Review article: the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D in chronic hepatitis C infection.

BACKGROUND: Recent interest has focused on the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D, in particular, in patients with chronic hepatitis C. AIMS: To review data in the literature regarding the extra-skeletal effects of vitamin D in patients with chronic hepatitis C, with and without liver transplantation. METHODS: A Medline search was performed for relevant studies up to August 2011 using the terms 'vitamin D' 'chronic liver disease' and 'hepatitis C'. RESULTS: Vitamin D deficiency is very frequent before liver transplantation ranging between 51% and 92%, whereas, in the liver transplantation setting, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is also high. Severe liver disease may increase the risk of vitamin D deficiency and vice versa, as there may be a relationship between vitamin D deficiency and fibrosis. In patients with chronic hepatitis C and those with recurrent of hepatitis C after liver transplantation, recent clinical data shows that a higher serum vitamin D level is an independent predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) following anti-viral therapy, and that a higher SVR is achieved with vitamin D supplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Larger randomised clinical studies with adequate statistical power are needed to confirm these potentially very important nonskeletal effects of vitamin D in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Long-term therapy with adefovir dipivoxil in hepatitis B e antigen-negative patients developing resistance to lamivudine.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of long-term adefovir dipivoxil monotherapy or combination of adefovir and lamivudine in hepatitis B e antigen (HBe-Ag)-negative lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients is still under investigation. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of the long-term adefovir treatment alone or in combination with lamivudine in HBe-Ag-negative CHB patients who had developed breakthrough because of lamivudine-resistant mutants. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients received combination therapy, while 23 switched to adefovir alone after a 3-month course of combination therapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up after adefovir's onset was 31 (18-40) months. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. At 12 and 24 months, 69% and 89% of patients receiving combination therapy and 73% and 82% of patients receiving adefovir monotherapy had serum HBV-DNA <10(4) copies/mL (P > 0.5). Normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels occurred in 81% and 79% of patients receiving combination vs. 61% and 53% receiving adefovir monotherapy at 12 and 24 months, respectively (P > 0.50). Virological breakthroughs because of adefovir-resistant mutants occurred in five patients under adefovir monotherapy and in none receiving combination therapy (P = 0.001). No one developed decompensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma during follow-up. Re-introduction of lamivudine in adefovir-resistant patients achieved reduction in HBV-DNA and biochemical remission, but re-emergence of lamivudine mutants was observed in one patient after 7.5 months. CONCLUSION: In HBe-Ag-negative CHB patients with lamivudine resistance, adding adefovir to continuing lamivudine therapy maximizes anti-viral efficacy because of absence of viral resistance.

An evaluation of emergency sclerotherapy of varices in randomized trials: looking the needle in the eye.

BACKGROUND: The role of sclerotherapy for acute variceal bleeding is challenged by vasoactive drugs and by ligation. AIM: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate whether sclerotherapy remains a gold standard in acute variceal bleeding. METHODS: Sclerotherapy was evaluated across four randomized trial groups: (a) combined with vasoconstrictors vs. vasoconstrictors alone (five trials, with 400 patients); (b) vs. vasoconstrictors alone (15 trials, with 1296 patients); (c) vs. combination of vasoconstrictors and sclerotherapy (eight trials, with 1026 patients); (d) vs. ligation (12 trials, with 1309 patients). We used the risk difference (absolute risk reduction) as our main effect measure. RESULTS: The efficacy of acute sclerotherapy was highest vs. ligation at 95 %, with a small advantage for ligation (an overtube was used in eight trials) of 2.5 % (95 % CI 0.4 % to 4.6 %) ( P = 0.018), but no survival difference. Efficacy of sclerotherapy combined with vasoconstrictors vs. vasoconstrictors alone was 86 %, whereas it was 83 % for sclerotherapy vs. vasoconstrictors alone. In both these groups sclerotherapy was superior for control of bleeding at, respectively, 16.3 % (95 % CI 8.7 % to 23.9 % ( P = 0.0001) and 5.9 % (95 % CI, 1.5 % to 10.3 %) ( P = 0.008), with increased survival in the latter. In the combination group of sclerotherapy with vasoconstrictors, the efficacy of sclerotherapy alone was 69 %, with the combination superior in controlling bleeding, at 13.2 % (95 % CI, 8.4 % to 18.1 %) ( P < 0.0001) but with no survival difference. CONCLUSION: This comparison of sclerotherapy across trials demonstrates a problem in defining its real efficacy. The conclusive evidence for substituting banding ligation or the combination of vasoconstrictors with sclerotherapy as better therapeutic approaches has not been provided in randomized trials. Sclerotherapy can remain a gold standard in variceal bleeding but there is scope for further studies of ligation and vasoactive drugs.

