RESUMEN
PURPOSE: As the demand in cancer care continues to increase, health systems require a workforce of highly educated specialists and generalists to provide continuity of care across settings. OBJECTIVES: Led by de Souza Institute in Canada, an interdisciplinary working group was formed to develop a competency framework with relevance across regulated health professionals involved in cancer care. METHODS: The working group was presented with results from a scoping review of national and international guidelines, standards, and competencies in oncology, as well as data from needs assessments on continuing education opportunities and oncology topics most relevant to clinicians. Fifty-one professionals from, e.g., family medicine, pharmacy, social work, psychology, occupational therapy, and nursing participated in seven focus groups. An additional 32 nurses participated in a nursing-specific needs assessment survey. Using modified Delphi technique, working group members conducted three iterative rounds to review data and built consensus on competency items in relation to three levels of expertise, from early learner/novice practitioner, advancing practitioner, to expert practitioner. RESULTS: A final consensus was reached for the selection of competencies that reflect optimal cancer care mapped into three levels of expertise, as well as knowledge, skills, and attitudes expected of each level. Examples for the competency for early learner/novice practitioner include the following: Have awareness of common ethical issues in cancer care (knowledge); demonstrate ability to discuss, educate, and counsel patients and their support persons(s) regarding preferences (skills); and appreciate the impact of culture, the sensitivity, and diversity of attitudes in relation to cancer (attitude). Expert practitioner examples include: recognition of need for, and ability to advocate for challenges involving equity and access in order to improve health outcomes (skill) and awareness of workplace complexities, such as provider roles, team functioning, and organizational environments affecting patient-practitioner relationships (attitude). CONCLUSION: The de Souza Interprofessional practice cancer competency framework provides a set of shared competencies and a novice to expert pathway for clinicians across disciplines and supports a more standardized learning and comprehensive approach in organizing professional development towards a coordinated, high quality, and person-centered care.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación en Salud/métodos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud/educación , Neoplasias/terapia , Canadá , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Evaluación de Necesidades , Lugar de TrabajoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Delivering person-centered care begins with understanding perspectives of individuals who are recipients of care about their experiences and what constitutes a "positive" experience. METHODS: This project explored views of individuals with cancer regarding their care experiences and identified aspects of care patients thought were important through a qualitative analysis of data from the Ambulatory Oncology Patient Satisfaction Survey (AOPSS). Permission was obtained from seven Canadian provinces to access de-identified written comments to a final open-ended question on the survey: Is there anything else you would like to tell us about your cancer care experience? The descriptive qualitative analysis was guided by two questions: (1) what is the nature of the written comments and (2) what are key ideas expressed about care experiences? Key ideas were collated across provinces to identify significant themes within the national sample. RESULTS: The sample included comments from 6232 individuals. A total of 42.5% comments were positive, 29.7% were negative, and 19.8% were mixed. Four broad themes were identified from the comments: (1) characteristics of a "positive" experience, (2) personal care, (3) interaction with health care providers, and (4) service delivery. Respondents cited being treated as a person with respect and dignity, clear communication, access to relevant and timely information, and care that takes their needs into account as important aspects. Communication, consistency, and ongoing interactions with staff were highlighted as essential elements of a positive experience, yet areas where improvements in care are necessary. CONCLUSION: Patients reported a range of aspects that contribute to positive and negative care experiences which can be used to guide quality improvement initiatives in cancer centers. Results underscore the importance of having data collection systems in place to ensure agencies and providers have timely feedback about patients' experiences and concerns in order to provide responsive and individualized care.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Canadá , Comunicación , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/normas , Pacientes/psicología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To understand the experiences of adult cancer survivors as they transition from the end of cancer treatment to follow-up care as a basis for developing actionable recommendations to integrate cancer care delivery and survivorship care. METHODS: A national survey was conducted in collaboration with ten Canadian provinces to identify unmet needs and experiences with follow-up for cancer survivors between 1 and 3 years post-treatment. Surveys were available in English and French and completed either on paper or on-line. Samples were drawn from provincial cancer registries and packages distributed by mail. RESULTS: A total of 40,790 survey packages were mailed out across the ten provinces and 12,929 surveys were completed by adults (age 30+ years), and 329 surveys were completed by adolescents and young adults (age 18 to 29 years) giving an overall response rate of 33.3%. For the purposes of this publication, the focus will be on the adult sample. In the adult cohort (age 30+ years), 51% of the sample were females, 60% were 65 years of age or older, and 77% had not experienced metastatic spread. Three-quarters reported their health as good/very good and 82% that their quality of life was good/very good. Overall, 87% experienced at least one physical concern, 78% experienced at least one emotional concern, and 44% experienced at least one practical concern. The average number of concerns reported for each domain ranged from 2.0 to 3.8. For those who sought help, a third experienced difficulty obtaining assistance or did not receive it. The most frequently cited reasons for not seeking help was that someone had told them what they were experiencing was normal. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that many adult survivors have concerns about physical, emotional, and practical issues but are not receiving help to reduce their suffering. It is imperative we take action to correct this current reality.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/terapia , Cuidado de Transición/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , Canadá/epidemiología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Emociones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Cancer patients experience a high symptom burden throughout their illness. Quality cancer symptom management has been shown to improve patient quality of life and prevent emergency department use. Cancer Care Ontario introduced standardized symptom screening in Ontario, using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) to facilitate patient reporting and management of symptoms. However, patient symptom information is not always sufficiently addressed. To address these gaps, patient and family advisors collaborated with clinicians, administrators and health system leaders from across the Province in a Symptom Management Summit to share perspectives and co-design context-specific solutions to improve care in their region.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/complicaciones , Pacientes/psicología , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Instituciones Oncológicas/organización & administración , Familia/psicología , Humanos , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Neoplasias/psicología , Ontario , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/métodosRESUMEN
AbstractCancer is one of the leading causes of death in the world. Along with increased new cases, cancer care has become increasingly complex due to advances in diagnostics and treatments, greater survival, and new models of palliative care. Nurses are a critical resource for cancer patients and their families. Their roles and responsibilities are expanding across the cancer care continuum, calling for specialized training and support. Formal education prepares nurses for entry level of practice, however, it does not provide the specialized competencies required for quality care of cancer patients. There is urgent need to align the educational system to the demands of the health care system, ease transition from formal academic systems to care settings, and to instill a philosophy of lifelong learning. We describe a model of education developed by de Souza Institute in Canada, based on the Novice to Expert specialty training framework, and its success in offering structured oncology continuing education training to nurses, from undergraduate levels to continued career development in the clinical setting. This model may have global relevance, given the challenge in managing the demand for high quality care in all disease areas and in keeping pace with the emerging advances in technologies.
Asunto(s)
Creación de Capacidad , Bachillerato en Enfermería/organización & administración , Rol de la Enfermera , Enfermería Oncológica/organización & administración , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Femenino , Humanos , Perfil Laboral , Masculino , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Enfermería Oncológica/educación , Innovación Organizacional , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Facultades de Enfermería , Desarrollo de Personal , Lugar de Trabajo/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews have found limited evidence for the effectiveness of pharmacological and psychological interventions for the management of depression in patients with cancer. This paper provides the first meta-analysis of newer collaborative care interventions, which may include both types of treatment, as well as integrated delivery and follow-up. Meta-analyses of pharmacological and psychological interventions are included as a comparison. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library from July 2005 to January 2015 for randomized controlled trials of depression treatments for cancer patients diagnosed with a major depressive disorder, or who met a threshold on a validated depression rating scale was conducted. Meta-analyses were conducted using summary data. RESULTS: Key findings included eight reports of four collaborative care interventions, eight pharmacological, and nine psychological trials. A meta-analysis demonstrated that collaborative care interventions were significantly more effective than usual care (standardized mean difference = -0.49, p = 0.003), and depression reduction was maintained at 12 months. By comparison, short-term (up to 12 weeks), but not longer-term effectiveness was demonstrated for both pharmacological and psychological interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative care interventions have newly emerged as multidisciplinary care delivery models, which may result in more long-term depression remission. This review also updates previous findings of modest evidence for the effectiveness of both pharmacological and psychological interventions for threshold depression in cancer patients. Research designs focusing on combined treatments and delivery systems may best further the limited evidence-base for the management of depression in cancer.