Antithymocyte globulin induction and rapid steroid taper leads to excellent results in kidney transplantation with donation after cardiac death donors: importance of rejection and delayed graft function.

Recipients of primary transplants from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors (n = 40) performed from January 2005 to December 2009 were retrospectively reviewed and compared with recipients of primary transplants from donation after brain death (DBD) donors (n = 142). Patients received rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction and rapid steroid taper (RST; steroids stopped 5 days after surgery). Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Protocol kidney biopsies, creatinine (Cr), and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR; determined by cold iothalamate or 24-h creatinine clearance) were obtained at 1, 4, 12, and 24 months. Kidney biopsies for cause were conducted for unexplained elevated Cr, decline in mGFR, or new proteinuria. Biopsies were graded for rejection according to the Banff criteria. Graft survival at 3 years was 90.0% for DCD recipients and 86.6% for DBD recipients (P = NS). Rejection of any grade diagnosed on any biopsy through the first 2 years occurred in 18 DCD (45%) and 50 DBD (35%) recipients. Rejection of a grade more than Banff borderline occurred in 12.5% DCD and 12.7% DBD recipients. At 2 years, the mean ± SEM Cr and mGFR for DCD recipients with rejection were 1.8 ± 0.29 mg/dL and 59.2 ± 8.5 mL/min versus 1.3 ± 0.11 mg/dL and 67.0 ± 7.8 ml/min for those without rejection. For DBD recipients with rejection, Cr and mGFR at 2 years were 1.7 ± 0.12 mg/dL and 54.0 ± 4.4 mL/min versus 1.4 ± 0.11 mg/dL and 66.6 ± 3.3 ml/min for those without rejection (P = NS). Comparing DCD to DBD, there was no statistical difference in mean Cr or mGFR outcomes. Regardless of group, grafts with delayed graft function had lower 3-year survival. DCD primary kidney transplant recipients treated with rabbit antithymocyte induction and RST have short-term graft survival and function equivalent to DBD recipients. RST appears to be acceptable immunosuppression for DCD recipients.

Evaluation of risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection and disease occurring within 1 year of liver transplantation in high-risk patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have demonstrated that cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are associated with increased risk of graft loss and death in high-risk (donor CMV seropositive/recipient CMV seronegative) liver transplant recipients (LTR) despite effective antiviral chemoprophylaxis. Predictors of CMV infection and disease in this important population are incompletely defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 227 high-risk first LTR who received primary anti-CMV chemoprophylaxis during the first 100 days after transplant was performed. A large number of patient, donor, operative, and post-transplant potential risk factors were collected. Associations of potential risk factors for CMV infection or disease that occurred during the first year after transplant were assessed using Cox regression models. After Bonferroni adjustment for multiple testing, P-values ≤0.00125 (associations with CMV infection) and ≤0.00122 (associations with CMV disease) were considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: CMV infection and disease occurred in 91 (40%) and 43 (19%) of LTR, respectively. In multivariable analysis, increased risk of CMV infection was observed for patients with lower model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (P = 0.025), lower total bilirubin (P = 0.014), and longer operative time (P = 0.038), whereas increased risk of CMV disease was seen in patients with lower MELD score (P = 0.026), lower total bilirubin (P = 0.044), and lower international normalized ratio (P = 0.043). However, after adjustment for multiple testing, none of these findings approached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that interventions designed to prevent CMV infection and disease should be applied to all high-risk LTR until more definitive predictors of these complications are identified.

Tuberculous hepatitis in renal transplant recipients following alemtuzumab induction therapy.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is one of many opportunistic infections in renal transplant recipients, arising either from reactivation of latent infection or de novo infection, occasionally donor derived. M. tuberculosis hepatitis has never been reported in patients who have received alemtuzumab as part of their renal transplant management. We describe 2 patients who underwent deceased-donor renal transplantation following alemtuzumab induction therapy and presented with a febrile syndrome, subsequently diagnosed as tuberculous hepatitis, one with disseminated disease. Both responded well to treatment without significant side effects, resulting in excellent graft function. The importance of chemoprophylaxis should be emphasized to minimize the risk of developing active tuberculosis in patients with latent tuberculosis infection undergoing solid organ transplantation.

Kidney allocation to liver transplant candidates with renal failure of undetermined etiology: role of percutaneous renal biopsy.

