Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health ; 35(5): 571-584, 2022 Oct 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35856815

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The pandemic caused by the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) affected a disproportionately high percentage of healthcare workers (HCWs). The aim of the study was to assess the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies in nurses and clinicians working in 2 Slovenian regional hospitals, and to identify the factors associated with seropositivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was designed as a crosssectional study. Clinicians and nurses were invited to participate in November-December 2020. The respondents (813, 65.8%) completed a questionnaire and consented to provide 10 ml of blood for determining the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. RESULTS: The authors observed a seroprevalence rate of 20.4%. The results of the univariate analysis proved that the age of a nurse or clinician was the factor most strongly associated with seropositivity - in fact, the youngest nurses and clinicians were 8.33 times more likely to be seropositive than those in the oldest age group (p = 0.041). Being in contact with a family/household member who was SARS-CoV-2-positive was also a very important factor. In the work-related factors group, being in the contact with a SARS-CoV-2-positive colleague (OR = 2.35, p = 0.026) or being in contact with a COVID-19 patient (OR = 1.96, p = 0.004) correlated with seropositivity. In the primary work location/department group, the only significant association appeared among those working in surgical, ENT or ophthalmology departments. The results of the multivariate analysis further supported the thesis that the age of nurses and clinicians was the factor most strongly associated with seropositivity. The youngest nurses and clinicians were 12.5 times more likely to be seropositive than those in the oldest age group (p = 0.024). Being in contact with a SARS-CoV-2-positive family/household member remained the second most important factor. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of clinicians and nurses working in secondary healthcare were infected in the first 9 months of the pandemic. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022;35(5):571-84.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Pandemias , Personal de Hospital , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Eslovenia/epidemiología
2.
Transbound Emerg Dis ; 68(2): 789-801, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32687685

RESUMEN

Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) represents a concern in both human and veterinary medicine. The aim of this study was to investigate potential LA-MRSA transmission between animals and humans in rural settings. To this aim, a study was designed to include 14 farms in Slovenia, which were selected on the basis of a farmer (initial patient) with confirmed LA-MRSA infection and regular animal contacts. On all farms, the initial patients, their household members, animals and barn environment were analysed for the presence of LA-MRSA. In addition, the epidemiologically linked hospital-related LA-MRSA isolates were included to investigate possible nosocomial transmissions. On five farms, LA-MRSA was discovered both in animals and in humans. In total, 49 LA-MRSA isolates of different origins underwent whole-genome sequencing, antimicrobial susceptibility testing and spa typing. All 49 isolates belonged to the sequence type 398 (ST398), spa types t011 and t034, and harboured staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec Vc. High levels of concordance between resistance phenotypes and genotypes were observed. No transmission pairs between animals and initial patients were discovered. However, several isolates originating from farm animals and other household members formed clusters with pairwise distances of ≤14 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), indicating recent transmission events. In addition, three closely related isolates (0 SNP) form hospitalized patients were observed, indicating a possible nosocomial transmission. Two hospital-related isolates harboured the immune evasion cluster genes, which are associated with adaptation to the human host; however, these two isolates differed in >30 SNPs from the remaining isolates. Characteristics of LA-MRSA from Slovenia reflect those observed previously in other European studies. Immune evasion cluster-positive LA-MRSA ST398 suggests its re-adaptation to the human host and calls for a closer monitoring of such emerging LA-MRSA lineages, in addition to monitoring and preventing the introduction of LA-MRSA from farms to hospitals where transmission is highly plausible.


Asunto(s)
Agricultores , Ganado/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/veterinaria , Zoonosis/microbiología , Animales , Granjas , Humanos , Eslovenia/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma/veterinaria
3.
Zdr Varst ; 56(1): 24-30, 2017 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28289460

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The identification of patients infected and/or colonised by methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is necessary for the timely introduction of measures for infection control. We compared the diagnostic efficacy of combinations of MRSA surveillance swabs routinely taken by health institutions in the country. METHODS: All surveillance samples, which were sent for a microbiological analysis to detect MRSA with the culture method in 2014, in the three departments for medical microbiology of the National Laboratory for Health, Environment and Food, were included in this study. RESULTS: Among 65,251 surveillance cultures from 13,274 persons, 1,233 (2.1%) were positive (490 positive persons). Prevailing positive surveillance cultures were throat swabs (31.3%), followed by nose swab (31.2%), skin swab (18.9%), perineum (16.4%) and wound swabs (1.4%). The contribution of other samples, such as aspirate, urine and excreta, was under 1%. We found no statistically significant differences in the frequency of detection of a positive patient, if the combination of samples NTS (nose, throat, skin) or NTP (nose, throat, perineum) was analysed. However, statistically significant differences were confirmed when any of the anatomic sites would be omitted from the sets of NTP and NTS (chi square; p<0.01). Adding additional samples resulted in only 24 additional positive patients (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that increasing the number of surveillance cultures above three does not add much to the sensitivity of MRSA surveillance, the exception could be wound. The swabs from the perineum and from the skin are exchangeable.

