Revascularization and outcomes in ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction after heart failure admission: The RevascHeart study.

AIMS: Despite numerous trials on revascularization in patients with heart failure (HF) and ischaemic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, its role remains unsettled. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF has shown benefits on outcomes. This multicentre study aims to compare long-term mortality between revascularization and GDMT in patients with ischaemic LV dysfunction following admission for HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2023, 408 patients admitted for HF with a LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less and documented coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their initial treatment decision: revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] or coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]) or GDMT. The primary outcome was rate of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, and secondary outcomes included type of revascularization (PCI vs. CABG) and LV reverse remodelling. After a median 44.6-month follow-up, 100 patients (33%) died in the revascularization group, compared to 44 (43%) in the GDMT group. Multivariate analysis showed no significant benefit of revascularization on all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.39, p = 0.45) or cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.62-1.52, p = 0.90) compared to GDMT. Neither CABG (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-1.08, p = 0.13) nor PCI (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.55, p = 0.93) demonstrated a mortality reduction compared to GDMT. Both groups experienced significant reductions in LV size and improvements in LVEF, greater in the revascularization group. CONCLUSION: Revascularization did not outperform GDMT in ischaemic LV dysfunction following HF admission in this retrospective analysis. Larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the potential role of revascularization in improving outcomes.

Left atrial deformation analysis in patients with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy in atrial fibrillation.

Aims: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common comorbidity in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) affecting conventional measures of left atrial (LA) function. We aimed to determine whether LA function analysis could identify patients at higher risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs). Methods and results: A retrospective study of patients with NIDCM in AF referred to a single centre for transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) between 2015 and 2019. Peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS) was measured along with LA emptying fraction and LA filling index (LAFI = E wave/PALS). Cox regression analysis was conducted. A total of 153 patients were included [median age 74 years, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 35%], and 57 (37.3%) had MACE after a median follow-up of 3.2 years. LAFI was the only independent TTE parameter associated with MACE after adjustment for age, diabetes, LVEF, left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS), and LA volume index [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02 per point increase, P = 0.024], with the best cut-off at ≥15. LAFI ≥15 predicted each of MACE components when separately analysed: MACE HR = 1.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-3.30; cardiovascular death HR = 3.68, 95% CI 1.41-9.56, heart failure admission HR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.19-3.80, and ventricular arrhythmia HR = 4.72, 95% CI 1.52-14.67. Higher LAFI was associated with worsening LV-GLS, E/e', systolic pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right ventricular to PA coupling. Conclusion: LA deformation analysis is feasible in patients with NIDCM presenting with AF. LAFI may identify patients at higher risk of MACE and correlates with higher pulmonary pressures and worse right ventricular function, suggesting an elevation of left-sided ventricular pressures in patients with higher LAFI.

Solving problems at the cath lab.

We describe a case of aortic rupture following transcatheter aortic valve implantation that was managed percutaneously.

Risk of Stroke and Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Patients in Sinus Rhythm With Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) is associated with an increased risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke, especially in patients with high CHA2DS2-VASc. We aimed to identify variables associated with incident AF or stroke using left atrial (LA) deformation analysis and its prognostic value added to CHA2DS2-VASc score. Patients with NIDCM and LVEF <50% in sinus rhythm were included between January 2015 and December 2019. LA volume index (LAVI) and atrial strain were used in combination with the CHA2DS2-VAS score to predict ischemic stroke or incident AF. Proportional hazards Cox regression was used to provide hazard ratios (HR). There were 338 patients included. After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the endpoint occurred in 41 (12.1%) patients. LAVI outperformed other echocardiographic parameters, with significant improvement in risk reclassification compared to CHA2DS2-VASc alone (net reclassification index 0.6, increase in Harrell's C from 0.63 to 0.73, P=0.003) and remained significant after multivariate adjustment. LAVI was associated with both components of the endpoint separately. The best cutoff for LAVI was 44 ml/m2. LAVI ≥44ml/m2 increased the risk of the endpoint among those with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 (HR=6.0, 95%CI 2.6-13.5), but not in those with CHA2DS2-VASc <3 (HR=1.2, 95%CI 0.3-4.5). Competing risk analysis did not alter the results. In conclusion, LAVI might be used to assess the risk of incident AF or stroke in NIDCM. Patients with LAVI ≥44 ml/m2 and CHA2DS2-VASc ≥3 could be at high risk of AF and stroke and may benefit from more intensive surveillance.