The feasibility, value and risk of percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) in liver transplant candidates with renal failure are unknown. PRB was performed on 44 liver transplant candidates with renal failure of undetermined etiology and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (n = 37) or on renal replacement therapy (RRT) (n = 7). Patients with >or=30% interstitial fibrosis (IF), >or=40% global glomerulosclerosis (gGS) and/or diffuse glomerulonephritis were approved for simultaneous-liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation. Prebiopsy GFR, urinary sodium indices, dependency on RRT and kidney size were comparable between 27 liver-transplant-alone (LTA) and 17 SLK candidates and did not relate to the biopsy diagnosis. The interobserver agreement for the degree of IF or gGS was moderate-to-excellent. After a mean of 78 +/- 67 days, 16 and 8 patients received LTA and SLK transplants. All five LTA recipients on RRT recovered kidney function after transplantation and serum creatinine was comparable between LTA and SLK recipients at last follow-up. Biopsy complications developed in 13, of these, five required intervention. PRB is feasible in liver transplant candidates with renal failure and provides reproducible histological information that does not relate to the pretransplant clinical data. Randomized studies are needed to determine if PRB can direct kidney allocation in this challenging group of liver transplant candidates.

Proceedings of Consensus Conference on Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation (SLK).

A consensus conference sponsored by the American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS), American Society of Transplantation (AST), United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) and American Society of Nephrology (ASN) convened to examine simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation (SLK). Directors from the 25 largest liver transplant programs along with speakers with recognized expertise attended. The purposes of this conference were to propose indications for SLK, to establish a prospective data registry and, most importantly, to recommend standard listing criteria for these patients. Scientific registry of transplant recipients data, and single center data regarding chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI) in conjunction with liver failure as a basis for SLK was presented and discussed. The consensus was that Regional Review Boards (RRB) should determine listing for SLK, as with other MELD exceptions, with automatic approval for: (i) End-stage renal disease with cirrhosis and symptomatic portal hypertension or hepatic vein wedge pressure gradient >/= 10 mm Hg (ii) Liver failure and CKD with GFR /= 2.0 mg/dL and dialysis >/= 8 weeks (iv) Liver failure and CKD and biopsy demonstrating > 30% glomerulosclerosis or 30% fibrosis. The RRB would evaluate all other requests to determine appropriateness.

Continued influence of preoperative renal function on outcome of orthotopic liver transplant (OLTX) in the US: where will MELD lead us?

Renal function is a component of the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD), We queried the 1999-2004 OPTN/UNOS database to determine whether preoperative renal function remained an important determinant of survival in primary deceased donor liver transplant alone patients (DDLTA) or primary combined kidney liver transplant patients (KLTX). We examined preoperative creatinine, renal replacement therapy (RRT), incidence of KLTX, and patient survival in the 34 months before and after introduction of MELD and performed a multivariate Cox regression analysis of time to death. Preoperative renal function is an independent predictor of survival in DDLTA but not in KLTX. When compared to DDLTA with a preoperative serum creatinine of 0-0.99 mg/dL, patients with serum creatinine from 1-1.99 mg/dL, >2.0 mg/dL, those requiring RRT, and those receiving KLTX had a relative risk of death following transplant of 1.11, 1.58, 1.77, and 1.44 respectively. KLTX requiring RRT had better survival than DDLTA requiring RRT. Since introduction of MELD, KLTX, preoperative creatinine, and number of patients requiring preoperative RRT have increased. Despite this, patient survival following orthotopic liver transplant (OLTX) in the 34 months after introduction of MELD is not different than prior to introduction of MELD.

Hypertension and renal dysfunction in long-term liver transplant recipients.

1. A 10-year survival rate of 60% or greater after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is expected. 2. Renal dysfunction is common after OLT. 3. Patients without early renal dysfunction after OLT are at low risk for long-term renal dysfunction. 4. Hypertension occurs in greater than 50% of long-term survivors. 5. Immunosuppressive protocols must be adjusted early to avoid long-term complications.

Cannulation of the aorta in organ donors with infrarenal aortic pathologies.

Retrograde embolization of atherosclerotic arterial plaque remains a threat at the time of organ perfusion in elderly donors. In order to circumvent this potential procurement complication, we describe a technique with two variations. This technique allows for perfusion with UW solution without having to cannulate through severely atherosclerotic distal aortic walls.

Cannulation of the aorta in organ donors with aortic and caval injuries at the time of procurement.

Injuries sustained by major vessels during procurement pose a major threat to organ viability. Aortic and inferior vena cava lacerations produce rapid hemorrhage associated with hypoperfusion and ischemic damage. We describe a technique that will prevent such damage in the event of vascular mishaps.

Randomized trial of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine versus cyclosporine oral solution (modified) plus mycophenolate mofetil after cadaveric kidney transplantation: results at 2 years.

