DNA polymorphisms as tools for spinal cord injury research.

STUDY DESIGN: Data mining of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in gene pathways related to spinal cord injury (SCI). OBJECTIVES: To identify gene polymorphisms putatively implicated with neuronal damage evolution pathways, potentially useful to SCI study. SETTING: Departments of Psychiatry and Orthopedics, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS: Genes involved with processes related to SCI, such as apoptosis, inflammatory response, axonogenesis, peripheral nervous system development and axon ensheathment, were determined by evaluating the 'Biological Process' annotation of Gene Ontology (GO). Each gene of these pathways was mapped using MapViewer, and gene coordinates were used to identify their polymorphisms in the SNP database. As a proof of concept, the frequency of subset of SNPs, located in four genes (ALOX12, APOE, BDNF and NINJ1) was evaluated in the DNA of a group of 28 SCI patients and 38 individuals with no SC lesions. RESULTS: We could identify a total of 95,276 SNPs in a set of 588 genes associated with the selected GO terms, including 3912 nucleotide alterations located in coding regions of genes. The five non-synonymous SNPs genotyped in our small group of patients, showed a significant frequency, reinforcing their potential use for the investigation of SCI evolution. CONCLUSION: Despite the importance of SNPs in many aspects of gene expression and protein activity, these gene alterations have not been explored in SCI research. Here we describe a set of potentially useful SNPs, some of which could underlie the genetic mechanisms involved in the post trauma spinal cord damage.

WITHDRAWN: Association between polymorphisms in genes of inflammatory response and axonal repair with spinal cord injury.

Ahead of Print article withdrawn by publisher. Please see re-submitted article 'DNA polymorphisms as tools for spinal cord injury research' Spinal Cord advance online publication, 20 May 2008; doi:10.1038/sc.2008.67.

Improving primary health care through systematic supervision: a controlled field trial.

Most primary health care services in developing countries are delivered by staff working in peripheral facilities where supervision is problematic. This study examined whether systematic supervision using an objective set of indicators could improve health worker performance. A checklist was developed by the Philippine Department of Health which assigned a score from 0 to 3 on each of 20 indicators which were clearly defined. The checklist was implemented in 4 remote provinces with 6 provinces from the same regions serving as a control area. In all 10 provinces, health facilities were randomly selected and surveyed before implementation of the checklist and again 6 months later. Performance, as measured by the combined scores on the 20 indicators, improved 42% (95% Cl = 29% to 55%) in the experimental group compared to 18% (95% Cl = 9% to 27%) in the control group. In the experimental, but not in the control facilities, there was a correlation between frequency of supervision and improvements in scores. The initial cost of implementing the checklist was US $ 19.92 per health facility and the annual recurrent costs were estimated at $ 1.85. Systematic supervision using clearly defined and quantifiable indicators can improve service delivery considerably, at modest cost.