Impact of valve-sparing aortic root replacement on aortic fluid dynamics and biomechanics in patients with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic disease.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with syndromic heritable thoracic aortic diseases (sHTAD) who underwent prophylactic aortic root replacement are at high risk of distal aortic events, but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. This prospective, longitudinal study aims to assess the impact of valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) on aortic fluid dynamics and biomechanics in these patients, and to examine whether they present altered haemodynamics or biomechanics prior to surgery compared to sHTAD patients with no indication for surgery (sHTAD-NSx) and healthy volunteers (HV). METHODS: Sixteen patients with Marfan or Loeys-Dietz syndrome underwent two 4D flow CMR studies before (sHTAD-preSx) and after VSARR (sHTAD-postSx). Two age, sex and BSA matched cohorts of 40 HV and 16 sHTAD-NSx patients with available 4D flow CMR, were selected for comparison. In-plane rotational flow (IRF), systolic flow reversal ratio (SFRR), wall shear stress (WSS), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and aortic strain were analysed in the ascending (AscAo) and descending aorta (DescAo). RESULTS: All patients with sHTAD presented altered haemodynamics and increased aortic stiffness (p<0.05) compared to HV, both in the AscAo (median PWV 7.4 in sHTAD-NSx; 6.8 in sHTAD-preSx; 4.9m/s in HV) and DescAo (median PWV 9.1 in sHTAD-NSx; 8.1 in sHTAD-preSx; 6.3m/s in HV). Patients awaiting VSARR had markedly reduced in-plane (median IRF -2.2 vs 10.4 cm2/s in HV, p=0.001), but increased through-plane flow rotation (median SFRR 7.8 vs 3.8% in HV, p=0.002), and decreased WSS (0.36 vs 0.47N/m2 in HV, p=0.004) in the proximal DescAo. After VSARR, proximal DescAo in-plane rotational flow (p=0.010) and circumferential WSS increased (p=0.011), no longer differing from HV, but through-plane rotational flow, axial WSS and stiffness remained altered. Patients in which aortic tortuosity was reduced after surgery showed greater post-surgical increase in IRF compared to those in which tortuosity increased (median IRF increase 18.1 vs 3.3cm²/s, p=0.047). Most AscAo flow alterations were restored to physiological values after VSARR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with sHTAD, VSARR partially restores downstream fluid dynamics to physiological levels. However, some flow disturbances and increased stiffness persist in the proximal DescAo. Further longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate whether persistent alterations contribute to post-surgical risk.

Position Statement on Cardiac Computed Tomography Following Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is rapidly growing as valid stroke prevention therapy in atrial fibrillation. Cardiac imaging plays an instrumental role in preprocedural planning, procedural execution, and postprocedural follow-up. Recently, cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has made significant advancements, resulting in increasing use both preprocedurally and in outpatient follow-up. It provides a noninvasive, high-resolution alternative to the current standard, transesophageal echocardiography, and may display advantages in both the detection and characterization of device-specific complications, such as peridevice leak and device-related thrombosis. The implementation of CCT in the follow-up after LAAO has identified new findings such as hypoattenuated thickening on the atrial device surface and left atrial appendage contrast patency, which are not readily assessable on transesophageal echocardiography. Currently, there is a lack of standardization for acquisition and interpretation of images and consensus on definitions of essential findings on CCT in the postprocedural phase. This paper intends to provide a practical and standardized approach to both acquisition and interpretation of CCT after LAAO based on a comprehensive review of the literature and expert consensus among European and North American interventional and imaging specialists.

