Efficacy of an automatic electric toothbrush with nylon bristles in dental plaque removal: a cross-over randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this single-use, five-treatment, five-period, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a new Y-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (Y-brush) compared to a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U-brush), a manual toothbrushing procedure (for 45 and 120 s), and no brushing (negative control). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible participants were volunteer students randomized to the treatments in the five periods of the study. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing while the secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. RESULTS: After brushing procedures, manual toothbrushing (120 s) showed a statistically significant reduction in FMPS than Y-brush (difference 36.9; 95%CI 29.6 to 44.1, p < 0.0001), U-brush (difference 42.3; 95%CI 35.1 to 49.6, p < 0.0001), manual brushing (45 s) (difference 13.8; 95%CI 6.5 to 21.1, p < 0.0001), and No brushing (difference 46.6; 95%CI 39.3 to 53.9, p < 0.0001). Y-brush was significantly more effective than No brushing (difference 9.8; 95%CI 2.5 to 17.0, p = 0.0030), while there was no significant difference compared to U- brush. Similar results were obtained for the differences in the Clean Mouth VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Y-brush was significantly more effective than no brushing (negative control) in removing dental plaque. When compared to manual toothbrushing for both 45 and 120 s, however, Y-brush was less effective in dental plaque removal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Modified design of automatic toothbrushing devices could improve plaque reduction, especially in patients with intellectual disabilities or motor difficulties.

Comparison of the effects on facial soft tissues produced by rapid and slow maxillary expansion using stereophotogrammetry: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on facial soft tissues produced by maxillary expansion generated by rapid maxillary expansion (RME) versus slow maxillary expansion (SME). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse discrepancy between the two arches of at least 3 mm. A conventional RME screw was compared to a new expansion screw (Leaf expander) designed to produce SME. Both screws were incorporated in a fixed expander. The primary outcome was the difference of the facial tissue changes in the nasal area measured on facial 3D images captured immediately before application of the expander (T0) and after one year of retention, immediately after the expander removal (T1). Secondary outcomes were soft tissue changes of other facial regions (mouth, lips, and chin). Analysis of covariance was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were allocated to the RME group, and 14 patients were allocated to the SME group. There were no dropouts. Nasal width change showed a difference between the two groups (1.3 mm greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.4 to 2.2, P = 0.005). Also, intercanthal width showed a difference between treatments (0.7 mm greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.0 to 1.3, P = 0.044). Nasal columella width, mouth width, nasal tip angle, upper lip angle, and lower lip angle did not show any statistically significant differences. The Y-axis (anterior-posterior) components of the nasal landmark showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (0.5 mm of forward displacement greater in the RME group, 95% CI from 0.0 to 1.2, P = 0.040). Also, Z-axis (superior-inferior) components of the lower lip landmark was statistically significant (0.9 mm of downward displacement in favor of the RME group, 95% CI from 0.1 to 1.7, P = 0.027). All the other comparisons of the three-dimensional assessments were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: RME produced significant facial soft tissue changes when compared to SME. RME induced greater increases in both nasal and intercanthal widths (1.3 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively). These findings, though statistically significant, probably are not clinically relevant. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN18263886. Registered 8 November 2016, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN18263886?q=Franchi&filters=&sort=&offset=2&totalResults=2&page=1&pageSize=10.