4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27348455

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bacterial vaginosis is of clinical interest because of its possible causal relationship with complications during pregnancy, postpartum, and complications after surgery. METHODS: Gram stain for clue cells and Gardnerella vaginalis culture methods were evaluated retrospectively in a microbiological medical laboratory for the first half of 2015. We were interested in the proportion of G. vaginalis bacteria isolated from genital samples, correlation with Gram-staining presence of clue cells, referral clinical diagnosis, and pregnancy. RESULTS: In the first half of 2015 we received 358 vaginal specimens; 82% of them had a referral clinical diagnosis of colpitis, cervicitis, or vaginal discharge; 40% were pregnant women. G. vaginalis was isolated from 14% of vaginal specimens, and 52% of these came from pregnant patients. Gram stain clue cells and isolation of G. vaginalis matched in 86%. CONCLUSIONS: For diagnosing bacterial vaginosis in clinical practice, standard clinical criteria, Gram staining of vaginal discharge smear, and/or isolation of G. vaginalis are used. Isolation of G. vaginalis without clue cells is reported only in cases in which bacterial growth is predominant. The results of our studies confirm that isolating G. vaginalis helps confirm the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.


Asunto(s)
Gardnerella vaginalis/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Frotis Vaginal , Vaginosis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Vaginosis Bacteriana/microbiología , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/microbiología , Humanos , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Eslovenia
5.
Zdr Varst ; 54(1): 37-44, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27646620

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An outbreak of gastroenteritis of etiologically unspecified origin and an outbreak of Salmonellosis occurred simultaneously in September 2011 in Trzic. The purpose of the investigation of both outbreaks was to identify the most probable source and the mode of transmission and to implement preventive measures. METHODS: In two retrospective case-control studies, the association between gastroenteritis of etiologically unspecified origin or Salmonellosis and food from a restaurant or drinking tap water were tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. The subject in the first study was a sick person with salmonellosis, and the subject in the second study was a resident that developed diarrhoea and/ or vomiting. Cases were reported by doctors, and controls were selected from healthy persons who responded to the questionnaire. RESULTS: A person exposed to food from the restaurant had a 24.8 times higher odds ratio (univariate analysis OR 24.8, 95% CI 7.5 to 82.3, p <0.05; multivariate analysis OR 14.7, 95% CI 3.5 - 61.3, p <0.05) for salmonellosis than non-exposed. A resident exposed to tap water from specific water source had a 3.4 times higher odds ratio (univariate analysis of OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.2 to 5.1 is p <0.05, multivariate analysis of RO 2.9, 95% CI 1, 7 to 5.3, p <0.05), for gastroenteritis of unspecific etiology than non-exposed. The dose response relationship was also statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Analytical cases - controls studies confirmed a causal relationship between salmonellosis and food from the specific restaurant and the causal relationship between gastroenteritis of etiologically unspecified origin and drinking tap water from specific water source. Salmonella enteritidis may have entered into the restaurant through tap water.

6.
Wien Klin Wochenschr ; 121(17-18): 552-7, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19890744

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) differs from healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) in its molecular and microbiological characteristics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six Slovenian regional public health institutes and the National Institute of Public Health took part in monitoring CA-MRSA infections. S. aureus isolates resistant to oxacillin and susceptible to > or = two of the four antibiotics ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin or gentamicin were defined as CA-MRSA and further analyzed. The presence of the gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) was confirmed using PCR, the type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) using multiplex PCR, and macrorestriction analysis of chromosomal DNA using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). RESULTS: A total of 31 strains from 31 patients were analyzed during a period of 21 months: 23 specimens were sent from hospitals, six from primary care, two from a long-term care facility. All 31 isolates contained the gene mecA. Sixteen (51.6%) isolates were identified as SCCmec type IV, three isolates were PVL positive. Using PFGE, the CA-MRSA strains were classified into 15 similarity groups. Results of antibiotic susceptibility showed there were five resistance types among the 31 strains. Simultaneous resistance against ciprofloxacin and gentamicin was often associated with the presence of SCCmec type I, strongly resembling HA-MRSA. CONCLUSIONS: PVL-positive strains of CA-MRSA have been isolated in Slovenia only rarely. We will continue to monitor strains of MRSA in order to obtain the complete microbiological and epidemiological features.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/microbiología , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/clasificación , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades/microbiología , Humanos , Eslovenia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA