical and easily available parameters, seems to better stratify patients in predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy compared to the traditional D'Amico risk classes.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia/métodos , Anciano , Algoritmos , Biopsia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Periodo Preoperatorio , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Análisis de Regresión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Prospectively assessing clinical/dosimetry factors affecting the acute worsening of urinary functionality after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. MATERIAL/METHODS: DUE01 population was considered, including patients treated with conventional or moderate hypo-fractionation (2.2-2.7 Gy/fr). Relevant clinical factors were collected, urinary symptoms were self-reported through the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) before and at the end of radiotherapy; while absolute weekly dose-surface histograms (DSHw) were chosen as dosimetry descriptors. An IPSS increase of at least 10 and 15 points (ΔIPSS ⩾ 10 and ΔIPSS ⩾ 15) were chosen as endpoints. Patients with baseline IPSS>20 were excluded. Relevant factors were chosen through a bootstrap-based in silico methodology. RESULTS: Complete information was available for 380 patients: 77/380 (20%) and 28/380 (7%) with ΔIPSS ⩾ 10 and ΔIPSS ⩾ 15, respectively. Neoadjuvant hormone was protective (OR=0.49 and 0.69). DSHw at 8.5 Gy/week and 12 Gy/week were risk factors, with additional risk for patients who use cardiovascular drugs and anti-hypercholesterolemia drugs. In the hypo-fractionated subgroup (n=209) the role of cardiovascular drugs (OR=2.16) for ΔIPSS ⩾ 10 and anti-hypercholesterolemia drugs (OR=2.80) for ΔIPSS⩾15, together with DSHw (10 Gy/week and 12.5 Gy/week, respectively), was confirmed. CONCLUSION: Current study shows a dose-surface/volume effect for acute large worsening of urinary functionality; several clinical variables largely impact the risk and especially all the factors related with vascular diseases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Trastornos Urinarios/etiología , Anciano , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Radiometría , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
AIMS: To report the 5- and 10-year results of accelerated hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with concomitant boost to the tumor bed in 83 consecutive patients with early breast cancer aged >70 years. METHODS: All patients were treated with breast conservation and hypofractionated WBRT. The prescription dose to the whole breast was 45 Gy (2.25 Gy/20 fractions) with an additional daily concomitant boost of 0.25 Gy to the surgical cavity (2.5 Gy/20 fractions up to 50 Gy). The maximum detected toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. We considered as skin toxicity: erythema, edema, desquamation, ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis, telangiectasia, fibrosis-induration, hyperpigmentation, retraction and atrophy. Cosmetic results were assessed as set by the Harvard criteria. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 60 months (range 36-88), no local recurrence was observed. The maximum detected acute skin toxicity was G0 in 57% of patients, G1 in 40% and G2 in 3%. Late skin and subcutaneous toxicity was generally mild with no ≥G3 events. The cosmetic results were excellent in 69% of patients, good in 22%, fair in 5%, and poor in 4%. CONCLUSIONS: The present results support the use of hypofractionation employing a concomitant boost to the lumpectomy cavity in women aged >70 years. This is a convenient treatment option for both this type of population and health-care providers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Mama/efectos de la radiación , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Clasificación del Tumor , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Piel/patología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This work aims to definitely show the ability of percentage of positive biopsy cores (%PC) to independently predict biochemical outcome beyond traditional pretreatment risk-factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with radiotherapy. METHODS: A cohort of 2493 men belonging to the EUREKA-2 retrospective multicentric database on (PCa) and treated with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) as primary treatment comprised the study population (median follow-up 50 months). A Cox regression time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure analysis was performed to evaluate the predictive power of %PC, both in univariate and multivariate settings, with age, pretreatment PSA, clinical-radiological staging, bioptic Gleason Score (bGS), RT dose and RT +/- ADT as covariates. RESULTS: P statistics for %PC is lower than 0.001 both in univariate and multivariate models. %PC as a continuous variable yields an AUC of 69% in ROC curve analysis for biochemical relapse. Four classes of %PC (1-20%, 21-50%, 51-80% and 81-100%) distinctly split patients for risk of biochemical relapse (overall log-rank test P<0.0001), with biochemical progression free survival (bPFS) at 5-years ranging from 88% to 58% and 10-years bPFS ranging from 80% to 38%. CONCLUSIONS: We strongly affirm the usefulness of %PC information beyond main risk factors (PSA, staging and bGS) in predicting biochemical recurrence after EBRT for PCa. The stratification of patients according to %PC may be valuable to further discriminate cases with favourable or adverse prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: A prospective trial started in 2010, aiming at developing models for urinary toxicity and erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer. This analysis is finalised at highlighting correlations between clinical/dosimetric factors and acute urinary specific symptoms, as measured by single questions of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). MATERIALS/METHODS: IPSS was prospectively collected before and at the end of radiotherapy; absolute weekly bladder dose-surface histograms (DSHw) were chosen as dosimetric descriptors. Relevant clinical factors were prospectively gathered. Backward feature selection was used to identify variables to be included in logistic models for moderate-severe (scores⩾4) urinary symptoms. RESULTS: Complete data of 262 patients (120 conventional fractionation, 142 hypofractionation) were available. Smoking was a strong predictor for feeling of incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency and straining; neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and use of antihypertensive drugs were risk factors for intermittency and weak stream, respectively. The baseline score was a major predictor for all symptoms with the exception of intermittency. DSHw were correlated to increased risk of frequency, intermittency, urgency and nocturia. Most models showed moderate-high discrimination (AUC≈0.60-0.79). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking and other clinical and dosimetric factors predict for specific moderate-severe acute urinary symptoms; baseline condition heavily modulated the risk in most endpoints.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Trastornos Urinarios/etiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Braquiterapia/efectos adversos , Braquiterapia/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
AIM: To report on clinical outcomes of prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy employing a simultaneous integrated boost strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 104 patients affected with prostate cancer was treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy using a hypofractionated schedule and a simultaneous integrated boost consisting of 70 Gy (2.5 Gy daily) to the prostate gland, 63 Gy to the seminal vesicles (2.25 Gy daily) and 53.2 Gy to the pelvic nodes (1.9 Gy daily) when needed, delivered in 28 fractions. All patients underwent image-guided radiotherapy procedure consisting of daily cone-beam computed tomography. RESULTS: After a median observation time of 26 (range=15-48) months, the 3-year biochemical failure-free survival was 96.5% [95% confidence interval (CI)=89%-98%], 3-year cancer-specific survival was 98.5% (95% CI=91%-99%) and 3-year overall survival was 96.5% (95% CI=89%-98%). The gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity profiles were mild with fewer than 2% of grade 3 events. Erectile function was partially affected by radiation in men potent at baseline. CONCLUSION: Hypofractionation delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and a simultaneous integrated boost approach proved to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with prostate cancer. Patients with a preserved baseline erectile function experience a decrease in functionality correlated with the mean dose received by penile bulb.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico/métodos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Radiation therapy delivered with hypofractionation, which involves the delivery of a higher dose per fraction in fewer fractions (generally with a lower total nominal dose) over a shorter overall treatment time, is an established therapeutic option at least for a selected group of early breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. Optimal delivery of the tumor bed boost dose in terms of timing, fractionation, and total dose whenever a hypofractionated schedule is employed has yet to be established. We herein present a review of the current evidence on the role of boost integration in whole breast radiotherapy.
RESUMEN
We herein report on a case of synchronous bilateral breast cancer patient undergoing adjuvant intensity-modulated whole breast with static angle tomotherapy (TomoDirect). The patient was treated with a hypofractionated schedule employing a simultaneous integrated boost approach. Radiotherapy schedule was 45 Gy/20 fractions (2.25 Gy daily) to the bilateral whole breast and 50 Gy/20 fractions (2.5 Gy daily) to the 2 lumpectomy cavities. Treatment was delivered over 4 weeks. Dosimetric results were robust with consistent target coverage and adequate normal tissue avoidance. Treatment was generally well-tolerated and acute toxicity profile was mild. The present report highlights the promising clinical feasibility of TomoDirect for bilateral breast irradiation.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/radioterapia , Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Primarias Múltiples/cirugía , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and response to palliative radiotherapy delivered with static ports of tomotherapy--TomoDirect (TD) in patients affected with painful bone metastases from solid tumors. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 130 patients (185 osseous lesions) was treated between 2010 and 2013 with TD. Three fractionation schedules were employed according to clinical decision-making (3 Gy × 10; 4 Gy × 5; 8 Gy × 1). Pain response was investigated at 2 weeks and 2 months (for evaluable patients). The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) was used to assess pain. Response rates to radiotherapy were calculated following the criteria of the International Bone Metastases Consensus Group (IBMCG), accounting for the use of concomitant analgesics (response: complete or partial; non-response: stable pain, pain progression or "other"). Analgesic consumption was recalculated into the daily oral morphine-equivalent dose (OMED). RESULTS: Most of the patients had 1-2 bone metastases (91); those with multiple lesions mostly had a metachronous presentation (60%). Synchronous lesions were mainly approached with multiple plans (63%). Most treatments employed 3-4 fields (77%). Treatment times ranged from 255 to 939 s depending on fractionation, fields, and target lesions number. At 2 weeks, the median self-reported worst pain decreased significantly as median oral morphine-equivalent dose regardless of fractionation used. The response rate according to the IBMCG-based response categories ranged from 45 to 55%. Pain relief duration seems (response at 2 months) slightly inferior with the single fraction approach, with a higher re-treatment rate. At 2 weeks, the median self-reported worst pain and OMED significantly decreased regardless of fractionation (response rate: 49-55%). Pain relief decreased at 2 months, especially for single fraction (higher re-treatment rate). CONCLUSION: TD is a valid option to deliver palliative radiotherapy for painful bone metastases from solid tumors.