Long-term effects produced by early treatment of Class III malocclusion with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask followed by fixed appliances: A multicentre retro-prospective controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the short- and long-term dentoskeletal effects of early Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask (RME/FM) followed by fixed appliances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 44 patients (27 females, 17 males) treated consecutively with RME/FM were included from the archives of 3 centres. Three lateral cephalograms were available: T0 (before the start of RME/FM therapy, mean age 8.1 ± 1.8 years), T1 (immediately after RME/FM, mean age 9.8 ± 1.6 years), and T2 (long-term observation, mean age 19.5 ± 1.6 years). A control group of 17 untreated Class III subjects (12 females and 5 males) also was selected. Between-group statistical comparisons were performed with ANCOVA. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences for any of the cephalometric variables were found at T0. In the short term, the treated group showed significant improvements in ANB (+2.9°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm), SNA (+1.8°) and SNB (-1.1°). A significant closure of CoGoMe angle (-1.3°) associated with smaller increments along Co-Gn (-2.4 mm) also was found together with a significant increase in intermaxillary divergence (+1.3°). In the long-term, significant improvements in ANB (+2.6°), Wits appraisal (+2.7 mm) and SNB (-1.7°) were recorded together with a significant closure of the CoGoMe angle (-2.9°). No significant long-term changes in vertical skeletal relationships were found. CONCLUSIONS: RME/FM therapy was effective in improving Class III dentoskeletal relationships in the short term. These changes remained stable in the long-term due mainly to favourable mandibular changes.

Long-Term Assessment of Treatment Timing for Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Facemask Therapy Followed by Fixed Appliances: A Multicenter Retro-Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: to determine the role of treatment timing in the long-term effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy (RME/FM) in Class III patients. METHODS: This study compared two sample groups treated with RME/FM followed by fixed appliances: the early prepubertal group (EPG) (17 patients; mean age before treatment (T0), 5.8 ± 0.7 years; range, 4.3-6.9 years) and the late prepubertal group (LPG) (17 patients; mean age at T0, 10.1 ± 0.8 years; range, 9.0-11.1 years). Lateral cephalograms for the two groups were examined before treatment (T0) and at a long-term observation (T1) (EPG, 19.8 ± 1.0 years; LPG, 21.0 ± 2.1 years). Independent sample t-tests were performed to compare the two groups at T0 and T1. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found for any of the cephalometric variables at T0, except for the total mandibular length, overjet, and inclination of the maxillary incisors to the palatal plane, which were greater in the LPG. At T1, no statistically significant differences were detected for any of the cephalometric variables. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant long-term differences when treating Class III patients with RME/FM, either during an early prepubertal phase (≤7 years of age) or during a late prepubertal phase (≥9 years of age).

Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the conventional alginate impression and the digital impression taken with an intraoral scanner of both dental arches in children, using a randomized crossover design. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a monocentric, controlled, superiority, randomized, crossover, open study. METHODS: Twenty-four orthodontic patients between 6 and 11 years of age underwent intraoral scanning (TRIOS 3; 3Shape) and alginate impression of both dental arches with an interval of 1 week between the two procedures. Participants were recruited from September 2021 to March 2022 and the study was completed in April 2022. Impression time for the two procedures was compared. Patients were asked which one of the two impression procedures they preferred. A questionnaire including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for comfort, pain, gag reflex and difficulty in breathing, was administered to the patients. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 24 patients preferred digital impression (75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55% to 88%; P = .014). Scanning time was significantly shorter than alginate impression time (difference -118 seconds; 95% CI: -138 to -99; P < .001). Comfort was significantly higher for digital impression (difference 1.7; 95% CI: 0.5 to 2.8; P = .007). There was no difference in pain (difference -0.2; 95% CI: -1.5 to 1.0; P = .686) while gag reflex and breathing difficulties were smaller for digital impression (gag reflex difference -2.5; 95% CI: -4.0 to -0.9; P = .004 and breathing difficulties difference -1.5; 95% CI: -2.5 to -0.5; P = -.004). CONCLUSIONS: Digital impression is preferred by children aged 6-11 years and it is significantly faster in acquisition time than conventional alginate impression. REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT04220957 on January 7th, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04220957).

