What We Know From Reports on Type III Endoleak in the Literature.

Objective: To analyse case reports published on the latest generations of endograft (EG) and understand the mechanisms of type III endoleak (EL) development. Methods: A literature review was undertaken of English language case reports and series that concerned modular junction or component disconnection (type IIIa EL) and fabric perforations (type IIIb EL) after endovascular aneurysm repair. Results: Of the 2 785 studies, 56 full texts were chosen to review 73 cases. Type III EL was diagnosed with computed tomography angiography in 67.1% and digital subtraction angiography in 12.3%; the rest were identified during surgery. Of the 73 EG, 65 (89.0%) were made of polyethylene terephthalate and seven (9.6%) were polytetrafluoroethylene. The type of material was not mentioned in one (1.4%) case report. There were 25 (34.2%) type IIIa and 48 (65.8%) type IIIb EL. The most frequent were trunk-trunk in nine (12.3%) and trunk-limb overlap separations in 14 (19.2%). Type IIIb EL in the trunk area was identified in 27 (37.0%) cases, while 21 (28.8%) defects were found in the limbs. Stent fractures were recognised as an underlying mechanism of type IIIb EL development in one report. A combination of fabric lesions in the trunk and limb area was found in one case. Seven type IIIb EL were related to suture disruption or suture-fabric abrasions. Four cases were related to stent-fabric abrasions, and two developed as a result of fabric fatigue owing to kinking. Information on the mechanisms of degradation was only occasionally and scarcely presented. Given the small number of reports and lack of detailed analysis, no definitive conclusions could be drawn. Conclusion: The available information is scarce and does not allow any definitive conclusions to be drawn on the mechanisms that lead to the development of type III EL. Further explant analyses would be beneficial.

Editor's Choice -- Type IIIb Endoleaks: Fabric Perforations of Explanted New Generation Endoprostheses.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse explanted endografts (EGs) and describe fabric degradation responsible for type IIIb endoleaks. METHODS: As part of the European collaborative retrieval programme, 32 EGs with fabric defects on macroscopic evaluation were selected. The explanted EGs were processed and studied based on the ISO 9001 certified standard protocol. It includes instructions on the collection, transportation, cleaning, and examination of explanted material. The precise analysis was performed with a digital microscope of 20 - 200 times magnification. Possible perforation mechanisms were assessed in stress tests. RESULTS: The median time to explantation of the 32 EGs was 54 months. The explants included 65 separate EG modules, with 46 (70.8%) having a combined 388 fabric perforations. Each EG had a median of 4.79 mm2 (interquartile range [IQR] 9.86 mm2) of cumulated hole area (an average of 0.13% of an EG's area). There were 239 (61.6%) expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE; 11 EGs) and 149 (38.4%) polyethylene terephthalate (PET; 21 EGs) fabric ruptures, with no difference in hole distribution between these types of material. Overall, 126 (32.5%) stent related and 262 (67.5%) non-stent related fabric perforations were identified. Perforations caused by fabric fatigue in ePTFE (151, 63.2%) and material kinking in PET (41, 27.5%) were the most common. The stent related perforations were larger in size (0.80 mm2) than non-stent related perforations (0.19 mm2); p < .001. Wider interstent spaces and prolonged implantation duration were associated with an increased risk of stent related perforation development; p < .001 and p = .004, respectively. Large stent related perforations were also detected in the short term, suggesting mechanical issues as underlying causes. CONCLUSION: The fabric of EGs may degrade and lead to the development of perforations. The largest perforations are stent related. Their occurrence and size depend on the implantation time and the EG shape affected by arterial tortuosity. The conclusions are limited to the samples from a select explant group.

Robotic Surgery For in situ Renal Artery Aneurysm Repair: Technical Note and Literature Review About a Mini- Invasive Alternative.

