RESUMEN
Regional recurrence of endometrial cancer is a challenging yet potentially curable group of patients without defined standard of care. Our aim is to determine optimal methods of salvage therapy for regionally recurrent endometrial cancer. Twenty-two cases of nodal, pelvic, or peritoneal cavity recurrences of endometrial cancer were identified from a single institution database. Univariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of a second recurrence or death. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to estimate the probability of progression free survival and overall survival among patients in three cohorts: Multimodality therapy (surgery, chemotherapy, and external beam radiotherapy [EBRT] +/- vaginal brachytherapy), non-surgery (chemotherapy or EBRT, or both), and surgery cohort (surgery +/- chemotherapy OR EBRT). Thirteen recurrences (59%) were regional including the pelvic and paraaortic nodes, while nine recurrences (41%) were abdominal. For the entire cohort, the probability of progression free survival at 2â¯years was 51% (95% CI, 26% - 72%). The 2-year probability of progression free survival was 62% in the multimodality cohort, 40% in the non-surgery cohort, and 38% in the surgery cohort. The 2-year probability of overall survival was 69% (95% CI, 38% - 86%) across our population. At 40â¯months of follow up, the only living patients belonged to the multimodality cohort. We found no significant association of a definitive salvage regimen for recurrent endometrial cancer of the pelvis and peritoneal cavity. Aggressive use of multimodality therapy with surgery followed by tumor-directed radiotherapy and chemotherapy offers potentially curative therapy for these patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective of our study was to describe the local control (LC) outcomes with 3- or 5-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the spine in patients with oligometastatic (≤5 systemic metastases) versus polymetastatic disease (>5 metastases). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of patients who had undergone SBRT for spinal metastases. No patients had undergone previous surgical intervention or had spinal cord compression. All patients were treated with 3-fraction (median dose, 27 Gy; range, 24-30 Gy) or 5-fraction (median dose, 35 Gy; range, 25-40 Gy) SBRT. The Kaplan-Meier method and Spine Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria were used to determine LC. RESULTS: We included 61 patients with a total of 72 distinct SBRT targets who had been treated from August 2007 to June 2017. The median follow-up period was 13.58 months. We treated 20 targets and 52 targets with 3 and 5 fractions, respectively. Thirteen patients (18.1%) had undergone previous RT to the SBRT area. Twenty patients (35% of the distinct SBRT targets) had an oligometastatic disease state. The 1-year LC rate was 83% for the entire cohort. On univariable analysis, polymetastases (1-year LC, 73.8% vs. 100%; P = 0.07) showed a trend toward worse LC. On multivariable analysis, patients with an oligometastatic state (hazard ratio, 0.21; P = 0.04) had improved LC. CONCLUSIONS: Our study was hypothesis-generating in that patients with an oligometastatic disease state appear to have improved LC after SBRT, suggesting a biological advantage exists with local therapy for this group of patients not seen for patients with polymetastatic disease.