Early and late hospital readmissions after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a nonpharmacological alternative for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, there are few data on readmissions after LACC. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of early (≤ 30 days) and late (31-365 days) readmission after LAAC, and to assess the predictors and clinical impact of rehospitalization. METHODS: This multicenter study included 1419 consecutive patients who underwent LAAC. The median follow-up was 33 [17-55] months, and follow-up was complete in all but 54 (3.8%) patients. The primary endpoint was readmissions for any cause. Logistic regression and Cox regression analysis were performed to determine the predictors of readmission and its clinical impact. RESULTS: A total of 257 (18.1%) patients were readmitted within the first year after LAAC (3.2% early, 14.9% late). The most common causes of readmission were bleeding (24.5%) and heart failure (20.6%). A previous gastrointestinal bleeding event was associated with a higher risk of early readmission (OR, 2.65; 95%CI, 1.23-5.71). The factors associated with a higher risk of late readmission were a lower body mass index (HR, 0.96-95%CI, 0.93-0.99), diabetes (HR, 1.38-95%CI, 1.02-1.86), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.60; 95%CI, 1.21-2.13), and previous heart failure (HR, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.26-2.27). Both early (HR, 2.12-95%CI, 1.22-3.70) and late (HR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.41-2.17) readmissions were associated with a higher risk of 2-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Readmissions within the first year after LAAC were common, mainly related to bleeding and heart failure events, and associated with patients' comorbidity burden. Readmission after LAAC confered a higher risk of mortality during the first 2 years after the procedure.

A comparison of simplified or conventional antithrombotic regimens after left atrial appendage closure in patients at high bleeding risk: the PLATEBRISK study.

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic treatment (ATT) post-left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) remains controversial. Furthermore, most of the patients undergoing LAAO are at a very high bleeding risk. AIMS: This study aimed to compare a simplified versus conventional ATT after LAAO in very high bleeding risk patients. METHODS: This is a multicentre, retrospective study including very high bleeding risk patients, according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition, who underwent LAAO. These included patients at >4% risk of BARC 3 to 5 bleeding or >1% risk of intracranial bleeding after the procedure. Two groups were established based on the discharge ATT. The simplified group included single antiplatelet treatment or no treatment, and the conventional group comprised dual antiplatelet treatment or anticoagulation (combined or not with antiplatelet therapy). RESULTS: A total of 1,135 patients were included. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 4.5±1.5 and 3.7±1.0, respectively. There were no differences in the composite endpoint (death, stroke, transient ischaemic attack, device-related thrombus or major bleeding) between the 2 groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.11; p=0.188). Although the rate of major bleeding during the first year was numerically lower in the simplified group, it did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.67, 95% CI: 0.41-1.10; p=0.104). Nonetheless, patients with previous major bleeding presented a significantly lower rate of major bleeding when using the simplified treatment (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.36-0.99; p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with very high bleeding risk, a simplified ATT after LAAO seems to be as effective as conventional protocols. Furthermore, patients with a history of major bleeding experienced a lower risk of major bleeding with the simplified ATT.