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Neoplasias/psicología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanos , Psicoterapia/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral therapy (OT) use for cancer is increasing globally. Yet, nurses in 4 Latin American countries lacked knowledge and educational opportunities to safely care for people receiving OTs. Global partnerships to contextualize education and create local capacity may enhance nursing practice. OBJECTIVE: Within 4 Latin American countries, this study aims to (1) develop, deliver, and evaluate an OT cancer nursing education program and (2) evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using an integrated knowledge translation (iKT) framework to develop the program and foster nurses' capacity for OT care. METHODS: Using the iKT framework, a "train the trainer" model was used to develop, contextualize, pilot test, implement, and evaluate the OT education program. An online survey evaluated nurses' perceived benefits, ease of use, barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for improvement. Nurses' self-reported OT practices were evaluated 9 months after the final workshop. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen nurses across 4 countries participated in a pilot and/or final OT educational workshop, facilitated by 6 local nurse champions. The nurse champions found the program easy to use and modify. Participants reported using the curriculum to teach other nurses and patients and networking opportunities for problem solving. Barriers included nurses' role clarity and time for education. CONCLUSIONS: The iKT approach was an effective method to develop the OT curriculum and build OT capacity among nurses and leaders within the 4 countries. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The iKT approach may be useful in low- or middle-income countries to enhance nursing education and practice. Future OT education projects should strengthen strategies for ongoing support after education intervention.
Asunto(s)
Administración Oral , Quimioterapia/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermería Oncológica/educación , Formación del Profesorado/normas , Adulto , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Curriculum/normas , Educación Continua en Enfermería/métodos , Educación Continua en Enfermería/normas , Femenino , Humanos , América Latina , Aprendizaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine oncology nurses' attitudes toward and reported use of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and to determine whether the length of work experience and presence of oncology certification are associated with their attitudes and reported usage.â©. DESIGN: Exploratory, mixed-methods study employing a questionnaire approach.â©. SETTING: 14 regional cancer centers (RCCs) in Ontario, Canada.â©. SAMPLE: Oncology nurses who took part in a larger province-wide study that surveyed 960 interdisciplinary providers in oncology care settings at all of Ontario's 14 RCCs.â©. METHODS: Oncology nurses' attitudes and use of ESAS were measured using a 21-item investigator-developed questionnaire. Descriptive statistics and Kendall's tau-b or tau-c test were used for data analyses. Qualitative responses were analyzed using content analysis.â©. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Attitudes toward and self-reported use of standardized symptom screening and ESAS.â©. FINDINGS: More than half of the participants agreed that ESAS improves symptom screening, most said they would encourage their patients to complete ESAS, and most felt that managing symptoms is within their scope of practice and clinical responsibilities. Qualitative comments provided additional information elucidating the quantitative responses. Statistical analyses revealed that oncology nurses who have 10 years or less of work experience were more likely to agree that the use of standardized, valid instruments to screen for and assess symptoms should be considered best practice, ESAS improves symptom screening, and ESAS enables them to better manage patients' symptoms. No statistically significant difference was found between oncology-certified RNs and noncertified RNs on attitudes or reported use of ESAS.â©. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a population-based symptom screening approach is a major undertaking. The current study found that oncology nurses recognize the value of standardized screening, as demonstrated by their attitudes toward ESAS.â©. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses are integral to providing high-quality person-centered care. Using standardized approaches that enable patients to self-report symptoms and understanding barriers and enablers to optimal use of patient-reported outcome tools can improve the quality of patient care.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Enfermería Oncológica/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/psicología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Autoinforme , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This report updates the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care guideline for the management of depression in adult patients with cancer. This guideline covers pharmacologic, psychological, and collaborative care interventions, with a focus on integrating practical management tools to assist clinicians in delivering appropriate treatments for depression in patients with cancer. METHODS: Recommendations were developed by synthesizing information from extant guidelines and reviews and searching for randomized controlled trials from the date of database inception (1964 for MEDLINE and 1974 for EMBASE) to January 2015. Quality assessment of guidelines and systematic reviews were conducted by using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II), Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), and Cochrane Risk of Bias tools. Final recommendations were developed through a