Effects produced by the facemask with and without skeletal anchorage for the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Skeletally anchored facemask has been proposed to maximize skeletal effects and minimize dental effects in the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the dento-skeletal effects produced by the facemask with or without skeletal anchorage for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and OpenGrey were used for the electronic search without language, publication status, and year restrictions. Only RCTs were included. Inclusion criteria were: growing patients (age under 18 years) with Class III malocclusion, with indications for treatment with the facemask. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. GRADE statement was executed. The mean of differences (MD) and the risk ratio (RR) were used. RESULTS: Three articles with a total of 123 patients were included. One article was at low risk of bias while two were at high risk of bias. There were no significant differences between the two groups in ANB angle, Wits appraisal, SNB angle, and SN-MP angle. SNA angle was significantly increased in the skeletally anchored facemask (pooled MD = 0.80 favouring skeletal anchorage, 95% CI from 0.29 to 1.31, P = 0.002, I2 = 12 per cent, three studies, GRADE moderate). The U1-SN angle was significantly reduced in the skeletally anchored facemask (pooled MD = -5.91 favouring skeletal anchorage, 95% CI from -7.64 to -4.27, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0 per cent, two studies, GRADE moderate). There were significantly less complications in tooth-anchored facemask (pooled RR = 7.98 favouring dental anchorage, 95 per cent CI from 1.04 to 61.27, P = 0.05, I2 = 0 per cent, two studies, GRADE low). LIMITATIONS: Few RCTs (three) were included, and two studies were at high risk of bias. There were no long-term RCTs comparing skeletally anchored facemask with dental-anchored facemask. Only Asiatic patients were included in this systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletally anchored facemask was associated to a greater increase of SNA angle at the end of treatment though clinically not significant. Facemask with skeletal anchorage determined a reduced inclination of maxillary incisors compared to dental-anchored facemask with greater risks of complications. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO register (CRD42020221982).

Comparison of rapid versus slow maxillary expansion on patient-reported outcome measures in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No systematic review and meta-analysis are present in the literature comparing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rapid maxillary expansion (RME) versus slow maxillary expansion (SME) in growing patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to compare PROMs in RME versus SME in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and OpenGrey was conducted. Only RCTs were included. Inclusion criteria were: growing patients in the mixed dentition or early permanent dentition, mild-to-moderate maxillary transverse deficiency, dental crowding, treatment with fixed expanders for rapid and slow maxillary expansion. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. GRADE statement was performed. The mean of the differences (MD) and the risk ratio (RR) were used for the aggregation of data. A random effect model was applied. RESULTS: Two articles with a total of 157 patients were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. One article was at low risk of bias, while one was at risk of bias with some concerns. Pain presence was less, though not statistically significant, in SME patients (RR = 2.02, 95%CI from 0.55 to 7.49, P = 0.29, I2 = 95%, 2 studies, GRADE very low). Pain intensity was significantly lower in SME appliance in the first week of treatment (pooled MD = 0.86 favoring SME, 95%CI from 0.47 to 1.26, P < 0.0001, I2 = 6%, 2 studies, GRADE moderate). There were no significant differences between the two groups in difficulty in speaking, difficulty in swallowing, hypersalivation, difficulty in hygiene, and patient and parent satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Pain intensity was significantly lower in SME compared to RME during the first week of treatment. For the following weeks, there were no differences in pain between the two protocols.

Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion / Effets dento-squelettiques de la force extra-orale sur gouttière maxillaire dans la correction précoce des malocclusions de classe II

Objective: To compare dentoskeletal changes produced by the maxillary splint headgear and cervical headgear appliance during the early phase of Class II treatment, specially the initial overjet and upper incisors position. Subjects and methods: In this retrospective study, 28 Class II patients treated with the maxillary splint headgear (maxillary splint headgear or MSG, mean age 10.1 ± 1.9 years) and 28 Class II patients treated with cervical headgear (cervical headgear group or CHG, mean age 9.5 ± 1.9 years) were evaluated before and after treatment. Statistical comparisons between the two groups for cephalometric measurements at T1 and for T2-T1 changes were performed by means of independent sample t tests. Results: The MSG showed a significantly greater reduction of the overjet in comparison to the CHG (-2.4 mm and -0.7 mm, respectively) and a significantly greater maxillary incisor uprighting (-1.8 mm and 0.4 mm, respectively). In the MSG, overjet correction was due mainly to mandibular advancement (3.5 mm), while the correction of molar relationship (3.9 mm) was 64% skeletal and 36% dentoalveolar. In the CHG, the overjet correction was also more skeletal, due to mandibular growth (1.8 mm), while correction of molar relationship (3.5 mm) was 63% dentoalveolar and 37% skeletal. Conclusions: Both groups showed favorable skeletal mandibular changes, which was more significant in the MSG. Regarding tooth movement, the maxillary splint headgear was more effective in uprighting upper incisors and reducing the overjet than cervical headgear appliance.