Determinants of adverse outcomes following patent foramen ovale closure in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure outcomes in the elderly. AIMS: Through this study, we aimed to determine the incidence and predictors of adverse events (recurrent cerebrovascular events [CVE] and atrial fibrillation [AF]) post-PFO closure in older patients with cryptogenic events. METHODS: This multicentre international study included patients over 60 years undergoing PFO closure for cryptogenic thromboembolic events. A dedicated database compiled baseline, procedural, and follow-up data. Competing risk and adjusted outcome predictor analyses were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 689 patients were included (median age 65 years, 41.2% female, mean Risk of Paradoxical Embolism [RoPE] score 4.5). The procedural success rate was 99.4%. After a median follow-up of 2 (interquartile range 1-5) years, 66 patients (9.6%) had died. CVE and stroke rates were 1.21 and 0.55 per 100 patient-years, respectively. Diabetes (hazard ratio [HR] 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.67-9.07; p=0.002) and atrial septal aneurysm (ASA; HR 5.25, 95% CI: 1.56-17.62; p=0.007) increased the CVE risk. New-onset AF occurred at a rate of 3.30 per 100 patient-years, with 51.3% within one month post-procedure. Older age (HR 1.05 per year, 95% CI: 1.00-1.09; p=0.023) and the absence of hypertension (HR 2.04, 95% CI: 1.19-3.57; p=0.010) were associated with an increased risk of AF. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients undergoing PFO closure had a relatively low rate of CVE and new-onset AF after a median follow-up of 2 years. The presence of diabetes, ASA, and a more advanced age determined an increased risk of adverse clinical events. These factors may be considered in the clinical decision-making process regarding PFO closure in this challenging population.

Low-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: The ADALA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Optimal antithrombotic therapy after percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is not well established as no randomized evaluation has been performed to date. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose direct oral anticoagulation (low-dose DOAC) vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 3 months after LAAO. Design, Setting, and Participants: The ADALA (Low-Dose Direct Oral Anticoagulation vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion) study was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolling participants from June 12, 2019, to August 28, 2022 from 3 European sites. Patients who underwent successful LAAO were randomly assigned 1:1 to low-dose DOAC vs DAPT for 3 months after LAAO. The study was prematurely terminated when only 60% of the estimated sample size had been included due to lower recruitment rate than anticipated due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Interventions: The low-dose DOAC group received apixaban, 2.5 mg every 12 hours, and the DAPT group received aspirin, 100 mg per day, plus clopidogrel, 75 mg per day, for the first 3 months after LAAO. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was a composite of safety (major bleeding) and efficacy (thromboembolic events including stroke, systemic embolism, and device-related thrombosis [DRT]) within the first 3 months after successful LAAO. Secondary end points included individual components of the primary outcome and all-bleeding events. Results: A total of 90 patients (mean [SD] age, 76.6 [8.1] years; 60 male [66.7%]; mean [SD] CHADS-VASc score, 4.0 [1.5]) were included in the analysis (44 and 46 patients in the low-dose DOAC and DAPT groups, respectively). A total of 53 patients (58.8%) presented with previous major bleeding events (60 gastrointestinal [66.7%] and 16 intracranial [17.8%]). At 3 months, low-dose DOAC was associated with a reduction of the primary end point compared with DAPT (2 [4.5%] vs 10 [21.7%]; hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.04-0.88; P = .02). Patients in the low-dose DOAC group exhibited a lower rate of DRT (0% vs 6 [8.7%]; P = .04) and tended to have a lower incidence of major bleeding events (2 [4.6%] vs 6 [13.0%]; P = .17), with no differences in thromboembolic events such as stroke and systemic embolism between groups (none in the overall population). Conclusions and Relevance: This was a small, randomized clinical trial comparing different antithrombotic strategies after LAAO. Results show that use of low-dose DOAC for 3 months after LAAO was associated with a better balance between efficacy and safety compared with DAPT. However, the results of the study should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size and will need to be confirmed in future larger randomized trials. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05632445.

Mitral Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair and Clinical Value of Novel Echocardiographic Biomarkers: A Hypothesis-Generating Study.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal data on reverse cardiac remodeling and outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) are limited. METHODS: A total of 78 patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) were included retrospectively. All patients had echocardiography at baseline and again six months after TEER. They were monitored for a primary composite endpoint, consisting of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death, over 13 months. RESULTS: Significant decreases in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), all myocardial work indices (except global wasted work), and the left atrial reservoir were observed after TEER. Additionally, there was a decrease in the pulmonary artery systolic pressure and an increase in the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure (TAPSE/PASP) ratio. A post-TEER TAPSE/PASP ratio of <0.47 (HR: 4.76, p-value = 0.039), and a post-TEER left atrial reservoir of <9.0% (HR: 2.77, p-value = 0.047) were associated with the primary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiography post-TEER reflects impairment in ventricular performance due to preload reduction and right ventricle and pulmonary artery coupling improvement. Short-term echocardiography after TEER identifies high-risk patients who could benefit from a close clinical follow-up. The prognostic significance of LA strain and the TAPSE/PASP ratio should be validated in subsequent large-scale prospective studies.