A randomized, controlled trial of medical therapy versus endoscopic ligation for the prevention of variceal rebleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients who have had one variceal bleed are at high risk of rebleeding. Since its introduction, endoscopic variceal banding has been shown to be superior to needle sclerotherapy. Banding has not been compared with hepatic venous pressure-guided medical therapy (beta-blockers and nitrates). METHODS: One hundred two patients with cirrhosis and a recent esophageal variceal bleed were randomized to either endoscopic banding (51 patients) or medical therapy (51 patients). The hepatic venous pressure gradient was measured in all patients at baseline, at 3 months (drug therapy arm), and at yearly intervals (all patients). Primary end points were death or rebleeding. RESULTS: The 2 groups were well matched. Fifty-one percent were Pughs C, with a median Pughs score of 9.5. Nineteen patients rebled in the drug arm (median time, 24 days) and 27 patients in the banding arm (median time, 24 days). At 1 year, 43.7% of patients had bled in the drug arm compared with 53.8% in the banding arm (P = 0.25). Thirty-two percent of patients on medical therapy had died at 1 year, 22.5% on banding (P = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: In the prevention of variceal rebleeding, beta-blockers +/- nitrates are as effective as endoscopic banding.

The role of different immunosuppression in the long-term histological outcome of HCV reinfection after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The effect of the type of immunosuppression on the course of posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the histological outcome of posttransplant HCV infection with respect to initial immunosuppressive therapy in a cohort of 59 of 65 HCV positive transplant patients who survived at least 12 months. METHODS: Initial immunosuppressive therapy was triple (cyclosporine or tacrolimus and azathioprine and prednisolone) in 41, double (cyclosporine and prednisolone) in 5, and single (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) in 13 patients. There was blinded histological evaluation, based on necroinflammatory activity (grading score:0-18) and fibrosis (staging score: 0-6). The median histological follow-up was 36 (12-72) months. RESULTS: In the last liver biopsy, high necroinflammatory activity indicating chronic hepatitis (grading score > or =4) was found in 42 (71%) and severe fibrosis or cirrhosis (staging score > or =4) in 18 (30.5%) patients. High necroinflammatory activity was associated significantly with absence of pretransplant alcohol abuse (P=0.01) and relatively with occurrence of posttransplant acute lobular hepatitis C (P=0.055). Development of severe fibrosis or cirrhosis was significantly associated only with the type of initial immunosuppressive therapy. In particular, severe fibrosis or cirrhosis developed significantly more frequently in patients treated with triple or double (17/46 or 37%) than with single initial immunosuppressive therapy (1/13 or 7.7%) (adjusted for biopsy time: P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Severe fibrosis or cirrhosis appears to develop in 30% of HCV transplant patients in a median of 3 years and to be associated with heavier initial immunosuppression.

Review article: primary prophylaxis for portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis.

Variceal bleeding is a consequence of portal hypertension, which in turn is the major complication of hepatic cirrhosis. Given the high rate of mortality of the first bleeding episode, primary prophylaxis to prevent bleeding from varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy is the current optimal therapeutic approach. The difficulty in identification of patients with varices who will bleed, before they do so, can justify a strategy of treating all patients with varices prophylactically. We evaluated the various therapies that have been assessed in randomized controlled trials for prevention of first bleeding, using meta-analysis where applicable. The current first choice treatment is non-selective beta-blockers; it is cheap, easy to administer, and is effective in preventing the first variceal haemorrhage and bleeding from gastric mucosa. Combination drug therapy of beta-blockers and nitrates looks promising, but needs further evaluation in randomized controlled trials. The conflicting results of the randomized studies of endoscopic banding ligation and the small number of patients and clinical events, as well as the cost, do not warrant any change in current practice. However, endoscopic banding ligation may be a reasonable alternative for patients who cannot tolerate, or have contraindications to beta-blockers or no haemodynamic response to the drug therapy, but this must be proved in randomized trials.

Role of vasoactive drugs in the treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices.

Recent advances in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has opened new indications for the pharmacologic treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Treatment with vasoactive agents is immediately available, easy to use and can be considered as definitive or adjunctive to endoscopic therapy. The data from randomised trials of vasoactive drug treatment for acute variceal bleeding are reviewed, using meta-analysis where applicable. The use of vasopressin has been decreased as a consequence of its questionable efficacy and its high incidence of side effects. Terlipressin is the only drug that has been shown to improve survival, albeit in small trials and there are insufficient data of its use over 5 days. Somatostatin has been shown to have similar efficacy with terlipressin with significantly less side effects. The demonstrated efficacy of octreotide in acute variceal bleeding is less than terlipressin and somatostatin and it cannot be considered as drug of first choice. Somatostatin combined with sclerotherapy represents the optimal therapy today as this combination has been shown to be more effective than sclerotherapy alone and it is safe given over 5 days.