Objectif: L'objectif de cet article était de comparer les changements dento-squelettiques produits par la force extra-orale sur gouttière maxillaire et la force extra-orale cervicale pendant la phase précoce du traitement de classe II, en particulier au niveau du surplomb initial et de la position des incisives supérieures. Matériels et méthodes: Dans cette étude rétrospective, les cas de 28 patients en classe II traités avec la force extra-orale sur gouttière maxillaire (maxillary splint headgear ou MSG, âge moyen 10,1 ± 1,9 ans) et de 28 patients en classe II traités avec la force extra-orale à traction cervicale (cervical headgear group ou CHG, âge moyen 9,5 ± 1,9 ans) ont été étudiés avant et après le traitement. Les comparaisons statistiques entre les deux groupes pour les mesures céphalométriques à T1 et pour les changements entre T2 et T1 ont été effectuées au moyen de tests t d'échantillons indépendants. Résultats: Le MSG a montré une réduction significativement plus importante du surplomb par rapport au CHG (-2,4 mm et -0,7 mm, respectivement) et un redressement significativement plus important des incisives maxillaires (-1,8 mm et 0,4 mm, respectivement). Dans le MSG, la correction du surplomb était principalement due à l'avancement mandibulaire (3,5 mm), tandis que la correction de la relation molaire (3,9 mm) était à 64 % squelettique et à 36 % dento-alvéolaire. Dans le CHG, la correction du surplomb était également plus squelettique, en raison de la croissance mandibulaire (1,8 mm), tandis que la correction de la relation molaire (3,5 mm) était à 63 % dento-alvéolaire et à 37 % squelettique. Conclusions: Les deux groupes ont présenté des modifications squelettiques mandibulaires favorables, qui étaient plus significatives dans le groupe MSG. En ce qui concerne le mouvement des dents, la force extra-orale sur gouttière maxillaire était plus efficace pour redresser les incisives supérieures et réduire le surplomb que la force extra-orale cervicale.

3D Printed Customized Facemask for Maxillary Protraction in the Early Treatment of a Class III Malocclusion: Proof-of-Concept Clinical Case.

In order to improve fit and comfort, a maxillary protraction facemask customized to the patient's anatomy was produced by means of 3D face scanning, digital design and additive manufacturing. An 8-year-old patient in need of early treatment for the Class III malocclusion received a rapid palatal expander and a Petit-type facemask, whose components were digitally designed on a 3D scan of the patient's face. For face scanning, the iPad Pro 2018 tablet (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA) with the Bellus3D DentalPro application (Bellus3D, Campbell, CA, USA) was used. Facemask components were modelled with 3D Blender software. The rests were 3D printed in BioMed Clear biocompatible resin (Formlabs, Somerville, MA, USA), and the bar in stainless steel. For greater comfort, the internal surface of the rests was lined with a polymer gel pad (Silipos, Niagara Falls, NY, USA). The manufacturing procedure of the customized facemask is patented. The patient wore the facemask at night for a period of 9 months. The patient's experience was evaluated with a questionnaire at 1 week, 3, 6, and 10 months of treatment. The customized facemask was well accepted by the patient and obtained the expected treatment outcome. Furthermore, 3D face scanning, 3D modelling and 3D printing allow for the manufacturing of customized facemasks with improved fit and comfort, favoring patient compliance and treatment success.