standardized Program in Evidence-Based Care multidisciplinary expert and knowledge user review process. RESULTS: Two high-quality relevant clinical practice guidelines, eight pharmacologic trials, nine psychological trials, and eight collaborative care intervention trials composed the evidence base upon which the recommendations were developed. Eight specific recommendations were made to establish a standard of care for the management of depression in patients with cancer. The recommendations and practical management tools were reviewed as being well organized and helpful, although systemic barriers to implementation were identified. CONCLUSION: This updated guideline supports the previous general recommendation that patients with cancer who have depression may benefit from psychological and/or pharmacologic interventions, without evidence for the superiority of any specific treatment over another. New recommendations for a collaborative care model that incorporates a stepped care approach suggest that multidisciplinary mental health care restructuring may be required for optimal management of depression.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Ontario , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Psicoterapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The pan-Canadian Oncology Symptom Triage and Remote Support (COSTaRS) team developed 13 evidence-informed protocols for symptom management. AIM: To build an effective and sustainable approach for implementing the COSTaRS protocols for nurses providing telephone-based symptom support to cancer patients. METHODS: A comparative case study was guided by the Knowledge to Action Framework. Three cases were created for three Canadian oncology programs that have nurses providing telephone support. Teams of researchers and knowledge users: (a) assessed barriers and facilitators influencing protocol use, (b) adapted protocols for local use, (c) intervened to address barriers, (d) monitored use, and (e) assessed barriers and facilitators influencing sustained use. Analysis was within and across cases. RESULTS: At baseline, >85% nurses rated protocols positively but barriers were identified (64-80% needed training). Patients and families identified similar barriers and thought protocols would enhance consistency among nurses teaching self-management. Twenty-two COSTaRS workshops reached 85% to 97% of targeted nurses (N = 119). Nurses felt more confident with symptom management and using the COSTaRS protocols (p < .01). Protocol adaptations addressed barriers (e.g., health records approval, creating pocket versions, distributing with telephone messages). Chart audits revealed that protocols used were documented for 11% to 47% of patient calls. Sustained use requires organizational alignment and ongoing leadership support. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Protocol uptake was similar to trials that have evaluated tailored interventions to improve professional practice by overcoming identified barriers. Collaborating with knowledge users facilitated interpretation of findings, aided protocol adaptation, and supported implementation. Protocol implementation in nursing requires a tailored approach. A multifaceted intervention approach increased nurses' use of evidence-informed protocols during telephone calls with patients about symptoms. Training and other interventions improved nurses' confidence with using COSTaRS protocols and their uptake was evident in some documented telephone calls. Protocols could be adapted for use by patients and nurses globally.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Líneas Directas/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/tendencias , Enfermería Oncológica/métodos , Canadá , Femenino , Líneas Directas/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Desarrollo de ProgramaRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Cancer patients experience a high symptom burden throughout their illness. Despite this, patients' symptoms and needs are often not adequately screened for, assessed, and managed. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the attitudes of cancer care professionals toward standardized systematic symptom assessment and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and their self-reported use of the instrument in daily practice in a large healthcare jurisdiction where this is routine. METHODS: A 21-item electronic survey, eliciting both closed and open-ended anonymous responses, was distributed to all 2806 cancer care professionals from four major provider groups: physicians, nurses, radiotherapists, and psychosocial oncology (PSO) staff at the 14 Regional Cancer Centres across Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: A total of 1065 questionnaires were returned (response rate: 38%); 960 were eligible for analysis. Most respondents (88%) considered symptom management to be within their scope of practice. Sixty-six percent of physicians considered the use of standardized tools to screen for symptoms as "best practice," compared to 81% and 93% of nurses and PSO staff, respectively. Sixty-seven percent of physicians and 85% of nurses found the ESAS to be a useful starting point to assess patients' symptoms. Seventy-nine percent of physicians looked at their patient's ESAS scores at visits either "always" or "often," compared to 29%, 66%, and 89% of radiotherapists, PSO staff, and nurses, respectively. Several areas for improvement of ESAS use and symptom screening were identified. CONCLUSION: Findings show significant albeit variable uptake across disciplines in the use of the ESAS since program initiation. Several barriers to using the ESAS in daily practice were identified. These need to be addressed.