Transjugular Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement: Early Compassionate Use Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Data on procedural and early outcomes after transjugular transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate first-in-man procedural and clinical outcomes after transjugular TTVR with a special focus on patients who received large device sizes in whom TTVR outcomes have been questioned. METHODS: The retrospective registry included patients who underwent TTVR using the LuX-Valve Plus system (Jenscare Biotechnology Co Ltd) for symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (TR) from January 2022 until February 2024 at 15 international centers in a compassionate use setting. The endpoints were procedural TR reduction, in-hospital death, adverse events, and 1-month survival. We further stratified results according to the size of the implanted device (<55 vs ≥55 mm). RESULTS: The registry included a total of 76 patients at a median age of 78 years (Q1-Q3: 72-83 years, 47.4% women). TR was reduced to ≤2+ and ≤1+ in 94.7% and 90.8% of patients (75.0% of patients received TTVR devices ≥55 mm) with well-sustained results at 1-month follow-up (TR ≤2+ in 95.0% and ≤1+ 86.8%). Residual TR was paravalvular in all cases. In-hospital death occurred in 4 patients (5.3%). Four patients (5.3%) underwent cardiac surgery during index hospitalization. Major in-hospital bleeding events occurred in 5 patients (6.6%). New in-hospital pacemaker implantation was required in 3.9% of patients in the overall cohort (5.7% in "pacemaker-naive" individuals). No cases of valve thrombosis, stroke, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolism were observed. At 1-month follow-up, survival was 94.4%, and NYHA functional class significantly improved. One further patient received a pacemaker, 1 further bleeding event occurred, and 2 patients underwent reintervention or surgery within the first 30 days after TTVR. No differences in procedural outcomes or adverse events were observed after stratification for valve size. CONCLUSIONS: Transjugular TTVR appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe TR with comparable outcomes in very large tricuspid anatomies.

Outcomes of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program for in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a tertiary hospital in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze if the implementation of a multidisciplinary extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) program in a tertiary hospital in Spain is feasible and could yield survival outcomes similar to international published experiences. DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING: One tertiary referral university hospital in Spain. PATIENTS: All adult patients receiving ECPR between January 2019 and April 2023. INTERVENTIONS: Prospective collection of variables and follow-up for up to 180 days. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: To assess outcomes, survival with good neurological outcome defined as a Cerebral Performance Categories scale 1-2 at 180 days was used. Secondary variables were collected including demographics and comorbidities, cardiac arrest and cannulation characteristics, ROSC, ECMO-related complications, survival to ECMO decannulation, survival at Intensive Care Unit (ICU) discharge, survival at 180 days, neurological outcome, cause of death and eligibility for organ donation. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received ECPR, 29 for OHCA and 25 for IHCA. Initial shockable rhythm was identified in 27 (50%) patients. The most common cause for cardiac arrest was acute coronary syndrome [29 (53.7%)] followed by pulmonary embolism [7 (13%)] and accidental hypothermia [5 (9.3%)]. Sixteen (29.6%) patients were alive at 180 days, 15 with good neurological outcome. Ten deceased patients (30.3%) became organ donors after neuroprognostication. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a multidisciplinary ECPR program in an experienced Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation center in Spain is feasible and can lead to good survival outcomes and valid organ donors.

Relationship between persistence with topical antiglaucomatous prescription and patient socioeconomic status at a tertiary university hospital in Jerez de la Frontera (Spain).