A retrospective long-term comparison of early RME-facemask versus late Hybrid-Hyrax, alt-RAMEC and miniscrew-supported intraoral elastics in growing Class III patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term dentoskeletal effects of early treatment with banded or bonded RME (Rapid Maxillary Expansion)-Face Mask (RME-FM) versus late treatment with bonded Hybrid-Hyrax, alt-RAMEC (Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Contraction) and intraoral Class III elastics anchored to miniscrew-reinforced-Lower-lingual-Arch (alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA) in growing, maxillary retrognathic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two groups were matched at long-term follow-up retrospectively. Patients received either early RME-FM (n=16, 5 males, 11 females, age T1: 6.5±0.9 years, age T2: 15.8±2.5 years) or late alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA (n=15, 7 males, 8 females, age T1: 12.52±0.94 years, age T2: 16.8±0.9 years). Total follow-up was 9.2±2.3 years and 4.2±0.2 years respectively, including fixed appliances to compete treatment. RESULTS: Both treatments resulted in Class III correction except one unsuccessful case of alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA. Active maxillary protraction was 1.6±0.5years with RME-FM and 0.5 years with alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA being significantly shorter (P<0.001). Values at T2 estimation with multivariate linear regression for correlated multiple outcomes, conditional on baseline estimates, age and sex showed alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA inducing significantly more retroclined lower incisors (mean: -6.11°; 95%CI: -10.66, -1.57; P=0.01), less overbite (mean: -1.28mm; 95%CI: -1.79, -0.761; P<0.001), less maxillo (Co-A)- (mean: -4.54mm; 95%CI: -7.91, -1.16; P=0.01) mandibular (Co-Gn) (mean: -10.5mm; 95%CI: -17.45, -3.55; P=0.003) projections/size, more open gonial angle (mean: 4.93°; 95%CI: 2.27, 7.59; P<0.001), and less S-N length (mean: -5.04mm; 95%CI: -6.57, -3.51; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with either early RME-FM or late Alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA had comparable overall post-pubertal skeletal and overjet corrections. However, the late Alt-RAMEC-HH-LLA showed less correction of dentoalveolar compensations and in particular of the mandibular incisors. The overbite, maxillary and mandibular projection and size were lower and the gonial angle was more open.

Post-pubertal effects of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols for the early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a retrospective controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the stability of the effects of the modified Alt-RAMEC and facial mask (FM) protocol at a post-pubertal observation. METHODS: Twenty-one Class III patients (11 males and 10 females, 6.5 ± 0.7 years) treated consecutively with the Alt-RAMEC/FM approach and presenting with lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), and at post-pubertal observations (T3) were compared with 22 Class III patients (9 males and 13 females, 6.9 ± 1.2 years) treated with the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and FM protocol and with 15 Class III untreated subjects (7 males and 8 females, 6.2 ± 2.2 years). At T3, all patients showed a post-pubertal skeletal maturation stage (CS4-CS6). Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons between the three groups at T1 and for the T3-T1, T2-T1, and T3-T2 changes were assessed by means of the ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: During the overall observation period, Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols produced statistically significant favourable effects when compared with the Control group (ANB + 2.8° and +2.2°, respectively; Wits appraisal +4.4 mm and +2.7 mm, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found between the outcomes of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols neither at the post-pubertal or short-term observations. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and the comparison with an historical control sample of subjects with untreated Class III malocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol cannot be recommended as the approach of choice for the therapy of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony in very young subjects compared to the conventional RME/FM protocol.