CASE REPORT: Classical surgical options for renal artery aneurysm (RAA) are usually restricted to endovascular surgery or open repair, either using an in-situ or ex-situ approach. A 45-year-old woman presenting with a 20-mm complex RAA with hilum location, not suitable for endovascular repair renal was treated with a mini-invasive robotic approach. This approach allowed an in-situ reconstruction in a complete mini-invasive manner with the Da Vinci Xi robot (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). The robotic system was used for both surgical exposure and aneurysmectomy with patch closure. Clamping time was 38 minutes (warm ischemia), total operative time was 210 minutes. LIITERATURE REVIEW: A comprehensive literature review was performed concerning the studies reporting a robotic approach for RAA. Main outcomes of interest were surgical technique, total operative time, clamping time, blood loss and postoperative renal function. Seven studies were identified, reporting a total of 20 RAAs. Most of the RAA were treated by aneurysmoraphy (n=9). Median total operative time varied between 228 and 300 min (range: 155 - 360 minutes), median clamping time varied between 26 and 44 minutes (range: 10 - 82 minutes). Median blood loss was comprised between100 and 150 mL (range: 25 - 650 mL). No alteration of renal function in the early post-operative period was reported. CONCLUSION: RAA in-situ repair with a robotic approach is feasible and safe and should be considered as an alternative to open surgical repair when endovascular technique cannot be an option.

Radiation-induced lower-limb arteriopathy: report of 4 cases and systematic literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Radiation-induced arteriopathy (RIA) is a rare complication but may become more common due to the increased use of radiotherapy and the prolonged survival of patients. There is still a lack of evidence concerning treatment options. The aim of this study is to review reported cases of lower-limb RIA in order to provide guidelines for management. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We reported 4 cases treated for lower limb RIA and performed a systematic literature review without time limitation in the Medline database using the MeSh tems "iliac artery/radiation effects" OR "femoral artery/radiation effects." Main outcomes of interest were radiation dose, time before symptoms, symptoms, involved vessels, treatment and outcome. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty-five studies were included, reporting a total of 43 patients. Median time between irradiation and symptoms was 12 years (range: 9 days-49 years), with a median irradiation dose of 40Gy. Clinical presentation was claudication in 18 patients (52%), critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) in 4 patients (11%), acute limb ischemia (ALI) in 3 patients (9%) and hemorrhage in 6 patients (17%), the remaining 4 patients were asymptomatic (11%). Vessels involved were iliac arteries in 65% of the cases, femoropopliteal arteries in 28% of cases and concomitant supra and infrainguinal vessels in 7% of the cases. Claudication was mostly treated by open surgery (62%). Treatment of CLTI included primary amputation (50%), open surgery (25%) or endovascular surgery (25%). ALI was treated medically (33%), by open surgery (33%) or in situ thrombolysis (33%). Hemorrhagic cases or pulsatile masses were mostly treated by open surgery (66%). Follow-up was reported in 26 patients (67%), with mean follow-up of 12 months (range: 2 weeks - 5 years). During follow-up, 16% of these patients presented a recurrence of symptoms, and 8% required a reintervention. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be no evidence for open versus endovascular treatment, but close and long-term follow-up is needed in these patients due to the possible late presentation and recurrence of symptoms after treatment.

The Impact of EndoAnchor Penetration on Endograft Structure: First Report of Explant Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The adjunctive use of Heli-FX EndoAnchors (EAs) in endovascular aneurysm repair has been proposed for the treatment or prevention of type Ia endoleaks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the penetration of EAs on endograft textile structure from two aortic endografts that had been explanted for persistent type Ia endoleak despite the implantation of EAs. METHODS: An Aorfix aortic endograft was implanted in an 85 year old man. Six months later, six EAs were implanted for Ia endoleak. The endograft was explanted as an emergency seven months later for aneurysm rupture. An Endurant II aortic endograft was implanted in an 80 year old man. Seven EAs were implanted 24 months later for type Ia endoleak. A proximal cuff extension with bilateral renal and superior mesenteric artery chimneys was performed 18 months later to treat a persistent type Ia endoleak. Endograft explantation was performed six months later owing to persistent type Ia endoleak and aneurysm sac enlargement. Explant analysis in both cases was performed at GEPROVAS. RESULTS: Systematic analysis of both explants, including the 13 EAs, revealed the following lesions: (1) alteration of textile structure directly linked to several penetrations of the fabric with the same EA and tears of the textile fibres in two cases; (2) tears of the binding threads as the EA had passed through them in five cases; and (3) interactions between EA and endograft stents in four cases. CONCLUSION: The site of EA penetration into the endograft might contribute to endograft fabric damage and to a loss of stability of the endograft at the level of the aortic neck.