INTRODUCTION: To study the relationship between socioeconomic status and persistence with topical antiglaucomatous medication. METHODS: A retrospective epidemiological observational cohort study was conducted with a sample of 1563 patients. The main dependent variable was persistence (medication possession ratio), the independent variable was socioeconomic status (deprivation index). Additional independent variables were used for multivariate analysis: individual health card index, sex, age, pharmacological group, number of eye drops, preservatives, diagnosis and concurrent medications. Bivariate statistical analysis was obtained using non-parametric tests. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: We obtained data showing greater persistence in the groups with a higher socioeconomic level (deprivation index 1 and 2), with medication possession ratio values of 79.97 and 75.30, respectively) as opposed to the groups at lower socioeconomic levels (deprivation index 4 and 5, with medication possession ratio values of 73.75 and 69.85, respectively. Logistic regression corroborated this difference, reaching a significant value (no persistence in deprivation index group 5 versus 1) with OR = 1.62; 95%CI: 1.13-2.31. Additionally, lower persistence was detected in males, under 60 years of age, undergoing treatment with alpha-agonists, and in patients with ocular hypertension. DISCUSSION: Low socioeconomic status of the patient was significantly associated with decreased persistence with topical antiglaucomatous therapy.

Impact of gender in patients with device-related thrombosis after left atrial appendage closure - A sub-analysis from the multicenter EUROC-DRT-registry.

BACKGROUND: Device-related thrombosis (DRT) is a common finding after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) and is associated with worse outcomes. As women are underrepresented in clinical studies, further understanding of sex differences in DRT patients is warranted. METHODS AND RESULTS: This sub-analysis from the EUROC-DRT-registry compromises 176 patients with diagnosis of DRT after LAAC. Women, who accounted for 34.7% (61/176) of patients, were older (78.0 ± 6.7 vs. 74.9 ± 9.1 years, p = .06) with lower rates of comorbidities. While DRT was detected significantly later in women (173 ± 267 vs. 127 ± 192 days, p = .01), anticoagulation therapy was escalated similarly, mainly with initiation of novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC), vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or heparin. DRT resolution was achieved in 67.5% (27/40) of women and in 75.0% (54/72) of men (p = .40). In the remaining cases, an intensification/switch of anticoagulation was conducted in 50.% (9/18) of men and in 41.7% (5/12) of women. Final resolution was achieved in 72.5% (29/40) cases in women, and in 81.9% (59/72) cases in men (p = .24). Women were followed-up for a similar time as men (779 ± 520 vs. 908 ± 687 days, p = .51). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in mortality rates in women (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 1.73, 95%-Confidence interval [95%-CI]: .68-4.37, p = .25) and no differences in stroke (HR: .83, 95%-CI: .30-2.32, p = .72) within 2 years after LAAC. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of risk factors and outcome revealed no differences between men and women, with DRT in women being diagnosed significantly later. Women should be monitored closely to assess for DRT formation/resolution. Treatment strategies appear to be equally effective.

Early Nonprocedural Bleeding After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) are at high bleeding risk. Intensive antithrombotic treatment is recommended after the procedure to prevent device-related thrombosis. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the incidence, consequences, and predictors of early nonprocedural bleeding after LAAO. METHODS: This was a multicenter study including 1,649 patients undergoing LAAO in 9 centers. Early nonprocedural bleeding was defined as bleeding unrelated to the procedure occurring within 3 months after device implantation. The severity of bleeding was defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 classification. A sensitivity analysis was performed at 45 days. RESULTS: A total of 121 (7.3%) patients experienced early nonprocedural bleeding events, and 69 (57.0%) were classified as major bleeding (4.2% of patients). Independent predictors of early nonprocedural bleeding were dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at discharge (adjusted HR [aHR]: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.12-2.33; P = 0.01), prior gastrointestinal bleeding (aHR: 2.15; 95% CI: 1.38-3.35; P < 0.001), and multiple locations of prior bleeding (aHR: 2.33; 95% CI: 1.34-4.05; P < 0.001). DAPT at discharge was predictive of both all and major nonprocedural bleeding at 3 months and 45 days. After a median follow-up of 2.3 years (Q1-Q3: 1.1-4.1 years), early nonprocedural bleeding was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause death (aHR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.15-2.06; P < 0.001). This heightened mortality risk was similar at 45 days. CONCLUSIONS: Early nonprocedural bleeding after LAAO occurred in ∼7% of patients within 3 months, with more than one-half being classified as major bleeding. Regardless of severity, early nonprocedural bleeding was associated with increased mortality. DAPT at discharge determined an increased risk of early nonprocedural bleeding after LAAO. These results emphasize the importance of bleeding risk for determining antithrombotic strategies after LAAO.