Comparison of the dento-skeletal effects produced by Leaf expander versus rapid maxillary expander in prepubertal patients: a two-center randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects produced by slow maxillary expansion (SME) with the Leaf expander versus the conventional rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on digital dental casts, lateral and postero-anterior cephalometric radiographs. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a superiority, two-center, two arms parallel balanced randomization trial. METHODS: Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse interarch discrepancy of at least 3 mm. An expansion screw using moderate continuous forces (Leaf group) was compared to a conventional RME screw (RME group). The primary response variable was the difference in maxillary intermolar width (U6-U6) measured at baseline (T0) and one-year follow-up (T1) on the digital dental casts. Other dento-skeletal variables were also measured on digital dental casts and cephalograms. Computer-generated block randomization was used with allocation concealed in sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes. The examiner was blinded on the type of expander used. Linear models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients in the Leaf group and 28 patients in the RME group were randomized and included in the study. There were no dropouts. U6-U6 did not show a statistically significant difference between the two groups (-0.4 mm in favor of the RME group, 95% CI from -1.2 to 0.5, P = 0.365). As for the other secondary variables no statistically significant differences were found between the two groups except maxillary intercanine width (U3-U3, -0.9 mm in favor of the RME group, 95%CI from -1.5 to -0.3, P = 0.005) and maxillary skeletal width (Mx-Mx, -1.4 mm in favor of the RME group, 95%CI from -2.4 to -0.3, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences between the RME and Leaf groups were detected for any of the analyzed dento-skeletal variables except the T1-T0 differences in U3-U3 and Mx-Mx that were significantly greater in the RME group. REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the ISRCTN register on 08/11/2016 with the number ISRCTN18263886. FUNDING: No funding or conflict of interest to be declared.

Variations in maxillary second molar position of untreated subjects with normal occlusions: A long-term observational study.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term variations in maxillary second molar position in untreated subjects with normal occlusion. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: A sample of 39 subjects (18 females and 21 males) selected from the University of Michigan Growth Study (UMGS) was followed longitudinally with digital dental casts at 3 observation times: T1, when the maxillary permanent second molars were fully erupted, T2, last observation available in the longitudinal series (38 subjects), and T3, at least 20 years after T2 (12 subjects). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Digital measurements were recorded with an open-source software. Outcome variables were sagittal and transverse inclinations of the upper second molars. Two mixed-effect models were performed. RESULTS: The maxillary second molars had a distolingual inclination at T1, T2 and T3. Sagittal and transverse inclination showed progressive significant uprighting from T1 through T3 (P < .001). From T1 to T2, the adjusted difference in sagittal crown inclination was 8.0° (95% CI from 6.5° to 9.6°; P < .001). From T2 to T3, the adjusted difference was 5.5° (95% CI from 3.0° to 8.1°; P < .001). From T1 to T2, the adjusted difference in transverse crown inclination was 1.9° (95% CI from 0.4° to 3.5°; P = .011). From T2 to T3, the adjusted difference was 6.0° (95% CI from 3.4° to 8.5°; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Along with age, maxillary second molars showed a progressive significant uprighting with a decrease in the distal and lingual inclinations.

Retrograde Peri-implantitis: Report of a Case Successfully Treated by Resection of the Implant Apex.

Retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) is a periapical lesion that develops after implant insertion in which the coronal portion of the implant achieves a normal bone-to-implant interface. The most common etiology of RPI is the presence of an adjacent endodontic lesion. In most of the case reports available in the literature, the diagnosis of RPI occurred between 1 week and 4 years after implant placement. This case report illustrates the treatment of RPI that occurred more than 15 years after implant loading, caused by endodontic infection of the adjacent tooth.