BACKGROUND: A previous report described the 1-year results of a prospective, randomized trial designed to investigate the optimal combination of immunosuppressants in kidney transplantation. Recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were treated with tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), cyclosporine oral solution (modified) (CsA)+MMF, or tacrolimus+azathioprine (AZA). Results at 1 year revealed that optimal efficacy and safety were achieved with a regimen containing tacrolimus+MMF. The present report describes results at 2 years. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-three recipients of first cadaveric kidney allografts were randomized to receive tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, or tacrolimus+AZA. All regimens contained corticosteroids, and antibody induction was used only in patients who experienced delayed graft function. Patients were followed up for 2 years. RESULTS: The results at 2 years corroborate and extend the findings of the previous report. Patients randomized to either treatment arm containing tacrolimus experienced improved kidney function. New-onset insulin dependence remained in four, three, and four patients in the tacrolimus+MMF, CsA+MMF, and tacrolimus+AZA treatment arms, respectively. Furthermore, patients with delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis who were treated with tacrolimus+MMF experienced a 23% increase in allograft survival compared with patients receiving CsA+MMF (P=0.06). Patients randomized to tacrolimus+MMF received significantly lower doses of MMF compared with those administered CsA+MMF. CONCLUSIONS: All three immunosuppressive regi-mens provided excellent safety and efficacy. How-ever, the best results overall were achieved with tacrolimus+MMF. The combination may provide particular benefit to kidney allograft recipients who develop delayed graft function/acute tubular necrosis. Renal function at 2 years was better in the tacrolimus treatment groups compared with the CsA group.

Renal replacement therapy and orthotopic liver transplantation: the role of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: The need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) either before or after orthotopic liver transplant (OLTX) has been reported to be a poor prognostic indicator for survival. Use of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) for RRT has been reported in three series of OLTX patients with high 90-day mortality rates of 57-60%. We have examined our patient population to determine the effect of necessity and type of RRT on patient survival after OLTX. METHODS: We analyzed 1535 OLTX that were performed at our institution from 1985 through 1999, 1037 from 1985 to 1995 (period I) and 498 from 1996 to 1999 (period II). Combined liver-kidney transplants were excluded from analysis. Hospital dialysis unit records and a prospectively maintained database on all OLTX patients served as the source of data. Patients were classified into groups defined on whether or not they received RRT, when they received RRT, and the type of RRT. Groups were compared for preoperative intensive care unit status, time on the waiting list, laboratory variables, 90-day postoperative mortality, 1-year patient survival, and absolute survival. RESULTS: Use of RRT increased from 8.29% in period I to 12.45% in period II, along with increased median waiting times. In period I, patients receiving preoperative RRT had a 90-day mortality (0%) and a 1-year survival (89.5%) almost identical to those patients who never required RRT (1.7% and 90.6%). Patients who developed acute renal failure postoperatively requiring RRT, however, had a 90-day mortality of 28.6% and a 1-year survival of 55%. In period II, patients requiring RRT had a 90-day mortality of 39.7% and a 1-year actuarial survival of 54.5% compared with 6.9% and 88.6% in patients never requiring RRT. Patients treated with CVVHD had a 90-day mortality of 42% compared with 25% in patients treated with hemodialysis alone. However, patients receiving CVVHD both pre- and postoperatively had a 90-day mortality of 27.7% vs. 50% in those patients who only received CVVHD postoperatively. Patients who developed acute renal failure postoperatively, which required RRT, regardless of therapy, had a 1-year survival of only 41.0% compared with a 1-year survival of 73.6% in those patients started on RRT preoperatively, P=0.03. CONCLUSIONS: The need for RRT has increased along with waiting time in OLTX patients. Patients developing the need for RRT postoperatively have an increased 90-day mortality and lower 1-year survival with the highest being present in patients receiving CVVHD, which was started postoperatively. These findings may reflect a trend toward a sicker population awaiting OLTX and emphasize the negative impact of renal failure on survival after OLTX.