Randomised controlled trials of ursodeoxycholic-acid therapy for primary biliary cirrhosis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the only approved treatment for primary biliary cirrhosis, but its effect on disease progression and survival is uncertain. The aim of this study was to clarify the efficacy of UDCA in primary biliary cirrhosis. METHODS: A systematic review, including the use of meta-analysis, was done for the randomised and switch-over phases of trials comparing UDCA with placebo, obtained from Medline and Embase databases, and from manual searches derived from review articles and abstracts of major international meetings. All trials had more than a mean of 6 months' follow-up and only included patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) according to established diagnostic criteria. FINDINGS: 17 relevant articles were identified: 11 randomised controlled trials, including 1272 patients, and six reports of the switch-over phases. UCDA had a favourable effect on liver biochemistry in most of the studies but not on symptoms or the progression of histological stage; two studies did not assess survival, liver transplantation, or complications of liver disease. Meta-analysis showed no difference between UDCA and placebo in the incidence of death (odds ratio 1.21, 95% CI 0.71-2.04), liver related death (0.72, 0.22-2.32), liver transplantation (1.27, 0.78-2.07), death or liver transplantation (1.26, 0.87-1.82), and in the development of complications of liver disease (1.11, 0.64-1.92). With the primary end point defined by the authors (a combined end point in three studies, and death or liver transplantation in the others) an odds ratio of 1.53 (0.97-2.42) was obtained. Assessment of the switch-over phases, during which there was a longer follow-up, did not change the results of the meta-analysis. INTERPRETATION: Published randomised controlled trials of UDCA do not show evidence of therapeutic benefit in PBC and its use as standard therapy needs to be re-examined.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt compared with endoscopic treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding: A meta-analysis.

Endoscopic treatment (ET) is frequently used to prevent variceal rebleeding but this still occurs in about 50% of patients. Recently, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been compared with ET in several trials. Using a meta-analysis, we evaluated randomized trials comparing TIPS to ET assessing prevention of rebleeding, survival, and the effects on resource use and the quality of patients' lives. Medical databases were searched between January 1988 and January 1999 as well as published citations and conference proceedings. Sensitivity analyses for type of publication, methodological quality score, mean duration of follow-up, type of ET, etiology, and severity of liver disease were performed. Eleven randomized trials involving 811 patients fulfilled the selection criteria. The median follow-up ranged from 10 to 32 months. Variceal rebleeding was significantly more frequent with ET (47%) compared with TIPS (19%) (odds ratio [OR], 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8-5.2; P <.001), but there was no difference in mortality (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.71-1.34). Post-treatment encephalopathy occurred significantly less often after ET (19%) than after TIPS (34%) (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.60; P <.001). In the studies showing resource use this was more extensive for TIPS. The sensitivity analyses did not alter the main conclusion, and sole comparison with endoscopic ligation did not alter these results. In conclusion, in patients with variceal bleeding, TIPS compared with ET reduces the rebleeding rate, but does not improve survival, and increases the incidence of encephalopathy in a period of 1 to 2.5 years. Thus, TIPS cannot be recommended as the first choice treatment for prevention of variceal rebleeding.

Thrombopoietin concentrations are low in patients with cirrhosis and thrombocytopenia and are restored after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients may be due to deficient production of thrombopoietin. AIMS: To determine the relation between thrombopoietin and thrombocytopenia in cirrhotic patients before and after orthotopic liver transplantation. METHODS: Thrombopoietin concentrations and platelet counts were measured in 43 cirrhotic patients and 21 normal controls and serially for 14 days after transplantation in 23/43 patients. RESULTS: 27 of the 43 patients had thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 120 x 10(9)/l; group 1) whereas 16 patients had normal platelet count (group 2). Thrombopoietin concentrations were lower in group 1 than in group 2 (92.5 (20.3-286.3) v 226.6 (30.1-848.3) pg/ml, p=0.003) and normal controls (92.5 (20.3-286.3) v 158.3 (22.5-232.9) pg/ml, p=0.028). Post-transplantation thrombopoietin concentrations increased with a peak at day 5. The rise was significant in patients with low pretransplantation platelet count (89.1 (21.29-247.6) to 545.1 (66.2-2569) pg/ml; n=16, p=0.001) but not in those with normal platelet count (262.8 (30.1-848.3) to 315.1 (114-954.6) pg/ml; n=7, p=0.47). No correlation was found pretransplantation between spleen volume and platelet count (r=-0.11, p=0.6) or thrombopoietin concentrations (r=-0.04, p=0.8). However, pretransplantation thrombopoietin concentrations correlated with platelet count (r=0.47, p=0.0015), whereas an inverse correlation was found between peak thrombopoietin concentrations and nadir platelet count (r=-0.41 p=0. 049) post-transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate thrombopoietin production may contribute to cirrhotic thrombocytopenia. Thrombopoietin production is restored after liver transplantation leading to the resolution of thrombocytopenia.