Dento-skeletal effects produced by rapid versus slow maxillary expansion using fixed jackscrew expanders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No systematic review and meta-analysis of dento-skeletal effects following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) using the same jackscrew expander with different activation protocols is available. OBJECTIVE: To compare dento-skeletal effects produced by RME with those induced by SME using the same fixed jackscrew expanders in growing patients. SEARCH METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and OpenGrey were searched with no language or publication date restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected and the following inclusion criteria were used: growing patients in mixed or permanent dentition, with maxillary transverse discrepancy, dental crowding, and treated with fixed jackscrew maxillary expander (e.g. Hyrax, Haas) activated to achieve either RME or SME. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). For the aggregation of continuous data, the mean of the differences (MD) between treatments was used. A random effect model was applied. RESULTS: From 4855 retrieved articles, 3 studies were selected, 1 at unclear risk and 2 at high risk of bias. Maxillary intermolar distance showed no significant differences between the two modalities of expansion [pooled MD = 0.99 mm favouring RME, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.09 to 4.06, P = 0.53, I2 = 90%]. As for maxillary molar inclination measured as the angle formed by the axes passing through the disto-buccal cusps and the apexes of the palatine root of the first upper molars, it was significantly smaller in the SME group (MD = -11.51°, with 95% CI = -15.23 to -7.79, P < 0.0001). Posterior maxillary expansion was significantly greater in RME than SME (pooled MD = 0.75 mm, with 95% CI = 0.27-1.23, P = 0.002, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Both RME and SME produce an effective dento-skeletal expansion of the maxilla. RME is slightly more effective in increasing the posterior transverse skeletal width of the maxilla while SME induces smaller molar inclination. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CDR42018105530.

Predicting the mandibular growth spurt.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a prediction model that combined information derived from chronological age, sex, and the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method to predict the pubertal spurt in mandibular growth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 subjects (29 females, 21 males) were selected from the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection, the University of Michigan Growth Study, and the Denver Child Growth study. A total of 456 lateral cephalograms were analyzed, and a multilevel logistic model was applied. The outcome variable was the presence or absence of the mandibular pubertal growth peak. The predictive variables were chronological age up to the third order, sex, presence or absence of CS 3 interactions between age and sex, age and CS 3, sex and CS 3. RESULTS: The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) at the first cephalogram was 8.2 ± 0.5 years, whereas the mean age at the last cephalogram was 16.5 ± 1.1 years. The mean interval ± SD between two consecutive cephalograms was 1.0 ± 0.1 years. The mean age ± SD at the lateral cephalogram obtained immediately before the mandibular pubertal growth peak was 12.1 ± 1.1 years for females and 13.2 ± 0.8 years for males. The greatest increase in mandibular length occurred after CS 3 in 78% of the subjects. The presence of CS 3, age, second-order age, sex, and the interaction between age and sex were all statistically significant predictors of the mandibular pubertal growth spurt. CONCLUSIONS: CS 3, chronological age, and sex can be used jointly to predict the pubertal peak in mandibular growth.

Prognostic approach to Class III malocclusion through case-based reasoning.

OBJECTIVE: This investigation evaluates the evidence of case-based reasoning (CBR) in providing additional information on the prediction of future Class III craniofacial growth. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: The craniofacial characteristics of 104 untreated Class III subjects (7-17 years of age), monitored with two lateral cephalograms obtained during the growth process, were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were compared with the skeletal characteristics of subjects who showed a high degree of skeletal imbalance ('prototypes') obtained from a large data set of 1263 Class III cross-sectional subjects (7-17 years of age). RESULTS: The degree of similarity of longitudinal subjects with the most unbalanced prototypes allowed the identification of subjects who would develop a subsequent unfavourable skeletal growth (accuracy: 81%). The angle between the palatal plane and the sella-nasion line (PP-SN angle) and the Wits appraisal were two additional craniofacial features involved in the early prediction of the adverse progression of the Class III skeletal imbalance. CONCLUSIONS: Case-based reasoning methodology, which uses a personalized inference method, may bring additional information to approximate the skeletal progression of Class III malocclusion.

