Investigating the impact of non-gated thoracic CT prior to CTCA to reduce layered testing.

AIM: To determine the proportion of computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (CTCA) referrals with coronary artery calcification (CAC) evident on previous non-cardiac CT imaging and how this impacted the diagnostic yield for CTCA, the requirement for additional diagnostic testing, and the associated costs to confirm or refute obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of CTCA examinations was undertaken between 01/05/2018 and 31/05/2020 in which the examinations were cross referenced for previous non-gated thoracic CT at Royal United Hospitals Bath. Major epicardial vessel CAC on baseline CT was re-evaluated by published semi-quantitative methods, giving a per-patient CAC score (mild = 1-3, moderate = 4-6, severe >6). Subsequent incomplete CTCA diagnostic yield, further testing, and cost implications were examined. RESULTS: Of the 2140 CTCA examinations identified, 13% (280/2140) had a preceding non-gated thoracic CT (53% female, age 63 ± 11 years). The incomplete diagnostic rate increased with CAC grade, mild 32%, (RR 12; 95% CI 4-40), moderate 64% (RR 25; 95% CI 8-80), severe 75%, (RR 29; 95% CI 9-94). Additional diagnostic testing occurred in 4% for the mild CAC category, and 14% and 42% for moderate and severe, respectively. When severe CAC was identified on a non-gated thoracic CT a cost saving of £171/patient (dobutamine stress echo [DSE]) and £61/patient (myocardial perfusion scintigraphy [MPS]) was established with a direct to functional testing pathway. CONCLUSIONS: In patients referred for CTCA where severe CAC was identified on a preceding non-gated thoracic CT a direct to functional testing altered management in 42% of cases and was cost-effective.

Coronary artery calcification on routine CT has prognostic and treatment implications for all ages.

AIMS: Guidelines have recommended reporting coronary artery calcification (CAC) if present on chest CT imaging regardless of indication. This study assessed CAC prevalence, prognosis and the potential clinical impact of its reporting. METHODS: We performed a single-centre retrospective analysis (January-December 2015) of 1400 chest CTs (200 consecutive within each age group: <40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, ≥90). CTs were re-reviewed for CAC presence and severity and excluded if prior coronary intervention. Comorbidities, statin prescription and clinical outcomes (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, all-cause mortality) were recorded. The impact of reporting CAC was assessed against pre-existing statin prescriptions. RESULTS: 1343 patients were included (mean age 63±20 years, 56% female). Inter- and intra-observer variability for CAC presence at re-review was almost perfect (κ 0.89, p < 0.001; κ 0.90, p < 0.001) and for CAC grading was substantial and almost perfect (κ 0.68, p < 0.001; κ 0.91, p < 0.001). CAC was observed in 729/1343 (54%), more frequently in males (p < 0.001) and rising age (p < 0.001). A high proportion of patients with CAC in all age groups had no prior statin prescription (range: 42% [80-89] to 100% [<40]). The 'number needed to report' CAC presence to potentially impact management across all ages was 2. 689 (51%) patients died (median follow-up 74-months). CAC presence was associated with risk of MI, stroke and all-cause mortality (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, severe calcification predicted risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.8 [1.2-2.5], p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Grading of CAC was reproducible, and although prevalence rose with age, prognostic and treatment implications were maintained in all ages.

CT coronary angiography-guided cardiovascular risk screening in asymptomatic patients: is it time?

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in the UK, whilst millions live with various forms of the disease. Coronary artery disease constitutes a significant portion of this morbidity and mortality, and is the leading cause of premature death. Increasing focus is thus being placed on the optimisation of CVD prevention, where risk screening plays a key role. Indeed, the decline in age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality achieved up to now has been largely attributed to primary preventative therapies (e.g., statins) introduced earlier in the disease process. National initiatives exist to improve cardiovascular health at a population level, but in its current form, CVD screening at the individual level is predominantly undertaken using multivariate risk scores based on population-based data. These have multiple innate flaws, highlighted in this review. Non-invasive imaging plays a key role in the screening of other disease processes, helping to personalise the screening process. Although the coronary artery calcium score as a screening tool has a role in national and international guidance, whether a shift to screening with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) is now appropriate is open for discussion. Image acquisition techniques continue to improve with reducing radiation exposure and an ever-expanding evidence-base for additional prognostic data offered by CTCA. This enables the potential identification of sub-clinical atherosclerosis, including with novel artificial intelligence techniques. This review aims to report current guidelines regarding cardiac CT imaging in the asymptomatic primary prevention setting, advances in various CT technologies and future opportunities for progress in this field.

Real-world clinical and cost analysis of CT coronary angiography and CT coronary angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT)-guided care in the National Health Service.

AIM: To quantify the real-world clinical and cost impact of computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography (CTCA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in the National Health Service (NHS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive clinical CTCA examinations from September to December 2018 with ≥1 stenosis of ≥25% underwent FFRCT analysis. The Heart Team reviewed clinical data and CTCA findings, blinded to FFRCT values, and documented hypothetical consensus management. FFRCT results were then unblinded and hypothetical consensus management re-recorded. Diagnostic waiting times for management pathways were estimated. A per-patient cost analysis for diagnostic certainty regarding coronary artery disease (CAD) management was performed using 2014-2020 NHS tariffs for pre- and post-FFRCT pathways. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-one CTCAs were performed during the study period. Fifty-seven percent (145/251) had no CAD or stenosis <25%. One study was non-diagnostic. Of the remaining 42% (105/251), two were ineligible for FFRCT and there was a 5% (5/103) failure rate. FFRCT led to a change in hypothetical management in 65% (64/98; p<0.001) patients with a functional imaging test cancelled in 17% (17/98) and a diagnostic angiogram cancelled in 47% (46/98). FFRCT-guided management had a reduced mean time to definitive investigation compared with CTCA alone (28 ± 4 versus 44 ± 4 days; p=0.004). Using the proposed 2020/21 tariff, CTCA + FFRCT for stenosis ≥50% resulted in a diagnostic pathway £44.97 more expensive per patient than usual care without FFRCT. CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world NHS setting, FFRCT-guided management has the potential to rationalise patient management, accelerate diagnostic pathways, and depending on the stenosis severity modelled, may be cost-effective.