Echocardiography-Derived Hemodynamic Forces Are Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.

Introduction: Non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) is characterized by a reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF, <50%) and a high risk for heart failure (HF) and death. Echocardiography-derived hemodynamic forces (HDFs) may provide important information on LV mechanics, but their prognostic value is unknown. Aim: To explore the features of echocardiography-derived HDFs in NIDCM and their association with clinical endpoints. Methods: Asymptomatic, non-hospitalized NIDCM patients free from coronary artery disease and moderate or severe valvular heart disease were included in this single-center observational retrospective longitudinal study. Those with atrial fibrillation and a follow-up <12 months were excluded. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as a composite of all-cause death, HF hospitalization, and ambulatory intravenous diuretics administration. LV HDFs were analyzed with a prototype software. Apex-base (HDFs-ab), lateral-septal (HDFs-ls), and HDFs-angle were computed. Results: Ninety-seven patients were included, sixty-seven (69%) were males, mean age was 62 ± 14 years, and mean LVEF was 39.2 ± 8.6%. During a median follow-up of 4.2 (3.1-5.1) years, 19 (20%) patients experienced MACE. These patients had a higher HDFs-angle (71.0 (67.0-75.0) vs. 68.0 (63.0-71.0)°, p = 0.005), lower HDFs-ls (1.36 (1.01-1.85) vs. 1.66 ([1.28-2.04])%, p = 0.015), but similar HDFs-ab (5.02 (4.39-6.34) vs. 5.66 (4.53-6.78)%, p = 0.375) compared to those without MACE. in a Cox regression analysis, HDFs-angle (HR 1.16 (95%-CI 1.04-1.30), p = 0.007) was associated with MACE, while other conventional echocardiography parameters, including LVEF and LV longitudinal strain, were not. Conclusions: HDFs-angle is associated with clinical endpoints in NIDCM. A higher HDFs-angle may be a marker of impaired myocardial performance in patients with reduced LVEF.

Efficacy and safety of sagittal synostosis surgery in older (> 12 months) patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Sagittal synostosis is the most common isolated craniosynostosis. Surgical treatment of this synostosis has been extensively described in the global literature, with promising outcomes when it is performed in the first 12 months of life. However, in some cases, patients older than 12 months arrive at the craniofacial center with this synostosis. A comprehensive study on efficacy and perioperative outcomes has yet to be fully explored in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the available evidence of surgical outcomes for the treatment of sagittal synostosis among older patients to analyze the efficacy and safety of synostosis surgery in this unique population. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were searched for studies published from inception to March 2024 reporting surgical outcomes of synostosis surgery in older patients (> 12 months) with isolated sagittal synostosis. The main outcome was the reoperation rate, with secondary endpoints including transfusion rates, aesthetic outcomes, and surgical complications. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled proportion of the reoperation rate was 1%. The rate of excellent aesthetic results was 95%. The need for transfusion associated with the procedures was 86%, and finally, surgical complications attained a pooled ratio of 2%, indicating minimal morbidity associated with the surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Sagittal synostosis surgery is a safe and effective procedure to perform in older patients; this meta-analysis suggests that open surgery confers a significant rate of excellent aesthetic results with a low reoperation rate and minimal complications associated with the intervention. Future research with direct comparisons among different techniques will validate the findings of this study, which will all contribute to the rigor of synostosis management.