Comparison between two screws for maxillary expansion: a multicenter randomized controlled trial on patient's reported outcome measures.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare an expansion screw of the maxilla that generates moderate and continuous forces versus a conventional screw for rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on patient-reported outcome measure during the first 12 weeks of treatment. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a superiority, multicenter, two-arm parallel balanced randomization trial. METHODS: Patients in the mixed dentition were included with a transverse discrepancy between the two arches of at least 3 mm. An expansion screw using moderate continuous forces (Leaf group, treated with an expansion screw with Ni-Ti springs) was compared to a conventional RME screw that generates intermittent heavy forces (RME group). The primary response variable was the visual analogue scale (VAS) on pain calculated in the first 12 weeks of therapy. The VAS on difficulty on speaking and oral hygiene, patient satisfaction, and complications were also evaluated. A computer-generated block randomization was used with allocation concealed in sequentially numbered opaque-sealed envelopes. Blinding was not applicable. Linear models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients in the Leaf group and 28 patients in the RME group were randomized and included in the study. There were no dropouts. The mean of the VAS for pain was 0.3 ± 0.4 in the Leaf group and 0.6 ± 0.5 in the RME group. The difference was -0.3 (95 per cent CI from -0.5 to -0.0; P = 0.017) in favour of the Leaf group. The difference in pain was marked in the first week (Leaf group 2.2 ± 2.3; RME group 3.7 ± 2.6; difference -1.5; 95 per cent CI from -2.7 to -0.3; P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the Leaf group experienced a lower degree of pain, especially during the first week following the application of the expander. For the other variables, no significant differences were reported between the two treatments. REGISTRATION: The study was registered in the ISRCTN register on 8 November 2016 with the number ISRCTN18263886.

Predicting mandibular growth based on CVM stage and gender and with chronological age as a curvilinear variable.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model that combines the information derived from chronological age (analysed as a curvilinear variable), gender and the CVM method to predict mandibular growth. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: 50 participants (29 females, 21 males) were selected from the AAOF Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection, the Michigan Growth Study and the Denver Child Growth study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this investigation, 456 lateral cephalograms were analysed by applying a mixed effect model. The outcome variable was the annualized increment in total mandibular length (Co-Gn) during the year following the lateral cephalogram on which the cervical stage and chronological age were evaluated. The predictive variables were chronological age up to the fifth order, gender, stage of cervical vertebral maturation, as well as interactions between age and gender, age and cervical stage, and gender and cervical stage. RESULTS: Cervical stage, chronological age up to the fourth order, gender, and the interaction between age and gender were significant predictors of annualized increments in mandibular length. The annualized increment in Co-Gn was significantly greater for CS 3 when compared to all other cervical stages. Further, annualized increments in Co-Gn for CS 1 and CS 2 were significantly greater when compared to CS 5. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical stage, chronological age and gender can be used jointly to predict the annualized increment in mandibular growth. Cervical stage 3 exhibited the greatest annualized increase in mandibular length.

Occlusal Plane and Skeletal Changes After Cervical Headgear Treatment With and Without Lower Utility Arch in Class II Growing Patients.

ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to investigate skeletal and dental changes affecting occlusal plane inclination after cervical headgear treatment with and without lower utility arch. In order to distinguish the orthodontic changes from natural growth a control group was employed.The sample of this study consisted by 20 Class II subjects (10 males, 10 females; mean age 8.54) treated by using cervical headgear, 19 class II children (19 males, 9 females; mean age 8.64) treated with cervical headgear and utility arch, and 21 Class II patients (11 males, 10 females; mean age 8.41) who had no therapy.Lateral head films were studied for all the patients before treatment (T1) and after therapy (T2) for all the treated groups and at the beginning and at the end of observational period for the control group; cephalometric analysis was carried out in order to seek for the modifications between time points and between groups.Means and standard deviation have been analyzed for all the groups. In order to compare the modification between the time points within the same group the ANOVA test was applied. The ANOVA test was used to compare the mean differences (T2-T1) of 3 groups.The study revealed that there were significant changes in occlusal plane inclination after the different treatment modalities employed instead control group. The treatment with cervical headgear and utility arch is more effective than cervical headgear alone in lowering occlusal plane posteriorly when it is compared with controls.