Bacterial infection in the pathogenesis of variceal bleeding.

Variceal bleeding is a life-threatening complication of cirrhosis. Potential risk factors include clinical, endoscopic, and haemodynamic factors, but why bleeding occurs unpredictably in individual patients is not known. We postulate that bacterial infections in patients with variceal haemorrhage may be the critical factor that triggers bleeding. In patients with large varices and a high wall tension, the release of endotoxin into the systemic circulation during episodes of bacterial infection results in a further increase in portal pressure through the induction of endothelin and possibly vasoconstrictive cyclo-oxygenase products. The subsequent contraction of hepatic stellate cells causes a rise in intrahepatic vascular resistance. Furthermore, endotoxin-induced nitric oxide and prostacyclin, and prostacyclin induced by endothelin could inhibit platelet aggregation, which may result in a further deterioration of primary haemostasis at the level of varix. We propose that the combination of these two effects leads to the onset of variceal haemorrhage.

Bacterial infection is independently associated with failure to control bleeding in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage.

Bacterial infection is frequently diagnosed in cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of failure to control bleeding in cirrhotic patients during the first 5 days after the episode of variceal bleeding in relation to the diagnosis of bacterial infection and use of antibiotics. One hundred seventy-seven consecutive admissions for gastrointestinal bleeding in 151 patients were evaluated prospectively. From them, 163 admissions for variceal bleeding in 137 patients were included in the main analysis. Bleeding was managed in a standardized protocol using octreotide or terlipressin with sclerotherapy or band ligation for active bleeding at endoscopy. The end points were defined as in Baveno guidelines related to transfusion requirement or fresh hematemesis after 6 hours from time zero. The standardized screening protocol for bacterial infection consisted of chest radiograph and blood, urine, and ascitic fluid cultures. Active bleeding was reported at endoscopy in 86 admissions (53%). Failure to control bleeding occurred in 76 patient admissions (47%). Empirical antibiotic treatment was used in 113 admissions (69%), whereas in 81% of them (91 admissions, 56%) 102 bacterial infections were documented. Multivariate analysis showed that proven bacterial infection (P < .0001) or antibiotic use (P < .003) as well as active bleeding at endoscopy (P < .001) and Child-Pugh score (P < .02) were independent prognostic factors of failure to control bleeding. The results remained unchanged when all patient admissions with gastrointestinal bleeding of any source were included in the multivariate analysis. Bacterial infection is associated with failure to control variceal bleeding and needs to be evaluated in the planning and analysis of clinical trials.

Serum/ascites albumin gradient: its value as a rational approach to the differential diagnosis of ascites.

BACKGROUND: The utility of differentiating ascites into 'transudate' and 'exudate' has recently been challenged. The aim of the present study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the serum/ascites albumin gradient, proposed as a new biochemical criterion for the differential diagnosis of ascites, with the markers traditionally used for the classification of peritoneal fluid into transudate and exudate. METHODS: Paired ascitic fluid and serum samples from 51 patients were examined with an established method for the diagnosis of the cause of ascitic fluid collection. Included in the study were 32 patients with ascites related to portal hypertension (cirrhosis, n = 28; 'cardiac' ascites, n = 2; Budd-Chiari, n = 2) and 19 patients with ascites not related to portal hypertension (peritoneal carcinomatosis, n = 17; tuberculous peritonitis, n = I; secondary bacterial peritonitis, n = 1). Specimens were collected during an episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in 7 of 28 patients with cirrhosis. The serum/ascites albumin gradient was compared with ascitic fluid total protein, ascites/serum total protein ratio, ascites lactic dehydrogenase concentration, and ascites/serum lactic dehydrogenase ratio. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy was 98% for the serum/ascites albumin gradient compared with only 52%-80% for the four other markers tested. In patients with infected ascites, diagnostic accuracy was 89% for the albumin gradient and < or = 50% for the four other markers. CONCLUSIONS: The classification of ascites into transudate and exudate appears to be based on markers with low diagnostic accuracy. Differential diagnosis of ascites should be based on the serum/ascites albumin gradient, which is a reliable marker distinguishing ascites related to portal hypertension from all other causes of ascitic fluid collection, regardless of the presence of bacterial infection.