Readmission to the intensive care unit after liver transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to understand the factors at our transplant center that contribute to patients' return to the ICU after their liver transplant and their initial discharge from that unit. Patients who, after liver transplantation, fail discharge from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and must be readmitted to that unit may well utilize many more resources than those patients who are well enough to stay out of the ICU. DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained liver transplant research database followed by a retrospective review of (a subgroup) patient charts and contemporaneous controls. SETTING: A large metropolitan tertiary care center and adult liver transplant center. PATIENTS: A total of 1,197 consecutive adult patients who underwent their initial liver transplantation from 1984 to 1996. INTERVENTION: Readmission to the intensive care unit after adult liver transplantation and discharge from that unit. MAIN RESULTS: Only recipient age, pretransplant synthetic function labs (protime and albumin), bilirubin levels, and intraoperative blood product requirements could be statistically linked to the group requiring ICU readmission. The primary etiology for ICU readmission was cardiopulmonary deterioration. Readmission was associated with significantly lower patient and graft survivals. A detailed review of 23 patients transplanted from October 1994 to June 1996 was made, with special emphasis on cardiopulmonary status (hemodynamics, respiratory variables, and chest radiograph findings). This subgroup was compared with 30 temporally matched controls who were not readmitted to the ICU. Intravascular fluid overload and lower inspiratory capacity were significant factors related to ICU readmission. Readmitted patients had a longer hospitalization with higher hospital charges than the control group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the most important means of preventing ICU readmission in liver transplantation patients is to optimize cardiopulmonary function and status. Close monitoring of fluid balance to avoid hypervolemia is essential. Readmitted patients have a greater resource utilization and have lower survival rates.

The elderly liver transplant recipient: a call for caution.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether liver transplantation is judicious in recipients older than 60 years of age. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The prevailing opinion among the transplant community remains that elderly recipients of liver allografts fare as well as their younger counterparts, but our results have in some cases been disappointing. This study was undertaken to review the results of liver transplants in the elderly in a large single-center setting. A secondary goal was to define, if possible, factors that could help the clinician in the prudent allocation of the donor liver. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained single-institution database of 1,446 consecutive liver transplant recipients was conducted. The 241 elderly patients (older than 60 years) were compared with their younger counterparts by preoperative laboratory values, illness severity, nutritional status, and donor age. Survival data were stratified and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Elderly patients with better-preserved hepatic synthetic function or with lower pretransplant serum bilirubin levels fared as well as younger patients. Elderly patients who had poor hepatic synthetic function or high bilirubin levels or who were admitted to the hospital had much lower survival rates than the sicker younger patients or the less-ill older patients. Recipient age 60 years or older, pretransplant hospital admission, and high bilirubin level were independent risk factors for poorer outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Low-risk elderly patients fare as well as younger patients after liver transplantation. However, unless results can be improved, high-risk patients older than 60 years should probably not undergo liver transplantation.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) using calcineurin-based immunotherapy: risk of development and treatment.

BACKGROUND: The calcineurin inhibitors cyclosporine and tacrolimus are both known to be nephrotoxic. Their use in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) has dramatically improved success rates. Recently, however, we have had an increase of patients who are presenting after OLTX with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This retrospective study examines the incidence and treatment of ESRD and chronic renal failure (CRF) in OLTX patients. METHODS: Patients receiving an OLTX only from June 1985 through December of 1994 who survived 6 months postoperatively were studied (n=834). Our prospectively collected database was the source of information. Patients were divided into three groups: Controls, no CRF or ESRD, n=748; CRF, sustained serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl, n=41; and ESRD, n=45. Groups were compared for preoperative laboratory variables, diagnosis, postoperative variables, survival, type of ESRD therapy, and survival from onset of ESRD. RESULTS: At 13 years after OLTX, the incidence of severe renal dysfunction was 18.1% (CRF 8.6% and ESRD 9.5%). Compared with control patients, CRF and ESRD patients had higher preoperative serum creatinine levels, a greater percentage of patients with hepatorenal syndrome, higher percentage requirement for dialysis in the first 3 months postoperatively, and a higher 1-year serum creatinine. Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis using preoperative and postoperative variables identified that an increase of serum creatinine compared with average at 1 year, 3 months, and 4 weeks postoperatively were independent risk factors for the development of CRF or ESRD with odds ratios of 2.6, 2.2, and 1.6, respectively. Overall survival from the time of OLTX was not significantly different among groups, but by year 13, the survival of the patients who had ESRD was only 28.2% compared with 54.6% in the control group. Patients developing ESRD had a 6-year survival after onset of ESRD of 27% for the patients receiving hemodialysis versus 71.4% for the patients developing ESRD who subsequently received kidney transplants. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are more than 10 years post-OLTX have CRF and ESRD at a high rate. The development of ESRD decreases survival, particularly in those patients treated with dialysis only. Patients who develop ESRD have a higher preoperative and 1-year serum creatinine and are more likely to have hepatorenal syndrome. However, an increase of serum creatinine at various times postoperatively is more predictive of the development of CRF or ESRD. New strategies for long-term immunosuppression may be needed to decrease this complication.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C: recurrence and disease progression in 300 patients.

