RESUMEN
To examine the association of preoperative opioids and/or benzodiazepines on postoperative outcomes in total knee and hip arthroplasty, we retrospectively compared postoperative outcomes in those prescribed preoperative opioids and/or benzodiazepines versus those who were not who underwent elective total knee and hip arthroplasty at a single urban academic institution. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for readmission rate, respiratory failure, infection, and adverse cardiac events. Multivariable zero-truncated negative binomial regression was used for length of stay. After exclusions, there were 4307 adult patients in the study population, 2009 of whom underwent total knee arthroplasty and 2298 of whom underwent total hip arthroplasty. After adjusting for potential confounders, preoperative benzodiazepine use was associated with increased odds of readmission (p < 0.01). Preoperative benzodiazepines were not associated with increased odds of respiratory failure nor increased length of stay. Preoperative opioids were not associated with increased odds of the examined outcomes. There were insufficient numbers of infection and cardiac events for analysis. In this study population, preoperative benzodiazepines were associated with increased odds of readmission. Preoperative opioids were not associated with increased odds of the examined outcomes. Studies are needed to further examine risks associated with preoperative benzodiazepine use.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Readmisión del Paciente , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Objectives To compare postoperative outcomes in patients prescribed long-acting opioids vs opioid-naïve patients who underwent elective noncardiac surgeries. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Single urban academic institution. Methods and Subjects We retrospectively compared postoperative outcomes in long-acting opioid users vs opioid-naïve patients who underwent elective noncardiac surgeries. Inpatient and ambulatory surgery cohorts were separately analyzed. Preoperative medication lists were queried for the presence of long-acting opioids or absence of opioids. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to analyze the impact of long-acting opioid use on readmission rate, respiratory failure, and adverse cardiac events. Multivariable zero-truncated negative binomial regression was used to examine length of stay. Results After exclusions, there were 93,644 adult patients in the study population, 23,605 of whom underwent inpatient surgeries and 70,039 of whom underwent ambulatory surgeries. After adjusting for potential confounders and inpatient surgeries, preoperative long-acting opioid use was associated with increased risk of prolonged length of stay (incidence rate ratio = 1.1, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0-1.2, P < 0.01) but not readmission. For ambulatory surgeries, preoperative long-acting opioid use was associated with increased risk of all-cause as well as pain-related readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 2.1, 99% CI = 1.5-2.9, P < 0.001; OR = 2.0, 99% CI = 0.85-4.2, P = 0.02, respectively). There were no significant differences for respiratory failure or adverse cardiac events. Conclusions The use of preoperative long-acting opioids was associated with prolonged length of stay for inpatient surgeries and increased risk of all-cause and pain-related readmission for ambulatory surgeries. Timely interventions for patients on preoperative long-acting opioids may be needed to improve these outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Preoperatorio , Adulto , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Dolor Postoperatorio , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
We have demonstrated that enteral glutamine provides protection to the postischemic gut, and that peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) plays a role in this protection. Using Cre/lox technology to generate an intestinal epithelial cell (IEC)-specific PPARγ null mouse model, we now investigated the contribution of IEC PPARγ to glutamine's local and distant organ-protective effects. These mice exhibited absence of expression of PPARγ in the intestine but normal PPARγ expression in other tissues. After 1 h of intestinal ischemia under isoflurane anesthesia, wild-type and null mice received enteral glutamine (60 mM) or vehicle followed by 6 h of reperfusion or 7 days in survival experiments and compared with shams. Small intestine, liver, and lungs were analyzed for injury and inflammatory parameters. Glutamine provided significant protection against gut injury and inflammation, with similar protection in the lung and liver. Changes in systemic tumor necrosis factor-α reflected those seen in the injured organs. Importantly, mice lacking IEC PPARγ had worsened injury and inflammation, and glutamine lost its protective effects in the gut and lung. The survival benefit found in glutamine-treated wild-type mice was not observed in null mice. Using an IEC-targeted loss-of-function approach, these studies provide the first in vivo confirmation in native small intestine and lung that PPARγ is responsible for the protective effects of enteral glutamine in reducing intestinal and lung injury and inflammation and improving survival. These data suggest that early enteral glutamine may be a potential therapeutic modality to reduce shock-induced gut dysfunction and subsequent distant organ injury.