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicología , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ontario , AutoinformeRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Assess patient and family member experiences with telephone cancer treatment symptom support. METHODS: Descriptive study guided by the Knowledge-to-Action Framework. Patients and family members who received telephone support for a cancer treatment symptom within the last month at one of three ambulatory cancer programs (Nova Scotia, Ontario, Quebec) were eligible. An adapted Short Questionnaire for Out-of-hours Care instrument was analyzed with univariate statistics. RESULTS: Of 105 participants, 83 % telephoned about themselves and 17 % for a family member. Participants received advice over the telephone (90 %) and were advised to go to emergency (13 %) and/or the clinic (9 %). Two left a message and were not called back. Participants were "very satisfied" with the manner of nurse or doctor (58 %), explanation about problem (56 %), treatment/advice given (54 %), way call was handled (48 %), getting through (40 %), and wait time to speak to a nurse or doctor (38 %). The proportion "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied" for the above items was 4, 5, 9, 11, 10, and 14 %, respectively. Suggestions were shorter call back time, weekend access to telephone support, more knowledgeable advice on self-care strategies, more education at discharge, and shared documentation on calls to avoid repetition and improve continuity. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients and family members who responded to the survey were satisfied with telephone-based cancer treatment symptom support. Programs could improve telephone support services by providing an estimated time for callback, ensuring that nurses have access to and use previous call documentation, and enhancing patient education on self-care strategies for managing and triaging treatment-related symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/enfermería , Satisfacción del Paciente , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Urgencias Médicas , Familia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Escocia , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Ontario , Alta del Paciente , Quebec , Autocuidado , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , TeléfonoRESUMEN
The authors of the paper, "The Patient Experience in Ontario 2020: What is Possible?", framed both the current state as well as the future of what patient experience might look like in five years. To ensure intention is catalyzed into meaningful change to improve experience and outcomes, we suggest four winning conditions. The first is to change the language; patients are people too, irrespective of their disease or illness; person-centred is inclusive language and ought to be the focus. The second condition is focused on leaders who play a critical role to establish, build and embed person-centred within the organization. The third and fourth winning conditions are building the evidence base and using effective and meaningful engagement, moving beyond advice, to partnership, respectively. Person-centred care is not the flavour of the month, it is here to stay. Ontarians are important actors in the system not only as users of the system but owners as well. To those who might argue that it is costly to do this work, what are the costs to not engage? Are we satisfied not only as administrators, and clinicians, but as patients at some point, to maintain the status quo?
Asunto(s)
Humanos , OntarioRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chemotherapy delivery is complex, involving multiple providers across settings to deliver safe, effective care. Cancer Care Ontario initiated a provincial breakthrough series collaborative, based on methodology from the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI), to improve the safe delivery of chemotherapy, from ordering through preparation and administration. METHODS: Over the 1-year period of the collaborative, three in-person sessions educated participants on improvement methodology. Twenty teams tested and implemented elements of a predefined change package in their local systems. Monthly teleconferences supplemented the education while encouraging a culture of knowledge sharing. Teams completed monthly self-assessment surveys that evaluated their progress using a 6-point scale, where 1 indicated no evidence of improvement and 5 indicated achievement of all goals and improvement objectives. RESULTS: Monthly self-assessment surveys revealed that over time, scores improved from 1 to 4, indicating significant progress. Moreover, 100% of participants reported in an exit survey that the collaborative had improved the culture of safety in their organizations. The gains of the collaborative have been sustained through development of a practice community and provision of ongoing coaching through the IHI Open School. CONCLUSION: Participation in the collaborative enabled local interdisciplinary teams to develop processes and structures to support ongoing quality improvement, including formation of a sustainable structure for knowledge translation and exchange. However, lack of a shared provincial target limited overall evaluation. Other lessons learned included providing adequate time for planning and clearly defining roles and responsibilities of involved teams and project sponsors.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/métodos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud/métodos , Conducta Cooperativa , Quimioterapia/métodos , Quimioterapia/normas , Humanos , Oncología Médica/educación , Oncología Médica/métodos , Ontario , Mejoramiento de la CalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this paper is to summarize the use of the knowledge to action framework for adapting guidelines for practice and the evidence for effective implementation interventions to promote a quality response to cancer distress screening data. METHODS: We summarize progress in screening implementation in Ontario, Canada and the application of a systematic approach for adapting knowledge to practice and use of evidence-based knowledge translation interventions to ensure the uptake of best practices to manage distress. RESULTS: While significant progress has been made in the uptake of distress screening it is less clear if this has resulted in improvements in patient outcomes, i.e., reduced distress. The use of evidence-based knowledge translation strategies tailored to barriers at many levels of care delivery is critical to facilitate the uptake of distress screening data by the primary oncology team. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: There is a wealth of knowledge about the approaches that can be applied to translate knowledge into practice to improve psychosocial care and promote evidence-based distress management by the primary care oncology team. However, further implementation research is needed to advance knowledge about the most effective strategies in the context of cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/enfermería , Trastornos de Ansiedad/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo/enfermería , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Tamizaje Masivo/enfermería , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Neoplasias/enfermería , Neoplasias/psicología , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Rol del Enfermo , Adaptación Psicológica , Algoritmos , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Conducta Cooperativa , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia , Adhesión a Directriz , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Ontario , Psicometría/estadística & datos numéricos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
In this study, we tested a structural equation model to examine work environment factors related to changes in job satisfaction of oncology nurses between 2004 and 2006. Relational leadership and good physician/nurse relationships consistently influenced perceptions of enough RNs to provide quality care, and freedom to make patient care decisions, which, in turn, directly influenced nurses' job satisfaction over time. Supervisor support in resolving conflict and the ability to influence patient care outcomes were significant influences on job satisfaction in 2004, whereas, in 2006, a clear philosophy of nursing had a greater significant influence. Several factors that influence job satisfaction of oncology nurses in Canada have changed over time, which may reflect changes in work environments and work life. These findings suggest opportunities to modify work conditions that could improve nurses' job satisfaction and work life.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermería Oncológica , Canadá , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing chemoradiotherapy treatment, there is a paucity of information regarding the effects of radiation exposure on ambulatory infusion pumps used to deliver chemotherapy or other essential medications. The aim of this overview is to present the available evidence on this subject, heighten awareness within the clinical community, provide considerations for minimizing possible negative effects on patient care, and encourage the monitoring of infusion devices after exposure to radiation or electromagnetic interference. METHODS: Published literature was systematically searched using MEDLINE and EMBASE; gray literature was searched using Google and an environmental scan of relevant Web sites. A multidisciplinary working group reviewed the compiled evidence, and a draft of the document was sent to health professionals from various disciplines for an external review. RESULTS: Four reports and three manufacturer device alerts were identified that suggest a risk of pump malfunction as a result of radiation exposure. The estimated cumulative dose at which pump failure has been reported ranges from 28.5 to 42 Gy; however, additional clinical investigations should be undertaken. Pump relocation, pump shielding, and assessment of the pump after radiation exposure are most commonly suggested to minimize pump malfunction related to radiation exposure. A list of additional considerations is offered for those developing institution specific policies and procedures based on the available evidence and expert consensus. CONCLUSION: The varied and unpredictable results of radiation exposure on infusion devices suggest that additional testing should be carried out to determine the limits of dose exposure and to raise awareness around this patient safety issue.
Asunto(s)
Rayos gamma , Bombas de Infusión , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Atención Ambulatoria , Análisis de Falla de Equipo , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this scoping review study were 1) to identify core domains and dimensions for inclusion in a person-focused and self-reported outcome measurement system for cancer and 2) to reach consensus among key stakeholders including cancer survivors on the relevance, acceptability, and feasibility of a core outcome set for collection in routine clinical care. METHODS: Following a scoping review of the literature, a Rand Delphi consensus method was used to engage key interdisciplinary decision makers, clinicians, and cancer survivors in reaching consensus on a core patient-reported outcome domain taxonomy and outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 21,900 citations identified in the scoping review, 1,503 citations were included in the full article review (380 conceptual articles, 461 psychometric evaluation articles, and 662 intervention studies) and subjected to data abstraction and mapping. Final consensus was reached on 20 domains, related subdimensions, and 45 self-report measures considered relevant and feasible for routine collection in cancer by the Delphi panel (PROMS-Cancer Core). CONCLUSIONS: Standardization of patient-reported outcome data collection is key to assessing the impact of cancer and treatment on the person for population comparison and monitoring the quality of clinical care. The PROMS-Cancer Core taxonomy of domains and outcome measures can be used to guide the development of a patient-reported outcome information system for cancer.