The time progression of allograft damage in patients with recurrent hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is not precisely determined. The aim of this analysis is to study the progression of disease recurrence and its impact on patient and graft survival. Data for 300 patients who underwent OLT for hepatitis C were analyzed regarding the incidence of histological recurrence, risk factors, immunosuppressive regimen, rejection episodes, and survival. For patients with histological recurrence, the timing and risks for disease progression were analyzed. Data for 30 patients who underwent retransplantation were studied. Histological recurrence occurred in 40.3% of patients, 27.2% of whom progressed to bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis. Eighty-seven percent of the patients experienced recurrence of disease within 24 months of OLT. Patients with histological recurrence within 6 months of OLT had an increased risk for progression to cirrhosis compared with patients with recurrence later than 6 months (risk ratio, 2.3). Recurrence within 1 year was associated with decreased patient and graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years (65.1% and 56.4% versus 80.6% and 78.4%; P =.004 and P =.0008, respectively). Patients with histological recurrence had a greater incidence of acute cellular rejection, as well as multiple episodes of rejection, steroid-resistant rejections, and greater cumulative doses of corticosteroids. Histological recurrence after OLT for hepatitis C is common and usually occurs within 2 years of OLT. Early recurrence negatively affects patient and graft survival. Host factors impacting on recurrence need further study. A relation between the hepatitis C virus, allograft rejection, and immunosuppression exists and needs investigation.

Intravenous mycophenolate mofetil: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics.

An intravenous (i.v.) formulation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; CellCept, Roche Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) that will enable its administration to patients unable to tolerate oral medication is available. Two separate studies, an open-labeled pharmacokinetic (PK) study and a double-blind safety study, were performed. Within 24 h after transplant, 153 (safety study) and 45 (PK study) first or second renal transplant recipients were started on i.v. MMF 1 g Q12h or placebo (used in the safety study only, 2:1 MMF:placebo), given over 2 h via a dedicated peripheral venous catheter. In the safety study, per os (p.o.) MMF (1g Q12h) or placebo was administered, starting within 72 h after transplant, whereas in the PK study, p.o. MMF was started on the evening of day 5. Sequential blood samples obtained on study days 5 (i.v. MMF) and 6 (p.o. MMF) before and up to 12 h after the AM dose were analyzed for mycophenolic acid (MPA) and MPA glucuronide (MPAG) concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography. The area under the concentration curve (AUC) was calculated using the linear trapezoidal rule. The MPA AUC(0-12) was higher for i.v. MMF than p.o. MMF (40.8 +/- 11.4 microg x h/ mL vs. 32.9 +/- 15, p < 0.001). There were no other significant PK differences for plasma MPA or MPAG. In the safety study (n = 98 i.v. MMF vs. n = 55 placebo), 11 patients (11%, i.v. MMF) and 4 patients (7%, placebo) discontinued their use of the drug because of an adverse event (AE). Overall, AEs were similar between i.v. MMF and placebo. Injection site phlebitis (4%) and thrombosis (4%) were observed only with i.v. MMF. MMF i.v. 1 g twice daily (b.i.d.) should provide efficacy at least equivalent to p.o. MMF without increased toxicity, and it provides an acceptable alternative dose form in the immediate period after transplant.

Comparing quality of life following liver transplantation for Laennec's versus non-Laennec's patients.

The overall success of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) includes not only survival, but quality of life (QOL) as well. We studied one controversial group of OLTX recipients, patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease (Laennec's), to determine if their post-OLTX QOL was similar to that of patients transplanted for non-alcoholic liver disease (non-Laennec's). Over a 10-yr period, patients undergoing OLTX at our institution were asked to complete a QOL questionnaire addressing a wide range of topics from demographics and employment to symptom distress/frequency, activities of daily living, and effect of loss of health on daily life. Twenty-four Laennec's and 100 non-Laennec's OLTX recipients completed the questionnaire at both their 2- and 5-yr follow-up visits at our institution. Both groups were well-matched in age, race, and patient location status at the time of OLTX. No significant differences could be detected between Laennec's and non-Laennec's scores regarding overall QOL, including one's ability to function, health perception, and self-perception at 2 and 5 years post-OLTX, and between 2 and 5 years post-OLTX. Although not between groups, a significant difference was noted regarding patients' satisfaction with life, with less satisfaction reported at the 5-yr versus the 2-yr time point post-OLTX. Rates of current/recent employment between both groups were also similar at 2 years post-OLTX, and again at 5 years post-OLTX. We conclude that overall QOL and employment levels appear similar between patients transplanted for alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease. This similarity appears to extend to 5 years post-OLTX.